<p>在强生公司多次尝试将其滑石粉诉讼转入破产程序失败后，卵巢癌索赔再次在全国各地的法庭上推进。</p>
<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum，一家全国知名的原告律师事务所，继续代表那些声称长期使用强生婴儿爽身粉和其他滑石粉产品导致卵巢癌的女性，原因包括石棉污染、滑石的炎症特性以及警告不足。该诉讼目前在全国多个法庭进行，法院拒绝了强生公司（J&amp;J）通过企业重组来保护自身免于责任的努力。</p>
<p>继续阅读</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null"/></p>
<p>“通过在虚假破产中隐藏资产来延迟和否认责任的企业手法只能走到这一步。”</p>
<p>最近加州的一起案件进一步证明了滑石粉诉讼正在推进。根据路透社的报道，12 月 12 日，加州陪审团裁定强生公司的婴儿爽身粉导致两名女性的卵巢癌，判给她们 4000 万美元的赔偿，其中洛杉矶高等法院判给莫妮卡·肯特 1800 万美元，判给德博拉·舒尔茨及其丈夫 2200 万美元，陪审团发现强生公司多年来知道其滑石粉产品是危险的，但未能警告消费者。</p>
<p>这一时刻对原告、消费者和监管者都具有重要意义，因为科学证据——包括美国国立卫生研究院支持的研究——持续加强了滑石使用与卵巢癌之间的关联。法庭审查与科学清晰性的结合重新聚焦于原告所声称的关于产品安全的数十年隐瞒。</p>
<p>“通过在虚假破产中隐藏资产来延迟和否认责任的企业手法只能走到这一步，”<strong>阿里·弗里德曼</strong>，<strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的合伙人说。“律师和法庭都越来越善于识别这些手法的本质：这是逃避责任的努力，而不是处理其产品造成的伤害。”</p>
<p><strong>长期以来的公共健康风险，终于再次受到关注</strong></p>
<p>多年来，公众对滑石粉使用与卵巢癌之间联系的认识落后于科学。然而，现在提交法庭的公司内部记录和宣誓证词详细说明了原告所声称的强生公司数十年来所知的事实：<strong>其滑石产品易受石棉污染，并在按市场推广使用时对健康构成严重风险。</strong></p>
<p>自 1970 年代以来，研究提出了滑石颗粒通过生殖道迁移的担忧，内部测试反复发现化妆品中含有石棉和纤维滑石。尽管如此，原告声称这些产品仍然被宣传为纯净、温和和安全的日常女性卫生使用产品。</p>
<p>“受害者从未被告知完整的故事，” 弗里德曼说。“通过诉讼变得清晰的是，J&amp;J 知道石棉污染的风险，却选择不与监管机构或公众分享这些信息。”</p>
<p>最近的陪审团裁决——包括在间皮瘤案件中的重大赔偿——强调陪审团对科学和企业不当行为证据的接受度日益提高，标志着这些案件评估方式的转变。</p>
<p><strong>诉讼如何重塑消费者安全期望</strong></p>
<p>随着滑石案件的推进，其影响远超单一制造商，重塑了消费者商品行业对透明度和产品安全的期望。</p>
<p><strong>主要影响包括：</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>消费者安全意识：</strong> 强调滑石因其来自含石棉矿床，无法始终或可靠地保证无石棉。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>更安全的替代品：</strong> 突出玉米淀粉基粉末——长期以来被认为更安全——提供有效的、非致癌的替代品。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>监管问责：</strong> 重新呼吁加强联邦监管、明确标签要求和独立的化妆品石棉检测标准。</li>
</ul>
<p>“没有任何滑石粉产品是安全的，” 弗里德曼说。“玉米淀粉替代品已经存在几十年，消费者应当获得不带有隐性癌症风险的产品。”</p>
<p><strong>企业问责的决定性时刻</strong></p>
<p>随着破产不再阻碍法庭的门口，滑石诉讼进入了一个决定性阶段。Wisner Baum 在主要消费者安全和有毒暴露案件中积累了丰富经验，运用数十年的诉讼专业知识来保护公共健康并追究企业责任。</p>
<p>该事务所继续在全国范围内推进代表受卵巢癌影响的女性和家庭的索赔，支持其索赔的有流行病学数据、公司内部文件以及日益增多的陪审团裁决。有关诉讼和消费者安全指导的更多信息可在 <strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的网站上找到。</p>
<p>“这场诉讼传达了一个明确的信息，” 弗里德曼说。“大型企业不能通过延迟、分散注意力或重组来逃避责任，当证据显示真实伤害时。法庭和陪审团准备审视事实——这改变了一切。”</p>
<p><strong>关于 Wisner Baum</strong></p>
<p>Wisner Baum 始于一个简单但激进的想法：法律应该服务于人民，而不是保护权力。自 1985 年开业以来，该事务所的成就远超法庭胜利。总部位于洛杉矶，Wisner Baum 在美国享有盛誉，通过追究强大企业的责任建立了自己的遗产——不仅是为了为个别客户赢得正义，更是为了激发更广泛的社会变革。</p>
<p>他们所处理的每一个案件，从灾难性伤害和药品失败到环境毒性和企业疏忽，都是更大使命的一部分：让世界对每个人来说更加安全、公正和透明。凭借超过 40 亿美元的判决和和解，他们的法律胜利帮助提高了公众意识，影响了法规，并迫使行业清理有害的做法。他们的工作已成为产品安全改革、食品透明度和医疗责任的催化剂。</p>
<p>Wisner Baum 不仅仅是一家律师事务所。它是一个变革的运动——在这里，正义不是最终目标，而是更安全社会的起点。</p>
<p>Wisner Baum：为社会变革而改变系统，一次一个案件。</p>
<p>了解更多信息，请访问 wisnerbaum.com</p>
<p><strong>参考文献：</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). 投诉和陪审团审判请求（ <em>Nguyen 诉强生等，</em> 案号 ATL-L-003241-19）。新泽西州高级法院，法律部门，大西洋县。</li>
<li>路透社，<em>路透社</em>，2025 年 12 月 15 日。reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
<p>媒体咨询：</p>
<p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
<p>JOTO PR™</p>
<p>727-777-4629</p>
<p>Jotopr.com</p>
<p>来源：Wisner Baum</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw"/></p>

强生

<p>关于强生的卵巢癌诉讼正在法院推进，科学证据越来越多地将滑石粉使用与癌症联系起来。Wisner Baum 律师事务所代表声称长期使用滑石粉产品导致卵巢癌的女性。最近的陪审团裁决，包括加利福尼亚州的 4000 万美元赔偿，突显了该公司对其产品相关健康风险的认知。这场诉讼正在重塑消费者安全预期，强调了透明度和更安全替代品的必要性，同时推动化妆品行业加强监管</p>

<p><em>After multiple failed attempts by Johnson &amp; Johnson to move its talc litigation into bankruptcy, ovarian cancer claims are once again advancing in courts across the country.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在强生公司多次尝试将其滑石粉诉讼转入破产程序失败后，卵巢癌索赔再次在全国各地的法庭上推进。</p>
