<p>在動態且競爭激烈的商業環境中，對公司進行全面分析對投資者和行業愛好者至關重要。在本文中，我們將對廣泛零售行業進行廣泛的行業比較，評估 <strong>亞馬遜（NASDAQ: AMZN）</strong> 與其主要競爭對手的關係。通過仔細審查關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並闡明公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>亞馬遜背景</h3>
<p>亞馬遜是領先的在線零售商和第三方賣家的市場。與零售相關的收入約佔總收入的 74%，其次是亞馬遜網絡服務（17%）和廣告服務（9%）。國際業務佔亞馬遜總收入的 22%，主要來自德國、英國和日本。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率</strong></th>
<th><strong>淨資產收益率</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>亞馬遜公司</td>
<td>31.25</td>
<td>6.40</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>6.02%</td>
<td>$45.5</td>
<td>$91.5</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>阿里巴巴集團控股有限公司</td>
<td>19.81</td>
<td>2.40</td>
<td>2.45</td>
<td>2.05%</td>
<td>$27.26</td>
<td>$97.01</td>
<td>4.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD 控股有限公司</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>2.68</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
<td>$25.03</td>
<td>$61.44</td>
<td>8.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre 公司</td>
<td>46.77</td>
<td>15.62</td>
<td>3.71</td>
<td>7.06%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>39.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sea 有限公司</td>
<td>51.94</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>3.57</td>
<td>3.77%</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>$2.6</td>
<td>38.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>京東公司</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>0.23</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$7.36</td>
<td>$50.47</td>
<td>14.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang 公司</td>
<td>108.19</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>2.02%</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>17.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay 公司</td>
<td>18.34</td>
<td>7.92</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>9.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's 公司</td>
<td>17.61</td>
<td>4.95</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>6.55%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>2.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>唯品會控股有限公司</td>
<td>10.10</td>
<td>1.64</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>3.06%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$4.91</td>
<td>3.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Global E Online 有限公司</td>
<td>992</td>
<td>7.22</td>
<td>7.77</td>
<td>1.43%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>25.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings 公司</td>
<td>30.28</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>2.66</td>
<td>2.55%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>18.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's 公司</td>
<td>13.61</td>
<td>1.42</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$2.06</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO 集團控股有限公司</td>
<td>20.34</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2.20</td>
<td>4.08%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$2.59</td>
<td>28.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's 公司</td>
<td>12.97</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>-3.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop 公司</td>
<td>65</td>
<td>8.94</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>7.15%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>7.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>5.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>2.22</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.24%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$4.35</strong></td>
<td><strong>$15.44</strong></td>
<td><strong>14.41%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>在對亞馬遜進行詳細分析後，以下趨勢變得明顯：</p>
<ul>
<li>31.25 的市盈率比行業平均水平低 0.33 倍，表明該股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>6.4 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 1.23 倍，亞馬遜在賬面價值方面可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>股票相對較高的市銷率為 3.46，超過行業平均水平 1.56 倍，可能表明在銷售表現方面存在高估的情況。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司的淨資產收益率（ROE）為 6.02%，比行業平均水平高出 1.78%。這表明公司有效利用股本來產生利潤，顯示出盈利能力和增長潛力。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>與行業相比，公司擁有更高的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 455 億美元，超過行業平均水平 10.46 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>與行業相比，公司擁有更高的毛利潤為 915 億美元，超過行業平均水平 5.93 倍，表明盈利能力更強和核心業務的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>收入增長為 13.4%，遠低於行業平均水平 14.41%，公司在銷售擴張方面正經歷顯著放緩。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766070050_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="債務與股本" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766070050_0.png"/></p>
<p>債務與股本（D/E）比率表示公司用於融資其資產和運營的債務與股本的比例。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，有助於簡潔評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>通過將亞馬遜與其在債務與股本比率方面的前四大同行進行評估，得出以下觀察結果：</p>
<ul>
<li>亞馬遜的債務與股本比率為 0.37，顯示出其在該行業前四大同行中更強的財務狀況。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>這表明公司在債務和股本之間有更有利的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的方面。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>對於亞馬遜在廣泛零售行業中的表現，市盈率相較於同行較低，表明可能被低估。市淨率和市銷率較高，表明相對於行業標準存在高估。在淨資產收益率、EBITDA 和毛利潤方面，亞馬遜的表現優於行業同行。然而，收入增長率低於行業平均水平，可能影響未來的估值。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

