<p>Meta，這家背後擁有 Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp 等平台的科技巨頭，最近陷入了爭議的中心——不僅因為首席執行官馬克·扎克伯格對唐納德·特朗普總統及某些 MAGA 理念的支持轉變，還因為其在今年一月對被指控表現不佳的員工進行的激進清洗。</p>
<p>根據最近的一份報告，這些員工中的許多人在不知情的情況下被加入了 Meta 的非正式 “禁止再僱用” 名單。</p>
<p>公司實際上將一些前員工——其中一些有着良好業績記錄——列入黑名單的揭露，進一步加深了扎克伯格日益負面的聲譽，使他不再是曾經的遠見卓識的科技巨頭，而更像是一個嚴厲的硅谷人物。</p>
<p>報告強調，即使是被現任高管重新招聘到關鍵崗位的前員工，也因這一有爭議的做法而受到阻礙。</p>
<p>Meta 的有爭議的禁止再僱用名單的一個典型例子是一位在 2022 年裁員中成為犧牲品的高級工程師，這是自 2020 年以來大規模裁減 35,600 個職位的一部分。</p>
<p>儘管在他四年的任期內獲得了高度評價，但這位工程師在 Meta 內部申請的 20 多個職位的申請被突然拒絕，即使在招聘人員和招聘經理最初熱情的回應之後。</p>
<p>當他詢問態度突然變化的原因時，被告知 Meta 已將他標記為 “禁止再僱用”，因為他被列入了公司的前員工黑名單。</p>
<p>《商業內幕》（BI）報道：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“前員工和經理確認，Meta 使用多個系統來跟蹤再僱用不合格，包括 ‘非遺憾離職’ 的標記和 ‘禁止再僱用’ 的標記，儘管具體機制和受影響員工的數量仍不清楚。對五位來自不同部門的前員工的採訪，以及 BI 查看的內部電子郵件和消息，揭示了多起被裁員工在申請新職位時發現自己被禁止重新加入 Meta 的情況，儘管他們在之前的工作中表現良好。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>這一黑名單系統的揭露，雖然並非 Meta 獨有，但由於其在公司內部的廣泛影響而引起了重大關注。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>新消息：一些前員工發現很難在 Meta 重新被僱用，有時通過人力資源公司得知自己不合格。一些 Meta 的經理在嘗試重新僱用前員工時也遇到了系統性障礙。 https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) 2025 年 3 月 5 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>這一披露恰逢扎克伯格在一月宣佈裁員時，他稱被解僱的 3,600 名員工為 “低績效者”。</p>
<p>在他的聲明中，扎克伯格還表達了希望改變 Meta 文化的願望，強調一種慶祝 “攻擊性” 和 “男性能量” 的新方向，這一立場與他之前的 MAGA 風格言論相呼應。</p>
<p>現在，世界看到了這種攻擊性思維是如何通過隱秘的禁止僱用名單針對前員工的，為公司的日益嚴厲形象增添了另一層面。</p>
<p>許多前 Meta 員工震驚地發現自己被列入公司的禁止再僱用名單，儘管他們曾獲得積極評價並保持良好的工作關係。</p>
<p>一些人承認，這種企業行為是他們最初猶豫重新申請的原因之一。</p>
<p>這位高級工程師説：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“這是我工作過的最糟糕的公司。但他們的薪水也是最好的。如果我能再進去幾年賺點錢，我會這麼做。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meta 的禁止再僱用名單實際上使得這一選擇變得不可能。</p>
<p>公司代表解釋説，維護該名單的系統在員工離職處理過程中會自動將許多離職員工列入其中。</p>
<p>然而，一些高管承認，通常根據合法的工作相關問題或規則違規列出員工的做法常常被忽視。</p>
<p>在某些情況下，經理因個人原因，包括簡單的不喜歡而將員工列入黑名單。</p>
<p>雖然這樣的黑名單的存在可能看起來小氣、報復性，並可能對職業生涯造成損害，但這並不違法。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>前 Meta 員工和現任高管表示，公司的正式禁止再僱用名單有時會因任意或瑣碎的原因將有能力的老兵列入黑名單，這幾乎是不可能克服的。 https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) 2025 年 3 月 7 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>要使該系統違反反歧視法，它需要特別針對受保護類別的員工。</p>
<p>有趣的是，儘管禁止再僱用名單的常規使用似乎是 Meta 獨有的，但軼事證據表明，這一做法比普遍認為的更為廣泛。</p>
<p>谷歌前人力資源主管拉茲洛·博克承認，儘管這樣的名單 “非常非常少見”，但在某些情況下確實存在。</p>
<p>Reddit 的 r/technology 子版塊的用户對 Meta 的禁止再僱用名單的揭露反應冷淡，許多人聲稱曾遭遇過來自過去僱主的類似黑名單經歷。</p>
<p>一些人分享説，他們在離職時被明確警告過禁令，提到的公司從一家大型家居改善連鎖店到大型分銷商不等。</p>
<p>其他用户則認為，這種做法可能比看起來更為普遍。</p>
<blockquote>
<p>有趣... “Meta 保留前員工的 ‘阻止’ 名單。Meta 的招聘經理有時會追求被裁員工的再僱用。” 我維護着一個客户的阻止名單。我認為任何公司都應該有保護措施。</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) 2025 年 3 月 6 日</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reddit 用户 TheElusiveFox 寫道：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“很多公司都有 ‘禁止僱用名單’。它們的有效性因公司而異，但在大型公司中是有必要的。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Travelerdude 表示贊同：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“我曾在思科工作，他們不會重新僱傭員工，無論他們表現多麼優秀，或者是自願離職還是被解僱。通常被解僱是因為底層 5% 的離職政策，那麼他們為什麼還會重新僱傭呢。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>一位評論者 PalebloodPervert 擴展了據稱維護此類黑名單的公司名單：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“還有誰呢？亞馬遜、谷歌、微軟等等。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meta 既沒有確認也沒有否認該名單的存在，但拒絕了因管理者的個人恩怨而隨意添加前員工的説法。</p>
<p>Meta 在一份聲明中表示：</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“對於被標記為不適合重新僱傭的員工，有明確的標準，這些標準適用於所有離職員工，並且在這個過程中有檢查和平衡機制，以確保單個管理者不能單方面標記某人為不適合而沒有支持。我們在離職時確定員工離職的原因——政策違規、績效終止、自願辭職等——以及離職前的最後評級和任何其他近期績效信號，決定員工是否適合重新僱傭。”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>雖然社交媒體上的回應表明 Meta 並不是唯一使用此類名單的公司，但共識很明確：這種做法被廣泛認為是不忠、陰險和報復性的。</p>