</div><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum, a nationally recognized plaintiffs' law firm, continues to represent women who allege that long-term use of Johnson's Baby Powder and other talc-based products caused ovarian cancer due to asbestos contamination, talc's inflammatory properties, and inadequate warnings. The litigation, which is now proceeding in multiple courts across the nation, continues after courts rejected Johnson &amp; Johnson's (J&amp;J) efforts to shield itself from liability through corporate restructuring.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum，一家全国知名的原告律师事务所，继续代表那些声称长期使用强生婴儿爽身粉和其他滑石粉产品导致卵巢癌的女性，原因包括石棉污染、滑石的炎症特性以及警告不足。该诉讼目前在全国多个法庭进行，法院拒绝了强生公司（J&amp;J）通过企业重组来保护自身免于责任的努力。</p>
</div><p>Continue Reading</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>继续阅读</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null" alt="" original-src="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null"/></p>
<p>“The corporate playbook to delay and deny accountability by hiding assets in a sham bankruptcy only goes so far”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“通过在虚假破产中隐藏资产来延迟和否认责任的企业手法只能走到这一步。”</p>
</div><p>A recent California case provides more proof that talcum powder litigation is advancing. On December 12, a California jury awarded $40 million to two women who said Johnson &amp; Johnson's baby powder was to blame for their ovarian cancer, according to <em>Reuters, which</em> reported that the jury in Los Angeles Superior Court awarded $18 million to Monica Kent and $22 million to Deborah Schultz and her husband after finding that Johnson &amp; Johnson knew for years its talc-based products were dangerous but failed to warn consumers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最近加州的一起案件进一步证明了滑石粉诉讼正在推进。根据路透社的报道，12 月 12 日，加州陪审团裁定强生公司的婴儿爽身粉导致两名女性的卵巢癌，判给她们 4000 万美元的赔偿，其中洛杉矶高等法院判给莫妮卡·肯特 1800 万美元，判给德博拉·舒尔茨及其丈夫 2200 万美元，陪审团发现强生公司多年来知道其滑石粉产品是危险的，但未能警告消费者。</p>
</div><p>The moment is significant not only for plaintiffs, but for consumers and regulators, as scientific evidence—including NIH-supported research—has continued to strengthen the association between talc use and ovarian cancer. The convergence of courtroom scrutiny and scientific clarity has renewed focus on what plaintiffs allege was decades of concealment about product safety.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这一时刻对原告、消费者和监管者都具有重要意义，因为科学证据——包括美国国立卫生研究院支持的研究——持续加强了滑石使用与卵巢癌之间的关联。法庭审查与科学清晰性的结合重新聚焦于原告所声称的关于产品安全的数十年隐瞒。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The corporate playbook to delay and deny accountability by hiding assets in a sham bankruptcy only goes so far,&#34; said <strong>Ari Friedman</strong>, partner at <strong>Wisner Baum</strong>. &#34;Attorneys and courts alike have become increasingly adept at recognizing these maneuvers for what they are: efforts to avoid responsibility rather than deal with the harm their products caused.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“通过在虚假破产中隐藏资产来延迟和否认责任的企业手法只能走到这一步，”<strong>阿里·弗里德曼</strong>，<strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的合伙人说。“律师和法庭都越来越善于识别这些手法的本质：这是逃避责任的努力，而不是处理其产品造成的伤害。”</p>
</div><p><strong>A Longstanding Public Health Risk, Finally Back in the Spotlight</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>长期以来的公共健康风险，终于再次受到关注</strong></p>
</div><p>For years, public awareness of the link between talcum powder use and ovarian cancer lagged behind the science. Yet internal company records and sworn testimony now before the courts detail what plaintiffs allege Johnson &amp; Johnson knew for decades: <strong>that its talc products were vulnerable to asbestos contamination and posed serious health risks when used as marketed.</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>多年来，公众对滑石粉使用与卵巢癌之间联系的认识落后于科学。然而，现在提交法庭的公司内部记录和宣誓证词详细说明了原告所声称的强生公司数十年来所知的事实：<strong>其滑石产品易受石棉污染，并在按市场推广使用时对健康构成严重风险。</strong></p>
