<p>銀很少自我宣告。它缺乏黃金的神話和銅的增長敍事，但它悄然支撐着現代經濟所依賴的系統：電力、效率和精確性。這種低調的普遍性正是其近期表現值得關注的原因。</p>
<p>銀價已飆升至歷史高位，隨之而來的波動性也不容忽視。這本身並不奇怪。商品價格是週期性波動的，價格發現過程可能會很混亂。這次引起廣泛關注的並不是波動性本身，而是中國自然而然地進入了討論之中。不是作為對手或破壞者，而是提醒人們它在全球銀加工和供應中扮演的核心角色。</p>
<p>這種可見性很重要。當一個對精煉和出口流動有重要影響的國家調整監管或信號時，市場會有所反應。這種反應不是政治性的，而是機械性的。參與者重新校準那些長期未受到挑戰的假設。</p>
<p>這有助於揭示一個重要的觀點。銀價的近期飆升並不僅僅是由情緒或動量驅動的投機事件。它也是對全球系統對曾被視為完全可互換材料的依賴程度的壓力測試。隨着監管、法規和戰略重要性的交匯，問題從銀價多少轉變為銀的流動性有多可靠。</p>
<p><strong>當信任停止擴展</strong></p>
<p>中國的角色至關重要。它不僅僅是銀的礦主，更是全球最重要的加工和精煉者之一。隨着出口許可和更嚴格的監管從理論轉變為政策，市場正面臨一個他們多年來回避的現實。當一種材料深深嵌入能源系統、電子產品和先進製造中時，對其流動的控制就成為了槓桿。</p>
<p>這就是為什麼埃隆·馬斯克的警告引起了關注。製造商並不因孤立的高價格而感到不安。他們對不確定性感到不安。一旦對關鍵輸入的獲取變得有條件，規劃就會迅速崩潰，風險向上遊遷移。</p>
<p>更大的問題是，幾十年來，商品和貴金屬市場一直依賴於信任。證書、精煉廠印章和交易對手的確認足以保持貿易的高效運轉。這個模型只在激勵保持一致的情況下有效。</p>
<p>一旦政府開始將材料視為戰略性，基於信任的系統就開始承受壓力。紙質記錄變成了瓶頸。文檔變得容易被解讀。合規變慢，成本上升，脆弱性悄然侵入曾經感覺例行的事務。</p>
<p>銀現在正跨越這一門檻。</p>
<p>這不再是關於銀是否會繼續有需求的辯論。這個問題已經得到回答。真正的問題是，在監管收緊和假設讓位於控制的情況下，銀將如何被鑑定、驗證和允許流動。</p>
<p><strong>SMX 的角色</strong></p>
<p>這就是 <strong>SMX</strong> <strong>(NASDAQ:SMX)</strong> 進入討論的地方，它不是一個金屬故事，而是一個基礎設施的故事。在這種情況下，提供至關重要且急需的技術。</p>
<p>SMX 可以獨特地將分子級別的標識符直接嵌入物理材料中。一旦嵌入，這種身份就與材料本身不可分割。在加工、熔化或再利用過程中，它無法被移除、改變或丟失。材料攜帶着自己的證明。</p>
<p>對於銀來説，這改變了規則。</p>
<p>不再依賴文件來證明來源或合規，金屬本身變得可驗證。這一區別在一個朝着許可、審計和最終用途審查的市場中顯得尤為重要。還記得那句老話 “信息就是力量” 嗎？在這種情況下，它可能意味着競爭生存。</p>
<p><strong>為什麼銀是一個自然候選者</strong></p>
<p>因為銀處於一個不尋常的交匯點。它的價值足以需要控制，工業性足以不可或缺，全球交易性足以暴露驗證中的薄弱環節。銀的池子現在是共享的。</p>
<p>然而，隨着監管的增加，銀不再能被視為一個單一的未區分池。出口批准的銀、合規的銀、回收的銀和未經驗證的銀將不會以同樣的方式流動。市場將會對這種差異定價，無論現貨價格是否反映這一點。</p>
<p>SMX 允許這種區分在不減緩甚至不停止貿易的情況下發生，通過提供基於物理學的驗證，而不是紙質文件。</p>
<p><strong>基礎設施，而非敍事</strong></p>
<p>不要誤解這裏發生的事情。這不是一個 ESG 論點，也不是一個定價理論。這是一個認識，即現代供應鏈在控制到位後，僅靠信任無法繼續擴展。隨着銀成為基礎設施而不僅僅是交易輸入，其用户必須要求身份。這正是 SMX 旨在提供的內容，也是它為何更傾向於廣泛、包容的市場而非人為稀缺的原因。</p>
<p>SMX 並不從銀的稀缺中獲益。它從銀的重要性中獲益。隨着材料從開放市場轉向許可系統，身份不再是一個特徵，而是一個要求。市場往往會遲遲才認識到這些變化。基礎設施在敍事趕上之前悄然建立。銀的近期波動性並不是故事的全部。故事在於，這種金屬已經跨越了一個門檻，現在處於工業、金融和監管系統的中心，這些系統要求提供證明。</p>
<p>而一旦需要證明，它就不會消失。這很好。SMX 提供了這種持久性。</p>
<p><strong>關於 SMX</strong></p>
<p>隨着全球企業面臨與碳中和相關的新挑戰以及滿足新的政府和地區法規和標準的複雜挑戰，SMX 能夠為價值鏈上的參與者提供其標記、跟蹤、測量和數字平台技術，以更成功地過渡到低碳經濟。</p>
<p><em><strong>前瞻性聲明</strong></em></p>
<p><em>本信息包含 1995 年《私人證券訴訟改革法案》、1933 年《證券法》第 27A 條和 1934 年《證券交易法》第 21E 條所定義的前瞻性聲明。這些聲明基於對 SMX（納斯達克：SMX）、其技術、合作活動以及其開發用於回收 PET 和其他材料的分子標記系統的未來事件的當前預期、估計、預測和假設。前瞻性聲明並非歷史事實。它們涉及風險、不確定性和可能導致實際結果與所表達或暗示的結果存在重大差異的因素。</em></p>
<p><em>本社論中的前瞻性聲明包括但不限於其宣佈的資本設施及其條款、關於 SMX 的分子標記在美國回收市場整合的預期；FDA 合規標記使回收 PET 進入食品級和其他受監管應用的潛力；SMX 解決方案在全球多樣化供應鏈中的可擴展性；製造商、回收商、監管機構或品牌所有者對基於身份的驗證系統的預期採用；將回收塑料轉變為可交易或可貨幣化資產的潛在經濟影響；SMX 的塑料循環代幣或其他數字驗證工具的預期表現；以及分子級認證可能影響塑料行業內定價、合規、可持續性報告或財務策略的信念。</em></p>
<p><em>這些前瞻性聲明還受到關於監管發展、對認證回收內容的市場需求、企業採用可追溯技術的速度、全球經濟狀況、供應鏈限制、不斷變化的環境政策以及與可持續性承諾和回收要求相關的一般行業行為的假設的影響。風險包括但不限於 FDA 或國際監管標準的變化；分子標記大規模部署中的技術挑戰；其他公司的競爭性創新；回收或塑料製造中的運營中斷；原料或回收塑料價格的波動；以及影響資本投資和工業活動的更廣泛經濟條件。</em></p>