亞馬遜

<p>本文對亞馬遜與廣泛零售行業的競爭對手進行了分析。文章強調了亞馬遜的財務指標，例如較低的市盈率表明可能被低估，高市淨率和市銷率則暗示被高估，以及與同行相比強勁的股本回報率、息税折舊攤銷前利潤和毛利潤。然而，亞馬遜的收入增長低於行業平均水平。分析還指出，亞馬遜的債務與股本比率較為有利，表明其財務狀況穩健</p>

<p>In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN)</strong> in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在動態且競爭激烈的商業環境中，對公司進行全面分析對投資者和行業愛好者至關重要。在本文中，我們將對廣泛零售行業進行廣泛的行業比較，評估 <strong>亞馬遜（NASDAQ: AMZN）</strong> 與其主要競爭對手的關係。通過仔細審查關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並闡明公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>亞馬遜背景</h3>
</div><p>Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 74% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services (17%), and advertising services (9%). International segments constitute 22% of Amazon's total revenue, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>亞馬遜是領先的在線零售商和第三方賣家的市場。與零售相關的收入約佔總收入的 74%，其次是亞馬遜網絡服務（17%）和廣告服務（9%）。國際業務佔亞馬遜總收入的 22%，主要來自德國、英國和日本。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>31.25</td>
<td>6.40</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>6.02%</td>
<td>$45.5</td>
<td>$91.5</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>19.81</td>
<td>2.40</td>
<td>2.45</td>
<td>2.05%</td>
<td>$27.26</td>
<td>$97.01</td>
<td>4.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>2.68</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
<td>$25.03</td>
<td>$61.44</td>
<td>8.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>46.77</td>
<td>15.62</td>
<td>3.71</td>
<td>7.06%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>39.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sea Ltd</td>
<td>51.94</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>3.57</td>
<td>3.77%</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>$2.6</td>
<td>38.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>0.23</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$7.36</td>
<td>$50.47</td>
<td>14.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>108.19</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>2.02%</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>17.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>18.34</td>
<td>7.92</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>9.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>17.61</td>
<td>4.95</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>6.55%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>2.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>10.10</td>
<td>1.64</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>3.06%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$4.91</td>
<td>3.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Global E Online Ltd</td>
<td>992</td>
<td>7.22</td>
<td>7.77</td>
<td>1.43%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>25.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>30.28</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>2.66</td>
<td>2.55%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>18.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>13.61</td>
<td>1.42</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$2.06</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>20.34</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2.20</td>
<td>4.08%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$2.59</td>
<td>28.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>12.97</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>-3.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>65</td>
<td>8.94</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>7.15%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>7.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>5.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>2.22</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.24%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$4.35</strong></td>
<td><strong>$15.44</strong></td>
<td><strong>14.41%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率</strong></th>
<th><strong>淨資產收益率</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>亞馬遜公司</td>
<td>31.25</td>
<td>6.40</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>6.02%</td>
<td>$45.5</td>
<td>$91.5</td>
<td>13.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>阿里巴巴集團控股有限公司</td>
<td>19.81</td>
<td>2.40</td>
<td>2.45</td>
<td>2.05%</td>
<td>$27.26</td>
<td>$97.01</td>
<td>4.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD 控股有限公司</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>2.68</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
<td>$25.03</td>
<td>$61.44</td>
<td>8.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre 公司</td>
<td>46.77</td>
<td>15.62</td>
<td>3.71</td>
<td>7.06%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>39.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sea 有限公司</td>
<td>51.94</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>3.57</td>
<td>3.77%</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>$2.6</td>
<td>38.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>京東公司</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>0.23</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
<td>$7.36</td>
<td>$50.47</td>
<td>14.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang 公司</td>
<td>108.19</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>2.02%</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>17.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay 公司</td>
<td>18.34</td>
