<h2>关键点</h2>
<ul>
<li>VOO 提供比 MGK 更广泛的行业多样化和更高的股息收益率。</li>
<li>MGK 在一年和五年的总回报上表现更强，但回撤更深。</li>
<li>VOO 交易流动性更高，风险更低，吸引寻求稳定性的投资者。</li>
<li>这 10 只股票可能会造就下一波百万富翁 ›</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF</strong>（NYSEMKT:MGK）和 <strong>Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF</strong>（NYSEMKT:VOO）都是被动管理的先锋基金，旨在提供美国大盘股的投资敞口，但它们的策略不同：MGK 倾向于高增长的大盘股，而 VOO 则反映整个 S&amp;P 500。</p>
<p>本比较考察成本、回报、风险、行业倾斜和投资组合构建，以帮助澄清哪种方法可能更具吸引力，具体取决于投资者的优先事项。</p>
<h2>快照（成本和规模）</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>发行人</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>费用比率</td>
<td>0.07%</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1 年回报（截至 2025 年 12 月 18 日）</td>
<td>14.12%</td>
<td>11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>股息收益率</td>
<td>0.37%</td>
<td>1.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>贝塔（5 年月度）</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>管理资产</td>
<td>327 亿美元</td>
<td>1.5 万亿美元</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>贝塔衡量相对于 S&amp;P 500 的价格波动性。1 年回报代表过去 12 个月的总回报。</em></p>
<p>VOO 收取更低的费用比率，并提供显著更高的股息收益率，使其对关注成本和收入的投资者更具吸引力。</p>
<h2>绩效与风险比较</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>最大回撤（5 年）</td>
<td>-36.02%</td>
<td>-24.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5 年内 $1,000 的增长</td>
<td>$2,017</td>
<td>$1,819</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>内部构成</h2>
<p>VOO 持有 505 只股票，并跟踪 S&amp;P 500，提供美国最大公司的横截面。其行业配置以科技（占总资产的 37%）、金融服务（13%）和消费品（11%）为主。</p>
<p>其前十大持股包括 <strong>Nvidia</strong>、<strong>Apple</strong> 和 <strong>Microsoft</strong>，但没有单一行业或公司像某些倾向于增长的基金那样占主导地位。</p>
<p>相比之下，MGK 的集中度更高，仅有 66 只持股，且重度倾向于科技（58%），其次是通信服务（15%）和消费品（12%）。</p>
<p>其前三大持股与 VOO 相同，但在投资组合中占比更大。这可以在强劲的科技市场中推动超额收益，但如果该行业出现问题，也会放大风险。</p>
<p>有关 ETF 投资的更多指导，请查看此链接的完整指南。</p>
<h2>这对投资者意味着什么</h2>
<p>VOO 是一只广泛市场基金，跟踪 S&amp;P 500，提供跨行业和个股的丰富多样化。它的持股数量约为 MGK 的七倍，且对科技股的倾斜较小——这可以在市场波动期间带来更多的稳定性和较温和的回撤。</p>
<p>另一方面，MGK 更加专注于目标增长。由于持股数量仅为 VOO 的一小部分，它的多样化程度较低，且对科技股的倾斜更重。</p>
<p>这种缺乏多样化对 MGK 来说既是优势也是劣势。两只基金的前三大持股相同，但这些股票在 MGK 投资组合中占比约 38%，而 VOO 约为 22%。当这些特定股票表现良好时，MGK 可以显著超越 VOO。但如果它们出现问题，MGK 将受到更大影响。</p>
<p>这也使得 MGK 更容易受到波动的影响，正如其较高的贝塔值和过去五年更陡峭的最大回撤所示。尽管它在一年和五年的总回报上最终超越了 VOO，但过程却更加波动。</p>
<p>对于那些更愿意承担风险以换取更高潜在收益的投资者，MGK 可能更具吸引力，而风险厌恶型投资者可能更青睐 VOO 的长期一致性和稳定性。</p>
<h2>术语表</h2>
<p><strong>ETF：</strong> 交易所交易基金；一种在股票交易所像单只股票一样交易的集合投资。</p>
<p><strong>费用比率：</strong> 投资者为覆盖基金运营成本而支付的年度费用，按资产的百分比计算。</p>
<p><strong>股息收益率：</strong> 基金支付的年度股息与其当前价格之比，以百分比表示。</p>
<p><strong>贝塔：</strong> 衡量投资相对于整体市场的波动性；1.0 表示与市场波动性相匹配。</p>
<p><strong>管理资产：</strong> 资产管理规模；基金代表投资者管理的资产的总市场价值。</p>
<p><strong>最大回撤：</strong> 基金从峰值到最低点的最大观察到的百分比下降。</p>
<p><strong>总回报：</strong> 投资的价格变化加上所有股息和分配，假设这些支付被再投资。</p>
<p><strong>行业配置：</strong> 基金资产投资于不同产业部门的百分比。</p>
<p><strong>成长股：</strong> 预计增长速度快于市场平均水平的公司股票，通常将利润再投资而不是支付股息。</p>
<p><strong>流动性：</strong> 资产在市场上买卖而不影响其价格的难易程度。</p>
<p><strong>投资组合构建：</strong> 在投资基金中选择和加权资产以满足特定目标的过程。</p>
<p><strong>回撤：</strong> 投资价值从峰值到谷底的下降，直到达到新的峰值。</p>
<h2>不要错过这个潜在的丰厚机会的第二次机会</h2>
<p>是否曾觉得自己错过了购买最成功股票的机会？那么你会想听听这个。</p>
<p>在少数情况下，我们的专家分析师会发布 <strong>“加倍下注” 股票</strong> 推荐，针对他们认为即将上涨的公司。如果你担心自己已经错过了投资的机会，现在是购买的最佳时机，趁还不算太晚。而且数字证明了一切：</p>
<ul>
<li>Nvidia：如果你在 2009 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $469,438！*</li>
