<p>香港综合企业长和控股的一个子公司指责巴拿马当局通过在存放与正在进行的法律程序相关材料的设施进行 “未通知的侵入”，破坏了正当程序。巴拿马港务公司（PPC）周五指责该国政府制造危机，称对巴拿马运河两个港口设施的 “非法接管” 未能遵守 “宪法、合同和国际义务”。在巴拿马媒体报道当地当局搜查该公司办公室的前一天，前巴尔博亚和克里斯托巴尔港的运营商发布了一份声明。袭击期间，看到有箱子装着文件被带走。上个月，巴拿马最高法院裁定，批准 PPC 持有的港口特许权的法律违宪。PPC 周五表示，公司及其投资者已向巴拿马政府明确表达了对港口 “非法接管” 和其财产 “占用” 的反对意见，包括对 “专有和法律保护信息” 的扣押。“PPC 还特别要求国家建立明确的协调机制，以便作为私营公司对其专有和特权信息的访问、保管和保护，包括与港口运营无关的信息，” 它补充道。“国家采取了更极端的措施，通过对一个私人存储设施进行未通知的侵入，夺取 PPC 的财产 [在周四]，该设施中存放着在正在进行的法律程序中编制的专有和法律特权材料，表明国家在其接管过程中破坏了正当程序。” 该公司还抨击巴拿马当局的多项行动，认为这些行动未能遵守其 “宪法、合同和国际义务，包括与投资保护、正当程序和法律安全相关的义务”。这些行动包括巴拿马政府周一下令停止两个港口的终端运营，以及对 PPC 设施的 “侵入性入侵”，它表示。“PPC 及其投资者明确并持续保留与巴拿马国家所引发的这一危机相关的所有适用权利。” 巴拿马的接管结束了一年多的关于控制这两个关键航运路线港口的争端，这已成为华盛顿与北京之间地缘战略竞争的一个焦点。美国总统唐纳德·特朗普早前誓言要 “夺回” 运河，声称其受到中国控制。这场争端还与长和控股试图与美国资产管理巨头黑石集团和航运集团 MSC 领导的财团出售全球 40 多个港口的单独尝试交织在一起。该交易引发了北京的愤怒，中国监管机构随后于 2025 年 3 月底启动了全面的反垄断审查，实际上暂停了销售。报告还显示，北京希望在涉及巴拿马终端的任何安排中，给予国有航运巨头中远海运更大的角色。</p>

长和

长和(ADR)

<p>长和的一个子公司指控巴拿马当局在其储存设施进行 “未通知的侵入”，破坏了正在进行的法律程序中的正当程序。巴拿马港务公司批评政府的行为是对两个港口设施的非法接管，违反了宪法和国际义务。在最高法院裁定港口特许权违宪后，PPC 对政府的行为表示强烈反对，包括对专有信息的扣押。这场争端突显了美国和中国之间在地缘战略竞争中的紧张关系，特别是在对巴拿马运河的控制方面</p>

