<p>意见 <em>注册</em> 某个年龄段的读者会记得 1970 年代的事件，当时由于各种国际争端导致燃料短缺，结果出现了排队、冲突和成本上升。其结果之一是推动了更高的效率。也许是时候将这些教训应用于当前的内存短缺了。</p>
<p>随着内存价格的持续上涨，工程师们是时候重新考虑他们的应用程序和工具链对内存的贪婪需求了。一个简单的网页真的需要几兆字节来向用户展示现代版的 Hello World 吗？今天的 Windows 任务管理器可执行文件占用 6 MB 的磁盘空间。在显示 Chrome 如今是多么占用内存之前，它几乎需要 70 MB 的内存。原版的磁盘占用为 85 KB。它的继任者并没有在功能上有数量级的提升。</p>
<p>那些记得有效软件在千字节而非千兆字节中运行的人，早已对现代工程的奢侈方式摇头叹息。但随着科技的进步，内存密度似乎注定会无止境地增加，抗议臃肿的感觉就像是 “老头对着云喊叫”。</p>
<p>进入人工智能热潮。随着世界竞相将数据中心装满计算设备，内存价格在最近几个月飙升，目前没有迹象表明会回到开发者可以轻松添加另一个多兆字节框架以满足任意用户需求的水平。</p>
<ul>
<li>由于内存成本飙升，服务器价格预计将上涨 15%</li>
<li>更便宜的 1 GB Raspberry Pi 5 在内存成本飙升时问世</li>
<li>商品内存价格预计将翻倍，因为半导体厂商转向人工智能市场</li>
<li>内存的繁荣 - 萧条周期再次繁荣，三星据报道将内存价格提高了 60%</li>
</ul>
<p>开发者应该仔细考虑他们真正需要多少框架，并致力于提高效率。管理者必须确保他们也有空间去这样做。确保工具链的精力也应该投入到检查其效率上。</p>
<p>人们常常开玩笑说，能够让人类登上月球的内存和计算能力与现代智能手机相比显得微不足道。然而，距离现在并不久之前，完全可用的应用程序和操作系统还在软盘上运行，设备的内存以千字节而非兆字节来衡量。</p>
<p>扭转数十年的应用增长不会在一夜之间发生。这需要思维的转变和不同的视角。工具链必须重新思考，并且在静止和运行时都应奖励紧凑性。</p>
<p>在 1970 年代，能源短缺促进了效率。在 2020 年代，计算机内存的短缺可能最终会导致软件不再用无谓的填充物占满每一个字节。®</p>

<p>这篇文章将 1970 年代的燃料短缺与当前的内存短缺进行了类比，呼吁软件工程师优先考虑效率。随着内存价格的上涨，作者认为是时候重新审视现代软件的臃肿特性。文章呼吁转变思维，创造更紧凑和高效的应用程序，类似于早期计算时代的作品</p>

<p>Opinion <em>Register</em> readers of a certain age will recall the events of the 1970s, where a shortage of fuel due to various international disagreements resulted in queues, conflicts, and rising costs. One result was a drive toward greater efficiencies. Perhaps it's time to apply those lessons to the current memory shortage.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>意见 <em>注册</em> 某个年龄段的读者会记得 1970 年代的事件，当时由于各种国际争端导致燃料短缺，结果出现了排队、冲突和成本上升。其结果之一是推动了更高的效率。也许是时候将这些教训应用于当前的内存短缺了。</p>
</div><p>As memory prices continue to rise, it is time engineers reconsidered their applications and toolchains' voracious appetite for memory. Does a simple web page really need megabytes to show a user the modern equivalent of Hello World? Today's Windows Task Manager executable occupies 6 MB of disk space. It demands almost 70 MB before it will show a user just how much of a memory hog Chrome is these days. The original weighs in at 85 KB on disk. Its successor is not orders of magnitude more functional.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>随着内存价格的持续上涨，工程师们是时候重新考虑他们的应用程序和工具链对内存的贪婪需求了。一个简单的网页真的需要几兆字节来向用户展示现代版的 Hello World 吗？今天的 Windows 任务管理器可执行文件占用 6 MB 的磁盘空间。在显示 Chrome 如今是多么占用内存之前，它几乎需要 70 MB 的内存。原版的磁盘占用为 85 KB。它的继任者并没有在功能上有数量级的提升。</p>
</div><p>Those who remember effective software running in kilobytes rather than gigabytes have long shaken their heads at the profligate ways of modern engineering. But as tech progress marched on and memory densities seemed destined to increase without end, protesting about bloat felt a lot like &#34;old man yells at cloud.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>那些记得有效软件在千字节而非千兆字节中运行的人，早已对现代工程的奢侈方式摇头叹息。但随着科技的进步，内存密度似乎注定会无止境地增加，抗议臃肿的感觉就像是 “老头对着云喊叫”。</p>
</div><p>Enter the AI boom. As the world races to pack datacenters full of computing gear, memory prices have rocketed in recent months and currently show no signs of returning to levels where a developer could shrug and bolt on another multi-megabyte framework to meet an arbitrary user requirement.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>进入人工智能热潮。随着世界竞相将数据中心装满计算设备，内存价格在最近几个月飙升，目前没有迹象表明会回到开发者可以轻松添加另一个多兆字节框架以满足任意用户需求的水平。</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Server prices set to jump 15% as memory costs spike</li>
<li>Cheaper 1 GB Raspberry Pi 5 lands as memory costs go through the roof</li>
<li>Commodity memory prices set to double as fabs pivot to AI market</li>
<li>Memory boom-bust cycle booms again as Samsung reportedly jacks memory prices 60%</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>由于内存成本飙升，服务器价格预计将上涨 15%</li>
<li>更便宜的 1 GB Raspberry Pi 5 在内存成本飙升时问世</li>
<li>商品内存价格预计将翻倍，因为半导体厂商转向人工智能市场</li>
<li>内存的繁荣 - 萧条周期再次繁荣，三星据报道将内存价格提高了 60%</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Developers should consider precisely how much of a framework they really need and devote effort to efficiency. Managers must ensure they also have the space to do so. The energy spent securing a toolchain should go into checking its efficiency too.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>开发者应该仔细考虑他们真正需要多少框架，并致力于提高效率。管理者必须确保他们也有空间去这样做。确保工具链的精力也应该投入到检查其效率上。</p>
</div><p>It is often joked that the memory and computing power that enabled humans to land on the Moon compare poorly to those of a modern smartphone. However, it is not so very long ago that perfectly usable applications and operating systems ran from floppy disks on devices with RAM measured in kilobytes rather than megabytes.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>人们常常开玩笑说，能够让人类登上月球的内存和计算能力与现代智能手机相比显得微不足道。然而，距离现在并不久之前，完全可用的应用程序和操作系统还在软盘上运行，设备的内存以千字节而非兆字节来衡量。</p>
</div><p>Reversing decades of application growth will not happen overnight. It requires a change of thinking and a different outlook. Toolchains must be rethought, and rewards should be given for compactness, both at rest and in operation.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>扭转数十年的应用增长不会在一夜之间发生。这需要思维的转变和不同的视角。工具链必须重新思考，并且在静止和运行时都应奖励紧凑性。</p>
</div><p>In the 1970s, a shortage of energy spurred efficiency. In the 2020s, a shortage of computer memory might finally result in software that doesn't fill every byte with needless fluff. ®</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在 1970 年代，能源短缺促进了效率。在 2020 年代，计算机内存的短缺可能最终会导致软件不再用无谓的填充物占满每一个字节。®</p>
</div>

内存即将耗尽，软件臃肿的借口也越来越少