<p>在當今快速變化且競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者進行全面的公司評估至關重要。本文將深入探討一個廣泛的行業比較，評估 <strong>微軟 (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> 與其在軟件行業的主要競爭對手。通過分析關鍵的財務指標、市場地位和增長潛力，我們的目標是為投資者提供有價值的見解，並深入瞭解公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>微軟背景</h3>
<p>微軟開發和許可消費及企業軟件。它以其 Windows 操作系統和 Office 辦公套件而聞名。公司分為三個規模相當的廣泛部門：生產力和業務流程（傳統的 Microsoft Office、基於雲的 Office 365、Exchange、SharePoint、Skype、LinkedIn、Dynamics）、智能雲（基礎設施和平台即服務產品 Azure、Windows Server 操作系統、SQL Server）以及更個人化的計算（Windows 客户端、Xbox、Bing 搜索、展示廣告以及 Surface 筆記本、平板和台式機）。</p>
<p>通過對微軟的詳細審查，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
<ul>
<li>股票的市盈率為 38.97，低於行業平均水平 0.28 倍，表明有利的增長潛力。</li>
<li>市淨率為 11.5，顯著低於行業平均水平 0.82 倍，表明被低估以及未開發的增長前景。</li>
<li>市銷率為 14.08，為行業平均水平的 0.78 倍。這表明基於銷售表現可能被低估。</li>
<li>股本回報率（ROE）為 8.19%，高於行業平均水平 1.13%，表明公司有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
<li>息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 444.3 億美元，超過行業平均水平 56.96 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和穩健的現金流生成。</li>
<li>毛利潤為 524.3 億美元，超過行業的 34.72 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
<li>收入增長為 18.1%，遠低於行業平均水平 64.8%，公司在銷售擴張方面正經歷顯著放緩。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw"/></p>
<p>債務與股本比率（D/E）通過評估公司的債務相對於其股本來衡量公司的財務槓桿。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡明地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>在比較微軟與其前四大同行的債務與股本比率時，以下信息變得明顯：</p>
<ul>
<li>微軟在該行業中表現出比其前四大同行更強的財務狀況。</li>
<li>債務與股本比率為 0.18，表明公司對債務融資的依賴較低，保持了債務與股本之間更健康的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的信號。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>對於微軟在軟件行業中的表現，市盈率、市淨率和市銷率均低於同行，表明潛在的被低估。另一方面，微軟的高 ROE、EBITDA 和毛利潤表明其強大的盈利能力和運營效率。然而，低收入增長率可能是與行業同行相比未來表現的一個擔憂。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

微軟

2 倍做多 MSFT ETF - GraniteShares

MSFO

微軟每日 1 倍做空 ETF - Direxion

微軟每日 2 倍做多 ETF - Direxion

MSFX

MSFY

<p>本文對微軟（NASDAQ:MSFT）與其在軟件行業的競爭對手進行了評估，分析了財務指標和市場地位。主要發現包括其市盈率（38.97）和市淨率（11.5）低於行業平均水平，表明可能被低估。微軟展現出強勁的盈利能力，股本回報率為 8.19%，息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 444.3 億美元，但面臨 18.1% 的收入增長放緩。該公司保持健康的財務狀況，低債務股本比率為 0.18，表明對債務融資的依賴較小</p>

<p>Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在當今快速變化且競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者進行全面的公司評估至關重要。本文將深入探討一個廣泛的行業比較，評估 <strong>微軟 (NASDAQ:MSFT)</strong> 與其在軟件行業的主要競爭對手。通過分析關鍵的財務指標、市場地位和增長潛力，我們的目標是為投資者提供有價值的見解，並深入瞭解公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>微軟背景</h3>
</div><p>Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>微軟開發和許可消費及企業軟件。它以其 Windows 操作系統和 Office 辦公套件而聞名。公司分為三個規模相當的廣泛部門：生產力和業務流程（傳統的 Microsoft Office、基於雲的 Office 365、Exchange、SharePoint、Skype、LinkedIn、Dynamics）、智能雲（基礎設施和平台即服務產品 Azure、Windows Server 操作系統、SQL Server）以及更個人化的計算（Windows 客户端、Xbox、Bing 搜索、展示廣告以及 Surface 筆記本、平板和台式機）。</p>
</div><p>Through a detailed examination of Microsoft, we can deduce the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過對微軟的詳細審查，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>At 38.97, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.28x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.</li>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 11.5, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.82x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.</li>
<li>The Price to Sales ratio is 14.08, which is 0.78x the industry average. This suggests a possible undervaluation based on sales performance.</li>
<li>With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.19% that is 1.13% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
<li>The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $44.43 Billion is 56.96x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
<li>The gross profit of $52.43 Billion is 34.72x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
<li>With a revenue growth of 18.1%, which is much lower than the industry average of 64.8%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股票的市盈率為 38.97，低於行業平均水平 0.28 倍，表明有利的增長潛力。</li>
<li>市淨率為 11.5，顯著低於行業平均水平 0.82 倍，表明被低估以及未開發的增長前景。</li>
<li>市銷率為 14.08，為行業平均水平的 0.78 倍。這表明基於銷售表現可能被低估。</li>
<li>股本回報率（ROE）為 8.19%，高於行業平均水平 1.13%，表明公司有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
<li>息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 444.3 億美元，超過行業平均水平 56.96 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和穩健的現金流生成。</li>
<li>毛利潤為 524.3 億美元，超過行業的 34.72 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
<li>收入增長為 18.1%，遠低於行業平均水平 64.8%，公司在銷售擴張方面正經歷顯著放緩。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png/query-YXV0bz13ZWJwJmRwcj0yJm9wdGltaXplPW1lZGl1bSZ3aWR0aD0xMDgw" alt="" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1761663633_0.png?optimize=medium&amp;dpr=2&amp;auto=webp&amp;width=1080"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本比率（D/E）通過評估公司的債務相對於其股本來衡量公司的財務槓桿。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡明地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>When examining Microsoft in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在比較微軟與其前四大同行的債務與股本比率時，以下信息變得明顯：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Microsoft demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.</li>
<li>With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>微軟在該行業中表現出比其前四大同行更強的財務狀況。</li>
<li>債務與股本比率為 0.18，表明公司對債務融資的依賴較低，保持了債務與股本之間更健康的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的信號。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. On the other hand, Microsoft's high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit suggest strong profitability and operational efficiency. However, the low revenue growth rate may be a concern for future performance compared to industry peers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於微軟在軟件行業中的表現，市盈率、市淨率和市銷率均低於同行，表明潛在的被低估。另一方面，微軟的高 ROE、EBITDA 和毛利潤表明其強大的盈利能力和運營效率。然而，低收入增長率可能是與行業同行相比未來表現的一個擔憂。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

Evaluating Microsoft Against Peers In Software Industry

- 微軟在軟件行業的市盈率、賬面價值比和銷售比均低於同行，顯示出潛在低估。  
- 公司的高股本回報率、EBITDA 和毛利潤表明其盈利能力強。  
- 然而，18.1% 的收入增長率低於行業平均 64.8%，可能影響未來表現。  

評估微軟在軟件行業中的競爭表現