<p>小米在印度的特许权税案被视为设立先例</p>
<p>Flex 印度分公司表示面临严厉处罚的风险</p>
<p>小米正在单独挑战特许权税率裁决</p>
<p>作者：阿尔潘·查图尔维迪</p>
<p>新德里，2 月 26 日（路透社）- 合同制造商 Flex（FLEX.O）正在请求印度最高法院推翻与中国智能手机制造商小米（1810.HK）之间的税务机关支付争议相关的印度税务法庭命令，路透社看到的 Flex 的法庭文件显示。</p>
<p>小米被要求支付 7200 万美元的未缴税款，但它已在最高法院对此提出挑战，此案被视为对该国合同制造法律框架的考验。</p>
<p>Flex 请求最高法院撤销印度税务法庭的命令，该命令称小米的合同制造商 “自愿参与了促进逃税的交易层次化”，Flex 的法庭文件显示。</p>
<p>在法庭文件中，上市于美国的 Flex（FLEX.O）告诉印度最高法院，它并未帮助中国智能手机制造商小米低估某些进口到印度的商品，法庭文件显示。</p>
<p>Flex 的法庭文件称，印度税务法庭的裁决可能使合同制造商面临 “极其严厉的处罚”。</p>
<p>Flex 在印度和小米未立即回应置评请求。印度海关当局未回应置评请求。</p>
<p>Flex 的子公司 Flextronics Technologies India 在其 1 月 16 日的法庭文件中表示，未 “以任何方式参与与特许权相关的交易”，该文件未公开，但已被路透社审阅。</p>
<p>小米表示，法庭裁决的影响深远，因为它们表明 “对整个合同制造行业的隐含不信任”。</p>
<p>在其最高法院挑战中，小米辩称税务法庭错误地认为它是组件的 “实际所有者”，同时要求其就特许权支付税款。</p>
<p>最高法院周一要求印度政府对法律挑战作出回应，并将在四月下次审理此案。</p>

小米集团(ADR)

伟创力国际

<p>合同制造商伟创力正在寻求推翻印度税务法庭的裁决，该裁决要求小米支付 7200 万美元的未缴税款。伟创力辩称，法庭的决定可能会导致他们面临严重的处罚，声称他们并未协助小米低估进口价值。小米也在挑战这一裁决，表示这削弱了人们对印度合同制造行业的信任。最高法院已要求印度政府作出回应，下一次听证会定于四月举行</p>

<p>Xiaomi’s royalty tax case in India seen setting precedent</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>小米在印度的特许权税案被视为设立先例</p>
</div><p>Flex India unit says it risks facing harsh penalties</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flex 印度分公司表示面临严厉处罚的风险</p>
</div><p>Xiaomi is separately challenging the royalty tariff ruling</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>小米正在单独挑战特许权税率裁决</p>
</div><p>By Arpan Chaturvedi</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>作者：阿尔潘·查图尔维迪</p>
</div><p>NEW DELHI, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Contract manufacturer Flex (FLEX.O) is asking India’s Supreme Court to overturn an Indian Tax Tribunal order relating to the tax authorities payment dispute with Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi (1810.HK) , a court filing from Flex, seen by Reuters, showed.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>新德里，2 月 26 日（路透社）- 合同制造商 Flex（FLEX.O）正在请求印度最高法院推翻与中国智能手机制造商小米（1810.HK）之间的税务机关支付争议相关的印度税务法庭命令，路透社看到的 Flex 的法庭文件显示。</p>
</div><p>Xiaomi has been asked to pay $72 million in unpaid taxes on royalties, but it has challenged this at the Supreme Court in a case seen as a test of the country’s legal framework for contract manufacturing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>小米被要求支付 7200 万美元的未缴税款，但它已在最高法院对此提出挑战，此案被视为对该国合同制造法律框架的考验。</p>
</div><p>Flex is asking the Supreme Court to strike down the Indian Tax Tribunal order, which said Xiaomi’s contract manufacturers “willingly participated in the layering of transactions facilitating the evasion of taxes,” Flex’s court filing showed.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flex 请求最高法院撤销印度税务法庭的命令，该命令称小米的合同制造商 “自愿参与了促进逃税的交易层次化”，Flex 的法庭文件显示。</p>
</div><p>U.S.-listed Flex (FLEX.O) told India’s Supreme Court it did not help Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi to undervalue certain imports into India, the court filing showed.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在法庭文件中，上市于美国的 Flex（FLEX.O）告诉印度最高法院，它并未帮助中国智能手机制造商小米低估某些进口到印度的商品，法庭文件显示。</p>
</div><p>Flex’s court filing said the Indian Tax Tribunal ruling could expose the contract manufacturer to “extremely harsh penalties.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flex 的法庭文件称，印度税务法庭的裁决可能使合同制造商面临 “极其严厉的处罚”。</p>
</div><p>Flex in India and Xiaomi did not immediately respond to requests for comment. India’s customs authorities did not respond to requests for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flex 在印度和小米未立即回应置评请求。印度海关当局未回应置评请求。</p>
</div><p>Flextronics Technologies India, a subsidiary of Flex, was not “involved in any manner in the transaction pertaining to royalty,” the company told the court in its January 16 filing, which is not public but has been reviewed by Reuters.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Flex 的子公司 Flextronics Technologies India 在其 1 月 16 日的法庭文件中表示，未 “以任何方式参与与特许权相关的交易”，该文件未公开，但已被路透社审阅。</p>
</div><p>Xiaomi has said the implications of the tribunal’s ruling are far-reaching as they indicate “an implicit mistrust of the entire contract manufacturing industry” in the country.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>小米表示，法庭裁决的影响深远，因为它们表明 “对整个合同制造行业的隐含不信任”。</p>
</div><p>In its Supreme Court challenge, Xiaomi argued that the tax tribunal erred by saying it was the “beneficial owner” of the components while requiring it to pay tax on the royalties.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在其最高法院挑战中，小米辩称税务法庭错误地认为它是组件的 “实际所有者”，同时要求其就特许权支付税款。</p>
</div><p>The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Indian government to respond to the legal challenges and it will take up the case next in April.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最高法院周一要求印度政府对法律挑战作出回应，并将在四月下次审理此案。</p>
</div>

法院文件显示，合同制造商伟创力国际正在寻求推翻印度法庭在小米税务案件中的裁决