<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" width="960" height="540" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992"/></p>
<p>2025 年 3 月 10 日，怀俄明州最后一家堕胎诊所 Wellspring Center 的检查室空无一人，地点位于怀俄明州卡斯珀。- Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
<p>在怀俄明州最高法院推翻包括全国首个明确禁止堕胎药物的法律后，堕胎在怀俄明州将继续合法，法院周二裁定这些法律违反了州宪法。</p>
<p>法官们支持了该州唯一的堕胎诊所及其他因 2022 年通过的禁令提起诉讼的机构，当时美国最高法院推翻了具有里程碑意义的罗诉韦德案。</p>
<p>卡斯珀的 Wellspring Health Access、堕胎权利倡导组织 Chelsea’s Fund 以及包括两名妇产科医生在内的四名女性辩称，这些法律违反了确保合格成年人有权做出自身医疗决策的州宪法修正案。</p>
<p>然而，州政府的律师辩称，堕胎不能违反怀俄明州宪法，因为它不是医疗保健。</p>
<p>选民在 2012 年通过了这一宪法修正案，以回应联邦《平价医疗法案》。法官们承认该修正案并未写明适用于堕胎，但表示他们的职责不是 “添加词语” 到州宪法中。</p>
<p>“但立法者可以要求怀俄明州选民考虑一项更明确解决此问题的宪法修正案，” 法官们在总结他们的 4-1 裁决时写道。</p>
<p>共和党州长马克·戈登在一份声明中表示，他对这一裁决感到失望，并呼吁州立法者在冬季会议上通过一项提议的宪法修正案，禁止堕胎，并在今年秋季提交给选民投票。</p>
<p>“这一裁决可能暂时解决了一个法律问题，但并未解决道德问题，也未反映许多怀俄明州公民的立场，包括我自己。是时候让这个问题交给人民投票了，” 戈登说。</p>
<p>这样的修正案需要三分之二的投票才能在主要用于州预算的一个月立法会议上提出考虑。但在共和党主导的州议会中，它将获得广泛支持。</p>
<p>周二推翻的法律之一试图禁止堕胎，除非是为了保护孕妇的生命或涉及强奸或乱伦的情况。另一项法律将使怀俄明州成为唯一明确禁止堕胎药物的州，尽管其他州通过广泛禁止堕胎实际上实施了对堕胎药物的禁令。</p>
<p>自从杰克逊的提顿县地方法官梅丽莎·欧文斯在诉讼进行期间阻止了这些禁令以来，堕胎在这个保守的州一直是合法的。欧文斯在 2024 年裁定这些法律违宪。</p>
<p>Wellspring Health Access 及案件双方的律师尚未立即回复评论请求。</p>
<p>去年，怀俄明州通过了额外法律，要求堕胎诊所必须是获得许可的外科中心，并要求女性在进行药物堕胎前接受超声检查。最高法院的裁决意味着这些限制可能会生效，尽管在另一项诉讼中，一名法官已阻止它们生效，案件仍在进行中。</p>
<p>欲获取更多 CNN 新闻和通讯，请在 CNN.com 上创建账户。</p>

<p>怀俄明州的堕胎在州最高法院推翻相关法律后仍然合法，包括美国首个禁止堕胎药的法律，裁定这些法律违反了州宪法。法院支持该州唯一的堕胎诊所及其他主张这些法律侵犯医疗决策权的团体。州长马克·戈登表示失望，并呼吁进行宪法修正案以禁止堕胎，这需要立法机构的三分之二投票支持。该裁决允许现有对堕胎诊所的限制在进一步法律挑战之前可能生效</p>

