<p>前马来西亚总理纳吉布·拉扎克的孩子们一直渴望父亲能离开监狱，与家人一起度过新年。但在本周，法院驳回了纳吉布申请以居家监禁的方式回家的请求，令他们的希望破灭。\n 在周一裁决后不久，纳吉布的长子莫哈末·尼扎尔·纳吉布在网上发布的一段五分钟视频中表示，家人已做好了两种结果的准备，但他们默默相信，基于有争议的皇室附录的潜在缓解，漫长的斗争最终会给家庭带来解脱。\n“当我见到父亲时，我看到他早上很开心，并且收拾了一些个人物品，” 他说，因为家人准备好迎接他 “当天就能回家” 的可能性。\n 当吉隆坡高等法院裁定一份允许纳吉布在居家监禁中服完余刑的皇室特赦附录无效时，这些期望瞬间崩溃，理由是该附录未经过特赦委员会的审议。\n 这一裁决意味着 72 岁的纳吉布将继续留在卡江监狱，那里他因挪用与 SRC 国际（一个曾与丑闻缠身的 1 马发展公司，或称 1MDB 有关的单位）相关的 4200 万林吉特（约 1030 万美元）而被判处减刑六年。\n\n 尼扎尔，47 岁，表示这一裁决对家庭来说是毁灭性的，不仅因为对他父亲的影响，还因为他们认为这对马来西亚的皇室特赦制度有更广泛的影响。\n“文件是存在的。命令是存在的，” 他在视频中说。“让人们感到愤怒和失望的是，它的存在被隐藏并未得到承认，直到 [纳吉布的] 律师被迫去法院确认。”\n 他补充说，法官认为附录在未经过特赦委员会的情况下没有法律效力，这引发了严重的宪法问题。\n 另一位儿子莫哈末·纳兹菲丁·纳吉布在社交媒体上表示，周一是 “对家庭来说极其悲伤的一天”。\n“我了解我的父亲。‘Bossku’ 不会放弃。他会继续战斗，” 纳兹菲丁写道，使用了纳吉布的流行昵称。“但作为儿子，我忍不住想问：这一切什么时候才会结束？什么时候才算足够？”\n42 岁的纳兹菲丁表示，这一裁决动摇了人们对君主制角色的长期假设，特别是在纳吉布曾领导的巫统党内，该党历史上一直将自己定位为皇室机构的捍卫者。\n“转眼之间……任何皇室法令或文件似乎在未经政府程序的情况下都没有价值。这对我们维持数十年的制度是一个非常深刻和严重的影响，” 他写道。\n\n\n 附录争议加深\n 纳吉布的女儿诺瑞亚娜·纳吉瓦，36 岁，在周二晚上的一则社交媒体帖子中表示，司法审查是最后的手段，仅在几个月向政府机构（包括总检察署和总理办公室）发出未回复的信件后进行。\n 她表示，家人最初试图安静地解决此事，考虑到其政治敏感性，并且不想让任何一方，包括政府，处于困难境地。\n 纳吉布通过他的律师花了几个月时间寻求对所谓皇室附录的确认和认可，辩方称该附录是由前国王阿卜杜拉·阿赫迈德·沙赫颁布的。然而，安瓦尔·易卜拉欣总理的政府否认了这一补充法令的存在，尽管前国王的宫殿和一名联邦律师在今年早些时候表示该文件是存在的。\n 在周一的裁决中，高等法院法官艾丽斯·洛克·怡青表示，特赦委员会没有讨论或审议任何附录命令，该事项未能满足宪法要求。\n\n 解释裁决的法律依据时，宪法律师萨利姆·巴希尔（前马来西亚律师公会会长）表示，法院明确指出，国王在授予特赦时不能超越联邦宪法。\n“这一裁决加强了君主受宪法约束的观念，任何未经特赦委员会审议的异常法令或决定被视为不规则，没有约束力，并且可能受到司法审查，” 他在《亚洲周刊》中表示。\n 纳吉布的律师表示，他们将向上诉法院提出上诉，该法院是马来西亚仅次于联邦法院的第二高法院。\n 周五，高等法院计划对纳吉布涉及 230 亿林吉特的 1MDB 审判作出裁决，该笔资金据称被转入他的银行账户。</p>

<p>纳吉布·拉扎克的孩子们对马来西亚法院驳回他申请居家监禁的决定表示失望。法院认为，允许居家监禁的皇家附录无效，因为该附录并未经过特赦委员会的审议。纳吉布将继续在监狱中服刑，因挪用与 1MDB 相关的资金而被判处六年监禁。该裁决引发了对马来西亚皇家特赦制度的质疑。纳吉布的家人计划对该决定提出上诉</p>

<p>The children of ex-Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak have been yearning for their father to leave prison and the family to spend the New Year together. But their hopes were dashed this week after a court ruled against Najib’s application to return home under house arrest.\nIn a five-minute video posted online shortly after the decision on Monday, Najib’s eldest son, Mohd Nizar Najib, said the family had gone to court prepared for both outcomes, but had quietly believed the long fight – based on a potential reprieve through a disputed royal addendum – would finally bring relief to the family.\n“When I met my father, I saw that he was cheerful in the morning, and he had packed some of his belongings,” he said, as the family prepared for the possibility that he would be “allowed home that very day”.\nThose expectations collapsed when the Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled that a purported addendum to a royal clemency order allowing Najib to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest was invalid because it had not been deliberated by the Pardons Board.