<p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者在做出投資決策之前，必須對公司進行全面分析。本文將對半導體及半導體設備行業中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過考察關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
<p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例後來發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>通過對 NVIDIA 的詳細審查，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
<ul>
<li>46.42 的市盈率比行業平均水平低 0.48 倍，表明該股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>38.34 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 4.9 倍，表明在賬面價值方面，NVIDIA 可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>24.64 的市銷率相對較高，是行業平均水平的 2.14 倍，表明該股票可能在銷售表現上被視為高估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）比行業平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司在利用股本創造利潤方面表現高效。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 387.5 億美元，比行業平均水平高出 1.02 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力穩健。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>418.5 億美元的毛利潤是行業水平的 1.29 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司正在經歷顯著的收入增長，增長率為 62.49%，超過行業平均水平的 31.75%。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="debt to equity" width="500" height="400" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png"/></p>
<p>債務與股本比率（D/E）評估公司在多大程度上依賴借款資金與其股本的比較。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡潔地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>在根據債務與股本比率比較 NVIDIA 與其前四大同行時，可以觀察到以下見解：</p>
<ul>
<li>在債務與股本比率方面，NVIDIA 的債務水平低於其前四大同行，表明其財務狀況更強。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>這意味着公司對債務融資的依賴較小，債務與股本之間的平衡更為有利，債務與股本比率為 0.09。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>對於半導體及半導體設備行業中的 NVIDIA，其市盈率相較於同行較低，表明可能被低估。較高的市淨率和市銷率表明市場情緒強烈和收入倍數高。在股本回報率、息税折舊攤銷前利潤、毛利潤和收入增長方面，NVIDIA 超越了其行業同行，反映出強勁的財務表現和增長前景。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

英偉達

2 倍做多英偉達 ETF - GraniteShares

南方兩倍做多英偉達

南方兩倍做空英偉達

英偉達期權收益策略 ETF - YieldMax

1 倍做空英偉達 ETF - Direxion

2 倍做多 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

2 倍做空 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

半導體 3 倍做多 - Direxion

<p>本文對英偉達在半導體及半導體設備行業的表現進行了深入分析，並與其競爭對手進行了比較。關鍵財務指標顯示，英偉達可能被低估，因為其市盈率較低，而其市淨率和市銷率較高則暗示被高估。該公司展現出強勁的盈利能力，股本回報率高，收入增長顯著，達到 62.49%。此外，英偉達的財務狀況良好，債務與股本比率低於同行，表明其對債務融資的依賴較小</p>

<p>In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者在做出投資決策之前，必須對公司進行全面分析。本文將對半導體及半導體設備行業中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過考察關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
</div><p>Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence to run large language models. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例後來發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intel Corp</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.42</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>24.64</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>73.34</td>
<td>20.40</td>
<td>26.58</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>31.04</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>13.44</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>112.74</td>
<td>5.77</td>
<td>10.98</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.82</td>
<td>5.60</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>8.77</td>
<td>4.33</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>621.67</td>
<td>1.67</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>31.95</td>
<td>9.59</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>3.98</td>
<td>12.39</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>142.13</td>
<td>15.88</td>
<td>26.79</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>30.55</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>9.67</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>27.19</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>23.70</td>
<td>12.41</td>
<td>16.72</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.28</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.93</td>
<td>20.35</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.93</td>
<td>1.30</td>
<td>2.06</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.30</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>14.79</td>
<td>1.74</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>69.75</td>
<td>4.75</td>
<td>9.03</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>372.90</td>
<td>14.44</td>
<td>20.82</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>45.09</td>
<td>7.91</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>96.02</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.83</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.49</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>Through a detailed examination of NVIDIA, we can deduce the following trends:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過對 NVIDIA 的詳細審查，我們可以推斷出以下趨勢：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>The Price to Earnings ratio of 46.42 is 0.48x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>46.42 的市盈率比行業平均水平低 0.48 倍，表明該股票可能被低估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 38.34, which is 4.9x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>38.34 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 4.9 倍，表明在賬面價值方面，NVIDIA 可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 24.64, which is 2.14x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>24.64 的市銷率相對較高，是行業平均水平的 2.14 倍，表明該股票可能在銷售表現上被視為高估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 29.14% that is 24.67% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）比行業平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司在利用股本創造利潤方面表現高效。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.75 Billion, which is 1.02x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 387.5 億美元，比行業平均水平高出 1.02 倍，表明盈利能力更強和現金流生成能力穩健。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The gross profit of $41.85 Billion is 1.29x above that of its industry, highlighting stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>418.5 億美元的毛利潤是行業水平的 1.29 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 62.49%, outperforming the industry average of 31.75%.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司正在經歷顯著的收入增長，增長率為 62.49%，超過行業平均水平的 31.75%。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767279647_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本比率（D/E）評估公司在多大程度上依賴借款資金與其股本的比較。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，可以簡潔地評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>When comparing NVIDIA with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在根據債務與股本比率比較 NVIDIA 與其前四大同行時，可以觀察到以下見解：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>In terms of the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA has a lower level of debt compared to its top 4 peers, indicating a stronger financial position.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>在債務與股本比率方面，NVIDIA 的債務水平低於其前四大同行，表明其財務狀況更強。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>這意味着公司對債務融資的依賴較小，債務與股本之間的平衡更為有利，債務與股本比率為 0.09。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>For NVIDIA in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, NVIDIA outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth prospects.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於半導體及半導體設備行業中的 NVIDIA，其市盈率相較於同行較低，表明可能被低估。較高的市淨率和市銷率表明市場情緒強烈和收入倍數高。在股本回報率、息税折舊攤銷前利潤、毛利潤和收入增長方面，NVIDIA 超越了其行業同行，反映出強勁的財務表現和增長前景。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

In-Depth Analysis: NVIDIA Versus Competitors In Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

- NVIDIA 在半導體行業中表現突出，市盈率 46.42 低於行業平均。  
- 市淨率和市銷率較高，顯示出市場情緒強勁。  
- 公司 ROE、EBITDA 和收入增長均優於同行，反映良好的財務表現。

深度分析：英偉達在半導體及半導體設備行業中與競爭對手的對比