<p>華盛頓（美聯社）——一名聯邦法官已阻止特朗普政府執行一項三月份的總統備忘錄，該備忘錄旨在撤銷華盛頓知名律師馬克·扎伊德的安全許可，裁定該命令——還針對其他 14 人——無法適用於他。</p>
<p>這一決定標誌着特朗普政府在週二遭遇的第二次法律挫折，此前最高法院拒絕允許特朗普在芝加哥地區部署國民警衞隊，結束了特朗普總統在任第一年中，試圖實施廣泛議程和追求對政治對手報復的努力屢屢被法院拖延的局面。</p>
<p>華盛頓地區法院法官阿米爾·阿里在扎伊德於五月起訴特朗普政府撤銷其安全許可後，批准了扎伊德的初步禁令請求。扎伊德的請求稱這是 “錯誤的政治報復” 行為，危及他繼續代表客户處理敏感國家安全案件的能力。</p>
<p>三月份的總統備忘錄特別提到了扎伊德和其他 14 名被白宮認為不適合保留安全許可的人，理由是這 “已不再符合國家利益”。名單中包括特朗普憤怒的目標，來自政治和法律領域，包括前副總檢察長麗莎·莫納科、紐約州檢察長萊蒂蒂亞·詹姆斯、前總統喬·拜登及其家人。</p>
<p>這一行動是特朗普自重返白宮以來發起的更廣泛報復運動的一部分，包括針對被視為對手的特定司法部調查以及發佈針對他不喜歡的法律工作的廣泛行政命令。</p>
<p>在八月份，特朗普政府表示將撤銷 37 名現任和前國家安全官員的安全許可。下令撤銷安全許可已成為特朗普在第二任期內對高調政治人物、律師和情報官員施加報復的常用手段——或者至少是他試圖使用的手段。</p>
<p>扎伊德在他的訴訟中表示，他在近 35 年中代表了來自政治光譜各個方面的客户，包括政府官員、執法和軍事官員以及舉報人。在 2019 年，他代表了一名情報界舉報人，該舉報人關於特朗普與烏克蘭總統弗拉基米爾·澤連斯基之間對話的描述為特朗普第一任期的兩次彈劾案件奠定了基礎。</p>
<p>阿里在他的命令中寫道：“本法院與本地區其他幾家法院一致，禁止政府利用安全許可的摘要撤銷來懲罰代表與其對立的人士的律師。”</p>
<p>阿里強調，他的命令並不妨礙政府因總統備忘錄以外的原因通過正常的機構程序撤銷或暫停扎伊德的安全許可。初步禁令將在 1 月 13 日生效。</p>
<p>扎伊德在一份聲明中表示：“這不僅是我個人的勝利，更是對特朗普政府試圖恐嚇和壓制法律界的控訴，尤其是那些敢於質疑或追究政府責任的律師。”</p>
<p>\<em>\</em>\_</p>
<p>美聯社記者埃裏克·塔克對此報道作出了貢獻。</p>

<p>一名聯邦法官阻止特朗普政府撤銷律師馬克·扎伊德的安全許可，裁定該命令無法適用於他。這標誌着政府在週二遭遇的第二次法律挫折。法官授予了初步禁令，稱撤銷是不當的政治報復。該禁令並不妨礙通過正常程序進行未來的撤銷。扎伊德稱這一裁決是對政府試圖恐嚇法律界的勝利</p>

