<p>能源部（DOE）邀请美国各州主办 “核生命周期创新校园”，以振兴核能，因有报道称该机构已削弱了对核电站运营方式的安全规则。</p>
<p>DOE 在周三发布了信息请求（RFI），寻求可能有兴趣主办这些校园的州的反馈，这些校园将运营一个 “全周期核生态系统”。</p>
<p>实际上，这意味着这些地点将被期望提供核废料再处理和处置的设施，以及燃料制造和浓缩的设施。它们还可能作为核反应堆和由其供电的数据中心的地点。</p>
<p>新闻网站 Politico 上周报道，特朗普政府计划将 “数十亿，甚至数千亿” 的资金引导到发展国内核燃料循环项目，以支持反应堆建设的快速扩张。根据其他消息来源，DOE 当时对此进行了否认。</p>
<p>各州被邀请在 4 月 1 日之前表明其对主办潜在核生命周期创新校园的兴趣，并提供他们所需的激励和其他支持的反馈。</p>
<p>作为回报，DOE 寻求关于优先考虑私人资本和州自身资金的方法的信息，仅提供有限时间的联邦支持。它还期望有 “强有力的财务保障” 来保护联邦纳税人免受无底责任的影响——这意味着华盛顿不想在一切都出错时承担费用。</p>
<p>去年，DOE 公布了十家公司，将与其合作测试和快速推进先进核反应堆项目，这些项目不在该机构的国家实验室范围内，符合特朗普总统的核反应堆试点计划。</p>
<p>加利福尼亚州代表迈克·莱文赞扬了这一新计划，称这是应对核废料的一个重要且久违的步骤。</p>
<p>“对于有兴趣的州，这些校园可以带来显著的经济和就业创造效益。提议的校园将支持核燃料生命周期中的关键功能，包括燃料制造、浓缩、再处理使用过的核燃料和废物处置，” 他在一份声明中表示。</p>
<p>但考虑这一举措的州或许应该仔细思考。来自非营利媒体组织 NPR 的报告称，DOE 已秘密修改了管理核能站点的核安全指令，显著削弱了规则。</p>
<ul>
<li>特朗普表示他在格林兰为稀土资源达成了协议，但这并不容易</li>
<li>特朗普承诺在 3 周内发放核数据中心许可证，称格林兰为 “美丽的大冰块”</li>
<li>特朗普希望大型科技公司为大型美丽的发电厂买单</li>
<li>特朗普媒体加入了投机核聚变的潮流</li>
</ul>
<p>这些变化是为了简化新一代核反应堆的开发，特朗普政府希望建设这些反应堆，以确保为新建的人工智能数据中心提供足够的电力，以及其他行业日益增长的电力需求。</p>
<p>根据 NPR 的报道，数百页与反应堆安全相关的要求被简单地删减，记录保存的要求也被削减。工人在正式事故调查触发之前可以暴露的辐射水平已提高，地下水和环境的保护措施被削弱。</p>
<p>例如，地下水的保护不再被描述为 “必须”，而是用措辞替代，表示公司必须 “考虑”“避免或最小化” 放射性污染。</p>
<p>_The Register_要求 DOE 发表评论。</p>
<p>倡导组织关心科学家联盟（UCS）对这一举措表示批评。</p>
<p>“这一令人深感不安的发展证实了我对特朗普政府下核能安全和监管状况的最坏担忧，” UCS 核能安全主任埃德温·莱曼博士在一份声明中表示。</p>
<p>“能源部不仅对有效核监管的基本原则进行了大刀阔斧的修改，而且还在暗中进行，让公众处于无知之中，” 他补充道，指出这些法规是在数十年间制定的，吸取了切尔诺贝利和福岛等痛苦事件的教训。</p>
<p>UCS 指出，任何新的反应堆设计在商业生产电力之前必须获得核监管委员会（NRC）的许可证。然而，NRC 已同意限制对获得 DOE 授权的设施的额外安全和安全审查的范围。®</p>

