<p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者在做出投資決策之前，必須對公司進行全面分析。本文將對半導體及半導體設備行業中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過審查關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
<h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
<p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例隨後發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.16</td>
<td>38.12</td>
<td>24.50</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>72.56</td>
<td>20.19</td>
<td>26.29</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>31.36</td>
<td>9.86</td>
<td>13.57</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>112.13</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>10.92</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.13</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>7.62</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.14</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>4.27</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>615</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>31.60</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>59.47</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>12.22</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>140.14</td>
<td>15.66</td>
<td>26.41</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>5.13</td>
<td>9.47</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>26.83</td>
<td>5.44</td>
<td>4.59</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>12.17</td>
<td>16.40</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.05</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.04</td>
<td>20.21</td>
<td>34.52</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.72</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.18</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>14.54</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>2.57</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>67.87</td>
<td>4.63</td>
<td>8.79</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>367.90</td>
<td>14.25</td>
<td>20.54</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>43.76</td>
<td>7.68</td>
<td>14.73</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>94.91</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.74</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.34</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>經過對 NVIDIA 的詳細分析，以下趨勢變得明顯：</p>
<ul>
<li>46.16 的市盈率顯著低於行業平均水平 0.49 倍，表明被低估。這可能使得該股票對尋求增長的投資者具有吸引力。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>38.12 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 4.93 倍，NVIDIA 在賬面價值方面可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>24.5 的市銷率是行業平均水平的 2.16 倍，表明該股票在銷售表現方面可能被高估。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）比行業平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司有效利用股本來創造利潤。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>387.5 億美元的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）比行業平均水平高出 1.02 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和穩健的現金流生成。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司毛利潤為 418.5 億美元，表明其高於行業平均水平 1.29 倍，顯示出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>公司收入增長率為 62.49%，顯著高於行業平均水平 31.75%，展示了卓越的銷售表現和對其產品或服務的強勁需求。</li>
</ul>
<h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767366033_0.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="債務與股本" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767366033_0.png"/></p>
<p>債務與股本比率（D/E）是公司財務健康狀況及其對債務融資依賴程度的關鍵指標。</p>
<p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，有助於簡明評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
<p>在債務與股本比率方面，NVIDIA 與其前四大同行進行比較，得出以下比較結果：</p>
<ul>
<li>與其前四大同行相比，NVIDIA 的財務狀況更強，債務與股本比率為 0.09。</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>這表明公司對債務融資的依賴較小，債務與股本之間的平衡更為有利，這可以被投資者視為一個積極的特徵。</li>
</ul>
<h3>關鍵要點</h3>
<p>對於 NVIDIA 來説，市盈率相較於同行較低，表明潛在的被低估。高市淨率和市銷率表明市場情緒強烈和收入倍數高。高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利潤和收入增長突顯出公司在行業內的強勁財務表現和增長前景。</p>
<p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>

英偉達

2 倍做多英偉達 ETF - GraniteShares

南方兩倍做多英偉達

南方兩倍做空英偉達

英偉達期權收益策略 ETF - YieldMax

1 倍做空英偉達 ETF - Direxion

2 倍做多 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

2 倍做空 NVDA ETF - T-Rex

<p>本文分析了英偉達在半導體及半導體設備行業的表現，並與主要競爭對手進行了比較。英偉達的市盈率（P/E）為 46.16，顯示出潛在的低估，而其市淨率（P/B）和市銷率（P/S）則表明被高估。該公司擁有 29.14% 的高股本回報率（ROE），強勁的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）為 387.5 億美元，以及 62.49% 的令人印象深刻的收入增長。此外，英偉達的債務與股本比率為 0.09，表明其相較於同行的強勁財務狀況</p>