<p><em>詳細的風險因素在 SMX 向證券交易委員會提交的文件中進行了描述，包括 10-K 表格的年度報告和後續的 10-Q 表格季度報告。讀者被提醒不要對前瞻性聲明過度依賴。這些聲明僅在發佈之日有效。除非法律要求，SMX 沒有義務更新或修訂前瞻性聲明以反映後續事件、情況變化或新信息。</em></p>
<p><strong>電子郵件</strong>：info@securitymattersltd.com</p>
<p><strong>來源</strong>：SMX（安全事務）公共有限公司</p>
<p>查看 ACCESS Newswire 上的原始新聞稿</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://app.accessnewswire.com/img.ashx/query-aWQ9MTEyMjQ1Mg?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://app.accessnewswire.com/img.ashx/query-aWQ9MTEyMjQ1Mg"/></p>

<p>銀價最近的飆升突顯了其在現代經濟中的關鍵作用，尤其是在地緣政治因素影響其可用性的背景下。中國在銀加工中的重要地位引發了對市場穩定性和信任的擔憂，因為更嚴格的監管可能會擾亂供應鏈。SMX（NASDAQ:SMX）通過在銀中嵌入分子標識符提供瞭解決方案，確保合規性和可追溯性，而無需依賴傳統文檔。這一轉變強調了在日益關注監管的市場中，經過驗證的銀的需求，將銀從單純的商品轉變為重要的基礎設施組成部分</p>

<p>Silver rarely announces itself. It lacks gold's mythology and copper's growth narrative, yet it quietly underpins the systems modern economies depend on: electricity, efficiency, and precision. That unassuming ubiquity is precisely why its recent behavior deserves attention.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>銀很少自我宣告。它缺乏黃金的神話和銅的增長敍事，但它悄然支撐着現代經濟所依賴的系統：電力、效率和精確性。這種低調的普遍性正是其近期表現值得關注的原因。</p>
</div><p>Silver prices have surged to historic levels, and volatility has followed. That, on its own, is not unusual. Commodities move in cycles, and price discovery can be messy. What has drawn broader attention this time is not the volatility itself, but the moment when China naturally entered the conversation. Not as an adversary or disruptor, but as a reminder of just how central its role is in global silver processing and availability.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>銀價已飆升至歷史高位，隨之而來的波動性也不容忽視。這本身並不奇怪。商品價格是週期性波動的，價格發現過程可能會很混亂。這次引起廣泛關注的並不是波動性本身，而是中國自然而然地進入了討論之中。不是作為對手或破壞者，而是提醒人們它在全球銀加工和供應中扮演的核心角色。</p>
</div><p>That visibility matters. When a country with meaningful influence over refining and export flows adjusts oversight or signaling, markets take notice. The response is not political. It is mechanical. Participants recalibrate assumptions that had long gone unchallenged.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這種可見性很重要。當一個對精煉和出口流動有重要影響的國家調整監管或信號時，市場會有所反應。這種反應不是政治性的，而是機械性的。參與者重新校準那些長期未受到挑戰的假設。</p>
</div><p>This helps expose an important point. Silver's recent surge is not purely a speculative episode driven by sentiment or momentum. It is also a stress test of how dependent global systems have become on materials that were once treated as fully interchangeable. As oversight, regulation, and strategic importance converge, the question shifts from how much silver costs to how reliably it can move.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這有助於揭示一個重要的觀點。銀價的近期飆升並不僅僅是由情緒或動量驅動的投機事件。它也是對全球系統對曾被視為完全可互換材料的依賴程度的壓力測試。隨着監管、法規和戰略重要性的交匯，問題從銀價多少轉變為銀的流動性有多可靠。</p>
</div><p><strong>When Trust Stops Scaling</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>當信任停止擴展</strong></p>