</div><p>Beginning in the 1970s, studies raised concerns about the migration of talc particles through the reproductive tract, and internal testing repeatedly identified asbestos and fibrous talc in cosmetic products. Despite this, plaintiffs allege the products continued to be advertised as pure, gentle, and safe for daily feminine hygiene use.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>自 1970 年代以来，研究提出了滑石颗粒通过生殖道迁移的担忧，内部测试反复发现化妆品中含有石棉和纤维滑石。尽管如此，原告声称这些产品仍然被宣传为纯净、温和和安全的日常女性卫生使用产品。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Victims were never told the full story,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;What's become clear through litigation is that J&amp;J knew about asbestos contamination risks and chose not to share that information with regulators or the public.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“受害者从未被告知完整的故事，” 弗里德曼说。“通过诉讼变得清晰的是，J&amp;J 知道石棉污染的风险，却选择不与监管机构或公众分享这些信息。”</p>
</div><p>Recent jury verdicts—including major awards in mesothelioma cases—underscore that juries are increasingly receptive to both the science and the evidence of corporate misconduct, signaling a shift in how these cases are evaluated.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最近的陪审团裁决——包括在间皮瘤案件中的重大赔偿——强调陪审团对科学和企业不当行为证据的接受度日益提高，标志着这些案件评估方式的转变。</p>
</div><p><strong>How the Litigation Is Reshaping Consumer Safety Expectations</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>诉讼如何重塑消费者安全期望</strong></p>
</div><p>As talc cases move forward, the implications extend well beyond a single manufacturer, reshaping expectations around transparency and product safety across the consumer goods industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>随着滑石案件的推进，其影响远超单一制造商，重塑了消费者商品行业对透明度和产品安全的期望。</p>
</div><p><strong>Key impacts include:</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>主要影响包括：</strong></p>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Consumer Safety Awareness:</strong> Reinforcing that talc, because it is mined from asbestos-bearing deposits, cannot be consistently or reliably guaranteed to be asbestos-free.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>消费者安全意识：</strong> 强调滑石因其来自含石棉矿床，无法始终或可靠地保证无石棉。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Safer Alternatives:</strong> Highlighting that cornstarch-based powders—long recognized as safer—provide effective, non-carcinogenic alternatives.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>更安全的替代品：</strong> 突出玉米淀粉基粉末——长期以来被认为更安全——提供有效的、非致癌的替代品。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Regulatory Accountability:</strong> Renewing calls for stronger federal oversight, clearer labeling requirements and independent asbestos testing standards in cosmetics.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>监管问责：</strong> 重新呼吁加强联邦监管、明确标签要求和独立的化妆品石棉检测标准。</li>
</ul>
</div><p>&#34;There is no such thing as a safe talcum powder product,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;Cornstarch alternatives have been available for decades, and consumers deserve products that don't carry hidden cancer risks.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“没有任何滑石粉产品是安全的，” 弗里德曼说。“玉米淀粉替代品已经存在几十年，消费者应当获得不带有隐性癌症风险的产品。”</p>
</div><p><strong>A Defining Moment for Corporate Accountability</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>企业问责的决定性时刻</strong></p>
</div><p>With bankruptcy no longer blocking the courthouse doors, talc litigation is entering a decisive phase. Wisner Baum brings extensive experience from major consumer-safety and toxic-exposure cases, applying decades of litigation expertise to protect public health and hold corporations accountable.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>随着破产不再阻碍法庭的门口，滑石诉讼进入了一个决定性阶段。Wisner Baum 在主要消费者安全和有毒暴露案件中积累了丰富经验，运用数十年的诉讼专业知识来保护公共健康并追究企业责任。</p>
