<div id="readability-page-1">Prediction of end tech hype of a controversial over promise getty I know, I know. This levitating stock market feels like a bubble that will burst any day.  So I get it if you’re nervous. And that’s actually a good thing. It pays to be wary when everyone else is throwing money at any asset—stocks included.  My take? Well, it might surprise you, but it’s this: We’re not in a bubble—AI-driven or otherwise.  But I get the fear—which is why we’re going to look at a two-step move that addresses it. This “best of both worlds” play gives us yields up to 8.2% and a hedge if, say, bullish analysts (like me!) end up wrong and the so-called “AI bubble” pops.  Like I said, I think that’s unlikely. But in any market, it always pays to spread out our risks, which is why I think this two-step move makes a lot of sense now.  You don’t have to look far to see what’s driving bubble worries. Over the last six months, stocks have soared 32.4%, or 65% annualized. There’s no way that can continue.  This perspective keeps people out of stocks, but we need to zoom out. Over the long haul, stocks have done well (but not too well) no matter when you bought them.  Ycharts MORE FOR YOU Over the last decade, stocks have risen 12.9% on average per year. That’s above the century-long average of 10.5%, but not far above. And a higher gain now than in, say, the 1930s, makes sense. After all, our technology is better, and our companies are more efficient. So why shouldn’t stocks rise a bit faster than they used to?  So, at the very least, we can say that the last decade has been very good for stocks, but not bubbly. To see what a real bubble looks like, let’s flip back 30 years or so.  Ycharts From 1996 to 2000, stocks returned 24.3% annualized. But most important, that was after several years of strong performance. Meantime, our recent strong market comes after two big selloffs: first due to the pandemic in 2020, and second due to misplaced recession fears in 2022.  So a bit of short-term outperformance to offset short-term underperformance makes sense. And that’s before we talk about AI.  I had a chat with an old friend who’s now the head of the English department at a small liberal-arts school. He was telling me that he doesn’t know how to plan the curriculum for the upcoming school year because, as he put it, “All anyone wants to talk about is artificial intelligence.”  If even liberal-arts schools are obsessed over AI, should we worry that we’re in a bubble? If you look at Google Trends for the phrase “AI bubble,” you can see that, well, there is a bubble of worry about AI.  Google Trends No wonder the AI-bubble case is capturing the thinking of banks, private equity investors and journalists.  But let’s stress test this assumption. Our first stop? The CNN Fear and Greed Index.  CNN A lack of greed has led to a “neutral” reading, or a market where the fears of bubble prognosticators and the hopes of pollyanna-ish speculators cancel each other out. This is a realistic indicator that, no, we’re not in a bubble—at least not at the inflationary peak of the bubble cycle.  A lot of data is telling us that the economy is strong and inflation is high—and that’s not me talking, it’s Apollo Investment’s chief economist, who makes this argument clearly with a slew of charts. Let me just share what I think is the most important point.  Apollo If Americans’ fear about their jobs is declining and well off earlier peaks (see the far right side of the above chart), we’re far from a situation where this harms the economy. I’m not saying that will never happen—just that it isn’t coming soon.  Moreover, a recent study has shown AI isn’t taking jobs.  “The labor market doesn’t feel great, so it feels correct that AI is taking people’s jobs,” says Martha Gimbel, one of the Yale academics who authored the study. “But we’ve looked at this many, many different ways, and we really cannot find any sign that this is happening.”  So, what is happening? In short, AI is boosting corporate profits.  Over the long-term, we’ve seen earnings growth on a steady upward track, with the pandemic breaking that trend. But setting that aside, we’re back on that trend.  In part, that’s thanks to things getting back to normal (hence the big jump in late 2021 and early 2022), but it’s also partly due to the 10% earnings rise in the past year, far above the 6.7% annual earnings growth of the S&amp;P 500 over the last 50 years.  In other words, stocks are rising more now because profits are doing the same, and technology will likely cause that trend to continue.  Nonetheless, if you’re still concerned we’re in a bubble, I have a solution: a closed-end fund (CEF) that sells covered-call options.  Under these deals, the fund sells investors the right to buy its stocks when they hit a certain price at a fixed future date. No matter what happens, the fund keeps the fee it charges for this and uses it to fund its dividend.  It’s a strategy that does best in volatile markets. So if you hold a fund that invests in the S&amp;P 500 broadly, you have a nice setup for gains in an up market and a bit of a hedge in a down one—say if we do see some short-term correction around AI.  That leads us to the Nuveen S&amp;P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (SPXX), which yields 7.7%—handing us a nice “cash cushion” in the form of that high dividend. It also owns the S&amp;P 500, so you’re getting a nice mix of large cap AI players, like Microsoft (MSFT) and Alphabet (GOOGL), and those that benefit from AI, like Visa (V).  The problem with the covered-call strategy is that it can cap our upside in the long run, as the fund’s best stocks are sold, or “called away.”  That’s why I prefer the 8.2%-yielding Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (ASG), a “pure” equity CEF that’s a holding in my CEF Insider service. This one not only has a strong long-term track record (it’s up over 200% in the last decade, including dividends) but has both increased regular payouts and paid out some huge special dividends, too.  Sure, that dividend does float a bit, but that’s because it’s tied to the fund’s underlying performance. It’s actually a good setup as it gives management latitude to reinvest its profits without worrying about being tied to a fixed payout.  That, in turn, drives further upside for us.  Moreover, as I write this, ASG trades at an 8.2% discount to NAV, which is much more generous than its historical average of 2.2%. That puts additional upside (beyond the stock market’s future gains) on the table as that discount returns to normal.  It’s a sweet setup that lets us ride further AI gains and grab big dividends, too—something those who limit themselves to mainstream AI stocks simply can’t get.  Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook . For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report “ Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends. ”</div>

<p>這篇文章討論了對股市潛在人工智能泡沫的擔憂，強調儘管近期股市上漲，但我們並未處於泡沫之中。文章建議了一種兩步投資策略，提供高達 8.2% 的收益，同時降低風險。作者認為，目前的市場表現是對之前下跌的恢復，並指出人工智能正在提升企業利潤，而不是消除就業機會。總體而言，市場未來的情緒是謹慎而樂觀的，得到了強勁經濟指標的支持</p>

This Protects You From An AI Bubble, Pays 7.7% Dividends

- 文章討論了當前股市是否處於泡沫狀態。
- 提出 AI 推動的市場並非泡沫，且股市長期表現良好。
- 推薦投資 Liberty All-Star Growth Fund 以獲取高收益和風險對沖。

這項投資可以保護您免受 AI 泡沫的影響，並提供 7.7% 的股息收益