</div><p>China's role is central. It is not merely a miner of silver, but one of the world's most important processors and refiners. As export licensing and tighter oversight move from theory to policy, markets are confronting a reality they sidestepped for years. When a material is deeply embedded in energy systems, electronics, and advanced manufacturing, control over its flow becomes leverage.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>中國的角色至關重要。它不僅僅是銀的礦主，更是全球最重要的加工和精煉者之一。隨着出口許可和更嚴格的監管從理論轉變為政策，市場正面臨一個他們多年來回避的現實。當一種材料深深嵌入能源系統、電子產品和先進製造中時，對其流動的控制就成為了槓桿。</p>
</div><p>That is why Elon Musk's warning landed. Manufacturers are not unnerved by higher prices in isolation. They are unnerved by uncertainty. Once access to a critical input becomes conditional, planning breaks down quickly, and risk migrates upstream.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這就是為什麼埃隆·馬斯克的警告引起了關注。製造商並不因孤立的高價格而感到不安。他們對不確定性感到不安。一旦對關鍵輸入的獲取變得有條件，規劃就會迅速崩潰，風險向上遊遷移。</p>
</div><p>The bigger issue that has not been fixed is that for decades, commodity and precious metals markets have run on trust. Certificates, refinery stamps, and counterparties' affirmations were enough to keep trade moving efficiently. That model holds only as long as incentives remain aligned.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>更大的問題是，幾十年來，商品和貴金屬市場一直依賴於信任。證書、精煉廠印章和交易對手的確認足以保持貿易的高效運轉。這個模型只在激勵保持一致的情況下有效。</p>
</div><p>The moment governments begin treating materials as strategic, trust-based systems start to strain. Paper trails turn into bottlenecks. Documentation becomes open to interpretation. Compliance slows, costs rise, and fragility creeps into what once felt routine.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一旦政府開始將材料視為戰略性，基於信任的系統就開始承受壓力。紙質記錄變成了瓶頸。文檔變得容易被解讀。合規變慢，成本上升，脆弱性悄然侵入曾經感覺例行的事務。</p>
</div><p>Silver is now crossing that threshold.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>銀現在正跨越這一門檻。</p>
</div><p>This is no longer a debate about whether silver will remain in demand. That question has already been answered. The real issue is how silver will be qualified, verified, and allowed to move as oversight tightens and assumptions give way to controls.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這不再是關於銀是否會繼續有需求的辯論。這個問題已經得到回答。真正的問題是，在監管收緊和假設讓位於控制的情況下，銀將如何被鑑定、驗證和允許流動。</p>
</div><p><strong>Where SMX Fits</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>SMX 的角色</strong></p>
</div><p>This is where <strong>SMX</strong> <strong>(NASDAQ:SMX)</strong> enters the discussion, not as a metals story, but as an infrastructure one. In this case, providing vital and much-needed technology.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這就是 <strong>SMX</strong> <strong>(NASDAQ:SMX)</strong> 進入討論的地方，它不是一個金屬故事，而是一個基礎設施的故事。在這種情況下，提供至關重要且急需的技術。</p>
