<p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者仔細評估公司至關重要。在本文中，我們將對 <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> 與其在半導體及半導體設備行業的主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過分析重要的財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>ASML Holding 背景</h3>
<p>ASML 是製造半導體的光刻系統市場領導者。光刻是利用光源將電路圖案從光掩模曝光到半導體晶圓上的過程。光刻使芯片製造商能夠在相同的硅面積上增加晶體管的數量，光刻在製造尖端芯片的成本中歷來佔據較高比例。ASML 將大部分零部件的製造外包，充當組裝商。ASML 的最大客户是台積電、三星和英特爾。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA, 以十億美元計)</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤 (以十億美元計)</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>應用材料公司</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>拉姆研究公司</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA 公司</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>泰瑞達公司</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity 電子公司</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris 公司</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS 公司</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor 科技公司</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova 有限公司</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto 創新公司</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek 有限公司</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor 公司</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase 能源公司</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis 科技公司</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM 研究公司</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics 公司</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco 儀器公司</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>通過對 ASML Holding 的細緻分析，我們可以觀察到以下趨勢：</p>
<ul>
<li>ASML 的市盈率為 37.84，低於行業平均水平 0.87 倍，顯示出合理價格下的增長潛力，使其成為市場參與者的有趣選擇。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>根據其市淨率 18.74，超過行業平均水平 2.6 倍，可能表明其相對於賬面價值的交易溢價。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>股票的市銷率相對較高，為 11.12，超過行業平均水平 1.81 倍，可能表明在銷售表現方面存在高估的情況。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>股本回報率（ROE）為 11.61%，高於行業平均水平 6.8%，突顯出有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 27.4 億美元，高於行業平均水平 6.09 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的毛利潤為 38.8 億美元，高於行業平均水平 6.06 倍，表明盈利能力更強和核心業務的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>該公司的收入增長為 0.65%，顯著低於行業平均水平 6.27%。這表明在增加銷售量方面可能面臨困難。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="債務與股本" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png"/></p>
<p>債務與股本比率（D/E）是一個衡量公司相對於其淨資產價值所承擔債務水平的指標。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡明地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>在使用債務與股本比率評估 ASML Holding 與其前四大同行時，可以進行以下比較：</p>
<ul>
<li>ASML Holding 在該行業的前四大同行中表現出更強的財務狀況。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>該公司的債務與股本比率為 0.14，較低，表明其對債務融資的依賴較小，維持了債務與股本之間更健康的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的信號。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>ASML Holding 的市盈率、市淨率和市銷率表明，與半導體及半導體設備行業的同行相比，其可能被低估。然而，高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利潤和低收入增長表明該公司的財務表現良好，並有效利用其資源。總體而言，儘管在收入增長方面面臨挑戰，ASML Holding 仍顯示出強勁的盈利能力和運營效率。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

阿斯麥

半導體 3 倍做多 - Direxion

<p>這篇文章將 ASML 控股的表現與半導體及半導體設備行業的競爭對手進行了比較，分析了市盈率（PE）、市淨率（PB）、市銷率（PS）、股本回報率（ROE）、息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）和收入增長等財務指標。ASML 展現出強勁的盈利能力和運營效率，但在收入增長方面面臨挑戰。它的債務與股本比率較低，表明其財務狀況更為健康。儘管面臨挑戰，ASML 相較於同行可能被低估，為投資者提供了潛在的增長機會</p>