<li>Apple：如果你在 2008 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $52,063！*</li>
<li>Netflix：如果你在 2004 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $509,039！*</li>
</ul>
<p>现在，我们正在为三家令人难以置信的公司发布 “加倍下注” 警报 **，加入 <em>Stock Advisor</em> 时可获得，可能不会再有这样的机会。</p>
<p><strong>查看这 3 只股票 »</strong></p>
<p><em>* 股票顾问截至 2025 年 12 月 15 日的回报</em></p>
<p><em>Katie Brockman 持有先锋标普 500 ETF 的头寸。The Motley Fool 持有并推荐苹果、微软、英伟达和先锋标普 500 ETF 的头寸。The Motley Fool 推荐以下期权：2026 年 1 月的微软 395 美元看涨期权和 2026 年 1 月的微软 405 美元看跌期权。The Motley Fool 有披露政策。</em></p>
<p>VOO 与 MGK：标普 500 的多样化投资还是大型成长股更适合投资者？最初由 The Motley Fool 发布。</p>

超大盘股成长 ETF - Vanguard

标普 500 ETF - Vanguard

<p>本文比较了两只 Vanguard ETF：VOO 和 MGK。VOO 提供更广泛的行业多样化和更高的股息收益，吸引风险厌恶型投资者。MGK 则专注于高增长的大盘股，提供更强的回报，但波动性较高。比较内容涵盖成本、回报、风险、行业倾斜和投资组合构建，以帮助投资者根据自身优先事项做出决策</p>

<h2>Key Points</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>关键点</h2>
</div><ul>
<li>VOO offers broader sector diversification and a higher dividend yield than MGK.</li>
<li>MGK has delivered stronger one-year and five-year total returns, but with deeper drawdowns.</li>
<li>VOO trades with greater liquidity and lower risk, appealing to investors seeking stability.</li>
<li>These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>VOO 提供比 MGK 更广泛的行业多样化和更高的股息收益率。</li>
<li>MGK 在一年和五年的总回报上表现更强，但回撤更深。</li>
<li>VOO 交易流动性更高，风险更低，吸引寻求稳定性的投资者。</li>
<li>这 10 只股票可能会造就下一波百万富翁 ›</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Both the <strong>Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF</strong>(NYSEMKT:MGK) and the <strong>Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF</strong>(NYSEMKT:VOO) are passively managed Vanguard funds aimed at U.S. large-cap equity exposure, but their strategies differ: MGK tilts toward high-growth mega-cap stocks, while VOO mirrors the full S&amp;P 500.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF</strong>（NYSEMKT:MGK）和 <strong>Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF</strong>（NYSEMKT:VOO）都是被动管理的先锋基金，旨在提供美国大盘股的投资敞口，但它们的策略不同：MGK 倾向于高增长的大盘股，而 VOO 则反映整个 S&amp;P 500。</p>
</div><p>This comparison examines cost, returns, risk, sector tilt, and portfolio construction to help clarify which approach may be more appealing, depending on an investor's priorities.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>本比较考察成本、回报、风险、行业倾斜和投资组合构建，以帮助澄清哪种方法可能更具吸引力，具体取决于投资者的优先事项。</p>
</div><h2>Snapshot (cost &amp; size)</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>快照（成本和规模）</h2>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Issuer</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Expense ratio</td>
<td>0.07%</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1-yr return (as of Dec. 18, 2025)</td>
<td>14.12%</td>
<td>11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dividend yield</td>
<td>0.37%</td>
<td>1.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Beta (5Y monthly)</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AUM</td>
<td>$32.7 billion</td>
<td>$1.5 trillion</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>发行人</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>费用比率</td>
<td>0.07%</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1 年回报（截至 2025 年 12 月 18 日）</td>
<td>14.12%</td>
<td>11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>股息收益率</td>