\nThe decision means Najib, 72, will remain in Kajang Prison, where he is serving a reduced six-year sentence for misappropriating 42 million ringgit (US$10.3 million) linked to SRC International, a former unit of the scandal-tainted 1Malaysia Development Berhad, or 1MDB.\n\nNizar, 47, said the ruling was devastating for the family, not only because of the impact on his father, but because of what they saw as broader implications for Malaysia’s system of royal clemency.\n“The document exists. The order exists,” he said in the video. “What made people angry and disappointed was that its existence was hidden and not acknowledged, until [Najib’s] lawyers were forced to go to court to confirm it.”\nHe added that the judge’s finding that an addendum had no legal effect without it going through the Pardons Board raised serious constitutional questions.\nAnother son, Mohd Nazifuddin Najib, described Monday as “an extremely sad day” for the family in a separate social media post.\n“I know my father. ‘Bossku’ will not give up. He will continue to fight,” Nazifuddin wrote, using Najib’s popular nickname. “But as a son, I cannot help asking: when will all this end? When will it be considered enough?”\nNazifuddin, 42, said the ruling had shaken long-held assumptions about the role of the monarchy, particularly within Umno, the party Najib once led that has historically positioned itself as a defender of royal institutions.\n“In the blink of an eye…any royal decree or document appeared to carry no value without going through government processes. That is a very deep and serious implication for a system we have upheld for decades,” he wrote.\n\n\nAddendum dispute deepens\nNajib’s daughter, Nooryana Najwa, 36, said in a separate social media post on Tuesday night that the judicial review was a last resort, pursued only after months of unanswered letters to government agencies regarding the addendum, including the Attorney General’s Chambers and the Prime Minister’s Office.\nShe said the family had initially tried to resolve the matter quietly, mindful of its political sensitivity and wary of putting any party, including the government, in a difficult position.\nNajib, through his lawyers, had spent months seeking confirmation and recognition of the supposed royal addendum, which the defence said had been issued by the former king, Sultan Abdullah Ahmad Shah. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s administration, however, has denied the existence of the supplementary decree, despite the former king’s palace and a federal lawyer earlier this year saying that the document existed.