<p>一名在新加坡航空從迪拜飛往新加坡的航班上盜取乘客行李的男子於週二被判入獄 20 個月。\n26 歲的中國國籍男子劉明對一起盜竊罪表示認罪。\n 檢方表示，該行為是由一個犯罪集團資助，劉特意登上該航班以盜取商務艙乘客的高價值物品。\n 他的案件是今年其他機上盜竊定罪的後續，包括一起案件中，罪犯在 Scoot 航班上作案時有同夥在場。\n 劉坐在 SQ495 航班的商務艙，該航班於 8 月 7 日晚從迪拜起飛前往新加坡。\n 受害者是一名 52 歲的阿塞拜疆男子，坐在劉前方五排的位置，而他的妻子則坐在劉前方一排的位置。\n 受害者與劉互不相識。\n 劉在 8 月 8 日凌晨行動，當時晚餐服務已結束，機艙燈光已調暗。\n 此時，受害者正在睡覺，而受害者的妻子剛剛從短暫的午睡中醒來。機組人員在機艙的餐具間，窗簾拉上了。\n 劉走到受害者的座位，打開了頭頂行李艙。他拿走了受害者的行李，帶回了自己的座位。\n 受害者的妻子看到劉在移動她丈夫的包，便質問他，詢問這個包是否屬於他。\n 由於她聽不懂他的回答，她通知了機組人員。在她這樣做時，劉將未打開的包放回受害者座位上方的行李艙，並返回自己的座位。\n 當機組人員詢問他時，劉撒謊稱他搞錯了，對自己的行李感到困惑。\n 對受害者的包進行搜查確認沒有物品丟失。包內物品的總價值超過 S$100,000（約合 78,000 美元）。\n 其中包括各種貨幣的現金約 S$12,000；一台價值約 S$2,100 的華為筆記本電腦；56 支價值超過 S$5,400 的雪茄；一隻價值超過 S$35,000 的 Chopard 手錶；以及一隻價值超過 S$51,000 的 Audemars Piguet 手錶。\n 機組人員通知了樟宜機場的地面工作人員，並報了警。劉在抵達機場時被捕。\n 在調查過程中，他不配合，否認盜竊，並虛假堅持認為他把受害者的包誤認為是自己的，想去拿他的洗漱用品。\n 儘管劉的包在外觀和材質上與受害者的包不同，且存放在他自己座位上方的行李艙中。\n 副檢察官謝文傑要求對劉判處 20 至 24 個月的監禁。他主張應給予嚴厲的判決，因為該罪行涉及公眾利益。\n“新加坡國家航空公司上盜竊罪行的泛濫將損害其聲譽，以及新加坡旅遊業的聲譽，” 他説。\n 謝還指出，檢測此類機上盜竊的困難，這在過去類似案件中已被強調。\n 因為毫無戒心的受害者無法在飛行中時刻關注自己的物品，而機組人員也無法在整個飛行過程中監控每位乘客，他説。\n 盜竊的懲罰可達三年監禁、罰款或兩者並罰。\n 這個故事最初由 CNA 發佈。</p>

新加坡航空公司

<p>一名 26 歲的中國公民劉明因試圖從一名乘客的行李中盜取高價值物品而被判處 20 個月監禁，該事件發生在一架從迪拜飛往新加坡的新加坡航空公司航班上。此次盜竊是由一個犯罪集團策劃的。劉的行為被受害者的妻子發現，導致他在抵達新加坡時被捕。此事件突顯了防止航班盜竊的挑戰，這可能會損害航空公司的聲譽</p>

