<p>在強生公司多次嘗試將其滑石粉訴訟轉入破產程序失敗後，卵巢癌索賠再次在全國各地的法庭上推進。</p>
<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum，一家全國知名的原告律師事務所，繼續代表那些聲稱長期使用強生嬰兒爽身粉和其他滑石粉產品導致卵巢癌的女性，原因包括石棉污染、滑石的炎症特性以及警告不足。該訴訟目前在全國多個法庭進行，法院拒絕了強生公司（J&amp;J）通過企業重組來保護自身免於責任的努力。</p>
<p>繼續閲讀</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null"/></p>
<p>“通過在虛假破產中隱藏資產來延遲和否認責任的企業手法只能走到這一步。”</p>
<p>最近加州的一起案件進一步證明了滑石粉訴訟正在推進。根據路透社的報道，12 月 12 日，加州陪審團裁定強生公司的嬰兒爽身粉導致兩名女性的卵巢癌，判給她們 4000 萬美元的賠償，其中洛杉磯高等法院判給莫妮卡·肯特 1800 萬美元，判給德博拉·舒爾茨及其丈夫 2200 萬美元，陪審團發現強生公司多年來知道其滑石粉產品是危險的，但未能警告消費者。</p>
<p>這一時刻對原告、消費者和監管者都具有重要意義，因為科學證據——包括美國國立衞生研究院支持的研究——持續加強了滑石使用與卵巢癌之間的關聯。法庭審查與科學清晰性的結合重新聚焦於原告所聲稱的關於產品安全的數十年隱瞞。</p>
<p>“通過在虛假破產中隱藏資產來延遲和否認責任的企業手法只能走到這一步，”<strong>阿里·弗裏德曼</strong>，<strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的合夥人説。“律師和法庭都越來越善於識別這些手法的本質：這是逃避責任的努力，而不是處理其產品造成的傷害。”</p>
<p><strong>長期以來的公共健康風險，終於再次受到關注</strong></p>
<p>多年來，公眾對滑石粉使用與卵巢癌之間聯繫的認識落後於科學。然而，現在提交法庭的公司內部記錄和宣誓證詞詳細説明了原告所聲稱的強生公司數十年來所知的事實：<strong>其滑石產品易受石棉污染，並在按市場推廣使用時對健康構成嚴重風險。</strong></p>
<p>自 1970 年代以來，研究提出了滑石顆粒通過生殖道遷移的擔憂，內部測試反覆發現化妝品中含有石棉和纖維滑石。儘管如此，原告聲稱這些產品仍然被宣傳為純淨、温和和安全的日常女性衞生使用產品。</p>
<p>“受害者從未被告知完整的故事，” 弗裏德曼説。“通過訴訟變得清晰的是，J&amp;J 知道石棉污染的風險，卻選擇不與監管機構或公眾分享這些信息。”</p>
<p>最近的陪審團裁決——包括在間皮瘤案件中的重大賠償——強調陪審團對科學和企業不當行為證據的接受度日益提高，標誌着這些案件評估方式的轉變。</p>
<p><strong>訴訟如何重塑消費者安全期望</strong></p>
<p>隨着滑石案件的推進，其影響遠超單一製造商，重塑了消費者商品行業對透明度和產品安全的期望。</p>
<p><strong>主要影響包括：</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>消費者安全意識：</strong> 強調滑石因其來自含石棉礦牀，無法始終或可靠地保證無石棉。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>更安全的替代品：</strong> 突出玉米澱粉基粉末——長期以來被認為更安全——提供有效的、非致癌的替代品。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>監管問責：</strong> 重新呼籲加強聯邦監管、明確標籤要求和獨立的化妝品石棉檢測標準。</li>
</ul>
<p>“沒有任何滑石粉產品是安全的，” 弗裏德曼説。“玉米澱粉替代品已經存在幾十年，消費者應當獲得不帶有隱性癌症風險的產品。”</p>
<p><strong>企業問責的決定性時刻</strong></p>
<p>隨着破產不再阻礙法庭的門口，滑石訴訟進入了一個決定性階段。Wisner Baum 在主要消費者安全和有毒暴露案件中積累了豐富經驗，運用數十年的訴訟專業知識來保護公共健康並追究企業責任。</p>
<p>該事務所繼續在全國範圍內推進代表受卵巢癌影響的女性和家庭的索賠，支持其索賠的有流行病學數據、公司內部文件以及日益增多的陪審團裁決。有關訴訟和消費者安全指導的更多信息可在 <strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的網站上找到。</p>
<p>“這場訴訟傳達了一個明確的信息，” 弗裏德曼説。“大型企業不能通過延遲、分散注意力或重組來逃避責任，當證據顯示真實傷害時。法庭和陪審團準備審視事實——這改變了一切。”</p>
<p><strong>關於 Wisner Baum</strong></p>
<p>Wisner Baum 始於一個簡單但激進的想法：法律應該服務於人民，而不是保護權力。自 1985 年開業以來，該事務所的成就遠超法庭勝利。總部位於洛杉磯，Wisner Baum 在美國享有盛譽，通過追究強大企業的責任建立了自己的遺產——不僅是為了為個別客户贏得正義，更是為了激發更廣泛的社會變革。</p>
<p>他們所處理的每一個案件，從災難性傷害和藥品失敗到環境毒性和企業疏忽，都是更大使命的一部分：讓世界對每個人來説更加安全、公正和透明。憑藉超過 40 億美元的判決和和解，他們的法律勝利幫助提高了公眾意識，影響了法規，並迫使行業清理有害的做法。他們的工作已成為產品安全改革、食品透明度和醫療責任的催化劑。</p>
<p>Wisner Baum 不僅僅是一家律師事務所。它是一個變革的運動——在這裏，正義不是最終目標，而是更安全社會的起點。</p>
<p>Wisner Baum：為社會變革而改變系統，一次一個案件。</p>
<p>瞭解更多信息，請訪問 wisnerbaum.com</p>
<p><strong>參考文獻：</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). 投訴和陪審團審判請求（ <em>Nguyen 訴強生等，</em> 案號 ATL-L-003241-19）。新澤西州高級法院，法律部門，大西洋縣。</li>
<li>路透社，<em>路透社</em>，2025 年 12 月 15 日。reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
<p>媒體諮詢：</p>
<p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
<p>JOTO PR™</p>
<p>727-777-4629</p>
<p>Jotopr.com</p>
<p>來源：Wisner Baum</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw"/></p>

強生

<p>關於強生的卵巢癌訴訟正在法院推進，科學證據越來越多地將滑石粉使用與癌症聯繫起來。Wisner Baum 律師事務所代表聲稱長期使用滑石粉產品導致卵巢癌的女性。最近的陪審團裁決，包括加利福尼亞州的 4000 萬美元賠償，突顯了該公司對其產品相關健康風險的認知。這場訴訟正在重塑消費者安全預期，強調了透明度和更安全替代品的必要性，同時推動化妝品行業加強監管</p>

