<p>韩国大学的期末考试中再次出现大规模作弊现象，暴露出各院校在有效在线考试控制和学生人工智能（AI）使用指南方面的准备不足和持续挣扎。\n 根据首尔国立大学的消息，周日，该校自然科学学院一门通识教育课程的期末考试结果被宣布无效，因为在 36 名注册学生中，近一半被发现有作弊迹象。\n 该课程是一门为服兵役的学生设计的在线远程学习课程，讲座和考试均通过远程方式进行。\n 为了防止不当行为，考试系统设置为在考生打开任何非考试屏幕的窗口时记录活动。随后，助教的审查发现近一半学生的活动记录，导致该校宣布考试结果无效。\n 然而，由于记录并未指明访问了哪些屏幕，因此很难确凿地确定不当行为。因此，负责该课程的教授决定无效化考试结果，并分配替代课程作业，而不是对学生施加纪律处分。\n 教授指出，尽管缺乏确凿证据，但可疑活动的规模强烈暗示了学术不端行为。\n 首尔国立大学表示，正在起草 “全校范围的措施” 以应对其所称的 “广泛作弊” 现象。\n 据报道，正在讨论将面对面考试作为默认形式，而在无法进行远程测试时，转向包括开卷考试、重新设计问题和基于作业的评估等替代方案。\n 该大学还表示，正在推进 “校园范围的 AI 使用指南” 的制定。\n 根据拟议的框架，教师需要在课程大纲中明确列出他们的 AI 政策，以便学生提前了解期望。根据该大学的说法，草案指南目前正在通过与教职员工和学生的咨询进行审查。\n 该大学在十月的期中考试中已经因一起与 AI 相关的作弊案件而受到冲击，突显出加强措施以遏制学术不端行为的紧迫性。\n 大规模作弊的潮流并不仅限于首尔国立大学，其他韩国顶尖大学在期中考试季节后也出现了类似案件，涉及与 AI 相关的作弊丑闻。\n 本月早些时候，延世大学在十月的期中考试中发现了另一起大规模作弊案件，该课程曾因涉及人工智能的大规模作弊丑闻而成为焦点。\n 这起事件发生在约 200 名学生参加的在线测验中，一些参与者被发现通过匿名在线聊天室交换问题和答案。还有一些人被报道在使用 Google Docs 等协作平台时实时分享考试内容。\n\n\n 该课程通过录制的在线讲座进行授课，并在期中考试期间已经引发了学术不端的指控。作为回应，该大学将期末考试改为面对面形式，而在线测验仍继续以远程方式进行。\n 延世大学自去年以来就已制定了人工智能使用指南，并在九月份进行了更新。但该框架仍然较为宽泛，主要是建议性而非强制性的，导致各个课程在使用这些工具时适用不同的标准。\n 批评者表示，大学在作弊案件出现时主要依赖临时应对措施——包括宣布考试无效——这种做法可能会加深学生与管理层之间的不信任，而不是解决学术不端行为的根本原因。\n 该报道最初由《韩国时报》发布。</p>

<p>包括首尔国立大学和延世大学在内的韩国大学正面临在线考试中广泛的作弊丑闻，这一问题因人工智能的使用而加剧。各院校在有效的在线考试控制方面面临困难，导致考试失效，并引发了关于面对面考试和人工智能指导方针的讨论。批评者认为，临时应对措施可能会加剧学生与管理者之间的信任问题。《韩国时报》首次报道了这一消息</p>