<td>0.37%</td>
<td>1.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>贝塔（5 年月度）</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>管理资产</td>
<td>327 亿美元</td>
<td>1.5 万亿美元</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p><em>Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&amp;P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>贝塔衡量相对于 S&amp;P 500 的价格波动性。1 年回报代表过去 12 个月的总回报。</em></p>
</div><p>VOO charges a lower expense ratio and offers a notably higher dividend yield, making it more affordable for cost- and income-conscious investors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>VOO 收取更低的费用比率，并提供显著更高的股息收益率，使其对关注成本和收入的投资者更具吸引力。</p>
</div><h2>Performance &amp; risk comparison</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>绩效与风险比较</h2>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Max drawdown (5 y)</td>
<td>-36.02%</td>
<td>-24.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Growth of $1,000 over 5 years</td>
<td>$2,017</td>
<td>$1,819</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>MGK</th>
<th>VOO</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>最大回撤（5 年）</td>
<td>-36.02%</td>
<td>-24.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5 年内 $1,000 的增长</td>
<td>$2,017</td>
<td>$1,819</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><h2>What's inside</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>内部构成</h2>
</div><p>VOO holds 505 stocks and tracks the S&amp;P 500, offering a cross-section of the largest U.S. companies. Its sector allocation is led by technology (37% of total assets), financial services (13%), and consumer cyclicals (11%).</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>VOO 持有 505 只股票，并跟踪 S&amp;P 500，提供美国最大公司的横截面。其行业配置以科技（占总资产的 37%）、金融服务（13%）和消费品（11%）为主。</p>
</div><p>Its top holdings include <strong>Nvidia</strong>, <strong>Apple</strong>, and <strong>Microsoft</strong>, but no single sector or company dominates the way it does in some growth-tilted funds.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>其前十大持股包括 <strong>Nvidia</strong>、<strong>Apple</strong> 和 <strong>Microsoft</strong>，但没有单一行业或公司像某些倾向于增长的基金那样占主导地位。</p>
</div><p>MGK, in contrast, is much more concentrated, with just 66 holdings and a heavy technology tilt (58%), followed by communication services (15%) and consumer cyclical (12%).</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>相比之下，MGK 的集中度更高，仅有 66 只持股，且重度倾向于科技（58%），其次是通信服务（15%）和消费品（12%）。</p>
</div><p>Its top three positions match VOO's, but they make up a larger portion of the portfolio. This can drive outperformance in strong tech markets, but it also amplifies risk if the sector stumbles.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>其前三大持股与 VOO 相同，但在投资组合中占比更大。这可以在强劲的科技市场中推动超额收益，但如果该行业出现问题，也会放大风险。</p>
</div><p>For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>有关 ETF 投资的更多指导，请查看此链接的完整指南。</p>
</div><h2>What this means for investors</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>这对投资者意味着什么</h2>
</div><p>VOO is a broad-market fund tracking the S&amp;P 500, offering plenty of diversification across sectors and individual holdings. It contains around seven times more holdings than MGK, with less of a tilt toward technology stocks -- which can result in more stability and milder drawdowns during periods of market volatility.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>VOO 是一只广泛市场基金，跟踪 S&amp;P 500，提供跨行业和个股的丰富多样化。它的持股数量约为 MGK 的七倍，且对科技股的倾斜较小——这可以在市场波动期间带来更多的稳定性和较温和的回撤。</p>
