<p>荷兰芯片制造商 Nexperia 及其中国母公司闻泰科技将在 2026 年初再次对峙，因为对该半导体公司的控制权的法律争斗愈演愈烈。\n 据一位不愿透露姓名的法院代表周二向《邮报》透露，双方将于 1 月 14 日在荷兰企业法庭对峙。\n 根据 Nexperia 的一位发言人的说法，此次听证会旨在确定在 10 月初法庭裁决之前，是否有合理理由怀疑 Nexperia 的管理是否稳健，该发言人同样选择匿名。\n 该裁决在 10 月 7 日的紧急听证会上解除张学政的首席执行官职务，法庭——一个处理荷兰独特公司法争议的特别法院——得出结论认为有理由质疑他的领导能力。\n 然而，闻泰科技正在加大反击力度。该公司正在准备一项 “多轨法律战略”，除了法庭听证外，还包括对荷兰经济事务部的行政命令提出异议，并向荷兰最高法院提出上诉，闻泰科技在周二向《邮报》发表的声明中表示。\n 关键是，该战略还涉及为双边投资条约（BIT）国际仲裁做准备。闻泰科技打算寻求相当于 Nexperia 全部价值的赔偿——约 80 亿美元，如果问题在 4 月 15 日之前未能解决，该声明称，闻泰科技敦促北京继续支持其重新获得 Nexperia 荷兰控制权的斗争。\n 令人困惑的是，在全球行业焦虑的背景下，荷方依然无动于衷和固执。\n 中国商务部\n 在荷兰政府于 9 月 30 日采取不寻常的措施接管 Nexperia 后，这一事件成为更广泛地缘政治紧张局势的焦点。官员们以国家安全为由，援引了一项自 1952 年以来一直处于休眠状态的法律。北京以限制芯片流动作为报复，扰乱了汽车供应链。\n11 月，荷兰政府暂停了冷战时期的法案，以示善意，双方在谈判中缓和了紧张局势。荷兰经济部长文森特·卡雷曼斯在 12 月初承认，他对北京的报复感到措手不及。\n 周二，闻泰科技的声明表示：“作为一家在荷兰进行了大量战略投资的中国公司，闻泰的经验不仅关乎自身利益，也关乎中国海外投资者对国际投资环境的公平性和可预测性的信心。”\n 中国商务部的一位发言人在周三再次呼吁荷兰政府不要单方面行动，并消除对全球半导体供应链稳定的障碍。这些评论是针对荷兰报纸《电讯报》12 月 24 日的报道，卡雷曼斯坚称这一决定是必要的，并倡导采取强硬措施。\n“令人困惑的是，在全球行业焦虑的背景下，荷方依然无动于衷和固执，未能采取任何实质性行动，对全球半导体供应链的安全感到没有责任感，” 该部发言人表示。\n\n\n 根据闻泰科技的声明，该公司及其位于香港的子公司宇诚控股于 10 月 15 日向荷兰政府发送了正式的争议通知，依据中荷双边投资条约和港荷双边投资条约。\n 这两项条约规定，只有在公共利益的情况下，且在法律和非歧视的基础上，且在宣布行动时给予相当于被征用投资价值的赔偿，任何一方才能征用另一方的投资。\n 闻泰科技进一步表示，即使其对 Nexperia 荷兰的控制权恢复，它仍将寻求因 “荷兰政府不当行为造成的重大损失” 而获得赔偿。这包括供应链中断、客户关系受损、员工士气受到影响以及声誉损害，该公司认为这些损害是 “深远且持久的”，根据声明所述。\nNexperia 荷兰拒绝对仲裁过程发表评论，因该过程是针对荷兰政府的。\n 闻泰科技在荷兰的法律挑战前景仍不明朗，因为中国公司在欧洲面临类似挑战时一直举步维艰。\n2024 年 11 月，英国政府命令中国所有者出售其在 2021 年收购的英国芯片制造商 Future Technology Devices International 的 80.2% 股份，理由是国家安全风险。所有者在 2025 年向英国高等法院提出了两次上诉，但均被驳回。\n 额外报道由 Kandy Wong 提供。</p>

闻泰科技

<p>荷兰芯片制造商 Nexperia 及其母公司闻泰科技将在 2026 年 1 月 14 日进行法律对决，争夺 Nexperia 的控制权，涉及金额高达 80 亿美元。荷兰企业法庭将评估在 CEO 张学政被解除职务后的 Nexperia 管理情况。闻泰计划采取多条法律策略，包括国际仲裁，以寻求赔偿。此争端加剧了地缘政治紧张局势，荷兰政府此前以国家安全为由接管 Nexperia，导致北京的报复</p>

<p>Dutch chipmaker Nexperia and its Chinese parent, Wingtech Technology, are set for another showdown in early 2026, as the legal battle over control of the semiconductor firm intensifies.\nThe two sides will face off before the Dutch Enterprise Chamber on January 14, a court representative told the Post on Tuesday, speaking on condition of anonymity.\nThe hearing aims to determine whether there were valid reasons to doubt the sound management of Nexperia before the chamber’s ruling in early October, according to a Nexperia spokesman who also declined to be named.\nThat ruling removed Zhang Xuezheng as CEO following an emergency hearing on October 7, where the chamber – a special court handling unique corporate law disputes in the Netherlands – concluded that there were grounds to question his leadership.\nWingtech, however, is escalating its counterattack. The company is preparing a “multi-track legal strategy” that – aside from the chamber hearing – includes filing objections against the administrative order of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and lodging an appeal before the Dutch Supreme Court, Wingtech said in a statement to the Post on Tuesday.