<p>白宫威胁如果史密森学会不提交特朗普政府广泛内容审查所需的额外文件，将会扣留对该著名博物馆系统的联邦资金。</p>
<p>在周四致史密森学会秘书长洛尼·班奇的信中，国内政策委员会主任文斯·哈利和白宫预算主任拉塞尔·沃特概述了他们所称仍需提交的材料，指出史密森学会之前的提交 “远未达到要求，绝大多数请求的项目仍未完成。”</p>
<p>特朗普政府在八月份启动了对八个史密森博物馆的审查，旨在确保与特朗普总统的行政命令 “庆祝美国的卓越，消除分裂或党派叙事，并恢复对我们共同文化机构的信心” 保持一致。</p>
<p>在周四的信中，白宫官员表示，史密森博物馆的资金取决于遵守特朗普的行政命令和审查程序。</p>
<p>“如您所知，分配给史密森学会的资金仅可用于与行政命令 14253‘恢复美国历史的真相与理智’ 一致的方式，以及满足我们 2025 年 8 月 12 日信中提出的请求，” 哈利和沃特在信中写道。</p>
<p>初步材料的截止日期是 9 月 11 日，但白宫官员将提交文件的截止日期延长至 “考虑到史密森学会正在进行的人员过渡。” 然而，官员们在周四的信中表示，自 9 月 18 日以来没有提供任何材料，仍有许多未完成。</p>
<p>班奇在周五回应特朗普政府时表示，史密森学会 “致力于分享信息和数据”，这封信被《华盛顿邮报》获得。</p>
<p>班奇在信中表示，政府关门延误了请求的工作，并请白宫官员 “请理解这项工作耗时较长，涉及史密森学会的许多员工和部门。”</p>
<p>他在信中补充说，他 “很高兴能会面并分享我们内部审查和更新内容的最新进展。”</p>
<p>《华盛顿邮报》还获得了一封周五晚上发给员工的电子邮件，班奇表示史密森学会打算当天向白宫提交更多信息。他还坚持认为 “所有内容、节目和策展决策均由史密森学会做出。”</p>
<p>《国会山》已联系班奇以获取信件和评论。</p>

<p>白宫威胁要停止对史密森学会的联邦资金支持，除非该学会提交特朗普政府发起的内容审查所需的额外文件。该审查旨在确保与特朗普的行政命令相一致，该命令提倡美国的例外主义。史密森学会最初的提交被认为不够充分，资金的发放取决于是否遵守审查流程。史密森学会秘书长洛尼·邦奇表示，尽管由于人员变动和政府停摆导致延误，他仍承诺提供所需的信息</p>

<p>The White House threatened to withhold federal funding to the Smithsonian if the prestigious museum system does not submit additional documentation for the Trump administration’s sweeping content review.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>白宫威胁如果史密森学会不提交特朗普政府广泛内容审查所需的额外文件，将会扣留对该著名博物馆系统的联邦资金。</p>
</div><p>In a Thursday letter to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch, Domestic Policy Council director Vince Haley and White House budget director Russell Vought outlined the material they said still must be submitted, noting the Smithsonian’s earlier submission “fell far short of what was requested, and the overwhelming majority of requested items remain outstanding.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在周四致史密森学会秘书长洛尼·班奇的信中，国内政策委员会主任文斯·哈利和白宫预算主任拉塞尔·沃特概述了他们所称仍需提交的材料，指出史密森学会之前的提交 “远未达到要求，绝大多数请求的项目仍未完成。”</p>
</div><p>The Trump administration, in August, launched a review of eight Smithsonian museums aimed at ensuring “alignment” with President Trump’s executive order “to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普政府在八月份启动了对八个史密森博物馆的审查，旨在确保与特朗普总统的行政命令 “庆祝美国的卓越，消除分裂或党派叙事，并恢复对我们共同文化机构的信心” 保持一致。</p>
</div><p>In the Thursday letter, White House officials said funding for the Smithsonian museums is conditioned on adherence to Trump’s executive order and on compliance with the review process.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在周四的信中，白宫官员表示，史密森博物馆的资金取决于遵守特朗普的行政命令和审查程序。</p>
</div><p>“As you may know, funds apportioned for the Smithsonian Institution are only available for use in a manner consistent with Executive Order 14253, ‘Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,’ and the fulfillment of the requests set forth in our August 12, 2025 letter,” Haley and Vought wrote in the letter.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“如您所知，分配给史密森学会的资金仅可用于与行政命令 14253‘恢复美国历史的真相与理智’ 一致的方式，以及满足我们 2025 年 8 月 12 日信中提出的请求，” 哈利和沃特在信中写道。</p>
</div><p>The initial material was due on Sept. 11, but White House officials extended the deadline to submit documentation “in recognition of ongoing staffing transitions at the Smithsonian.” Officials said in the Thursday letter, however, that no material had been provided since Sept. 18 and that much remains outstanding.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>初步材料的截止日期是 9 月 11 日，但白宫官员将提交文件的截止日期延长至 “考虑到史密森学会正在进行的人员过渡。” 然而，官员们在周四的信中表示，自 9 月 18 日以来没有提供任何材料，仍有许多未完成。</p>
</div><p>Responding to the Trump administration on Friday, Bunch said in a letter obtained by The Washington Post that the Smithsonian is “committed to sharing information and data.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>班奇在周五回应特朗普政府时表示，史密森学会 “致力于分享信息和数据”，这封信被《华盛顿邮报》获得。</p>
</div><p>Bunch said the government shutdown delayed the requested work and asked White House officials to “please understand that this work has been time consuming, involving many staff and departments throughout the Smithsonian,” according to the letter.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>班奇在信中表示，政府关门延误了请求的工作，并请白宫官员 “请理解这项工作耗时较长，涉及史密森学会的许多员工和部门。”</p>
</div><p>He added in the letter that he “would be pleased to meet and share an update on our internal efforts to review and update our content.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>他在信中补充说，他 “很高兴能会面并分享我们内部审查和更新内容的最新进展。”</p>
</div><p>The Post also obtained an email sent to staff Friday evening in which Bunch said the Smithsonian intended to submit more information to the White House that day. He also maintained that “all content, programming, and curatorial decisions are made by the Smithsonian.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>《华盛顿邮报》还获得了一封周五晚上发给员工的电子邮件，班奇表示史密森学会打算当天向白宫提交更多信息。他还坚持认为 “所有内容、节目和策展决策均由史密森学会做出。”</p>
</div><p>The Hill has reached out to Bunch for the letters and for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>《国会山》已联系班奇以获取信件和评论。</p>
</div>

白宫在审查期间威胁扣留史密森学会的资金