</div><p>The firm continues to advance claims nationwide on behalf of women and families affected by ovarian cancer, supported by epidemiological data, internal corporate documents, and a growing number of jury findings. More information about the litigation and consumer safety guidance is available at <strong>Wisner Baum</strong>'s website.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该事务所继续在全国范围内推进代表受卵巢癌影响的女性和家庭的索赔，支持其索赔的有流行病学数据、公司内部文件以及日益增多的陪审团裁决。有关诉讼和消费者安全指导的更多信息可在 <strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的网站上找到。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This litigation sends a clear message,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;Large corporations cannot delay, distract, or restructure their way out of responsibility when the evidence shows real harm. Courts and juries are prepared to look at the facts—and that changes everything.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“这场诉讼传达了一个明确的信息，” 弗里德曼说。“大型企业不能通过延迟、分散注意力或重组来逃避责任，当证据显示真实伤害时。法庭和陪审团准备审视事实——这改变了一切。”</p>
</div><p><strong>About Wisner Baum</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>关于 Wisner Baum</strong></p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum began with a simple but radical idea: that the law should serve people—not protect power. Since opening its doors in 1985, the firm has gone far beyond courtroom victories. Based in Los Angeles and known across the U.S., Wisner Baum has built its legacy by holding powerful corporations accountable—not just to win justice for individual clients, but to spark broader societal change.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum 始于一个简单但激进的想法：法律应该服务于人民，而不是保护权力。自 1985 年开业以来，该事务所的成就远超法庭胜利。总部位于洛杉矶，Wisner Baum 在美国享有盛誉，通过追究强大企业的责任建立了自己的遗产——不仅是为了为个别客户赢得正义，更是为了激发更广泛的社会变革。</p>
</div><p>Every case they take on, from catastrophic injuries and pharmaceutical failures to environmental toxicity and corporate negligence, is part of a bigger mission: to make the world safer, more just, and more transparent for everyone. With more than $4 billion in verdicts and settlements, their legal victories have helped raise public awareness, influence regulations, and force industries to clean up harmful practices. Their work has become a catalyst for product safety reforms, food transparency, and medical accountability.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>他们所处理的每一个案件，从灾难性伤害和药品失败到环境毒性和企业疏忽，都是更大使命的一部分：让世界对每个人来说更加安全、公正和透明。凭借超过 40 亿美元的判决和和解，他们的法律胜利帮助提高了公众意识，影响了法规，并迫使行业清理有害的做法。他们的工作已成为产品安全改革、食品透明度和医疗责任的催化剂。</p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum isn't just a law firm. It's a movement for change—where justice isn't the end goal, but the beginning of a safer society.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum 不仅仅是一家律师事务所。它是一个变革的运动——在这里，正义不是最终目标，而是更安全社会的起点。</p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum: Changing the System for Societal Change, One Case at a Time.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum：为社会变革而改变系统，一次一个案件。</p>
</div><p>Learn more at wisnerbaum.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>了解更多信息，请访问 wisnerbaum.com</p>
</div><p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>参考文献：</strong></p>
</div><ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). Complaint and demand for jury trial ( <em>Nguyen v. Johnson &amp; Johnson et al.,</em> Docket No. ATL-L-003241-19). Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County.</li>
<li>Reuters, <em>Reuters</em>, December 15, 2025. reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). 投诉和陪审团审判请求（ <em>Nguyen 诉强生等，</em> 案号 ATL-L-003241-19）。新泽西州高级法院，法律部门，大西洋县。</li>
<li>路透社，<em>路透社</em>，2025 年 12 月 15 日。reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Media Inquiries:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>媒体咨询：</p>
</div><p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
</div><p>JOTO PR™</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>JOTO PR™</p>
</div><p>727-777-4629</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>727-777-4629</p>
</div><p>Jotopr.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Jotopr.com</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Wisner Baum</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>来源：Wisner Baum</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=FL54460&amp;Transmission_Id=202512301030PR_NEWS_USPR_____FL54460&amp;DateId=20251230"/></p>

随着科学证据的不断增加，全国范围内的卵巢癌滑石索赔正在推进