\nCrucially, the strategy involves preparations for bilateral investment treaty (BIT) international arbitrations. Wingtech intends to seek compensation equivalent to the full value of Nexperia – around US$8 billion – if the issue is not settled by April 15, the statement said, with the company urging Beijing to continue supporting its fight to regain control of Nexperia Netherlands.\nIt is puzzling that, in the face of global industry anxiety, the Dutch side remains indifferent and stubborn\nChinese Ministry of Commerce\nThe saga has become a flashpoint in broader geopolitical tensions after the Dutch government took the unusual step of seizing control of Nexperia on September 30. Citing national security concerns, officials invoked a law that had lain dormant since 1952. Beijing retaliated by choking off chip flows, disrupting automotive supply chains.\nIn November, the Dutch government suspended the Cold War-era act as a gesture of goodwill, and tensions eased as both sides engaged in negotiations. Vincent Karremans, the Dutch economy minister, admitted in early December that he was blindsided by Beijing’s retaliation.\nOn Tuesday, Wingtech’s statement said: “As a Chinese company that has made substantial strategic investments in the Netherlands, Wingtech’s experience concerns not only its own interests, but also the confidence of Chinese overseas investors in the fairness and predictability of the international investment environment.”\nA spokesman for China’s Ministry of Commerce on Wednesday once again called on the Dutch government to refrain from acting unilaterally and to remove obstacles to the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain. The comments were in response to a December 24 report by Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf in which Karremans insisted the decision was necessary as he advocated for tough measures.\n“It is puzzling that, in the face of global industry anxiety, the Dutch side remains indifferent and stubborn and shows no sense of responsibility for the safety of the global semiconductor supply chain by taking any substantive actions,” the ministry spokesman said.\n\n\nAccording to Wingtech’s statement, the company and its Hong Kong-based subsidiary, Yucheng Holdings, sent formal notices of dispute to the Dutch government on October 15, based on the China-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty and the Hong Kong-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty.\nBoth treaties specify that one party can expropriate the investment of the other party only if the measure is taken in the public interest, on legal and non-discriminatory grounds, and with compensation equivalent to the value of the expropriated investment at the time the action is announced.