<p><em>After multiple failed attempts by Johnson &amp; Johnson to move its talc litigation into bankruptcy, ovarian cancer claims are once again advancing in courts across the country.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在強生公司多次嘗試將其滑石粉訴訟轉入破產程序失敗後，卵巢癌索賠再次在全國各地的法庭上推進。</p>
</div><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum, a nationally recognized plaintiffs' law firm, continues to represent women who allege that long-term use of Johnson's Baby Powder and other talc-based products caused ovarian cancer due to asbestos contamination, talc's inflammatory properties, and inadequate warnings. The litigation, which is now proceeding in multiple courts across the nation, continues after courts rejected Johnson &amp; Johnson's (J&amp;J) efforts to shield itself from liability through corporate restructuring.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Wisner Baum，一家全國知名的原告律師事務所，繼續代表那些聲稱長期使用強生嬰兒爽身粉和其他滑石粉產品導致卵巢癌的女性，原因包括石棉污染、滑石的炎症特性以及警告不足。該訴訟目前在全國多個法庭進行，法院拒絕了強生公司（J&amp;J）通過企業重組來保護自身免於責任的努力。</p>
</div><p>Continue Reading</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>繼續閲讀</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null" alt="" original-src="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/null"/></p>
<p>“The corporate playbook to delay and deny accountability by hiding assets in a sham bankruptcy only goes so far”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“通過在虛假破產中隱藏資產來延遲和否認責任的企業手法只能走到這一步。”</p>
</div><p>A recent California case provides more proof that talcum powder litigation is advancing. On December 12, a California jury awarded $40 million to two women who said Johnson &amp; Johnson's baby powder was to blame for their ovarian cancer, according to <em>Reuters, which</em> reported that the jury in Los Angeles Superior Court awarded $18 million to Monica Kent and $22 million to Deborah Schultz and her husband after finding that Johnson &amp; Johnson knew for years its talc-based products were dangerous but failed to warn consumers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最近加州的一起案件進一步證明了滑石粉訴訟正在推進。根據路透社的報道，12 月 12 日，加州陪審團裁定強生公司的嬰兒爽身粉導致兩名女性的卵巢癌，判給她們 4000 萬美元的賠償，其中洛杉磯高等法院判給莫妮卡·肯特 1800 萬美元，判給德博拉·舒爾茨及其丈夫 2200 萬美元，陪審團發現強生公司多年來知道其滑石粉產品是危險的，但未能警告消費者。</p>
</div><p>The moment is significant not only for plaintiffs, but for consumers and regulators, as scientific evidence—including NIH-supported research—has continued to strengthen the association between talc use and ovarian cancer. The convergence of courtroom scrutiny and scientific clarity has renewed focus on what plaintiffs allege was decades of concealment about product safety.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一時刻對原告、消費者和監管者都具有重要意義，因為科學證據——包括美國國立衞生研究院支持的研究——持續加強了滑石使用與卵巢癌之間的關聯。法庭審查與科學清晰性的結合重新聚焦於原告所聲稱的關於產品安全的數十年隱瞞。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The corporate playbook to delay and deny accountability by hiding assets in a sham bankruptcy only goes so far,&#34; said <strong>Ari Friedman</strong>, partner at <strong>Wisner Baum</strong>. &#34;Attorneys and courts alike have become increasingly adept at recognizing these maneuvers for what they are: efforts to avoid responsibility rather than deal with the harm their products caused.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“通過在虛假破產中隱藏資產來延遲和否認責任的企業手法只能走到這一步，”<strong>阿里·弗裏德曼</strong>，<strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的合夥人説。“律師和法庭都越來越善於識別這些手法的本質：這是逃避責任的努力，而不是處理其產品造成的傷害。”</p>
