<p>法官称司法部的传票为 “钓鱼行动”</p>
<p>儿童国家医院因法律风险停止性别确认护理</p>
<p>特朗普的行政命令结束了对跨性别青少年治疗的联邦资金支持</p>
<p>作者：内特·雷蒙德</p>
<p>1 月 22 日（路透社）- 一名联邦法官驳回了美国司法部获取涉及在儿童国家医院接受性别确认护理的多名患者记录的请求，称该请求是为了推进特朗普总统结束此类跨性别青少年治疗的目标而发出的 “借口”。巴尔的摩的美国地区法官朱莉·鲁宾周三的裁决进一步增加了司法部在其努力传唤向未成年人提供此类治疗的医疗服务提供者时的法院败诉记录。</p>
<p>在最近几个月中，至少还有六名法官支持了对司法部所称的向全国范围内提供性别确认护理的医生和诊所发出的 20 多份传票中的一些的挑战。</p>
<p>与其他挑战类似传票的医院不同，位于华盛顿特区的儿童国家医院并没有提起诉讼以撤销传票。在收到传票后，该医院于 7 月宣布由于 “法律和监管风险的升级” 停止开具性别确认药物。</p>
<p>相反，该传票是在 11 月由八个家庭提起的诉讼中受到挑战，这些家庭的孩子自 2020 年 1 月以来在该儿科医疗提供者处接受了性别确认护理。鲁宾法官表示，该传票构成了 “超越任何合法目的的过度行为”，而且似乎是为了骚扰医院及其患者，以实现特朗普的政治议程。</p>
<p>“政府试图通过出于恐惧的合规来实现其政策议程，” 她写道。“此外，在法庭看来，该传票是典型的不可接受的钓鱼行动。”</p>
<p>她将裁决的范围限制在提起诉讼的家庭，表示虽然该传票完全不当，但她并不相信原告有法律资格代表未参与诉讼的人挑战它。原告律师 Jennifer Levi 在 GLAD 法律组织的声明中表示，该裁决 “得到了寻求此裁决的家庭的热烈欢迎。”</p>
<p>“相关家庭希望得到的与所有家庭希望的相同——让他们的孩子获得所需的医疗护理，并能够与同龄人一起茁壮成长，” Levi 说。司法部拒绝对此发表评论。医院未对评论请求作出回应。</p>
<p>在特朗普于 2025 年 1 月上任后不久签署的行政命令中，向医疗服务提供者发出了传票，结束了对跨性别青少年性别确认护理的所有联邦资金或支持。</p>
<p>该命令将此类护理描述为 “我们国家历史上的污点”、“一种危险趋势” 和一种 “化学和外科 mutilation”，并指示司法部优先调查此类治疗，随后美国司法部长 Pam Bondi 指示该部门这样做。</p>
<p>儿童国家医院收到的行政传票是在 7 月 3 日发出的。它寻求患者记录，作为司法部所称的对通过非法推广或非法向未成年人分发青春期阻滞剂和激素的联邦食品、药品和化妆品法潜在违规行为的调查的一部分。但鲁宾表示，司法部并未提供任何依据来怀疑医院违反 FDCA，并且该传票实际上是 “为了实现行政部门广为人知的政策目标而发出的借口，以终止和阻止性别确认医疗护理。”</p>
<p>该案为：对儿童国家医院的 2025 年传票，马里兰州美国地区法院，案号 1:25-cv-03780</p>
<p>原告方：GLBTQ 法律倡导者与捍卫者的 Jennifer Levi</p>
<p>司法部方：美国司法部的 Ross Goldstein 和 Patrick Runkle</p>
<p>阅读更多：</p>
<p>法官驳回司法部对科罗拉多儿童医院的跨性别护理传票</p>
<p>法官阻止司法部对波士顿儿童医院的跨性别护理传票</p>

<p>Judge calls DOJ subpoena a ‘fishing expedition’</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官称司法部的传票为 “钓鱼行动”</p>
</div><p>Children’s National Hospital stopped gender-affirming care due to legal risks</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>儿童国家医院因法律风险停止性别确认护理</p>
</div><p>Trump’s executive order ended federal funding for treatments for transgender youth</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>特朗普的行政命令结束了对跨性别青少年治疗的联邦资金支持</p>
</div><p>By Nate Raymond</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>作者：内特·雷蒙德</p>
</div><p>Jan 22 (Reuters) - A federal judge has rejected the U.S. Department of Justice’s bid to obtain records involving several patients who received gender-affirming care at Children’s National Hospital, saying the request was issued as a “pretext” to advance President Donald Trump’s goal of ending such treatments for transgender youth. Wednesday’s ruling by U.S. District Judge Julie Rubin in Baltimore added to a growing string of court losses for the Justice Department in its efforts to subpoena healthcare providers that provided such treatments to minors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>1 月 22 日（路透社）- 一名联邦法官驳回了美国司法部获取涉及在儿童国家医院接受性别确认护理的多名患者记录的请求，称该请求是为了推进特朗普总统结束此类跨性别青少年治疗的目标而发出的 “借口”。巴尔的摩的美国地区法官朱莉·鲁宾周三的裁决进一步增加了司法部在其努力传唤向未成年人提供此类治疗的医疗服务提供者时的法院败诉记录。</p>
</div><p>At least six other judges in recent months have sustained challenges to some of the more than 20 subpoenas the Justice Department has said it issued to doctors and clinics involved in providing gender-affirming care to children nationwide.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在最近几个月中，至少还有六名法官支持了对司法部所称的向全国范围内提供性别确认护理的医生和诊所发出的 20 多份传票中的一些的挑战。</p>
</div><p>Unlike other hospitals that challenged similar subpoenas, Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., did not sue to quash it. After being served a subpoena, it announced in July it was discontinuing the prescription of gender-affirming medications due to “escalating legal and regulatory risks.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>与其他挑战类似传票的医院不同，位于华盛顿特区的儿童国家医院并没有提起诉讼以撤销传票。在收到传票后，该医院于 7 月宣布由于 “法律和监管风险的升级” 停止开具性别确认药物。</p>
</div><p>Instead, the subpoena was challenged in a lawsuit filed in November by eight families, whose children had received gender-affirming care since January 2020 at the pediatric healthcare provider. Rubin, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, said the subpoena constituted an “overreach untethered to any lawful purpose” and instead appeared designed to harass the hospital and its patients to fulfill Trump’s political agenda.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>相反，该传票是在 11 月由八个家庭提起的诉讼中受到挑战，这些家庭的孩子自 2020 年 1 月以来在该儿科医疗提供者处接受了性别确认护理。鲁宾法官表示，该传票构成了 “超越任何合法目的的过度行为”，而且似乎是为了骚扰医院及其患者，以实现特朗普的政治议程。</p>
