<p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者必須仔細評估公司。在本文中，我們將對半導體及半導體設備行業的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過分析重要的財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
<p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例後來發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>44.80</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>23.77</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>71.35</td>
<td>19.85</td>
<td>25.85</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>30.18</td>
<td>9.49</td>
<td>13.07</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>111.74</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>25.28</td>
<td>5.09</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.98</td>
<td>8.85</td>
<td>4.37</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>613.67</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>32.11</td>
<td>9.63</td>
<td>9.34</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>60.18</td>
<td>3.97</td>
<td>12.37</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>146.19</td>
<td>16.33</td>
<td>27.55</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.61</td>
<td>5.07</td>
<td>9.37</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP 半導體公司</td>
<td>27.97</td>
<td>5.67</td>
<td>4.79</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>24.04</td>
<td>12.58</td>
<td>16.95</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.97</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.49</td>
<td>3.18</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>129.42</td>
<td>21.09</td>
<td>36.02</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>75.63</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>3.73</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.52</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>68.84</td>
<td>4.69</td>
<td>8.92</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.89</td>
<td>8.05</td>
<td>15.45</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>376.70</td>
<td>14.59</td>
<td>21.03</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.95</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.84</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>通過分析 NVIDIA，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
<ul>
<li>以 44.8 的市盈率來看，低於行業平均水平的 0.47 倍，該股票在合理價格下顯示出增長潛力，使其成為市場參與者的一個有趣選擇。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>以 37.0 的市淨率來看，高於行業平均水平的 4.72 倍，NVIDIA 在賬面價值方面可能被認為是高估的，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>以 23.77 的市銷率來看，高於行業平均水平的 2.06 倍，該股票可能被認為是基於銷售表現的高估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）高於行業平均水平的 24.67%，突顯了有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 387.5 億美元，高於行業平均水平的 1.02 倍，表明其盈利能力更強，現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>以 418.5 億美元的毛利潤來看，高於行業平均水平的 1.29 倍，該公司展示了更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>以 62.49% 的收入增長率，超過行業平均水平的 31.75%，該公司展示了強勁的銷售擴張並獲得市場份額。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766415619_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766415619_0.png"/></p>
<p>債務與股本比率（D/E）通過評估公司的債務相對於其股本來衡量公司的財務槓桿。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡潔地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>在比較 NVIDIA 與其前四大同行的債務與股本比率時，以下信息變得明顯：</p>
<ul>
<li>NVIDIA 的財務狀況優於其前四大同行，其債務與股本比率為 0.09，顯示出更強的財務位置。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>這表明該公司在債務和股本之間有更有利的平衡，這可以被投資者視為一個積極的指標。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>對於 NVIDIA 在半導體及半導體設備行業中，市盈率（PE）、市淨率（PB）和市銷率（PS）表明該股票相對於同行而言相對被低估。另一方面，高股本回報率（ROE）、息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）、毛利潤和收入增長表明 NVIDIA 在盈利能力和運營效率方面表現出色。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

英偉達

2 倍做多英偉達 ETF - GraniteShares

南方兩倍做多英偉達

南方兩倍做空英偉達

英偉達期權收益策略 ETF - YieldMax

1 倍做空英偉達 ETF - Direxion

2 倍做多 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

2 倍做空 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

半導體 3 倍做多 - Direxion

<p>本文對英偉達（NASDAQ:NVDA）與其在半導體及半導體設備行業的競爭對手進行了全面分析。評估了關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景。英偉達展現出強勁的盈利能力、運營效率和穩健的銷售擴張，較低的債務股本比率表明其財務狀況良好。儘管在市盈率、市淨率和市銷率方面相對被低估，英偉達仍表現出高回報率、息税折舊攤銷前利潤、毛利潤和收入增長，使其成為投資者的一個有吸引力的選擇</p>