<p>In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者仔細評估公司至關重要。在本文中，我們將對 <strong>ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML)</strong> 與其在半導體及半導體設備行業的主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過分析重要的財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>ASML Holding Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>ASML Holding 背景</h3>
</div><p>ASML is the market leader in lithography systems for manufacturing semiconductors. Lithography is the process in which a light source is used to expose circuit patterns from a photo mask onto a semiconductor wafer. Lithography allows chipmakers to increase the number of transistors on the same area of silicon, with lithography historically representing a high portion of the cost of making cutting-edge chips. ASML outsources the manufacturing of most of its parts, acting like an assembler. ASML's largest clients are TSMC, Samsung, and Intel.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>ASML 是製造半導體的光刻系統市場領導者。光刻是利用光源將電路圖案從光掩模曝光到半導體晶圓上的過程。光刻使芯片製造商能夠在相同的硅面積上增加晶體管的數量，光刻在製造尖端芯片的成本中歷來佔據較高比例。ASML 將大部分零部件的製造外包，充當組裝商。ASML 的最大客户是台積電、三星和英特爾。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Applied Materials Inc</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lam Research Corp</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA Corp</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradyne Inc</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity Electronics Inc</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris Inc</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS Inc</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor Technology Inc</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova Ltd</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto Innovation Inc</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek Ltd</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor Inc</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase Energy Inc</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis Technologies Inc</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM Research Inc</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics Inc</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco Instruments Inc</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA, 以十億美元計)</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤 (以十億美元計)</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ASML Holding NV</td>
<td>37.84</td>
<td>18.74</td>
<td>11.12</td>
<td>11.61%</td>
<td>$2.74</td>
<td>$3.88</td>
<td>0.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>應用材料公司</td>
<td>29.89</td>
<td>10.05</td>
<td>7.37</td>
<td>9.5%</td>
<td>$2.45</td>
<td>$3.27</td>
<td>-3.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>拉姆研究公司</td>
<td>36.04</td>
<td>20.12</td>
<td>10.68</td>
<td>15.64%</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>$2.68</td>
<td>27.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KLA 公司</td>
<td>38.43</td>
<td>32.24</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>23.17%</td>
<td>$1.48</td>
<td>$1.97</td>
<td>12.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>泰瑞達公司</td>
<td>69.92</td>
<td>11.08</td>
<td>10.83</td>
<td>4.3%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qnity 電子公司</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>1.80</td>
<td>3.52</td>
<td>2.6%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.57</td>
<td>11.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Entegris 公司</td>
<td>46.29</td>
<td>3.43</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.35</td>
<td>-0.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MKS 公司</td>
<td>37.92</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>2.87%</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>$0.46</td>
<td>10.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Amkor 科技公司</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>6.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nova 有限公司</td>
<td>41.33</td>
<td>8.06</td>
<td>11.92</td>
<td>5.42%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>25.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Onto 創新公司</td>
<td>43.45</td>
<td>3.83</td>
<td>7.59</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-13.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camtek 有限公司</td>
<td>110.21</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>11.35</td>
<td>-8.83%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>12.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FormFactor 公司</td>
<td>105.62</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>1.57%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>-2.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Enphase 能源公司</td>
<td>21.82</td>
<td>4.19</td>
<td>2.91</td>
<td>7.11%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.2</td>
<td>7.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Axcelis 科技公司</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>2.54%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-16.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ACM 研究公司</td>
<td>21.59</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>2.83</td>
<td>2.97%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>31.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Photronics 公司</td>
<td>15.07</td>
<td>1.73</td>
<td>2.42</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>2.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Veeco 儀器公司</td>
<td>36.58</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>-10.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>43.36</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.81%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.45</strong></td>
<td><strong>$0.64</strong></td>
<td><strong>6.27%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>Through a meticulous analysis of ASML Holding, we can observe the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過對 ASML Holding 的細緻分析，我們可以觀察到以下趨勢：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Earnings ratio of 37.84, which is 0.87x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>ASML 的市盈率為 37.84，低於行業平均水平 0.87 倍，顯示出合理價格下的增長潛力，使其成為市場參與者的有趣選擇。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 18.74 which exceeds the industry average by 2.6x.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>根據其市淨率 18.74，超過行業平均水平 2.6 倍，可能表明其相對於賬面價值的交易溢價。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.12, surpassing the industry average by 1.81x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股票的市銷率相對較高，為 11.12，超過行業平均水平 1.81 倍，可能表明在銷售表現方面存在高估的情況。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The Return on Equity (ROE) of 11.61% is 6.8% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股本回報率（ROE）為 11.61%，高於行業平均水平 6.8%，突顯出有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $2.74 Billion, which is 6.09x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 27.4 億美元，高於行業平均水平 6.09 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $3.88 Billion, which indicates 6.06x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的毛利潤為 38.8 億美元，高於行業平均水平 6.06 倍，表明盈利能力更強和核心業務的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company's revenue growth of 0.65% is significantly below the industry average of 6.27%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>該公司的收入增長為 0.65%，顯著低於行業平均水平 6.27%。這表明在增加銷售量方面可能面臨困難。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1765983621_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本比率（D/E）是一個衡量公司相對於其淨資產價值所承擔債務水平的指標。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡明地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>When assessing ASML Holding against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在使用債務與股本比率評估 ASML Holding 與其前四大同行時，可以進行以下比較：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>ASML Holding demonstrates a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>ASML Holding 在該行業的前四大同行中表現出更強的財務狀況。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.14, the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>該公司的債務與股本比率為 0.14，較低，表明其對債務融資的依賴較小，維持了債務與股本之間更健康的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的信號。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>The PE, PB, and PS ratios for ASML Holding indicate that it may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that the company is performing well financially and efficiently utilizing its resources. Overall, ASML Holding shows strong profitability and operational efficiency despite facing challenges in revenue growth compared to its industry peers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>ASML Holding 的市盈率、市淨率和市銷率表明，與半導體及半導體設備行業的同行相比，其可能被低估。然而，高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利潤和低收入增長表明該公司的財務表現良好，並有效利用其資源。總體而言，儘管在收入增長方面面臨挑戰，ASML Holding 仍顯示出強勁的盈利能力和運營效率。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

阿斯麥控股與半導體及半導體設備行業競爭對手的性能比較