<p><strong>字母表公司</strong> 的 GOOGGOOGL <strong>谷歌</strong> 遭遇重大法律打擊，因為美國上訴法院維持了下級法院的裁決，要求這家科技巨頭徹底改革其 <strong>Play Store</strong> 運營。</p>
<p>熱門投資機會</p>
<h2><strong>法院在反壟斷對決中支持 Epic</strong></h2>
<p>週四，第九巡迴上訴法院一致駁回了谷歌推翻 2023 年陪審團裁決的論點，該裁決認定該公司存在反競爭行為，支持了 <strong>Fortnite</strong> 製作公司 <strong>Epic Games</strong>，該公司得到了 <strong>騰訊控股</strong> TCEHY 的支持。</p>
<p>巡迴法官 <strong>M Margaret McKeown</strong> 寫道，此案 “充滿了谷歌反競爭行為鞏固其主導地位的證據。” 該裁決為旨在恢復 <strong>Android</strong> 應用市場競爭的改革鋪平了道路。</p>
<h2><strong>法官稱 Play Store 必須向競爭對手開放</strong></h2>
<p>美國地區法官 <strong>James Donato</strong> 的原始命令要求谷歌允許用户在 Play Store 內下載競爭對手的應用商店，並使其應用目錄對競爭者可訪問。</p>
<p>這些變更在上訴期間一直處於暫停狀態。上訴法院的決定仍可在完整的第九巡迴法院或美國最高法院提出挑戰。</p>
<p>Epic Games 首席執行官 <strong>Tim Sweeney</strong> 慶祝勝利，在 <strong>X</strong>（前身為 <strong>Twitter</strong>）上發佈：“感謝裁決，Epic Games Store 將在谷歌 Play Store 上推出！”</p>
<h2><strong>谷歌警告有害變更，計劃進一步上訴</strong></h2>
<p>對此，谷歌監管事務副總裁 <strong>Lee-Anne Mulholland</strong> 表示，該裁決 “將嚴重危害用户安全，限制選擇，並削弱創新。”</p>
<p>該公司計劃繼續其上訴程序，堅稱其平台仍然具有競爭力和安全性，路透社報道。</p>
<p>Sweeney 在 X 上批評谷歌，轉發了 <strong>American Economic Liberties Project</strong> 的高級法律顧問 <strong>Lee Hepner</strong> 的推文，推文中表示：“就這樣，谷歌開始請求暫停法院的命令，等待其向最高法院的上訴。”</p>
<p>Hepner 指責這家科技巨頭利用拖延戰術獲利，並補充稱谷歌每年通過他所稱的 “非法應用商店壟斷” 賺取超過 100 億美元。</p>
<h2><strong>Sweeney：蘋果與谷歌在應用分發和支付方面並未競爭</strong></h2>
<p>在週末，Sweeney 還在社交媒體上強調，Epic v. Google 案件中提出的證據表明，谷歌對 <strong>蘋果公司</strong> AAPL 在應用分發和支付系統方面的行為幾乎沒有關注。</p>
<p>同樣，Sweeney 指出，Epic v. Apple 的藐視聽證會文件顯示，蘋果在這些特定領域對谷歌幾乎沒有考慮。</p>
<p>Sweeney 表示，儘管蘋果和谷歌在移動操作系統市場上顯然存在競爭，但這並不是這些法律鬥爭中審查的相關市場。</p>
<p>他説，重點在於應用分發和應用內支付——根據證據，兩家公司之間似乎缺乏嚴重的競爭考慮。</p>
<h2><strong>Epic 的十億美元鬥爭繼續</strong></h2>
<p>該裁決是 Epic 更廣泛法律行動的一部分，Epic 在與蘋果和谷歌就應用商店政策進行鬥爭中已花費超過 10 億美元。今年 5 月，Fortnite 在相關法院命令後重返蘋果的 <strong>App Store</strong>，Epic 提議如果蘋果放寬全球限制，將放棄所有訴訟。</p>
<p><strong>價格動態：</strong> 字母表公司的 A 類股票在過去五天內下跌了 2.39%，而 C 類股票在同一期間下滑了 2.36%，根據 Benzinga Pro 的數據。</p>
<p>儘管下跌，<strong>Benzinga 的股票排名</strong> 顯示，GOOG 在短期、中期和長期時間框架內保持強勁的上升勢頭。更多表現見解可在此獲取。</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>蘋果在 Safari 中的搜索可能會減少，但谷歌首席執行官 Sundar Pichai 堅持認為 AI 正在推動整體查詢增長：‘遠非零和遊戲’</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><em>圖片來源：JHVEPhoto on Shutterstock.com</em></p>