<p>In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者必須仔細評估公司。在本文中，我們將對半導體及半導體設備行業的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過分析重要的財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
</div><p>Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence to run large language models. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例後來發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>44.80</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>23.77</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>71.35</td>
<td>19.85</td>
<td>25.85</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.18</td>
<td>9.49</td>
<td>13.07</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>111.74</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>25.28</td>
<td>5.09</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>34.98</td>
<td>8.85</td>
<td>4.37</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intel Corp</td>
<td>613.67</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>32.11</td>
<td>9.63</td>
<td>9.34</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>60.18</td>
<td>3.97</td>
<td>12.37</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>146.19</td>
<td>16.33</td>
<td>27.55</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.61</td>
<td>5.07</td>
<td>9.37</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.97</td>
<td>5.67</td>
<td>4.79</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>24.04</td>
<td>12.58</td>
<td>16.95</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.97</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.49</td>
<td>3.18</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>129.42</td>
<td>21.09</td>
<td>36.02</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>75.63</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>3.73</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.52</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>68.84</td>
<td>4.69</td>
<td>8.92</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.89</td>
<td>8.05</td>
<td>15.45</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>376.70</td>
<td>14.59</td>
<td>21.03</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.95</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.84</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>44.80</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>23.77</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>71.35</td>
<td>19.85</td>
<td>25.85</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>30.18</td>
<td>9.49</td>
<td>13.07</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>111.74</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>25.28</td>
<td>5.09</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.98</td>
<td>8.85</td>
<td>4.37</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>613.67</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>32.11</td>
<td>9.63</td>
<td>9.34</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>60.18</td>
<td>3.97</td>
<td>12.37</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>146.19</td>
<td>16.33</td>
<td>27.55</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.61</td>
<td>5.07</td>
<td>9.37</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP 半導體公司</td>
<td>27.97</td>
<td>5.67</td>
<td>4.79</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>24.04</td>
<td>12.58</td>
<td>16.95</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>30.97</td>
<td>3.30</td>
<td>1.68</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.49</td>
<td>3.18</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>129.42</td>
<td>21.09</td>
<td>36.02</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>75.63</td>
<td>2.81</td>
<td>3.73</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.52</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>2.04</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>68.84</td>
<td>4.69</td>
<td>8.92</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.89</td>
<td>8.05</td>
<td>15.45</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>376.70</td>
<td>14.59</td>
<td>21.03</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>95.95</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.84</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>By analyzing NVIDIA, we can infer the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過分析 NVIDIA，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Earnings ratio of 44.8, which is 0.47x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>以 44.8 的市盈率來看，低於行業平均水平的 0.47 倍，該股票在合理價格下顯示出增長潛力，使其成為市場參與者的一個有趣選擇。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 37.0, which is 4.72x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>以 37.0 的市淨率來看，高於行業平均水平的 4.72 倍，NVIDIA 在賬面價值方面可能被認為是高估的，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 23.77, which is 2.06x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>以 23.77 的市銷率來看，高於行業平均水平的 2.06 倍，該股票可能被認為是基於銷售表現的高估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The Return on Equity (ROE) of 29.14% is 24.67% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）高於行業平均水平的 24.67%，突顯了有效利用股本來產生利潤。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.75 Billion, which is 1.02x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與行業相比，該公司的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 387.5 億美元，高於行業平均水平的 1.02 倍，表明其盈利能力更強，現金流生成能力更強。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With higher gross profit of $41.85 Billion, which indicates 1.29x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>以 418.5 億美元的毛利潤來看，高於行業平均水平的 1.29 倍，該公司展示了更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a revenue growth of 62.49%, which surpasses the industry average of 31.75%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>以 62.49% 的收入增長率，超過行業平均水平的 31.75%，該公司展示了強勁的銷售擴張並獲得市場份額。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766415619_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1766415619_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本比率（D/E）通過評估公司的債務相對於其股本來衡量公司的財務槓桿。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡潔地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>When examining NVIDIA in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在比較 NVIDIA 與其前四大同行的債務與股本比率時，以下信息變得明顯：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>NVIDIA has a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>NVIDIA 的財務狀況優於其前四大同行，其債務與股本比率為 0.09，顯示出更強的財務位置。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be perceived as a positive indicator by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>這表明該公司在債務和股本之間有更有利的平衡，這可以被投資者視為一個積極的指標。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>For NVIDIA in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. On the other hand, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest that NVIDIA is performing exceptionally well in terms of profitability and operational efficiency within the industry sector.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於 NVIDIA 在半導體及半導體設備行業中，市盈率（PE）、市淨率（PB）和市銷率（PS）表明該股票相對於同行而言相對被低估。另一方面，高股本回報率（ROE）、息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）、毛利潤和收入增長表明 NVIDIA 在盈利能力和運營效率方面表現出色。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

Market Analysis: NVIDIA And Competitors In Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

- NVIDIA 在半導體行業中與主要競爭對手進行比較分析。  
- 其市盈率、資產負債率和銷售增長率顯示出強勁的盈利能力。  
- 相較於行業平均，NVIDIA 的財務健康狀況和市場地位均較為優越。

市場分析：NVIDIA 與半導體及半導體設備行業的競爭對手