<p>A man who took a passenger’s luggage on a Singapore Airlines flight from Dubai to Singapore was jailed for 20 months on Tuesday.\nLiu Ming, a 26-year-old Chinese national, pleaded guilty to one charge of theft.\nThe act was financed by a criminal syndicate and Liu had boarded the flight specifically to steal high-value items from business class passengers, the prosecution said.\nHis case follows other convictions for on-board theft this year, including one case of an offender who had accomplices on board the Scoot flight where he struck.\nLiu was seated in the business class section of flight SQ495, which left Dubai for Singapore in the evening of August 7.\nThe victim, a 52-year-old Azerbaijani man, was seated five rows in front of Liu, while his wife was seated one row in front of Liu.\nThe victim and Liu did not know each other.\nLiu acted in the early hours of August 8, when the dinner service had finished and the cabin lights had been dimmed.\nAt the time, the victim was asleep while the victim’s wife had just woken from a short nap. The cabin crew were in the cabin pantry with the curtains drawn.\nLiu walked to the victim’s seat and opened the overhead compartment. He took the victim’s luggage and carried it back to his seat.\nThe victim’s wife saw Liu moving her husband’s bag and confronted him, asking whether the bag belonged to him.\nAs she did not understand his response, she alerted the cabin crew. While she did so, Liu returned the unopened bag to the compartment above the victim’s seat and returned to his own seat.\nWhen the cabin crew questioned him, Liu lied that he had made a mistake and was confused about his luggage.\nA search of the victim’s bag confirmed that no items were missing. The total value of items in the bag exceeded S$100,000 (US$78,000).\nThis comprised cash in various currencies amounting to about S$12,000; a Huawei laptop worth about S$2,100; 56 cigars worth more than S$5,400; a Chopard watch worth more than S$35,000; and an Audemars Piguet watch worth more than S$51,000.\nCabin crew notified the ground staff at Changi Airport and a police report was made. Liu was arrested upon arrival at the airport.\nHe was uncooperative during investigations, denying the theft and falsely maintaining that he had mistaken the victim’s bag as his own and wanted to get his toiletries.\nThis was even though Liu’s bag, which differed from the victim’s in appearance and material, was stored in the compartment above his own seat.\nDeputy Public Prosecutor Cheah Wenjie sought 20 to 24 months’ jail for Liu. He argued for a stiff sentence because the offence engages the public interest.\n“The proliferation of theft offences on board Singapore’s national carrier would tarnish its reputation, and that of Singapore’s tourist industry,” he said.\nCheah also pointed to the difficulty of detecting such on-board thefts, which has been highlighted in past similar cases.\nThis is because unsuspecting victims cannot keep a constant eye on their belongings on a flight and cabin crew also cannot monitor every passenger throughout the duration of a flight, he said.\nThe punishment for theft is up to three years in jail, a fine or both penalties.\nThis story was first published by CNA\n</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一名在新加坡航空從迪拜飛往新加坡的航班上盜取乘客行李的男子於週二被判入獄 20 個月。\n26 歲的中國國籍男子劉明對一起盜竊罪表示認罪。\n 檢方表示，該行為是由一個犯罪集團資助，劉特意登上該航班以盜取商務艙乘客的高價值物品。\n 他的案件是今年其他機上盜竊定罪的後續，包括一起案件中，罪犯在 Scoot 航班上作案時有同夥在場。\n 劉坐在 SQ495 航班的商務艙，該航班於 8 月 7 日晚從迪拜起飛前往新加坡。\n 受害者是一名 52 歲的阿塞拜疆男子，坐在劉前方五排的位置，而他的妻子則坐在劉前方一排的位置。\n 受害者與劉互不相識。\n 劉在 8 月 8 日凌晨行動，當時晚餐服務已結束，機艙燈光已調暗。\n 此時，受害者正在睡覺，而受害者的妻子剛剛從短暫的午睡中醒來。機組人員在機艙的餐具間，窗簾拉上了。\n 劉走到受害者的座位，打開了頭頂行李艙。他拿走了受害者的行李，帶回了自己的座位。\n 受害者的妻子看到劉在移動她丈夫的包，便質問他，詢問這個包是否屬於他。\n 由於她聽不懂他的回答，她通知了機組人員。在她這樣做時，劉將未打開的包放回受害者座位上方的行李艙，並返回自己的座位。\n 當機組人員詢問他時，劉撒謊稱他搞錯了，對自己的行李感到困惑。\n 對受害者的包進行搜查確認沒有物品丟失。包內物品的總價值超過 S$100,000（約合 78,000 美元）。\n 其中包括各種貨幣的現金約 S$12,000；一台價值約 S$2,100 的華為筆記本電腦；56 支價值超過 S$5,400 的雪茄；一隻價值超過 S$35,000 的 Chopard 手錶；以及一隻價值超過 S$51,000 的 Audemars Piguet 手錶。\n 機組人員通知了樟宜機場的地面工作人員，並報了警。劉在抵達機場時被捕。\n 在調查過程中，他不配合，否認盜竊，並虛假堅持認為他把受害者的包誤認為是自己的，想去拿他的洗漱用品。\n 儘管劉的包在外觀和材質上與受害者的包不同，且存放在他自己座位上方的行李艙中。\n 副檢察官謝文傑要求對劉判處 20 至 24 個月的監禁。他主張應給予嚴厲的判決，因為該罪行涉及公眾利益。\n“新加坡國家航空公司上盜竊罪行的泛濫將損害其聲譽，以及新加坡旅遊業的聲譽，” 他説。\n 謝還指出，檢測此類機上盜竊的困難，這在過去類似案件中已被強調。\n 因為毫無戒心的受害者無法在飛行中時刻關注自己的物品，而機組人員也無法在整個飛行過程中監控每位乘客，他説。\n 盜竊的懲罰可達三年監禁、罰款或兩者並罰。\n 這個故事最初由 CNA 發佈。</p>
</div>

新加坡航空公司的一名乘客因在航班上針對商務艙進行盜竊而被判入獄