<p>A subsidiary of Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings has accused Panamanian authorities of undermining due process by making an “unnotified intrusion” at a facility storing materials related to ongoing legal proceedings. The Panama Ports Company (PPC) on Friday accused the country’s government of creating a crisis, calling the “illegal takeover” of two port facilities at the Panama Canal a failure to comply with “constitutional, contractual and international obligations”. The former operator of the Balboa and Cristobal ports issued a statement a day after Panamanian media reported that local authorities had searched one of the company’s offices. Boxes of documents were seen being taken away during the raid. In a ruling last month, the Panamanian Supreme Court declared that a law approving the ports concession held by PPC was unconstitutional. PPC said on Friday that the company and its investors had strongly emphasised to the Panamanian government their objection to the “illegal takeover” of the ports and the “occupation” of its property, which included seizing “proprietary and legally protected information”. “PPC also specifically requested the state to establish clear coordination mechanisms regarding access to, custody and protection of its proprietary and privileged information as a private company, including information that is not relevant to the operation of the port operations,” it added. “Rather than any form of clarification or coordination of protection mechanisms, the state took even more extreme steps to take the property of PPC [on Thursday] through an unnotified intrusion on a private storage facility with proprietary and material subject to legal privilege compiled in the context of ongoing legal proceedings, demonstrating that the state has undermined due process as part of its takeover.” The company also slammed Panamanian authorities for multiple actions that it argued showed a failure to comply with its “constitutional, contractual, and international obligations, including in relation to the protection of investments, due process and legal security”. Such actions included orders by the Panamanian government to stop the operation of terminals at the two ports on Monday, as well as the “intrusive invasion” of PPC facilities, it said. “PPC and its investors expressly and continuously reserve all applicable rights related to this crisis generated by the Panamanian state,” the company said. Panama’s takeover caps a year-long dispute over control of the two ports on the key shipping route, which has become a flashpoint in the geostrategic rivalry between Washington and Beijing. United States President Donald Trump earlier vowed to “take back” the canal from what he claimed was Chinese control. The dispute also intersected with a separate attempt by CK Hutchison to sell more than 40 ports worldwide in a deal with a consortium led by US asset management giant BlackRock and shipping group MSC. The deal drew Beijing’s ire, and Chinese regulators subsequently launched a comprehensive antitrust review in late March 2025, effectively halting the sale. Reports also indicated that Beijing sought a greater role for state-owned shipping giant Cosco in any arrangement involving the Panama terminals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>香港综合企业长和控股的一个子公司指责巴拿马当局通过在存放与正在进行的法律程序相关材料的设施进行 “未通知的侵入”，破坏了正当程序。巴拿马港务公司（PPC）周五指责该国政府制造危机，称对巴拿马运河两个港口设施的 “非法接管” 未能遵守 “宪法、合同和国际义务”。在巴拿马媒体报道当地当局搜查该公司办公室的前一天，前巴尔博亚和克里斯托巴尔港的运营商发布了一份声明。袭击期间，看到有箱子装着文件被带走。上个月，巴拿马最高法院裁定，批准 PPC 持有的港口特许权的法律违宪。PPC 周五表示，公司及其投资者已向巴拿马政府明确表达了对港口 “非法接管” 和其财产 “占用” 的反对意见，包括对 “专有和法律保护信息” 的扣押。“PPC 还特别要求国家建立明确的协调机制，以便作为私营公司对其专有和特权信息的访问、保管和保护，包括与港口运营无关的信息，” 它补充道。“国家采取了更极端的措施，通过对一个私人存储设施进行未通知的侵入，夺取 PPC 的财产 [在周四]，该设施中存放着在正在进行的法律程序中编制的专有和法律特权材料，表明国家在其接管过程中破坏了正当程序。” 该公司还抨击巴拿马当局的多项行动，认为这些行动未能遵守其 “宪法、合同和国际义务，包括与投资保护、正当程序和法律安全相关的义务”。这些行动包括巴拿马政府周一下令停止两个港口的终端运营，以及对 PPC 设施的 “侵入性入侵”，它表示。“PPC 及其投资者明确并持续保留与巴拿马国家所引发的这一危机相关的所有适用权利。” 巴拿马的接管结束了一年多的关于控制这两个关键航运路线港口的争端，这已成为华盛顿与北京之间地缘战略竞争的一个焦点。美国总统唐纳德·特朗普早前誓言要 “夺回” 运河，声称其受到中国控制。这场争端还与长和控股试图与美国资产管理巨头黑石集团和航运集团 MSC 领导的财团出售全球 40 多个港口的单独尝试交织在一起。该交易引发了北京的愤怒，中国监管机构随后于 2025 年 3 月底启动了全面的反垄断审查，实际上暂停了销售。报告还显示，北京希望在涉及巴拿马终端的任何安排中，给予国有航运巨头中远海运更大的角色。</p>
</div>

长和子公司指责巴拿马在存储地点进行 ‘未通知的入侵’