<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a March presidential memorandum to revoke the security clearance of prominent Washington attorney Mark Zaid, ruling that the order — which also targeted 14 other individuals — could not be applied to him.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>華盛頓（美聯社）——一名聯邦法官已阻止特朗普政府執行一項三月份的總統備忘錄，該備忘錄旨在撤銷華盛頓知名律師馬克·扎伊德的安全許可，裁定該命令——還針對其他 14 人——無法適用於他。</p>
</div><p>The decision marked the administration’s second legal setback on Tuesday, after the Supreme Court declined to allow Trump to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area, capping a first year in office in which President Donald Trump’s efforts to impose a sweeping agenda and pursue retribution against political adversaries have been repeatedly slowed by the courts.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一決定標誌着特朗普政府在週二遭遇的第二次法律挫折，此前最高法院拒絕允許特朗普在芝加哥地區部署國民警衞隊，結束了特朗普總統在任第一年中，試圖實施廣泛議程和追求對政治對手報復的努力屢屢被法院拖延的局面。</p>
</div><p>U.S. District Judge Amir Ali in Washington granted Zaid's request for a preliminary injunction, after he sued the Trump administration in May over the revocation of his security clearance. Zaid's request called it an act of “improper political retribution” that jeopardized his ability to continue representing clients in sensitive national security cases.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>華盛頓地區法院法官阿米爾·阿里在扎伊德於五月起訴特朗普政府撤銷其安全許可後，批准了扎伊德的初步禁令請求。扎伊德的請求稱這是 “錯誤的政治報復” 行為，危及他繼續代表客户處理敏感國家安全案件的能力。</p>
</div><p>The March presidential memorandum singled out Zaid and 14 other individuals who the White House asserted were unsuitable to retain their clearances because it was “no longer in the national interest.” The list included targets of Trump’s fury from both the political and legal spheres, including former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, New York Attorney General Letitia James, former President Joe Biden and members of his family.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>三月份的總統備忘錄特別提到了扎伊德和其他 14 名被白宮認為不適合保留安全許可的人，理由是這 “已不再符合國家利益”。名單中包括特朗普憤怒的目標，來自政治和法律領域，包括前副總檢察長麗莎·莫納科、紐約州檢察長萊蒂蒂亞·詹姆斯、前總統喬·拜登及其家人。</p>
</div><p>The action was part of a much broader retribution campaign that Trump has waged since returning to the White House, including directing specific Justice Department investigations against perceived adversaries and issuing sweeping executive orders targeting law firms over legal work he does not like.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一行動是特朗普自重返白宮以來發起的更廣泛報復運動的一部分，包括針對被視為對手的特定司法部調查以及發佈針對他不喜歡的法律工作的廣泛行政命令。</p>
</div><p>In August, the Trump administration said it was revoking the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials. Ordering the revocation of clearances has been a favored retributive tactic that Trump has wielded — or at least tried to — against high-profile political figures, lawyers and intelligence officials in his second term.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在八月份，特朗普政府表示將撤銷 37 名現任和前國家安全官員的安全許可。下令撤銷安全許可已成為特朗普在第二任期內對高調政治人物、律師和情報官員施加報復的常用手段——或者至少是他試圖使用的手段。</p>
</div><p>Zaid said in his lawsuit that he has represented clients across the political spectrum over nearly 35 years, including government officials, law enforcement and military officials and whistleblowers. In 2019, he represented an intelligence community whistleblower whose account of a conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy helped set the stage for the first of two impeachment cases against Trump in his first term.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>扎伊德在他的訴訟中表示，他在近 35 年中代表了來自政治光譜各個方面的客户，包括政府官員、執法和軍事官員以及舉報人。在 2019 年，他代表了一名情報界舉報人，該舉報人關於特朗普與烏克蘭總統弗拉基米爾·澤連斯基之間對話的描述為特朗普第一任期的兩次彈劾案件奠定了基礎。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This court joins the several others in this district that have enjoined the government from using the summary revocation of security clearances to penalize lawyers for representing people adverse to it,&#34; Ali wrote in his order.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>阿里在他的命令中寫道：“本法院與本地區其他幾家法院一致，禁止政府利用安全許可的摘要撤銷來懲罰代表與其對立的人士的律師。”</p>
</div><p>Ali emphasized that his order does not prevent the government from revoking or suspending Zaid’s clearance for reasons independent of the presidential memorandum and through normal agency processes. The preliminary injunction does not go into effect until January 13.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>阿里強調，他的命令並不妨礙政府因總統備忘錄以外的原因通過正常的機構程序撤銷或暫停扎伊德的安全許可。初步禁令將在 1 月 13 日生效。</p>
</div><p>Zaid said in a statement, “This is not just a victory for me, it’s an indictment of the Trump administration’s attempts to intimidate and silence the legal community, especially lawyers who represent people who dare to question or hold this government accountable.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>扎伊德在一份聲明中表示：“這不僅是我個人的勝利，更是對特朗普政府試圖恐嚇和壓制法律界的控訴，尤其是那些敢於質疑或追究政府責任的律師。”</p>
</div><p>\<em>\</em>\_</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>\<em>\</em>\_</p>
</div><p>Associated Press reporter Eric Tucker contributed to this report.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>美聯社記者埃裏克·塔克對此報道作出了貢獻。</p>
</div>

法官阻止了特朗普試圖剝奪代表舉報人的律師安全許可的行動