</div><p><strong>A Longstanding Public Health Risk, Finally Back in the Spotlight</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>長期以來的公共健康風險，終於再次受到關注</strong></p>
</div><p>For years, public awareness of the link between talcum powder use and ovarian cancer lagged behind the science. Yet internal company records and sworn testimony now before the courts detail what plaintiffs allege Johnson &amp; Johnson knew for decades: <strong>that its talc products were vulnerable to asbestos contamination and posed serious health risks when used as marketed.</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>多年來，公眾對滑石粉使用與卵巢癌之間聯繫的認識落後於科學。然而，現在提交法庭的公司內部記錄和宣誓證詞詳細説明了原告所聲稱的強生公司數十年來所知的事實：<strong>其滑石產品易受石棉污染，並在按市場推廣使用時對健康構成嚴重風險。</strong></p>
</div><p>Beginning in the 1970s, studies raised concerns about the migration of talc particles through the reproductive tract, and internal testing repeatedly identified asbestos and fibrous talc in cosmetic products. Despite this, plaintiffs allege the products continued to be advertised as pure, gentle, and safe for daily feminine hygiene use.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>自 1970 年代以來，研究提出了滑石顆粒通過生殖道遷移的擔憂，內部測試反覆發現化妝品中含有石棉和纖維滑石。儘管如此，原告聲稱這些產品仍然被宣傳為純淨、温和和安全的日常女性衞生使用產品。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Victims were never told the full story,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;What's become clear through litigation is that J&amp;J knew about asbestos contamination risks and chose not to share that information with regulators or the public.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“受害者從未被告知完整的故事，” 弗裏德曼説。“通過訴訟變得清晰的是，J&amp;J 知道石棉污染的風險，卻選擇不與監管機構或公眾分享這些信息。”</p>
</div><p>Recent jury verdicts—including major awards in mesothelioma cases—underscore that juries are increasingly receptive to both the science and the evidence of corporate misconduct, signaling a shift in how these cases are evaluated.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>最近的陪審團裁決——包括在間皮瘤案件中的重大賠償——強調陪審團對科學和企業不當行為證據的接受度日益提高，標誌着這些案件評估方式的轉變。</p>
</div><p><strong>How the Litigation Is Reshaping Consumer Safety Expectations</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>訴訟如何重塑消費者安全期望</strong></p>
</div><p>As talc cases move forward, the implications extend well beyond a single manufacturer, reshaping expectations around transparency and product safety across the consumer goods industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>隨着滑石案件的推進，其影響遠超單一製造商，重塑了消費者商品行業對透明度和產品安全的期望。</p>