谷歌-C

谷歌-A

<p>谷歌對一項裁決的上訴失敗，該裁決要求對其 Play Store 運營進行重大改革，此裁決由美國第九巡迴上訴法院一致作出。法院支持 Epic Games，指控谷歌存在反競爭行為。該裁決要求谷歌允許競爭對手的應用商店，並使其應用目錄對競爭者開放。谷歌計劃上訴，辯稱這些變化可能會危害用户安全和創新。Epic Games 首席執行官 Tim Sweeney 慶祝這一決定，強調了與谷歌和蘋果在應用商店政策方面的持續法律鬥爭</p>

<p><strong>Alphabet Inc.'s</strong> GOOGGOOGL <strong>Google</strong> has suffered a significant legal blow as a U.S. appeals court upheld a lower court ruling requiring the tech giant to overhaul its <strong>Play Store</strong> operations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>字母表公司</strong> 的 GOOGGOOGL <strong>谷歌</strong> 遭遇重大法律打擊，因為美國上訴法院維持了下級法院的裁決，要求這家科技巨頭徹底改革其 <strong>Play Store</strong> 運營。</p>
</div><p>Trending Investment Opportunities</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>熱門投資機會</p>
</div><h2><strong>Court Sides With Epic In Antitrust Showdown</strong></h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2><strong>法院在反壟斷對決中支持 Epic</strong></h2>
</div><p>On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously rejected Google's arguments to overturn a 2023 jury verdict that found the company engaged in anticompetitive behavior, siding with <strong>Fortnite</strong>-maker <strong>Epic Games</strong>, backed by <strong>Tencent Holdings</strong> TCEHY.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>週四，第九巡迴上訴法院一致駁回了谷歌推翻 2023 年陪審團裁決的論點，該裁決認定該公司存在反競爭行為，支持了 <strong>Fortnite</strong> 製作公司 <strong>Epic Games</strong>，該公司得到了 <strong>騰訊控股</strong> TCEHY 的支持。</p>
</div><p>Circuit Judge <strong>M Margaret McKeown</strong> wrote that the case was &#34;replete with evidence that Google's anticompetitive conduct entrenched its dominance.&#34; The ruling clears the path for reforms aimed at restoring competition in the <strong>Android</strong> app market.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>巡迴法官 <strong>M Margaret McKeown</strong> 寫道，此案 “充滿了谷歌反競爭行為鞏固其主導地位的證據。” 該裁決為旨在恢復 <strong>Android</strong> 應用市場競爭的改革鋪平了道路。</p>
</div><h2><strong>Play Store Must Open To Rivals, Says Judge</strong></h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2><strong>法官稱 Play Store 必須向競爭對手開放</strong></h2>
</div><p>The original order by U.S. District Judge <strong>James Donato</strong> mandated Google allow users to download rival app stores within the Play Store and make its app catalog accessible to competitors.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美國地區法官 <strong>James Donato</strong> 的原始命令要求谷歌允許用户在 Play Store 內下載競爭對手的應用商店，並使其應用目錄對競爭者可訪問。</p>
</div><p>These changes had been on hold pending appeal. The appeals court's decision can still be challenged before the full 9th Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這些變更在上訴期間一直處於暫停狀態。上訴法院的決定仍可在完整的第九巡迴法院或美國最高法院提出挑戰。</p>
</div><p>Epic Games CEO <strong>Tim Sweeney</strong> celebrated the win, posting on <strong>X</strong>, formerly <strong>Twitter</strong>, &#34;Thanks to the verdict, the Epic Games Store for Android will be coming to the Google Play Store!&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Epic Games 首席執行官 <strong>Tim Sweeney</strong> 慶祝勝利，在 <strong>X</strong>（前身為 <strong>Twitter</strong>）上發佈：“感謝裁決，Epic Games Store 將在谷歌 Play Store 上推出！”</p>
</div><h2><strong>Google Warns of Harmful Changes, Plans Further Appeal</strong></h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2><strong>谷歌警告有害變更，計劃進一步上訴</strong></h2>
</div><p>In response, Google's VP of regulatory affairs <strong>Lee-Anne Mulholland</strong> said the ruling &#34;will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine innovation.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對此，谷歌監管事務副總裁 <strong>Lee-Anne Mulholland</strong> 表示，該裁決 “將嚴重危害用户安全，限制選擇，並削弱創新。”</p>
</div><p>The company plans to continue its appeal process, maintaining that its platform remains competitive and secure, reported Reuters.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該公司計劃繼續其上訴程序，堅稱其平台仍然具有競爭力和安全性，路透社報道。</p>
</div><p>Sweeney criticized Google on X, reposting a tweet by <strong>Lee Hepner,</strong> Senior Legal Counsel at the <strong>American Economic Liberties Project</strong>, which stated, “Aaaand just like that, Google moves to stay the court’s order pending its appeal to the Supreme Court.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Sweeney 在 X 上批評谷歌，轉發了 <strong>American Economic Liberties Project</strong> 的高級法律顧問 <strong>Lee Hepner</strong> 的推文，推文中表示：“就這樣，谷歌開始請求暫停法院的命令，等待其向最高法院的上訴。”</p>