</div><p>SMX can uniquely embed a molecular-level identifier directly into physical materials. Once embedded, that identity becomes inseparable from the material itself. It cannot be removed, altered, or lost during processing, melting, or reuse. The material carries its own proof.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>SMX 可以獨特地將分子級別的標識符直接嵌入物理材料中。一旦嵌入，這種身份就與材料本身不可分割。在加工、熔化或再利用過程中，它無法被移除、改變或丟失。材料攜帶着自己的證明。</p>
</div><p>For silver, this changes the rules.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於銀來説，這改變了規則。</p>
</div><p>Instead of relying on documents to prove origin or compliance, the metal itself becomes verifiable. That distinction matters in a market moving toward licensing, audits, and end-use scrutiny. Remember the old adage that &#34;information is power&#34;? Well, in this case, it can mean competitive survival.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>不再依賴文件來證明來源或合規，金屬本身變得可驗證。這一區別在一個朝着許可、審計和最終用途審查的市場中顯得尤為重要。還記得那句老話 “信息就是力量” 嗎？在這種情況下，它可能意味着競爭生存。</p>
</div><p><strong>Why Silver is a Natural Candidate</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>為什麼銀是一個自然候選者</strong></p>
</div><p>That's because silver finds itself at an unusual intersection. It is valuable enough to warrant controls, industrial enough to be indispensable, and globally traded enough to expose weak links in verification. The silver pool is shared now.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>因為銀處於一個不尋常的交匯點。它的價值足以需要控制，工業性足以不可或缺，全球交易性足以暴露驗證中的薄弱環節。銀的池子現在是共享的。</p>
</div><p>However, as oversight increases, silver can no longer be treated as a single undifferentiated pool. Export-approved silver, compliant silver, recycled silver, and unverified silver will not move with equal ease. Markets will price that difference whether spot prices reflect it or not.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，隨着監管的增加，銀不再能被視為一個單一的未區分池。出口批准的銀、合規的銀、回收的銀和未經驗證的銀將不會以同樣的方式流動。市場將會對這種差異定價，無論現貨價格是否反映這一點。</p>
</div><p>SMX allows that differentiation to happen without slowing or even halting trade by providing verification as a functional result of physics rather than paperwork.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>SMX 允許這種區分在不減緩甚至不停止貿易的情況下發生，通過提供基於物理學的驗證，而不是紙質文件。</p>
</div><p><strong>Infrastructure, Not Narrative</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>基礎設施，而非敍事</strong></p>
</div><p>Don't misunderstand what's happening here. This is not an ESG argument, and it is not a pricing thesis. It is a recognition that modern supply chains stop scaling on trust alone once controls are in place. As silver becomes infrastructure rather than just a traded input, its users must demand identity. That is precisely what SMX is designed to provide, and why it favors broad, inclusive markets over artificial scarcity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>不要誤解這裏發生的事情。這不是一個 ESG 論點，也不是一個定價理論。這是一個認識，即現代供應鏈在控制到位後，僅靠信任無法繼續擴展。隨着銀成為基礎設施而不僅僅是交易輸入，其用户必須要求身份。這正是 SMX 旨在提供的內容，也是它為何更傾向於廣泛、包容的市場而非人為稀缺的原因。</p>
