<p>在当今快速变化和竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者在做出投资决策之前，必须对公司进行全面分析。本文将对半导体及半导体设备行业中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 与其主要竞争对手进行全面的行业比较。通过考察关键财务指标、市场地位和增长前景，我们旨在为投资者提供有价值的见解，并揭示公司在行业中的表现。</p>
<h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
<p>Nvidia 是一家领先的图形处理单元（GPU）开发商。传统上，GPU 用于增强计算平台上的体验，尤其是在 PC 游戏应用中。GPU 的使用案例后来发展为在人工智能中作为重要的半导体，用于运行大型语言模型。Nvidia 不仅提供 AI GPU，还提供用于 AI 模型开发和训练的软件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 还在扩展其数据中心网络解决方案，帮助将 GPU 连接在一起以处理复杂的工作负载。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市净率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市销率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回报率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折旧摊销前利润 (EBITDA)（十亿美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利润（十亿美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增长</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台湾半导体制造公司</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半导体公司</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特尔公司</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州仪器公司</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模拟器件公司</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>单片电源系统公司</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>联华电子公司</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>通过对 NVIDIA 的详细审查，我们可以推断出以下趋势：</p>
<ul>
<li>46.42 的市盈率比行业平均水平低 0.48 倍，表明该股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>38.34 的市净率是行业平均水平的 4.9 倍，表明在账面价值方面，NVIDIA 可能被视为高估，因为其交易倍数高于行业同行。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>24.64 的市销率相对较高，是行业平均水平的 2.14 倍，表明该股票可能在销售表现上被视为高估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回报率（ROE）比行业平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司在利用股本创造利润方面表现高效。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 387.5 亿美元，比行业平均水平高出 1.02 倍，表明盈利能力更强和现金流生成能力稳健。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>418.5 亿美元的毛利润是行业水平的 1.29 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和核心业务的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司正在经历显著的收入增长，增长率为 62.49%，超过行业平均水平的 31.75%。</li>
</ul>
<h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="debt to equity" width="500" height="400" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png"/></p>
<p>债务与股本比率（D/E）评估公司在多大程度上依赖借款资金与其股本的比较。</p>
<p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简洁地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
<p>在根据债务与股本比率比较 NVIDIA 与其前四大同行时，可以观察到以下见解：</p>
<ul>
<li>在债务与股本比率方面，NVIDIA 的债务水平低于其前四大同行，表明其财务状况更强。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>这意味着公司对债务融资的依赖较小，债务与股本之间的平衡更为有利，债务与股本比率为 0.09。</li>
</ul>
<h3>关键要点</h3>
<p>对于半导体及半导体设备行业中的 NVIDIA，其市盈率相较于同行较低，表明可能被低估。较高的市净率和市销率表明市场情绪强烈和收入倍数高。在股本回报率、息税折旧摊销前利润、毛利润和收入增长方面，NVIDIA 超越了其行业同行，反映出强劲的财务表现和增长前景。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>

英伟达

2 倍做多英伟达 ETF - GraniteShares

南方两倍做多英伟达

南方两倍做空英伟达

英伟达期权收益策略 ETF - YieldMax

1 倍做空英伟达 ETF - Direxion

2 倍做多 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

2 倍做空 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

半导体 3 倍做多 - Direxion

<p>本文对英伟达在半导体及半导体设备行业的表现进行了深入分析，并与其竞争对手进行了比较。关键财务指标显示，英伟达可能被低估，因为其市盈率较低，而其市净率和市销率较高则暗示被高估。该公司展现出强劲的盈利能力，股本回报率高，收入增长显著，达到 62.49%。此外，英伟达的财务状况良好，债务与股本比率低于同行，表明其对债务融资的依赖较小</p>

