<p>韓國大學的期末考試中再次出現大規模作弊現象，暴露出各院校在有效在線考試控制和學生人工智能（AI）使用指南方面的準備不足和持續掙扎。\n 根據首爾國立大學的消息，週日，該校自然科學學院一門通識教育課程的期末考試結果被宣佈無效，因為在 36 名註冊學生中，近一半被發現有作弊跡象。\n 該課程是一門為服兵役的學生設計的在線遠程學習課程，講座和考試均通過遠程方式進行。\n 為了防止不當行為，考試系統設置為在考生打開任何非考試屏幕的窗口時記錄活動。隨後，助教的審查發現近一半學生的活動記錄，導致該校宣佈考試結果無效。\n 然而，由於記錄並未指明訪問了哪些屏幕，因此很難確鑿地確定不當行為。因此，負責該課程的教授決定無效化考試結果，並分配替代課程作業，而不是對學生施加紀律處分。\n 教授指出，儘管缺乏確鑿證據，但可疑活動的規模強烈暗示了學術不端行為。\n 首爾國立大學表示，正在起草 “全校範圍的措施” 以應對其所稱的 “廣泛作弊” 現象。\n 據報道，正在討論將面對面考試作為默認形式，而在無法進行遠程測試時，轉向包括開卷考試、重新設計問題和基於作業的評估等替代方案。\n 該大學還表示，正在推進 “校園範圍的 AI 使用指南” 的制定。\n 根據擬議的框架，教師需要在課程大綱中明確列出他們的 AI 政策，以便學生提前瞭解期望。根據該大學的説法，草案指南目前正在通過與教職員工和學生的諮詢進行審查。\n 該大學在十月的期中考試中已經因一起與 AI 相關的作弊案件而受到衝擊，突顯出加強措施以遏制學術不端行為的緊迫性。\n 大規模作弊的潮流並不僅限於首爾國立大學，其他韓國頂尖大學在期中考試季節後也出現了類似案件，涉及與 AI 相關的作弊醜聞。\n 本月早些時候，延世大學在十月的期中考試中發現了另一起大規模作弊案件，該課程曾因涉及人工智能的大規模作弊醜聞而成為焦點。\n 這起事件發生在約 200 名學生參加的在線測驗中，一些參與者被發現通過匿名在線聊天室交換問題和答案。還有一些人被報道在使用 Google Docs 等協作平台時實時分享考試內容。\n\n\n 該課程通過錄制的在線講座進行授課，並在期中考試期間已經引發了學術不端的指控。作為回應，該大學將期末考試改為面對面形式，而在線測驗仍繼續以遠程方式進行。\n 延世大學自去年以來就已制定了人工智能使用指南，並在九月份進行了更新。但該框架仍然較為寬泛，主要是建議性而非強制性的，導致各個課程在使用這些工具時適用不同的標準。\n 批評者表示，大學在作弊案件出現時主要依賴臨時應對措施——包括宣佈考試無效——這種做法可能會加深學生與管理層之間的不信任，而不是解決學術不端行為的根本原因。\n 該報道最初由《韓國時報》發佈。</p>

<p>包括首爾國立大學和延世大學在內的韓國大學正面臨在線考試中廣泛的作弊醜聞，這一問題因人工智能的使用而加劇。各院校在有效的在線考試控制方面面臨困難，導致考試失效，並引發了關於面對面考試和人工智能指導方針的討論。批評者認為，臨時應對措施可能會加劇學生與管理者之間的信任問題。《韓國時報》首次報道了這一消息</p>