</div><p>SMX does not benefit from silver being scarce. It benefits from silver being important enough to manage. As materials move from open markets to permissioned systems, identity stops being a feature and becomes a requirement. Markets tend to recognize these shifts late. Infrastructure gets built quietly, long before narratives catch up. Silver's recent volatility is not the story. The story is that the metal has crossed a threshold and now sits at the center of industrial, financial, and regulatory systems that demand proof.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>SMX 並不從銀的稀缺中獲益。它從銀的重要性中獲益。隨着材料從開放市場轉向許可系統，身份不再是一個特徵，而是一個要求。市場往往會遲遲才認識到這些變化。基礎設施在敍事趕上之前悄然建立。銀的近期波動性並不是故事的全部。故事在於，這種金屬已經跨越了一個門檻，現在處於工業、金融和監管系統的中心，這些系統要求提供證明。</p>
</div><p>And proof, once required, never goes away. That's fine. SMX provides that permanence.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>而一旦需要證明，它就不會消失。這很好。SMX 提供了這種持久性。</p>
</div><p><strong>About SMX</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>關於 SMX</strong></p>
</div><p>As global businesses face new and complex challenges relating to carbon neutrality and meeting new governmental and regional regulations and standards, SMX is able to offer players along the value chain access to its marking, tracking, measuring and digital platform technology to transition more successfully to a low-carbon economy.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>隨着全球企業面臨與碳中和相關的新挑戰以及滿足新的政府和地區法規和標準的複雜挑戰，SMX 能夠為價值鏈上的參與者提供其標記、跟蹤、測量和數字平台技術，以更成功地過渡到低碳經濟。</p>
</div><p><em><strong>Forward-Looking Statements</strong></em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em><strong>前瞻性聲明</strong></em></p>
</div><p><em>This information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and assumptions regarding future events involving SMX (NASDAQ:SMX), its technologies, its partnership activities, and its development of molecular marking systems for recycled PET and other materials. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts. They involve risks, uncertainties, and factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本信息包含 1995 年《私人證券訴訟改革法案》、1933 年《證券法》第 27A 條和 1934 年《證券交易法》第 21E 條所定義的前瞻性聲明。這些聲明基於對 SMX（納斯達克：SMX）、其技術、合作活動以及其開發用於回收 PET 和其他材料的分子標記系統的未來事件的當前預期、估計、預測和假設。前瞻性聲明並非歷史事實。它們涉及風險、不確定性和可能導致實際結果與所表達或暗示的結果存在重大差異的因素。</em></p>
</div><p><em>Forward-looking statements in this editorial include, but are not limited to, its announced capital facility and its terms, expectations regarding the integration of SMX's molecular markers into U.S. recycling markets; the potential for FDA-compliant markers to enable recycled PET to enter food-grade and other regulated applications; the scalability of SMX solutions across diverse global supply chains; anticipated adoption of identity-based verification systems by manufacturers, recyclers, regulators, or brand owners; the potential economic impact of turning recycled plastics into tradeable or monetizable assets; the expected performance of SMX's Plastic Cycle Token or other digital verification instruments; and the belief that molecular-level authentication may influence pricing, compliance, sustainability reporting, or financial strategies used within the plastics sector.