</div><p>“The Government seeks to fulfill its policy agenda through compliance born of fear,” she wrote. “Moreover, in the view of the court, the Subpoena is the classic impermissible fishing expedition.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“政府试图通过出于恐惧的合规来实现其政策议程，” 她写道。“此外，在法庭看来，该传票是典型的不可接受的钓鱼行动。”</p>
</div><p>She limited the scope of her ruling to the families who sued, saying that while the subpoena was wholly improper, she was not convinced the plaintiffs had the legal standing to challenge it on behalf of people who were not party to the lawsuit. Jennifer Levi, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at GLAD Law, in a statement said the ruling was “enormously welcomed by the families who sought it.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>她将裁决的范围限制在提起诉讼的家庭，表示虽然该传票完全不当，但她并不相信原告有法律资格代表未参与诉讼的人挑战它。原告律师 Jennifer Levi 在 GLAD 法律组织的声明中表示，该裁决 “得到了寻求此裁决的家庭的热烈欢迎。”</p>
</div><p>“The families involved want what all families want – for their kids to get the medical care that they need and for them to be able to thrive alongside their peers,” Levi said. The Justice Department declined to comment. The hospital did not respond to a request for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“相关家庭希望得到的与所有家庭希望的相同——让他们的孩子获得所需的医疗护理，并能够与同龄人一起茁壮成长，” Levi 说。司法部拒绝对此发表评论。医院未对评论请求作出回应。</p>
</div><p>The subpoenas to the healthcare providers were issued after Trump, shortly after taking office in January 2025, signed an executive order ending all federal funding or support for gender-affirming care for transgender youth.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在特朗普于 2025 年 1 月上任后不久签署的行政命令中，向医疗服务提供者发出了传票，结束了对跨性别青少年性别确认护理的所有联邦资金或支持。</p>
</div><p>The order described such care as a “stain on our Nation’s history, a “dangerous trend” and a form of “chemical and surgical mutilation,” and it directed the Justice Department to prioritize investigations concerning such treatments, which U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi then directed the department to do.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该命令将此类护理描述为 “我们国家历史上的污点”、“一种危险趋势” 和一种 “化学和外科 mutilation”，并指示司法部优先调查此类治疗，随后美国司法部长 Pam Bondi 指示该部门这样做。</p>
</div><p>The administrative subpoena the Children’s National Hospital received was issued on July 3. It sought patient records as part of what the Justice Department said was an investigation into potential violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act through the off-label promotion or unlawful dispensing of puberty blockers and hormones to minors. But Rubin said the Justice Department had not provided any basis on which it suspected the hospital violated the FDCA and that the subpoena was instead “a pretext to fulfill the Executive’s well-publicized policy objective to terminate and block gender affirming healthcare.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>儿童国家医院收到的行政传票是在 7 月 3 日发出的。它寻求患者记录，作为司法部所称的对通过非法推广或非法向未成年人分发青春期阻滞剂和激素的联邦食品、药品和化妆品法潜在违规行为的调查的一部分。但鲁宾表示，司法部并未提供任何依据来怀疑医院违反 FDCA，并且该传票实际上是 “为了实现行政部门广为人知的政策目标而发出的借口，以终止和阻止性别确认医疗护理。”</p>
</div><p>The case is In re 2025 Subpoena to Children’s National Hospital, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, No. 1:25-cv-03780</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该案为：对儿童国家医院的 2025 年传票，马里兰州美国地区法院，案号 1:25-cv-03780</p>
</div><p>For the plaintiffs: Jennifer Levi of GLBTQ Legal Advocates &amp; Defenders</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>原告方：GLBTQ 法律倡导者与捍卫者的 Jennifer Levi</p>
</div><p>For the Justice Department: Ross Goldstein and Patrick Runkle of the U.S. Department of Justice</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>司法部方：美国司法部的 Ross Goldstein 和 Patrick Runkle</p>
</div><p>Read more:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>阅读更多：</p>
</div><p>Judge rejects DOJ’s subpoena to Children’s Hospital Colorado over transgender care</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官驳回司法部对科罗拉多儿童医院的跨性别护理传票</p>
</div><p>Judge blocks Justice Department’s transgender care subpoena to Boston Children’s Hospital</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官阻止司法部对波士顿儿童医院的跨性别护理传票</p>
</div>

法官表示，司法部通过制造 “恐惧” 传唤医院，以终止性别确认护理