<td>7.92</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>13.35%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$2.0</td>
<td>9.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's 公司</td>
<td>17.61</td>
<td>4.95</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>6.55%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>2.74%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>唯品會控股有限公司</td>
<td>10.10</td>
<td>1.64</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>3.06%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$4.91</td>
<td>3.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Global E Online 有限公司</td>
<td>992</td>
<td>7.22</td>
<td>7.77</td>
<td>1.43%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>25.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings 公司</td>
<td>30.28</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>2.66</td>
<td>2.55%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>18.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's 公司</td>
<td>13.61</td>
<td>1.42</td>
<td>0.28</td>
<td>0.25%</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>$2.06</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO 集團控股有限公司</td>
<td>20.34</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2.20</td>
<td>4.08%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$2.59</td>
<td>28.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's 公司</td>
<td>12.97</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>0.16</td>
<td>0.2%</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>-3.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop 公司</td>
<td>65</td>
<td>8.94</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>7.15%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>7.56%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.15</strong></td>
<td><strong>5.2</strong></td>
<td><strong>2.22</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.24%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$4.35</strong></td>
<td><strong>$15.44</strong></td>
<td><strong>14.41%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>After a detailed analysis of Amazon.com, the following trends become apparent:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在對亞馬遜進行詳細分析後，以下趨勢變得明顯：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>The Price to Earnings ratio of 31.25 is 0.33x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>31.25 的市盈率比行業平均水平低 0.33 倍，表明該股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 6.4, which is 1.23x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>6.4 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 1.23 倍，亞馬遜在賬面價值方面可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 3.46, surpassing the industry average by 1.56x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>股票相對較高的市銷率為 3.46，超過行業平均水平 1.56 倍，可能表明在銷售表現方面存在高估的情況。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.02%, which is 1.78% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司的淨資產收益率（ROE）為 6.02%，比行業平均水平高出 1.78%。這表明公司有效利用股本來產生利潤，顯示出盈利能力和增長潛力。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.5 Billion, which is 10.46x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與行業相比，公司擁有更高的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 455 億美元，超過行業平均水平 10.46 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $91.5 Billion, which indicates 5.93x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與行業相比，公司擁有更高的毛利潤為 915 億美元，超過行業平均水平 5.93 倍，表明盈利能力更強和核心業務的收益更高。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a revenue growth of 13.4%, which is much lower than the industry average of 14.41%, the company is experiencing a notable slowdown in sales expansion.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>收入增長為 13.4%，遠低於行業平均水平 14.41%，公司在銷售擴張方面正經歷顯著放緩。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766070050_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766070050_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本（D/E）比率表示公司用於融資其資產和運營的債務與股本的比例。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，有助於簡潔評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>By evaluating Amazon.com against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過將亞馬遜與其在債務與股本比率方面的前四大同行進行評估，得出以下觀察結果：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Amazon.com exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector, as indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.37.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>亞馬遜的債務與股本比率為 0.37，顯示出其在該行業前四大同行中更強的財務狀況。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive aspect for investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>這表明公司在債務和股本之間有更有利的平衡，這對投資者來説是一個積極的方面。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>For Amazon.com in the Broadline Retail industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB and PS ratios are high, suggesting overvaluation relative to industry standards. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit, Amazon.com demonstrates strong performance compared to industry peers. However, the revenue growth rate is lower than industry averages, potentially impacting future valuation.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於亞馬遜在廣泛零售行業中的表現，市盈率相較於同行較低，表明可能被低估。市淨率和市銷率較高，表明相對於行業標準存在高估。在淨資產收益率、EBITDA 和毛利潤方面，亞馬遜的表現優於行業同行。然而，收入增長率低於行業平均水平，可能影響未來的估值。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

Analyzing Amazon.com In Comparison To Competitors In Broadline Retail Industry

- 亞馬遜在廣泛零售行業中表現出較低的市盈率，可能被低估。  
- 其市淨率和市銷率較高，顯示相對過高的估值。  
- 收入增長率低於行業平均水平，可能影響未來估值。

分析亞馬遜在廣泛零售行業中與競爭對手的比較