<p>英國高等法院命令自稱比特幣創始人的克雷格·賴特支付 154.8 萬英鎊的訴訟費用給播客主持人彼得·麥科馬克，賴特曾起訴麥科馬克誹謗。法院認定賴特的證詞虛假，並僅賠償麥科馬克 1 英鎊。這一裁決強調訴訟中的真實性至關重要，尤其是在加密貨幣行業的知名案件中。賴特現在受到全球凍結令的約束，以支付麥科馬克的訴訟費用。</p>
<p>賴特長期聲稱自己是比特幣的匿名發明者中本聰，他在 2016 年對 13 名比特幣核心開發者提起訴訟，聲稱侵犯比特幣白皮書和去中心化協議的版權。然而，賴特的主張遭到懷疑，有大量證據證明相反。代表被告的行業團體加密開放專利聯盟（COPA）提供了至少 50 份證據，指控賴特偽造。</p>
<p>在法律鬥爭過程中，曾在推特和 YouTube 視頻中指控賴特欺詐聲稱自己是中本聰的麥科馬克成為賴特誹謗的法律訴訟目標。然而，高等法院最終裁定賴特不是中本聰。這一具有里程碑意義的裁決奠定了法律基礎，免除了麥科馬克誹謗賴特人格和獲得法律賠償的權利，為加密貨幣行業提供了一則警示。</p>
<p>賴特虛假主張的後果並未就此結束。在高等法院的裁決後，針對賴特資產的全球凍結令頒佈，以幫助麥科馬克收回近 200 萬英鎊的訴訟費用。這一命令提醒了在訴訟中做出虛假主張可能帶來的潛在財務後果，尤其是在加密貨幣行業的知名案件中。</p>
<p>總之，克雷格·賴特訴彼得·麥科馬克案的最新裁決提醒了加密貨幣行業中訴訟中真實性的重要性和虛假主張可能帶來的潛在後果。隨着行業的不斷發展，對於所有當事方來説，以透明、誠信和對真相的承諾處理法律事務至關重要。</p>
<p>參考資料：</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png"/></p>

GBTC

<p>克雷格·賴特聲稱自己是比特幣創始人的謊言被英國高等法院判令支付 154.8 萬英鎊的法律費用給彼得·麥科馬克。賴特的虛假聲明和誹謗訴訟突顯了加密貨幣行業中誠實的重要性。賴特現在受到全球凍結令的約束，以支付麥科馬克的法律費用。這一裁決為該行業敲響了警鐘</p>

<p>Dr. Craig Wright, who falsely claimed to be Bitcoin's founder, has been ordered by the UK High Court to pay £1.548 million in legal expenses to Peter McCormack, a podcaster he sued for defamation. The court found Wright's testimony false and awarded McCormack just £1 in damages. This ruling emphasizes the importance of truthfulness in litigation, especially in high-profile cases within the cryptocurrency industry. Wright is now subject to a Worldwide Freezing Order to cover McCormack's legal costs.</p>
<p>The cryptocurrency industry is known for its dynamic and often contentious landscape, and a recent ruling by the UK High Court serves as a stark reminder of the importance of truthfulness and the potential consequences of false claims in litigation. In a case that has garnered significant attention, computer scientist and businessman Craig Wright, who falsely claimed to be the founder of Bitcoin, has been ordered to pay £1.548 million in legal expenses to Peter McCormack, a podcast host he sued for defamation [1].</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>英國高等法院命令自稱比特幣創始人的克雷格·賴特支付 154.8 萬英鎊的訴訟費用給播客主持人彼得·麥科馬克，賴特曾起訴麥科馬克誹謗。法院認定賴特的證詞虛假，並僅賠償麥科馬克 1 英鎊。這一裁決強調訴訟中的真實性至關重要，尤其是在加密貨幣行業的知名案件中。賴特現在受到全球凍結令的約束，以支付麥科馬克的訴訟費用。</p>
</div><p>Wright, who has long maintained that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin, began his legal crusade by filing lawsuits against 13 Bitcoin Core developers in 2016, claiming copyright infringement on the Bitcoin white paper and certain features of the decentralized protocol [1]. Wright's claims, however, were met with skepticism and a mountain of evidence to the contrary. The Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), an industry group representing several of the defendants, presented at least 50 pieces of evidence accusing Wright of forgery [1].</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>賴特長期聲稱自己是比特幣的匿名發明者中本聰，他在 2016 年對 13 名比特幣核心開發者提起訴訟，聲稱侵犯比特幣白皮書和去中心化協議的版權。然而，賴特的主張遭到懷疑，有大量證據證明相反。代表被告的行業團體加密開放專利聯盟（COPA）提供了至少 50 份證據，指控賴特偽造。</p>
</div><p>In the course of the legal battle, McCormack, who had accused Wright of fraudulently asserting his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto in several tweets and a YouTube video, became a target of Wright's legal action for defamation [1]. The High Court, however, ultimately ruled that Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto [1]. This landmark ruling, which established the legal foundation absolving McCormack of defaming Wright's character and the right to legal compensation, serves as a cautionary tale in the crypto industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在法律鬥爭過程中，曾在推特和 YouTube 視頻中指控賴特欺詐聲稱自己是中本聰的麥科馬克成為賴特誹謗的法律訴訟目標。然而，高等法院最終裁定賴特不是中本聰。這一具有里程碑意義的裁決奠定了法律基礎，免除了麥科馬克誹謗賴特人格和獲得法律賠償的權利，為加密貨幣行業提供了一則警示。</p>
</div><p>The consequences of Wright's false claims have not ended there. Following the High Court's ruling, a Worldwide Freezing Order was issued against Wright's assets to help McCormack recover nearly £2 million in legal fees [1]. This order serves as a stark reminder of the potential financial repercussions of making false claims in litigation, especially in high-profile cases within the cryptocurrency industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>賴特虛假主張的後果並未就此結束。在高等法院的裁決後，針對賴特資產的全球凍結令頒佈，以幫助麥科馬克收回近 200 萬英鎊的訴訟費用。這一命令提醒了在訴訟中做出虛假主張可能帶來的潛在財務後果，尤其是在加密貨幣行業的知名案件中。</p>
</div><p>In conclusion, the recent ruling in the Craig Wright vs. Peter McCormack case serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness and the potential consequences of false claims in litigation within the cryptocurrency industry. As the industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for all parties to approach legal matters with transparency, integrity, and a commitment to the truth.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>總之，克雷格·賴特訴彼得·麥科馬克案的最新裁決提醒了加密貨幣行業中訴訟中真實性的重要性和虛假主張可能帶來的潛在後果。隨着行業的不斷發展，對於所有當事方來説，以透明、誠信和對真相的承諾處理法律事務至關重要。</p>
</div><p>References:</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>參考資料：</p>
<p>[1] Cointelegraph. (2022, July 5). United Kingdom High Court Freezes Craig Wright Assets Over Legal Fees. https://cointelegraph.com/news/united-kingdom-high-court-freezes-craig-wright-assets</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png" alt="" original-src="https://lh-prod-oper-pub-opercenter.s3.amazonaws.com/discovery-image/compress-191e3bd056538001.png"/></p>

克雷格·賴特因在英國法律戰中虛假比特幣聲明被命令支付 154.8 萬英鎊