\nWingtech further said that, even if its control over Nexperia Netherlands were restored, it would still seek compensation for “significant losses caused by the Dutch government’s improper conduct”. This includes supply-chain disruptions, damage to customer relationships, impact on employee morale, and reputational harm, which the firm considers “profound and long-lasting”, according to the statement.\nNexperia Netherlands declined to comment on the arbitration process, given that it is directed at the Dutch government.\nThe prospect of Wingtech’s legal challenge in the Netherlands remains unclear, as Chinese companies have struggled with similar challenges in Europe.\nIn November 2024, the British government ordered the Chinese owners of UK chipmaker Future Technology Devices International to sell their 80.2 per cent stake acquired in 2021, citing national security risks. The owners appealed to the UK High Court twice in 2025, but both attempts were rejected.\nAdditional reporting by Kandy Wong\n</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>荷兰芯片制造商 Nexperia 及其中国母公司闻泰科技将在 2026 年初再次对峙，因为对该半导体公司的控制权的法律争斗愈演愈烈。\n 据一位不愿透露姓名的法院代表周二向《邮报》透露，双方将于 1 月 14 日在荷兰企业法庭对峙。\n 根据 Nexperia 的一位发言人的说法，此次听证会旨在确定在 10 月初法庭裁决之前，是否有合理理由怀疑 Nexperia 的管理是否稳健，该发言人同样选择匿名。\n 该裁决在 10 月 7 日的紧急听证会上解除张学政的首席执行官职务，法庭——一个处理荷兰独特公司法争议的特别法院——得出结论认为有理由质疑他的领导能力。\n 然而，闻泰科技正在加大反击力度。该公司正在准备一项 “多轨法律战略”，除了法庭听证外，还包括对荷兰经济事务部的行政命令提出异议，并向荷兰最高法院提出上诉，闻泰科技在周二向《邮报》发表的声明中表示。\n 关键是，该战略还涉及为双边投资条约（BIT）国际仲裁做准备。闻泰科技打算寻求相当于 Nexperia 全部价值的赔偿——约 80 亿美元，如果问题在 4 月 15 日之前未能解决，该声明称，闻泰科技敦促北京继续支持其重新获得 Nexperia 荷兰控制权的斗争。\n 令人困惑的是，在全球行业焦虑的背景下，荷方依然无动于衷和固执。\n 中国商务部\n 在荷兰政府于 9 月 30 日采取不寻常的措施接管 Nexperia 后，这一事件成为更广泛地缘政治紧张局势的焦点。官员们以国家安全为由，援引了一项自 1952 年以来一直处于休眠状态的法律。北京以限制芯片流动作为报复，扰乱了汽车供应链。\n11 月，荷兰政府暂停了冷战时期的法案，以示善意，双方在谈判中缓和了紧张局势。荷兰经济部长文森特·卡雷曼斯在 12 月初承认，他对北京的报复感到措手不及。\n 周二，闻泰科技的声明表示：“作为一家在荷兰进行了大量战略投资的中国公司，闻泰的经验不仅关乎自身利益，也关乎中国海外投资者对国际投资环境的公平性和可预测性的信心。”\n 中国商务部的一位发言人在周三再次呼吁荷兰政府不要单方面行动，并消除对全球半导体供应链稳定的障碍。这些评论是针对荷兰报纸《电讯报》12 月 24 日的报道，卡雷曼斯坚称这一决定是必要的，并倡导采取强硬措施。\n“令人困惑的是，在全球行业焦虑的背景下，荷方依然无动于衷和固执，未能采取任何实质性行动，对全球半导体供应链的安全感到没有责任感，” 该部发言人表示。\n\n\n 根据闻泰科技的声明，该公司及其位于香港的子公司宇诚控股于 10 月 15 日向荷兰政府发送了正式的争议通知，依据中荷双边投资条约和港荷双边投资条约。\n 这两项条约规定，只有在公共利益的情况下，且在法律和非歧视的基础上，且在宣布行动时给予相当于被征用投资价值的赔偿，任何一方才能征用另一方的投资。\n 闻泰科技进一步表示，即使其对 Nexperia 荷兰的控制权恢复，它仍将寻求因 “荷兰政府不当行为造成的重大损失” 而获得赔偿。这包括供应链中断、客户关系受损、员工士气受到影响以及声誉损害，该公司认为这些损害是 “深远且持久的”，根据声明所述。\nNexperia 荷兰拒绝对仲裁过程发表评论，因该过程是针对荷兰政府的。\n 闻泰科技在荷兰的法律挑战前景仍不明朗，因为中国公司在欧洲面临类似挑战时一直举步维艰。\n2024 年 11 月，英国政府命令中国所有者出售其在 2021 年收购的英国芯片制造商 Future Technology Devices International 的 80.2% 股份，理由是国家安全风险。所有者在 2025 年向英国高等法院提出了两次上诉，但均被驳回。\n 额外报道由 Kandy Wong 提供。</p>
</div>

闻泰科技与 Nexperia 将在一月展开新的对决，涉及金额高达 80 亿美元