</div><p>Hepner accused the tech giant of profiting from delay tactics, adding that Google earns more than $10 billion annually through what he called an “illegal app store monopoly.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Hepner 指責這家科技巨頭利用拖延戰術獲利，並補充稱谷歌每年通過他所稱的 “非法應用商店壟斷” 賺取超過 100 億美元。</p>
</div><h2><strong>Apple, Google Weren't Competing In App Distribution, Payments</strong>: Sweeney</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2><strong>Sweeney：蘋果與谷歌在應用分發和支付方面並未競爭</strong></h2>
</div><p>Over the weekend, Sweeney also took to social media to highlight that evidence presented in the Epic v. Google case shows that Google demonstrated little concern about <strong>Apple Inc.'s</strong> AAPL actions in the realm of app distribution and payment systems via Google Play.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在週末，Sweeney 還在社交媒體上強調，Epic v. Google 案件中提出的證據表明，谷歌對 <strong>蘋果公司</strong> AAPL 在應用分發和支付系統方面的行為幾乎沒有關注。</p>
</div><p>Similarly, Sweeney pointed out that documents from the Epic v. Apple contempt hearing revealed &#34;literally zero&#34; consideration by Apple regarding Google as a competitor in these specific areas.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>同樣，Sweeney 指出，Epic v. Apple 的藐視聽證會文件顯示，蘋果在這些特定領域對谷歌幾乎沒有考慮。</p>
</div><p>Sweeney said that while Apple and Google clearly compete in the mobile operating system market, that is not the relevant market under scrutiny in these legal battles.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Sweeney 表示，儘管蘋果和谷歌在移動操作系統市場上顯然存在競爭，但這並不是這些法律鬥爭中審查的相關市場。</p>
</div><p>The focus, he said, is on app distribution and in-app payments—where, based on the evidence, serious competitive considerations between the two companies appear to be absent.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>他説，重點在於應用分發和應用內支付——根據證據，兩家公司之間似乎缺乏嚴重的競爭考慮。</p>
</div><h2><strong>Epic's Billion-Dollar Fight Continues</strong></h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2><strong>Epic 的十億美元鬥爭繼續</strong></h2>
</div><p>The decision is part of a broader legal campaign by Epic, which has spent over $1 billion fighting Apple and Google over app store policies. In May, Fortnite returned to Apple's <strong>App Store</strong> following a related court order, and Epic has proposed dropping all litigation if Apple loosens global restrictions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該裁決是 Epic 更廣泛法律行動的一部分，Epic 在與蘋果和谷歌就應用商店政策進行鬥爭中已花費超過 10 億美元。今年 5 月，Fortnite 在相關法院命令後重返蘋果的 <strong>App Store</strong>，Epic 提議如果蘋果放寬全球限制，將放棄所有訴訟。</p>
</div><p><strong>Price Action:</strong> Alphabet Inc.’s Class A shares declined 2.39% over the past five days, while Class C shares slipped 2.36% during the same period, according to Benzinga Pro.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>價格動態：</strong> 字母表公司的 A 類股票在過去五天內下跌了 2.39%，而 C 類股票在同一期間下滑了 2.36%，根據 Benzinga Pro 的數據。</p>
</div><p>Despite the dip, <strong>Benzinga’s Edge Stock Rankings</strong> show that GOOG maintains strong upward momentum across short, medium and long-term timeframes. Additional performance insights are available here.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>儘管下跌，<strong>Benzinga 的股票排名</strong> 顯示，GOOG 在短期、中期和長期時間框架內保持強勁的上升勢頭。更多表現見解可在此獲取。</p>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Apple May See Fewer Searches In Safari, But Google CEO Sundar Pichai Insists AI Is Fueling Overall Query Growth: ‘Far From A Zero-Sum Game’</strong></li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>蘋果在 Safari 中的搜索可能會減少，但谷歌首席執行官 Sundar Pichai 堅持認為 AI 正在推動整體查詢增長：‘遠非零和遊戲’</strong></li>
</ul>
</div><p><em>Photo Courtesy: JHVEPhoto on Shutterstock.com</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>圖片來源：JHVEPhoto on Shutterstock.com</em></p>
</div>

Google Loses Epic Games Appeal As Court Orders Major Play Store Reforms Amid Antitrust Crackdown

- 美國上訴法院支持對谷歌的裁決，要求其改革 Play Store 運營。  
- 裁決有助於恢復 Android 應用市場的競爭。  
- 谷歌計劃繼續上訴，稱裁決將影響用户安全和創新。

谷歌在 Epic Games 上訴中敗訴，法院命令在反壟斷行動中對 Play 商店進行重大改革