\nIn her ruling on Monday, High Court judge Alice Loke Yee Ching said the Pardons Board did not discuss or deliberate on any addendum order, and the matter had failed to meet constitutional requirements as such.\n\nExplaining the legal basis of the ruling, constitutional lawyer Salim Bashir, a former Malaysian Bar president, said the court made clear that the king could not act outside the Federal Constitution when granting clemency.\n“The decision bolstered the notion that the monarch is subject to the Constitution, and that any irregular decree or decision that was not deliberated by the Pardons Board is deemed irregular, has no binding effect and is susceptible to judicial scrutiny,” he told This Week in Asia.\nNajib’s lawyers have said they will appeal to the Court of Appeal, the country’s second highest court behind the Federal Court of Malaysia.\nOn Friday, the High Court is scheduled to deliver its verdict in Najib’s separate 1MDB trial involving 2.3 billion ringgit allegedly channelled into his bank accounts.\n</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>前马来西亚总理纳吉布·拉扎克的孩子们一直渴望父亲能离开监狱，与家人一起度过新年。但在本周，法院驳回了纳吉布申请以居家监禁的方式回家的请求，令他们的希望破灭。\n 在周一裁决后不久，纳吉布的长子莫哈末·尼扎尔·纳吉布在网上发布的一段五分钟视频中表示，家人已做好了两种结果的准备，但他们默默相信，基于有争议的皇室附录的潜在缓解，漫长的斗争最终会给家庭带来解脱。\n“当我见到父亲时，我看到他早上很开心，并且收拾了一些个人物品，” 他说，因为家人准备好迎接他 “当天就能回家” 的可能性。\n 当吉隆坡高等法院裁定一份允许纳吉布在居家监禁中服完余刑的皇室特赦附录无效时，这些期望瞬间崩溃，理由是该附录未经过特赦委员会的审议。\n 这一裁决意味着 72 岁的纳吉布将继续留在卡江监狱，那里他因挪用与 SRC 国际（一个曾与丑闻缠身的 1 马发展公司，或称 1MDB 有关的单位）相关的 4200 万林吉特（约 1030 万美元）而被判处减刑六年。\n\n 尼扎尔，47 岁，表示这一裁决对家庭来说是毁灭性的，不仅因为对他父亲的影响，还因为他们认为这对马来西亚的皇室特赦制度有更广泛的影响。\n“文件是存在的。命令是存在的，” 他在视频中说。“让人们感到愤怒和失望的是，它的存在被隐藏并未得到承认，直到 [纳吉布的] 律师被迫去法院确认。”\n 他补充说，法官认为附录在未经过特赦委员会的情况下没有法律效力，这引发了严重的宪法问题。\n 另一位儿子莫哈末·纳兹菲丁·纳吉布在社交媒体上表示，周一是 “对家庭来说极其悲伤的一天”。\n“我了解我的父亲。‘Bossku’ 不会放弃。他会继续战斗，” 纳兹菲丁写道，使用了纳吉布的流行昵称。“但作为儿子，我忍不住想问：这一切什么时候才会结束？什么时候才算足够？”\n42 岁的纳兹菲丁表示，这一裁决动摇了人们对君主制角色的长期假设，特别是在纳吉布曾领导的巫统党内，该党历史上一直将自己定位为皇室机构的捍卫者。\n“转眼之间……任何皇室法令或文件似乎在未经政府程序的情况下都没有价值。这对我们维持数十年的制度是一个非常深刻和严重的影响，” 他写道。\n\n\n 附录争议加深\n 纳吉布的女儿诺瑞亚娜·纳吉瓦，36 岁，在周二晚上的一则社交媒体帖子中表示，司法审查是最后的手段，仅在几个月向政府机构（包括总检察署和总理办公室）发出未回复的信件后进行。\n 她表示，家人最初试图安静地解决此事，考虑到其政治敏感性，并且不想让任何一方，包括政府，处于困难境地。\n 纳吉布通过他的律师花了几个月时间寻求对所谓皇室附录的确认和认可，辩方称该附录是由前国王阿卜杜拉·阿赫迈德·沙赫颁布的。然而，安瓦尔·易卜拉欣总理的政府否认了这一补充法令的存在，尽管前国王的宫殿和一名联邦律师在今年早些时候表示该文件是存在的。\n 在周一的裁决中，高等法院法官艾丽斯·洛克·怡青表示，特赦委员会没有讨论或审议任何附录命令，该事项未能满足宪法要求。\n\n 解释裁决的法律依据时，宪法律师萨利姆·巴希尔（前马来西亚律师公会会长）表示，法院明确指出，国王在授予特赦时不能超越联邦宪法。\n“这一裁决加强了君主受宪法约束的观念，任何未经特赦委员会审议的异常法令或决定被视为不规则，没有约束力，并且可能受到司法审查，” 他在《亚洲周刊》中表示。\n 纳吉布的律师表示，他们将向上诉法院提出上诉，该法院是马来西亚仅次于联邦法院的第二高法院。\n 周五，高等法院计划对纳吉布涉及 230 亿林吉特的 1MDB 审判作出裁决，该笔资金据称被转入他的银行账户。</p>
</div>

纳吉布的子女对马来西亚法院的裁决感到遗憾——‘我们以为他要回家了’