</div><p>MGK, on the other hand, is much more focused on targeted growth. With only a fraction of the holdings of VOO, it's less diversified with a heavier tilt toward tech stocks.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>另一方面，MGK 更加专注于目标增长。由于持股数量仅为 VOO 的一小部分，它的多样化程度较低，且对科技股的倾斜更重。</p>
</div><p>This lack of diversification can be both a strength and a weakness for MGK. Both funds share the same top three holdings, but those stocks make up around 38% of MGK's portfolio compared to around 22% for VOO. When those particular stocks are thriving, MGK can significantly outperform VOO. But if they stumble, MGK will be hit harder.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这种缺乏多样化对 MGK 来说既是优势也是劣势。两只基金的前三大持股相同，但这些股票在 MGK 投资组合中占比约 38%，而 VOO 约为 22%。当这些特定股票表现良好时，MGK 可以显著超越 VOO。但如果它们出现问题，MGK 将受到更大影响。</p>
</div><p>This also makes MGK more prone to volatility, as seen with its higher beta and steeper max drawdown over the last five years. While it's ultimately outperformed VOO with higher one- and five-year total returns, it's been a bumpier ride along the way.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这也使得 MGK 更容易受到波动的影响，正如其较高的贝塔值和过去五年更陡峭的最大回撤所示。尽管它在一年和五年的总回报上最终超越了 VOO，但过程却更加波动。</p>
</div><p>Investors who are more comfortable with risk in exchange for higher potential earnings may prefer MGK, while risk-averse investors may favor VOO's long-term consistency and stability.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>对于那些更愿意承担风险以换取更高潜在收益的投资者，MGK 可能更具吸引力，而风险厌恶型投资者可能更青睐 VOO 的长期一致性和稳定性。</p>
</div><h2>Glossary</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>术语表</h2>
</div><p><strong>ETF:</strong> Exchange-traded fund; a pooled investment that trades on stock exchanges like a single stock.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>ETF：</strong> 交易所交易基金；一种在股票交易所像单只股票一样交易的集合投资。</p>
</div><p><strong>Expense ratio:</strong> Annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that investors pay to cover a fund’s operating costs.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>费用比率：</strong> 投资者为覆盖基金运营成本而支付的年度费用，按资产的百分比计算。</p>
</div><p><strong>Dividend yield:</strong> Annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its current price, shown as a percentage.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>股息收益率：</strong> 基金支付的年度股息与其当前价格之比，以百分比表示。</p>
</div><p><strong>Beta:</strong> A measure of an investment’s volatility compared to the overall market; 1.0 matches market volatility.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>贝塔：</strong> 衡量投资相对于整体市场的波动性；1.0 表示与市场波动性相匹配。</p>
</div><p><strong>AUM:</strong> Assets under management; the total market value of assets a fund manages on behalf of investors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>管理资产：</strong> 资产管理规模；基金代表投资者管理的资产的总市场价值。</p>
</div><p><strong>Max drawdown:</strong> The largest observed percentage drop from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a period.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>最大回撤：</strong> 基金从峰值到最低点的最大观察到的百分比下降。</p>