<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992" alt="" original-src="https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992"/></p>
<p>An examination room is empty at Wyoming's last abortion clinic, Wellspring Center, on March 10, 2025, in Casper, Wyoming. - Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>2025 年 3 月 10 日，怀俄明州最后一家堕胎诊所 Wellspring Center 的检查室空无一人，地点位于怀俄明州卡斯珀。- Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
</div><p>Abortion will remain legal in Wyoming after the state Supreme Court struck down laws that include the country’s first explicit ban on abortion pills, ruling Tuesday that they violate the state constitution.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在怀俄明州最高法院推翻包括全国首个明确禁止堕胎药物的法律后，堕胎在怀俄明州将继续合法，法院周二裁定这些法律违反了州宪法。</p>
</div><p>The justices sided with the state’s only abortion clinic and others who had sued over the bans passed since 2022, when the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官们支持了该州唯一的堕胎诊所及其他因 2022 年通过的禁令提起诉讼的机构，当时美国最高法院推翻了具有里程碑意义的罗诉韦德案。</p>
</div><p>Wellspring Health Access in Casper, the abortion access advocacy group Chelsea’s Fund and four women, including two obstetricians, argued that the laws violated a state constitutional amendment ensuring that competent adults have the right to make their own health care decisions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>卡斯珀的 Wellspring Health Access、堕胎权利倡导组织 Chelsea’s Fund 以及包括两名妇产科医生在内的四名女性辩称，这些法律违反了确保合格成年人有权做出自身医疗决策的州宪法修正案。</p>
</div><p>Attorneys for the state, however, argued that abortion can’t violate the Wyoming constitution because it is not health care.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，州政府的律师辩称，堕胎不能违反怀俄明州宪法，因为它不是医疗保健。</p>
</div><p>Voters approved the constitutional amendment in 2012 in response to the federal Affordable Care Act. The justices recognized that the amendment wasn’t written to apply to abortion but said it’s not their job to “add words” to the state constitution.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>选民在 2012 年通过了这一宪法修正案，以回应联邦《平价医疗法案》。法官们承认该修正案并未写明适用于堕胎，但表示他们的职责不是 “添加词语” 到州宪法中。</p>
</div><p>“But lawmakers could ask Wyoming voters to consider a constitutional amendment that would more clearly address this issue,” the justices wrote in summarizing their 4-1 ruling.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“但立法者可以要求怀俄明州选民考虑一项更明确解决此问题的宪法修正案，” 法官们在总结他们的 4-1 裁决时写道。</p>
</div><p>Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, said in a statement that he was disappointed by the ruling and called on state lawmakers meeting this winter to pass a proposed constitutional amendment banning abortion that would go before voters this fall.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>共和党州长马克·戈登在一份声明中表示，他对这一裁决感到失望，并呼吁州立法者在冬季会议上通过一项提议的宪法修正案，禁止堕胎，并在今年秋季提交给选民投票。</p>
</div><p>“This ruling may settle, for now, a legal question, but it does not settle the moral one, nor does it reflect where many Wyoming citizens stand, including myself. It is time for this issue to go before the people for a vote,” Gordon said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“这一裁决可能暂时解决了一个法律问题，但并未解决道德问题，也未反映许多怀俄明州公民的立场，包括我自己。是时候让这个问题交给人民投票了，” 戈登说。</p>
</div><p>Such an amendment would require a two-thirds vote to be introduced for consideration during the month-long legislative session devoted primarily to the state budget. But it would have wide support in the Republican-dominated statehouse.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这样的修正案需要三分之二的投票才能在主要用于州预算的一个月立法会议上提出考虑。但在共和党主导的州议会中，它将获得广泛支持。</p>
</div><p>One of the laws overturned Tuesday sought to ban abortion except to protect a pregnant woman’s life or in cases involving rape or incest. The other law would have made Wyoming the only state to explicitly ban abortion pills, though other states have instituted de facto bans on abortion medication by broadly prohibiting abortion.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>周二推翻的法律之一试图禁止堕胎，除非是为了保护孕妇的生命或涉及强奸或乱伦的情况。另一项法律将使怀俄明州成为唯一明确禁止堕胎药物的州，尽管其他州通过广泛禁止堕胎实际上实施了对堕胎药物的禁令。</p>
</div><p>Abortion has remained legal in this conservative state since Teton County District Judge Melissa Owens in Jackson blocked the bans while the lawsuit challenging them went ahead. Owens struck down the laws as unconstitutional in 2024.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>自从杰克逊的提顿县地方法官梅丽莎·欧文斯在诉讼进行期间阻止了这些禁令以来，堕胎在这个保守的州一直是合法的。欧文斯在 2024 年裁定这些法律违宪。</p>
</div><p>Wellspring Health Access and attorneys on both sides of the case didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wellspring Health Access 及案件双方的律师尚未立即回复评论请求。</p>
</div><p>Last year, Wyoming passed additional laws requiring abortion clinics to be licensed surgical centers and women to get ultrasounds before having medication abortions. The Supreme Court ruling means those limitations could take effect, although a judge in a separate lawsuit has blocked them from taking effect while the case proceeds.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>去年，怀俄明州通过了额外法律，要求堕胎诊所必须是获得许可的外科中心，并要求女性在进行药物堕胎前接受超声检查。最高法院的裁决意味着这些限制可能会生效，尽管在另一项诉讼中，一名法官已阻止它们生效，案件仍在进行中。</p>
</div><p>For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>欲获取更多 CNN 新闻和通讯，请在 CNN.com 上创建账户。</p>
</div>

怀俄明州的堕胎仍然合法，因为该州最高法院推翻了包括美国首个药物禁令在内的法律