</div><p><strong>Key impacts include:</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>主要影響包括：</strong></p>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Consumer Safety Awareness:</strong> Reinforcing that talc, because it is mined from asbestos-bearing deposits, cannot be consistently or reliably guaranteed to be asbestos-free.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>消費者安全意識：</strong> 強調滑石因其來自含石棉礦牀，無法始終或可靠地保證無石棉。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Safer Alternatives:</strong> Highlighting that cornstarch-based powders—long recognized as safer—provide effective, non-carcinogenic alternatives.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>更安全的替代品：</strong> 突出玉米澱粉基粉末——長期以來被認為更安全——提供有效的、非致癌的替代品。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li><strong>Regulatory Accountability:</strong> Renewing calls for stronger federal oversight, clearer labeling requirements and independent asbestos testing standards in cosmetics.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li><strong>監管問責：</strong> 重新呼籲加強聯邦監管、明確標籤要求和獨立的化妝品石棉檢測標準。</li>
</ul>
</div><p>&#34;There is no such thing as a safe talcum powder product,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;Cornstarch alternatives have been available for decades, and consumers deserve products that don't carry hidden cancer risks.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“沒有任何滑石粉產品是安全的，” 弗裏德曼説。“玉米澱粉替代品已經存在幾十年，消費者應當獲得不帶有隱性癌症風險的產品。”</p>
</div><p><strong>A Defining Moment for Corporate Accountability</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>企業問責的決定性時刻</strong></p>
</div><p>With bankruptcy no longer blocking the courthouse doors, talc litigation is entering a decisive phase. Wisner Baum brings extensive experience from major consumer-safety and toxic-exposure cases, applying decades of litigation expertise to protect public health and hold corporations accountable.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>隨着破產不再阻礙法庭的門口，滑石訴訟進入了一個決定性階段。Wisner Baum 在主要消費者安全和有毒暴露案件中積累了豐富經驗，運用數十年的訴訟專業知識來保護公共健康並追究企業責任。</p>
</div><p>The firm continues to advance claims nationwide on behalf of women and families affected by ovarian cancer, supported by epidemiological data, internal corporate documents, and a growing number of jury findings. More information about the litigation and consumer safety guidance is available at <strong>Wisner Baum</strong>'s website.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該事務所繼續在全國範圍內推進代表受卵巢癌影響的女性和家庭的索賠，支持其索賠的有流行病學數據、公司內部文件以及日益增多的陪審團裁決。有關訴訟和消費者安全指導的更多信息可在 <strong>Wisner Baum</strong> 的網站上找到。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This litigation sends a clear message,&#34; Friedman said. &#34;Large corporations cannot delay, distract, or restructure their way out of responsibility when the evidence shows real harm. Courts and juries are prepared to look at the facts—and that changes everything.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“這場訴訟傳達了一個明確的信息，” 弗裏德曼説。“大型企業不能通過延遲、分散注意力或重組來逃避責任，當證據顯示真實傷害時。法庭和陪審團準備審視事實——這改變了一切。”</p>
</div><p><strong>About Wisner Baum</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>關於 Wisner Baum</strong></p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum began with a simple but radical idea: that the law should serve people—not protect power. Since opening its doors in 1985, the firm has gone far beyond courtroom victories. Based in Los Angeles and known across the U.S., Wisner Baum has built its legacy by holding powerful corporations accountable—not just to win justice for individual clients, but to spark broader societal change.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum 始於一個簡單但激進的想法：法律應該服務於人民，而不是保護權力。自 1985 年開業以來，該事務所的成就遠超法庭勝利。總部位於洛杉磯，Wisner Baum 在美國享有盛譽，通過追究強大企業的責任建立了自己的遺產——不僅是為了為個別客户贏得正義，更是為了激發更廣泛的社會變革。</p>