能源业 ETF - SPDR

标普全球能源股指数 ETF - iShares

全球清洁能源 ETF - iShares

<p>美国能源部（DOE）邀请各州主办 “核生命周期创新校园”，以促进核能发展，尽管有报道称安全规则已放宽。各州必须在 4 月 1 日前表达兴趣，并提供对所需支持的反馈。能源部寻求私人资本的参与和强有力的财务保障。批评者，包括关注科学联盟，已对安全法规的放松表示担忧，这可能增加与核能相关的风险。该倡议旨在提升核燃料生命周期，包括废物再处理和反应堆建设，以应对日益增长的能源需求</p>

<p>The Department of Energy (DOE) is inviting US states to host &#34;Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses&#34; to revitalize atomic power amid reports the agency has weakened safety rules governing the way nuclear sites operate.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>能源部（DOE）邀请美国各州主办 “核生命周期创新校园”，以振兴核能，因有报道称该机构已削弱了对核电站运营方式的安全规则。</p>
</div><p>The DOE issued a Request for Information (RFI) on Wednesday, seeking responses from states that may be interested in hosting the campuses, which will operate a &#34;full‑cycle nuclear ecosystem.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>DOE 在周三发布了信息请求（RFI），寻求可能有兴趣主办这些校园的州的反馈，这些校园将运营一个 “全周期核生态系统”。</p>
</div><p>In practice, this means these sites will be expected to provide facilities for atomic waste reprocessing and disposal, in addition to fuel fabrication and enrichment. They may also serve as locations for nuclear reactors and co‑located datacenters powered by them.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>实际上，这意味着这些地点将被期望提供核废料再处理和处置的设施，以及燃料制造和浓缩的设施。它们还可能作为核反应堆和由其供电的数据中心的地点。</p>
</div><p>News site Politico reported last week about talk of the Trump administration planning to steer &#34;billions, if not hundreds of billions&#34; in funding toward developing a domestic nuclear fuel cycle program to support rapid expansion of reactor construction. The DOE denied this at the time, according to other sources.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>新闻网站 Politico 上周报道，特朗普政府计划将 “数十亿，甚至数千亿” 的资金引导到发展国内核燃料循环项目，以支持反应堆建设的快速扩张。根据其他消息来源，DOE 当时对此进行了否认。</p>
</div><p>States are invited to indicate by no later than April 1 their interest in hosting potential Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses, and provide feedback on the incentives and other support they require.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>各州被邀请在 4 月 1 日之前表明其对主办潜在核生命周期创新校园的兴趣，并提供他们所需的激励和其他支持的反馈。</p>
</div><p>In return, the DOE seeks information on approaches that prioritize private capital and the state's own funding, with only time‑limited federal support. It also expects &#34;robust financial assurances&#34; to protect federal taxpayers from open‑ended liabilities – meaning Washington doesn't want to pick up the tab if it all goes horribly wrong.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>作为回报，DOE 寻求关于优先考虑私人资本和州自身资金的方法的信息，仅提供有限时间的联邦支持。它还期望有 “强有力的财务保障” 来保护联邦纳税人免受无底责任的影响——这意味着华盛顿不想在一切都出错时承担费用。</p>
</div><p>Last year, the DOE named ten companies it will work with to test and fast-track advanced atomic reactor projects, outside the scope of the agency's national laboratories, in line with President Trump's Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>去年，DOE 公布了十家公司，将与其合作测试和快速推进先进核反应堆项目，这些项目不在该机构的国家实验室范围内，符合特朗普总统的核反应堆试点计划。</p>
</div><p>California representative Mike Levin praised the new scheme, saying it is a meaningful and long-overdue step toward dealing with spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>加利福尼亚州代表迈克·莱文赞扬了这一新计划，称这是应对核废料的一个重要且久违的步骤。</p>
</div><p>&#34;For interested states, these campuses could deliver significant economic and job-creation benefits. The proposed campuses would support key functions across the nuclear fuel lifecycle, including fuel fabrication, enrichment, reprocessing used nuclear fuel, and waste disposal,&#34; he said in a statement.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“对于有兴趣的州，这些校园可以带来显著的经济和就业创造效益。提议的校园将支持核燃料生命周期中的关键功能，包括燃料制造、浓缩、再处理使用过的核燃料和废物处置，” 他在一份声明中表示。</p>