<p>In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在当今快速变化和竞争激烈的商业环境中，投资者和行业爱好者在做出投资决策之前，必须对公司进行全面分析。本文将对半导体及半导体设备行业中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 与其主要竞争对手进行全面的行业比较。通过考察关键财务指标、市场地位和增长前景，我们旨在为投资者提供有价值的见解，并揭示公司在行业中的表现。</p>
</div><h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
</div><p>Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence to run large language models. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Nvidia 是一家领先的图形处理单元（GPU）开发商。传统上，GPU 用于增强计算平台上的体验，尤其是在 PC 游戏应用中。GPU 的使用案例后来发展为在人工智能中作为重要的半导体，用于运行大型语言模型。Nvidia 不仅提供 AI GPU，还提供用于 AI 模型开发和训练的软件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 还在扩展其数据中心网络解决方案，帮助将 GPU 连接在一起以处理复杂的工作负载。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intel Corp</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市净率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市销率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回报率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折旧摊销前利润 (EBITDA)（十亿美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利润（十亿美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增长</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台湾半导体制造公司</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半导体公司</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特尔公司</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州仪器公司</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模拟器件公司</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>单片电源系统公司</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>联华电子公司</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>Through a detailed examination of NVIDIA, we can deduce the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通过对 NVIDIA 的详细审查，我们可以推断出以下趋势：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>The Price to Earnings ratio of 46.42 is 0.48x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>46.42 的市盈率比行业平均水平低 0.48 倍，表明该股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 38.34, which is 4.9x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>38.34 的市净率是行业平均水平的 4.9 倍，表明在账面价值方面，NVIDIA 可能被视为高估，因为其交易倍数高于行业同行。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 24.64, which is 2.14x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>24.64 的市销率相对较高，是行业平均水平的 2.14 倍，表明该股票可能在销售表现上被视为高估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 29.14% that is 24.67% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回报率（ROE）比行业平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司在利用股本创造利润方面表现高效。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.75 Billion, which is 1.02x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司息税折旧摊销前利润（EBITDA）为 387.5 亿美元，比行业平均水平高出 1.02 倍，表明盈利能力更强和现金流生成能力稳健。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The gross profit of $41.85 Billion is 1.29x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>418.5 亿美元的毛利润是行业水平的 1.29 倍，突显出更强的盈利能力和核心业务的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 62.49%, outperforming the industry average of 31.75%.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司正在经历显著的收入增长，增长率为 62.49%，超过行业平均水平的 31.75%。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>债务与股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>债务与股本比率（D/E）评估公司在多大程度上依赖借款资金与其股本的比较。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行业比较中考虑债务与股本比率，可以简洁地评估公司的财务健康状况和风险特征，帮助做出明智的决策。</p>
</div><p>When comparing NVIDIA with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在根据债务与股本比率比较 NVIDIA 与其前四大同行时，可以观察到以下见解：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>在债务与股本比率方面，NVIDIA 的债务水平低于其前四大同行，表明其财务状况更强。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>这意味着公司对债务融资的依赖较小，债务与股本之间的平衡更为有利，债务与股本比率为 0.09。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>关键要点</h3>
</div><p>For NVIDIA in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, NVIDIA outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth prospects.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>对于半导体及半导体设备行业中的 NVIDIA，其市盈率相较于同行较低，表明可能被低估。较高的市净率和市销率表明市场情绪强烈和收入倍数高。在股本回报率、息税折旧摊销前利润、毛利润和收入增长方面，NVIDIA 超越了其行业同行，反映出强劲的财务表现和增长前景。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自动内容引擎生成，并由编辑审核。</em></p>
</div>

In-Depth Analysis: NVIDIA Versus Competitors In Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

- NVIDIA 在半导体行业中表现突出，市盈率 46.42 低于行业平均。  
- 市净率和市销率较高，显示出市场情绪强劲。  
- 公司 ROE、EBITDA 和收入增长均优于同行，反映良好的财务表现。

深度分析：英伟达在半导体及半导体设备行业中与竞争对手的对比