<p>Mass cheating in online exams has resurfaced during finals at South Korean universities, exposing institutions’ incomplete preparedness and ongoing struggles to establish effective online test controls and guidelines for students’ artificial intelligence (AI) use.\nAccording to Seoul National University, on Sunday, the results of a final exam for a general education course offered by its College of Natural Sciences were invalidated after signs of cheating were detected among nearly half of the 36 students enrolled.\nThe course was an online distance-learning class designed for students on leave for mandatory military service, with both lectures and exams conducted remotely.\nTo prevent misconduct, the exam system was set to record activity whenever test-takers opened any windows other than the exam screen. A subsequent review by a teaching assistant later found such logs for nearly half of the students, leading the university to invalidate the exam results.\nHowever, it has been difficult to conclusively establish misconduct because the logs do not indicate which screens were accessed. As a result, the professor overseeing the course invalidated the exam results and assigned alternative coursework, rather than imposing disciplinary penalties on students.\nThe professor noted that while definitive proof was lacking, the scale of the suspicious activity strongly hinted at academic misconduct.\nSeoul National University said it was drafting “institutionwide steps” in response to what it described as “widespread cheating”.\n\nReportedly, discussions are under way about making in-person exams the default, while turning to alternatives for online assessments – including open-book formats, redesigned questions and assignment-based evaluations – when remote testing is unavoidable.\nThe university said it is also moving to introduce “campuswide guidelines on AI use”.\nUnder the proposed framework, instructors would be required to clearly outline their AI policy in the course syllabus, enabling students to understand the expectations in advance. The draft guidelines are currently being reviewed through consultations with faculty and students, according to the university.\nThe university had already been rocked by an AI-related cheating case during the October midterm exam for an introductory statistics laboratory course, underscoring the urgency of stronger measures to curb academic misconduct.\nThe wave of mass cheating is not confined to Seoul National University, with similar cases resurfacing at other elite universities in South Korea following AI-related cheating scandals during midterm season.\nEarlier this month, Yonsei University uncovered another case of mass cheating during the October midterm exam in the same course that had been at the centre of a large-scale cheating scandal involving the use of artificial intelligence.\nIt occurred during an online quiz taken by roughly 200 students, where some participants were found to have exchanged questions and answers through anonymous online chat rooms. Some were also reported to have shared exam content in real time using collaborative platforms such as Google Docs.\n\n\nThe course is delivered through recorded online lectures and has already drawn allegations of academic misconduct during the midterm exam. In response, the university moved the final exam to an in-person format, while online quizzes continued to be administered remotely.\nYonsei University has had guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in place since last year and updated them in September. But the framework remains broad and largely advisory rather than enforceable, leaving individual courses to apply differing standards for the use of such tools.\nCritics say universities have largely relied on ad hoc responses – including invalidating exams – when cheating cases surface, an approach they warn could deepen mistrust between students and administrators instead of addressing the underlying causes of academic misconduct.\nThis story was first published by The Korea Times\n</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>韩国大学的期末考试中再次出现大规模作弊现象，暴露出各院校在有效在线考试控制和学生人工智能（AI）使用指南方面的准备不足和持续挣扎。\n 根据首尔国立大学的消息，周日，该校自然科学学院一门通识教育课程的期末考试结果被宣布无效，因为在 36 名注册学生中，近一半被发现有作弊迹象。\n 该课程是一门为服兵役的学生设计的在线远程学习课程，讲座和考试均通过远程方式进行。\n 为了防止不当行为，考试系统设置为在考生打开任何非考试屏幕的窗口时记录活动。随后，助教的审查发现近一半学生的活动记录，导致该校宣布考试结果无效。\n 然而，由于记录并未指明访问了哪些屏幕，因此很难确凿地确定不当行为。因此，负责该课程的教授决定无效化考试结果，并分配替代课程作业，而不是对学生施加纪律处分。\n 教授指出，尽管缺乏确凿证据，但可疑活动的规模强烈暗示了学术不端行为。\n 首尔国立大学表示，正在起草 “全校范围的措施” 以应对其所称的 “广泛作弊” 现象。\n 据报道，正在讨论将面对面考试作为默认形式，而在无法进行远程测试时，转向包括开卷考试、重新设计问题和基于作业的评估等替代方案。\n 该大学还表示，正在推进 “校园范围的 AI 使用指南” 的制定。\n 根据拟议的框架，教师需要在课程大纲中明确列出他们的 AI 政策，以便学生提前了解期望。根据该大学的说法，草案指南目前正在通过与教职员工和学生的咨询进行审查。\n 该大学在十月的期中考试中已经因一起与 AI 相关的作弊案件而受到冲击，突显出加强措施以遏制学术不端行为的紧迫性。\n 大规模作弊的潮流并不仅限于首尔国立大学，其他韩国顶尖大学在期中考试季节后也出现了类似案件，涉及与 AI 相关的作弊丑闻。\n 本月早些时候，延世大学在十月的期中考试中发现了另一起大规模作弊案件，该课程曾因涉及人工智能的大规模作弊丑闻而成为焦点。\n 这起事件发生在约 200 名学生参加的在线测验中，一些参与者被发现通过匿名在线聊天室交换问题和答案。还有一些人被报道在使用 Google Docs 等协作平台时实时分享考试内容。\n\n\n 该课程通过录制的在线讲座进行授课，并在期中考试期间已经引发了学术不端的指控。作为回应，该大学将期末考试改为面对面形式，而在线测验仍继续以远程方式进行。\n 延世大学自去年以来就已制定了人工智能使用指南，并在九月份进行了更新。但该框架仍然较为宽泛，主要是建议性而非强制性的，导致各个课程在使用这些工具时适用不同的标准。\n 批评者表示，大学在作弊案件出现时主要依赖临时应对措施——包括宣布考试无效——这种做法可能会加深学生与管理层之间的不信任，而不是解决学术不端行为的根本原因。\n 该报道最初由《韩国时报》发布。</p>
</div>

韩国大学因 AI 考试丑闻而面临 ‘广泛作弊’ 问题