<p>Mass cheating in online exams has resurfaced during finals at South Korean universities, exposing institutions’ incomplete preparedness and ongoing struggles to establish effective online test controls and guidelines for students’ artificial intelligence (AI) use.\nAccording to Seoul National University, on Sunday, the results of a final exam for a general education course offered by its College of Natural Sciences were invalidated after signs of cheating were detected among nearly half of the 36 students enrolled.\nThe course was an online distance-learning class designed for students on leave for mandatory military service, with both lectures and exams conducted remotely.\nTo prevent misconduct, the exam system was set to record activity whenever test-takers opened any windows other than the exam screen. A subsequent review by a teaching assistant later found such logs for nearly half of the students, leading the university to invalidate the exam results.\nHowever, it has been difficult to conclusively establish misconduct because the logs do not indicate which screens were accessed. As a result, the professor overseeing the course invalidated the exam results and assigned alternative coursework, rather than imposing disciplinary penalties on students.\nThe professor noted that while definitive proof was lacking, the scale of the suspicious activity strongly hinted at academic misconduct.\nSeoul National University said it was drafting “institutionwide steps” in response to what it described as “widespread cheating”.\n\nReportedly, discussions are under way about making in-person exams the default, while turning to alternatives for online assessments – including open-book formats, redesigned questions and assignment-based evaluations – when remote testing is unavoidable.\nThe university said it is also moving to introduce “campuswide guidelines on AI use”.\nUnder the proposed framework, instructors would be required to clearly outline their AI policy in the course syllabus, enabling students to understand the expectations in advance. The draft guidelines are currently being reviewed through consultations with faculty and students, according to the university.\nThe university had already been rocked by an AI-related cheating case during the October midterm exam for an introductory statistics laboratory course, underscoring the urgency of stronger measures to curb academic misconduct.\nThe wave of mass cheating is not confined to Seoul National University, with similar cases resurfacing at other elite universities in South Korea following AI-related cheating scandals during midterm season.\nEarlier this month, Yonsei University uncovered another case of mass cheating during the October midterm exam in the same course that had been at the centre of a large-scale cheating scandal involving the use of artificial intelligence.\nIt occurred during an online quiz taken by roughly 200 students, where some participants were found to have exchanged questions and answers through anonymous online chat rooms. Some were also reported to have shared exam content in real time using collaborative platforms such as Google Docs.\n\n\nThe course is delivered through recorded online lectures and has already drawn allegations of academic misconduct during the midterm exam. In response, the university moved the final exam to an in-person format, while online quizzes continued to be administered remotely.\nYonsei University has had guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence in place since last year and updated them in September. But the framework remains broad and largely advisory rather than enforceable, leaving individual courses to apply differing standards for the use of such tools.\nCritics say universities have largely relied on ad hoc responses – including invalidating exams – when cheating cases surface, an approach they warn could deepen mistrust between students and administrators instead of addressing the underlying causes of academic misconduct.\nThis story was first published by The Korea Times\n</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>韓國大學的期末考試中再次出現大規模作弊現象，暴露出各院校在有效在線考試控制和學生人工智能（AI）使用指南方面的準備不足和持續掙扎。\n 根據首爾國立大學的消息，週日，該校自然科學學院一門通識教育課程的期末考試結果被宣佈無效，因為在 36 名註冊學生中，近一半被發現有作弊跡象。\n 該課程是一門為服兵役的學生設計的在線遠程學習課程，講座和考試均通過遠程方式進行。\n 為了防止不當行為，考試系統設置為在考生打開任何非考試屏幕的窗口時記錄活動。隨後，助教的審查發現近一半學生的活動記錄，導致該校宣佈考試結果無效。\n 然而，由於記錄並未指明訪問了哪些屏幕，因此很難確鑿地確定不當行為。因此，負責該課程的教授決定無效化考試結果，並分配替代課程作業，而不是對學生施加紀律處分。\n 教授指出，儘管缺乏確鑿證據，但可疑活動的規模強烈暗示了學術不端行為。\n 首爾國立大學表示，正在起草 “全校範圍的措施” 以應對其所稱的 “廣泛作弊” 現象。\n 據報道，正在討論將面對面考試作為默認形式，而在無法進行遠程測試時，轉向包括開卷考試、重新設計問題和基於作業的評估等替代方案。\n 該大學還表示，正在推進 “校園範圍的 AI 使用指南” 的制定。\n 根據擬議的框架，教師需要在課程大綱中明確列出他們的 AI 政策，以便學生提前瞭解期望。根據該大學的説法，草案指南目前正在通過與教職員工和學生的諮詢進行審查。\n 該大學在十月的期中考試中已經因一起與 AI 相關的作弊案件而受到衝擊，突顯出加強措施以遏制學術不端行為的緊迫性。\n 大規模作弊的潮流並不僅限於首爾國立大學，其他韓國頂尖大學在期中考試季節後也出現了類似案件，涉及與 AI 相關的作弊醜聞。\n 本月早些時候，延世大學在十月的期中考試中發現了另一起大規模作弊案件，該課程曾因涉及人工智能的大規模作弊醜聞而成為焦點。\n 這起事件發生在約 200 名學生參加的在線測驗中，一些參與者被發現通過匿名在線聊天室交換問題和答案。還有一些人被報道在使用 Google Docs 等協作平台時實時分享考試內容。\n\n\n 該課程通過錄制的在線講座進行授課，並在期中考試期間已經引發了學術不端的指控。作為回應，該大學將期末考試改為面對面形式，而在線測驗仍繼續以遠程方式進行。\n 延世大學自去年以來就已制定了人工智能使用指南，並在九月份進行了更新。但該框架仍然較為寬泛，主要是建議性而非強制性的，導致各個課程在使用這些工具時適用不同的標準。\n 批評者表示，大學在作弊案件出現時主要依賴臨時應對措施——包括宣佈考試無效——這種做法可能會加深學生與管理層之間的不信任，而不是解決學術不端行為的根本原因。\n 該報道最初由《韓國時報》發佈。</p>
</div>

韓國大學因 AI 考試醜聞而面臨 ‘廣泛作弊’ 問題