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本社論中的前瞻性聲明包括但不限於其宣佈的資本設施及其條款、關於 SMX 的分子標記在美國回收市場整合的預期；FDA 合規標記使回收 PET 進入食品級和其他受監管應用的潛力；SMX 解決方案在全球多樣化供應鏈中的可擴展性；製造商、回收商、監管機構或品牌所有者對基於身份的驗證系統的預期採用；將回收塑料轉變為可交易或可貨幣化資產的潛在經濟影響；SMX 的塑料循環代幣或其他數字驗證工具的預期表現；以及分子級認證可能影響塑料行業內定價、合規、可持續性報告或財務策略的信念。</em></p>
</div><p><em>These forward-looking statements are also subject to assumptions regarding regulatory developments, market demand for authenticated recycled content, the pace of corporate adoption of traceability technology, global economic conditions, supply chain constraints, evolving environmental policies, and general industry behavior relating to sustainability commitments and recycling mandates. Risks include, but are not limited to, changes in FDA or international regulatory standards; technological challenges in large-scale deployment of molecular markers; competitive innovations from other companies; operational disruptions in recycling or plastics manufacturing; fluctuations in pricing for virgin or recycled plastics; and the broader economic conditions that influence capital investment and industrial activity.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>這些前瞻性聲明還受到關於監管發展、對認證回收內容的市場需求、企業採用可追溯技術的速度、全球經濟狀況、供應鏈限制、不斷變化的環境政策以及與可持續性承諾和回收要求相關的一般行業行為的假設的影響。風險包括但不限於 FDA 或國際監管標準的變化；分子標記大規模部署中的技術挑戰；其他公司的競爭性創新；回收或塑料製造中的運營中斷；原料或回收塑料價格的波動；以及影響資本投資和工業活動的更廣泛經濟條件。</em></p>
</div><p><em>Detailed risk factors are described in SMX's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of publication. SMX undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changes in circumstances, or new information, except as required by applicable law.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>詳細的風險因素在 SMX 向證券交易委員會提交的文件中進行了描述，包括 10-K 表格的年度報告和後續的 10-Q 表格季度報告。讀者被提醒不要對前瞻性聲明過度依賴。這些聲明僅在發佈之日有效。除非法律要求，SMX 沒有義務更新或修訂前瞻性聲明以反映後續事件、情況變化或新信息。</em></p>
</div><p><strong>EMAIL</strong>: info@securitymattersltd.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>電子郵件</strong>：info@securitymattersltd.com</p>
</div><p><strong>SOURCE:</strong> SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>來源</strong>：SMX（安全事務）公共有限公司</p>
</div><p>View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>查看 ACCESS Newswire 上的原始新聞稿</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://app.accessnewswire.com/img.ashx/query-aWQ9MTEyMjQ1Mg" alt="" original-src="https://app.accessnewswire.com/img.ashx?id=1122452"/></p>

白銀不僅僅是一種金屬，它還是具有地緣政治利益的基礎設施 | SMX 股票新聞