</div><p><strong>Total return:</strong> The investment’s price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>总回报：</strong> 投资的价格变化加上所有股息和分配，假设这些支付被再投资。</p>
</div><p><strong>Sector allocation:</strong> The percentage of a fund’s assets invested in different industry sectors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>行业配置：</strong> 基金资产投资于不同产业部门的百分比。</p>
</div><p><strong>Growth stocks:</strong> Shares of companies expected to grow faster than the market average, often reinvesting profits instead of paying dividends.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>成长股：</strong> 预计增长速度快于市场平均水平的公司股票，通常将利润再投资而不是支付股息。</p>
</div><p><strong>Liquidity:</strong> How easily an asset can be bought or sold in the market without affecting its price.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>流动性：</strong> 资产在市场上买卖而不影响其价格的难易程度。</p>
</div><p><strong>Portfolio construction:</strong> The process of selecting and weighting assets within an investment fund to meet specific goals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>投资组合构建：</strong> 在投资基金中选择和加权资产以满足特定目标的过程。</p>
</div><p><strong>Drawdown:</strong> A decline in investment value from a peak to a trough, before a new peak is achieved.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>回撤：</strong> 投资价值从峰值到谷底的下降，直到达到新的峰值。</p>
</div><h2>Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>不要错过这个潜在的丰厚机会的第二次机会</h2>
</div><p>Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>是否曾觉得自己错过了购买最成功股票的机会？那么你会想听听这个。</p>
</div><p>On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a <strong>“Double Down” stock</strong> recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在少数情况下，我们的专家分析师会发布 <strong>“加倍下注” 股票</strong> 推荐，针对他们认为即将上涨的公司。如果你担心自己已经错过了投资的机会，现在是购买的最佳时机，趁还不算太晚。而且数字证明了一切：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $469,438!*</li>
<li>Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $52,063!*</li>
<li>Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $509,039!*</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>Nvidia：如果你在 2009 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $469,438！*</li>
<li>Apple：如果你在 2008 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $52,063！*</li>
<li>Netflix：如果你在 2004 年我们加倍下注时投资了 $1,000，你现在将拥有 $509,039！*</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies <strong>, available when you join <em>Stock Advisor</em></strong>, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在，我们正在为三家令人难以置信的公司发布 “加倍下注” 警报 **，加入 <em>Stock Advisor</em> 时可获得，可能不会再有这样的机会。</p>
</div><p><strong>See the 3 stocks »</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>查看这 3 只股票 »</strong></p>
</div><p><em>*Stock Advisor returns as of December 15, 2025</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>* 股票顾问截至 2025 年 12 月 15 日的回报</em></p>
</div><p><em>Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>Katie Brockman 持有先锋标普 500 ETF 的头寸。The Motley Fool 持有并推荐苹果、微软、英伟达和先锋标普 500 ETF 的头寸。The Motley Fool 推荐以下期权：2026 年 1 月的微软 395 美元看涨期权和 2026 年 1 月的微软 405 美元看跌期权。The Motley Fool 有披露政策。</em></p>
</div><p>VOO vs. MGK: Is S&amp;P 500 Diversification or Mega-Cap Growth the Better Buy for Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>VOO 与 MGK：标普 500 的多样化投资还是大型成长股更适合投资者？最初由 The Motley Fool 发布。</p>
</div>

VOO 与 MGK：对于投资者来说，标普 500 的多元化投资还是超大盘股成长更值得购买？