</div><p>But states considering the move should perhaps think carefully. A report from nonprofit media organization NPR claims the DOE has secretly rewritten nuclear safety directives governing atomic energy sites, significantly watering down the rules.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>但考虑这一举措的州或许应该仔细思考。来自非营利媒体组织 NPR 的报告称，DOE 已秘密修改了管理核能站点的核安全指令，显著削弱了规则。</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Trump says he got a deal for rare earths in Greenland, but they won't come easy</li>
<li>Trump promises nuclear datacenter permits in 3 weeks, calls Greenland 'big beautiful ice'</li>
<li>Trump wants big tech to pay for big beautiful power plants</li>
<li>Trump Media jumps aboard the speculative nuclear fusion bandwagon</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>特朗普表示他在格林兰为稀土资源达成了协议，但这并不容易</li>
<li>特朗普承诺在 3 周内发放核数据中心许可证，称格林兰为 “美丽的大冰块”</li>
<li>特朗普希望大型科技公司为大型美丽的发电厂买单</li>
<li>特朗普媒体加入了投机核聚变的潮流</li>
</ul>
</div><p>The changes were made to streamline the development of a new generation of nuclear reactors, which the Trump administration wants building to ensure there is enough power for all the new-build AI datacenters that are popping up, as well as growing electricity use in other sectors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这些变化是为了简化新一代核反应堆的开发，特朗普政府希望建设这些反应堆，以确保为新建的人工智能数据中心提供足够的电力，以及其他行业日益增长的电力需求。</p>
</div><p>Hundreds of pages of requirements relating to security at reactors have simply been cut, according to NPR, and requirements for keeping records were trimmed. The level of radiation a worker can be exposed to before an official accident investigation gets triggered has been increased, and protections relating to groundwater and the environment weakened.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根据 NPR 的报道，数百页与反应堆安全相关的要求被简单地删减，记录保存的要求也被削减。工人在正式事故调查触发之前可以暴露的辐射水平已提高，地下水和环境的保护措施被削弱。</p>
</div><p>For example, protection of groundwater is no longer described as a &#34;must,&#34; replaced by wording that says companies must give &#34;consideration&#34; to &#34;avoiding or minimizing&#34; radioactive contamination.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>例如，地下水的保护不再被描述为 “必须”，而是用措辞替代，表示公司必须 “考虑”“避免或最小化” 放射性污染。</p>
</div><p><em>The Register</em> asked the DOE to comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>_The Register_要求 DOE 发表评论。</p>
</div><p>Advocacy group the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) criticized the move.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>倡导组织关心科学家联盟（UCS）对这一举措表示批评。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This deeply troubling development confirms my worst fears about the dire state of nuclear power safety and security oversight under the Trump administration,&#34; UCS director of nuclear power safety Dr Edwin Lyman said in a statement.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“这一令人深感不安的发展证实了我对特朗普政府下核能安全和监管状况的最坏担忧，” UCS 核能安全主任埃德温·莱曼博士在一份声明中表示。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The Energy Department has not only taken a sledgehammer to the basic principles that underlie effective nuclear regulation, but it has also done so in the shadows, keeping the public in the dark,&#34; he added, stating that regulations were developed over the course of many decades, incorporating lessons learned from painful events such as the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“能源部不仅对有效核监管的基本原则进行了大刀阔斧的修改，而且还在暗中进行，让公众处于无知之中，” 他补充道，指出这些法规是在数十年间制定的，吸取了切尔诺贝利和福岛等痛苦事件的教训。</p>
</div><p>Any new reactor designs will have to secure licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) before they are used to commercially produce power, the UCS points out. However, the NRC has agreed to restrict the scope of its additional safety and security reviews for facilities that have received DOE authorization. ®</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>UCS 指出，任何新的反应堆设计在商业生产电力之前必须获得核监管委员会（NRC）的许可证。然而，NRC 已同意限制对获得 DOE 授权的设施的额外安全和安全审查的范围。®</p>
</div>

山姆大叔在放宽安全规则的同时，为各州提供核校园的诱惑