<p>因此，商業領袖應仔細重新考慮使用不再僱傭名單，權衡對當前和未來員工聲譽的潛在長期風險。</p>

META

<p>Meta 正面臨關於將前員工列入黑名單的指控，儘管他們的績效評估是積極的，但仍被加入到一個非正式的 “禁止再僱傭” 名單中。報告詳細説明了即使是重新被招聘的個人也被禁止返回的情況。首席執行官馬克·扎克伯格最近關於裁員和公司文化的評論加劇了對 Meta 對待前員工方式的審查。雖然這種黑名單行為並不違法，但它引發了關於影響職業生涯的任意決定的擔憂。這個問題反映了企業實踐中的一個更廣泛趨勢， anecdotal evidence 表明其他公司也有類似的經歷</p>

<p>Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and other platforms, has recently found itself at the center of controversy—not only for CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s shift in support toward President Donald Trump and certain MAGA ideals, but also for its aggressive purge of alleged underperforming employees this past January.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta，這家背後擁有 Facebook、Instagram、WhatsApp 等平台的科技巨頭，最近陷入了爭議的中心——不僅因為首席執行官馬克·扎克伯格對唐納德·特朗普總統及某些 MAGA 理念的支持轉變，還因為其在今年一月對被指控表現不佳的員工進行的激進清洗。</p>
</div><p>Many of these individuals, according to a recent report, have unknowingly been added to Meta’s unofficial &#34;no-rehire&#34; list.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根據最近的一份報告，這些員工中的許多人在不知情的情況下被加入了 Meta 的非正式 “禁止再僱用” 名單。</p>
</div><p>The revelation that the company effectively blacklists former employees—some with strong track records—adds to Zuckerberg’s increasingly negative reputation, casting him less as the once-visionary tech mogul and more as a harsh Silicon Valley figure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>公司實際上將一些前員工——其中一些有着良好業績記錄——列入黑名單的揭露，進一步加深了扎克伯格日益負面的聲譽，使他不再是曾經的遠見卓識的科技巨頭，而更像是一個嚴厲的硅谷人物。</p>
</div><p>The report highlights how even former employees, re-recruited by current executives for key roles, are blocked due to this controversial practice.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>報告強調，即使是被現任高管重新招聘到關鍵崗位的前員工，也因這一有爭議的做法而受到阻礙。</p>
</div><p>A prime example of Meta's controversial no-rehire list is a senior engineer who became a casualty of the company’s 2022 layoff, part of the larger reduction of 35,600 jobs since 2020.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 的有爭議的禁止再僱用名單的一個典型例子是一位在 2022 年裁員中成為犧牲品的高級工程師，這是自 2020 年以來大規模裁減 35,600 個職位的一部分。</p>
</div><p>Despite receiving glowing reviews during his four-year tenure, the engineer’s applications for over 20 positions within Meta were abruptly rejected, even after initial enthusiastic responses from recruiters and hiring managers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>儘管在他四年的任期內獲得了高度評價，但這位工程師在 Meta 內部申請的 20 多個職位的申請被突然拒絕，即使在招聘人員和招聘經理最初熱情的回應之後。</p>
</div><p>When he inquired about the sudden change in attitude, he was informed that Meta had marked him as “ineligible for rehire” due to being placed on the company’s blacklist of former employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>當他詢問態度突然變化的原因時，被告知 Meta 已將他標記為 “禁止再僱用”，因為他被列入了公司的前員工黑名單。</p>
</div><p>Business Insider (BI) reported that:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>《商業內幕》（BI）報道：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“(F) ormer employees and managers confirmed that Meta uses multiple systems to track rehire ineligibility, including a ‘non-regrettable attrition” designation and a “do not rehire” flag, though the exact mechanisms and number of affected employees remain unclear. Interviews with five former employees across different divisions, along with internal emails and messages viewed by BI, revealed multiple instances of workers who were laid off and discovered they were barred from rejoining Meta after applying for new positions at the company despite good performance records in their previous stints.