</div><p>Every case they take on, from catastrophic injuries and pharmaceutical failures to environmental toxicity and corporate negligence, is part of a bigger mission: to make the world safer, more just, and more transparent for everyone. With more than $4 billion in verdicts and settlements, their legal victories have helped raise public awareness, influence regulations, and force industries to clean up harmful practices. Their work has become a catalyst for product safety reforms, food transparency, and medical accountability.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>他們所處理的每一個案件，從災難性傷害和藥品失敗到環境毒性和企業疏忽，都是更大使命的一部分：讓世界對每個人來説更加安全、公正和透明。憑藉超過 40 億美元的判決和和解，他們的法律勝利幫助提高了公眾意識，影響了法規，並迫使行業清理有害的做法。他們的工作已成為產品安全改革、食品透明度和醫療責任的催化劑。</p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum isn't just a law firm. It's a movement for change—where justice isn't the end goal, but the beginning of a safer society.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum 不僅僅是一家律師事務所。它是一個變革的運動——在這裏，正義不是最終目標，而是更安全社會的起點。</p>
</div><p>Wisner Baum: Changing the System for Societal Change, One Case at a Time.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wisner Baum：為社會變革而改變系統，一次一個案件。</p>
</div><p>Learn more at wisnerbaum.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>瞭解更多信息，請訪問 wisnerbaum.com</p>
</div><p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>參考文獻：</strong></p>
</div><ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). Complaint and demand for jury trial ( <em>Nguyen v. Johnson &amp; Johnson et al.,</em> Docket No. ATL-L-003241-19). Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County.</li>
<li>Reuters, <em>Reuters</em>, December 15, 2025. reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>Nguyen, D. D. (2019). 投訴和陪審團審判請求（ <em>Nguyen 訴強生等，</em> 案號 ATL-L-003241-19）。新澤西州高級法院，法律部門，大西洋縣。</li>
<li>路透社，<em>路透社</em>，2025 年 12 月 15 日。reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jury-orders-johnson-johnson-pay-40-million-two-women-latest-talc-trial-2025-12-13/</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Media Inquiries:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>媒體諮詢：</p>
</div><p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Karla Jo Helms</p>
</div><p>JOTO PR™</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>JOTO PR™</p>
</div><p>727-777-4629</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>727-777-4629</p>
</div><p>Jotopr.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Jotopr.com</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Wisner Baum</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>來源：Wisner Baum</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjUxMjMwJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Rkw1NDQ2MCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNTEyMzAxMDMwUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19GTDU0NDYw" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=FL54460&amp;Transmission_Id=202512301030PR_NEWS_USPR_____FL54460&amp;DateId=20251230"/></p>

隨着科學證據的不斷增加，全國範圍內的卵巢癌滑石索賠正在推進