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“前員工和經理確認，Meta 使用多個系統來跟蹤再僱用不合格，包括 ‘非遺憾離職’ 的標記和 ‘禁止再僱用’ 的標記，儘管具體機制和受影響員工的數量仍不清楚。對五位來自不同部門的前員工的採訪，以及 BI 查看的內部電子郵件和消息，揭示了多起被裁員工在申請新職位時發現自己被禁止重新加入 Meta 的情況，儘管他們在之前的工作中表現良好。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>The revelation of this blacklisting system, while not unique to Meta, has drawn significant attention due to its widespread impact within the company.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一黑名單系統的揭露，雖然並非 Meta 獨有，但由於其在公司內部的廣泛影響而引起了重大關注。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>New: Some former staffers are finding it tough to get rehired at Meta, sometimes finding out about their ineligibility through staffing agencies. Some managers at Meta are also running into systemic barriers trying to rehire former employees. https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) March 5, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>新消息：一些前員工發現很難在 Meta 重新被僱用，有時通過人力資源公司得知自己不合格。一些 Meta 的經理在嘗試重新僱用前員工時也遇到了系統性障礙。 https://t.co/lbOqUtEUaC</p>
<p>— ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@PranavDixit) 2025 年 3 月 5 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>This disclosure comes on the heels of Zuckerberg's January announcement about the layoffs, where he referred to the 3,600 employees let go as &#34;low performers.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一披露恰逢扎克伯格在一月宣佈裁員時，他稱被解僱的 3,600 名員工為 “低績效者”。</p>
</div><p>In his statements, Zuckerberg also expressed a desire to shift Meta’s culture, emphasizing a new direction that celebrates “aggression” and “masculine energy,” a stance that resonates with his previous MAGA-style rhetoric.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在他的聲明中，扎克伯格還表達了希望改變 Meta 文化的願望，強調一種慶祝 “攻擊性” 和 “男性能量” 的新方向，這一立場與他之前的 MAGA 風格言論相呼應。</p>
</div><p>Now, the world sees how that aggressive mindset was directed at ex-employees through a covert no-hire list, adding another layer to the company's increasingly harsh image.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>現在，世界看到了這種攻擊性思維是如何通過隱秘的禁止僱用名單針對前員工的，為公司的日益嚴厲形象增添了另一層面。</p>
</div><p>Many former Meta employees were shocked to discover they had been placed on the company’s no-rehire list, despite having received positive reviews and maintaining strong work relationships.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>許多前 Meta 員工震驚地發現自己被列入公司的禁止再僱用名單，儘管他們曾獲得積極評價並保持良好的工作關係。</p>
</div><p>Some admitted that this type of corporate behaviour was one of the reasons they had been hesitant to reapply in the first place.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一些人承認，這種企業行為是他們最初猶豫重新申請的原因之一。</p>
</div><p>The senior engineer said:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這位高級工程師説：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“It’s the worst company I’ve ever worked for. But they also pay the best. If I could get in there for a couple more years and make bank, I would do it.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“這是我工作過的最糟糕的公司。但他們的薪水也是最好的。如果我能再進去幾年賺點錢，我會這麼做。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Meta’s no-rehire list effectively renders that option impossible.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 的禁止再僱用名單實際上使得這一選擇變得不可能。</p>
</div><p>Company representatives explained that the system for maintaining the list automatically places many departing employees on it during exit processing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>公司代表解釋説，維護該名單的系統在員工離職處理過程中會自動將許多離職員工列入其中。</p>
</div><p>However, some executives acknowledged that the usual practice of listing employees based on legitimate work-related issues or rule violations was often disregarded.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，一些高管承認，通常根據合法的工作相關問題或規則違規列出員工的做法常常被忽視。</p>
</div><p>In some cases, managers had blacklisted employees for personal reasons, including simple disliking.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在某些情況下，經理因個人原因，包括簡單的不喜歡而將員工列入黑名單。</p>
</div><p>While the existence of such a blacklist may seem petty, vindictive, and potentially damaging to careers, it is not illegal.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>雖然這樣的黑名單的存在可能看起來小氣、報復性，並可能對職業生涯造成損害，但這並不違法。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>Former Meta staff and current executives say the company’s formal no-rehire list sometimes blackballs capable veterans for arbitrary or petty reasons that are virtually impossible to overcome. https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) March 7, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>前 Meta 員工和現任高管表示，公司的正式禁止再僱用名單有時會因任意或瑣碎的原因將有能力的老兵列入黑名單，這幾乎是不可能克服的。 https://t.co/Tsuhd2NO7p</p>
<p>— Inc. (@Inc) 2025 年 3 月 7 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>For the system to violate anti-discrimination laws, it would need to specifically target protected categories of employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>要使該系統違反反歧視法，它需要特別針對受保護類別的員工。</p>
</div><p>Interestingly, while the routine use of no-rehire lists may seem unique to Meta, anecdotal evidence suggests that this practice is more widespread than commonly believed.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>有趣的是，儘管禁止再僱用名單的常規使用似乎是 Meta 獨有的，但軼事證據表明，這一做法比普遍認為的更為廣泛。</p>
</div><p>Laszlo Bock, former head of people operations at Google, acknowledged that while such lists are &#34;very, very rare,&#34; they do exist in certain cases.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>谷歌前人力資源主管拉茲洛·博克承認，儘管這樣的名單 “非常非常少見”，但在某些情況下確實存在。</p>
</div><p>Redditors in the r/technology subreddit reacted with indifference to the revelation about Meta’s no-rehire list, with many claiming to have faced similar blacklisting experiences from past employers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Reddit 的 r/technology 子版塊的用户對 Meta 的禁止再僱用名單的揭露反應冷淡，許多人聲稱曾遭遇過來自過去僱主的類似黑名單經歷。</p>
</div><p>Some shared that they were explicitly warned about the ban when leaving, citing companies ranging from a major home improvement chain to large distributors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一些人分享説，他們在離職時被明確警告過禁令，提到的公司從一家大型家居改善連鎖店到大型分銷商不等。</p>
</div><p>Other users argued that this practice may be more widespread than it appears.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>其他用户則認為，這種做法可能比看起來更為普遍。</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>Interesting... &#34;Meta keeps “block” lists of ex-employees. Hiring managers at Meta sometimes pursue laid-off workers for rehire.&#34; I maintain a block list of clients. I would think any company would have protections in place.</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) March 6, 2025</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>有趣... “Meta 保留前員工的 ‘阻止’ 名單。Meta 的招聘經理有時會追求被裁員工的再僱用。” 我維護着一個客户的阻止名單。我認為任何公司都應該有保護措施。</p>
<p>— Amy Lynn (@AmyLynnOrg) 2025 年 3 月 6 日</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Redditor TheElusiveFox wrote:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Reddit 用户 TheElusiveFox 寫道：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“Lots of companies have ‘do not hire lists.’ How useful they are is different from company to company, but they are kind of necessary, especially in large companies.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“很多公司都有 ‘禁止僱用名單’。它們的有效性因公司而異，但在大型公司中是有必要的。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Travelerdude concurred:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Travelerdude 表示贊同：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“I worked for Cisco and they don’t rehire employees no matter how good they are or if they left on their own accord or were let go. Usually when they’re let go it is the bottom 5% attrition policy so then why would they rehire.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“我曾在思科工作，他們不會重新僱傭員工，無論他們表現多麼優秀，或者是自願離職還是被解僱。通常被解僱是因為底層 5% 的離職政策，那麼他們為什麼還會重新僱傭呢。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>One commenter, PalebloodPervert, expanded the list of companies allegedly maintaining such blacklists:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一位評論者 PalebloodPervert 擴展了據稱維護此類黑名單的公司名單：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“Guess who else. Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“還有誰呢？亞馬遜、谷歌、微軟等等。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>Meta neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the list but rejected the notion that ex-employees were arbitrarily added due to personal vendettas from managers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 既沒有確認也沒有否認該名單的存在，但拒絕了因管理者的個人恩怨而隨意添加前員工的説法。</p>
</div><p>Meta said in a statement:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Meta 在一份聲明中表示：</p>
</div><blockquote>
<p>“There are clear criteria for when someone is marked ineligible for rehire that are applied to all departing employees and there are checks and balances in the process so that a single manager cannot unilaterally tag someone ineligible without support. We determine, at the time of separation, the reason for the employee’s departure – policy violation, performance termination, voluntary resignation, etc. – and that, along with the last rating prior to separation and any other recent performance signals, determines whether an employee is eligible for rehire or not.”</p>
</blockquote>
<div class="lb-trans"><blockquote>
<p>“對於被標記為不適合重新僱傭的員工，有明確的標準，這些標準適用於所有離職員工，並且在這個過程中有檢查和平衡機制，以確保單個管理者不能單方面標記某人為不適合而沒有支持。我們在離職時確定員工離職的原因——政策違規、績效終止、自願辭職等——以及離職前的最後評級和任何其他近期績效信號，決定員工是否適合重新僱傭。”</p>
</blockquote>
</div><p>While responses on social media suggested that Meta is not alone in using such lists, the consensus was clear: the practice is widely regarded as disloyal, underhanded, and vindictive.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>雖然社交媒體上的回應表明 Meta 並不是唯一使用此類名單的公司，但共識很明確：這種做法被廣泛認為是不忠、陰險和報復性的。</p>
</div><p>For this reason, business leaders should carefully reconsider the use of no-rehire lists, weighing the potential long-term risks to their reputation among current and future employees.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>因此，商業領袖應仔細重新考慮使用不再僱傭名單，權衡對當前和未來員工聲譽的潛在長期風險。</p>
</div>

Meta Under Fire Again as Allegations of Blacklisting Former Workers Come Hot on its Heels

- Meta 因 CEO 扎克伯格的支持轉變及裁員引發爭議。  
- 公司被指存在 “禁止再僱” 名單，影響前員工再就業。  
- 此做法引發對公司文化和管理方式的廣泛批評。  

Meta 再次受到抨擊，因被指控將前員工列入黑名單而面臨新的指責