<p>In today's fast-paced and competitive business landscape, it is essential for investors and industry enthusiasts to thoroughly analyze companies before making investment decisions. In this article, we will conduct a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在當今快速變化和競爭激烈的商業環境中，投資者和行業愛好者在做出投資決策之前，必須對公司進行全面分析。本文將對半導體及半導體設備行業中的 <strong>NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA)</strong> 與其主要競爭對手進行全面的行業比較。通過審查關鍵財務指標、市場地位和增長前景，我們旨在為投資者提供有價值的見解，並揭示公司在行業中的表現。</p>
</div><h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>NVIDIA 背景</h3>
</div><p>Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence to run large language models. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Nvidia 是一家領先的圖形處理單元（GPU）開發商。傳統上，GPU 用於增強計算平台上的體驗，尤其是在 PC 遊戲應用中。GPU 的使用案例隨後發展為在人工智能中作為重要的半導體，用於運行大型語言模型。Nvidia 不僅提供 AI GPU，還提供用於 AI 模型開發和訓練的軟件平台 Cuda。Nvidia 還在擴展其數據中心網絡解決方案，幫助將 GPU 連接在一起以處理複雜的工作負載。</p>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>Company</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/E</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/B</strong></th>
<th><strong>P/S</strong></th>
<th><strong>ROE</strong></th>
<th><strong>EBITDA (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Gross Profit (in billions)</strong></th>
<th><strong>Revenue Growth</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.16</td>
<td>38.12</td>
<td>24.50</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>72.56</td>
<td>20.19</td>
<td>26.29</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>31.36</td>
<td>9.86</td>
<td>13.57</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>112.13</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>10.92</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>27.13</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>7.62</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>34.14</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>4.27</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intel Corp</td>
<td>615</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>31.60</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>59.47</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>12.22</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>140.14</td>
<td>15.66</td>
<td>26.41</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>5.13</td>
<td>9.47</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>26.83</td>
<td>5.44</td>
<td>4.59</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>12.17</td>
<td>16.40</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.05</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.04</td>
<td>20.21</td>
<td>34.52</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.72</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.18</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>14.54</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>2.57</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>67.87</td>
<td>4.63</td>
<td>8.79</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>367.90</td>
<td>14.25</td>
<td>20.54</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>43.76</td>
<td>7.68</td>
<td>14.73</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td><strong>94.91</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.74</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.34</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th><strong>公司</strong></th>
<th><strong>市盈率 (P/E)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市淨率 (P/B)</strong></th>
<th><strong>市銷率 (P/S)</strong></th>
<th><strong>股本回報率 (ROE)</strong></th>
<th><strong>息税折舊攤銷前利潤 (EBITDA)（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>毛利潤（十億美元）</strong></th>
<th><strong>收入增長</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>46.16</td>
<td>38.12</td>
<td>24.50</td>
<td>29.14%</td>
<td>$38.75</td>
<td>$41.85</td>
<td>62.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>72.56</td>
<td>20.19</td>
<td>26.29</td>
<td>11.02%</td>
<td>$9.86</td>
<td>$12.25</td>
<td>28.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>台灣半導體制造公司</td>
<td>31.36</td>
<td>9.86</td>
<td>13.57</td>
<td>9.44%</td>
<td>$691.11</td>
<td>$588.54</td>
<td>30.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>超威半導體公司</td>
<td>112.13</td>
<td>5.74</td>
<td>10.92</td>
<td>2.06%</td>
<td>$2.11</td>
<td>$4.78</td>
<td>35.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>美光科技公司</td>
<td>27.13</td>
<td>5.46</td>
<td>7.62</td>
<td>9.28%</td>
<td>$8.35</td>
<td>$7.65</td>
<td>56.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>高通公司</td>
<td>34.14</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>4.27</td>
<td>-12.88%</td>
<td>$3.51</td>
<td>$6.24</td>
<td>10.03%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>英特爾公司</td>
<td>615</td>
<td>1.65</td>
<td>3.04</td>
<td>3.98%</td>
<td>$7.85</td>
<td>$5.22</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>德州儀器公司</td>
<td>31.60</td>
<td>9.48</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td>8.21%</td>
<td>$2.24</td>
<td>$2.72</td>
<td>14.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>模擬器件公司</td>
<td>59.47</td>
<td>3.93</td>
<td>12.22</td>
<td>2.32%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$1.94</td>
<td>25.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>140.14</td>
<td>15.66</td>
<td>26.41</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>34.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marvell Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.92</td>
<td>5.13</td>
<td>9.47</td>
<td>13.84%</td>
<td>$2.58</td>
<td>$1.07</td>
<td>36.83%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>
<td>26.83</td>
<td>5.44</td>
<td>4.59</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$1.11</td>
<td>$1.79</td>
<td>-2.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>單片電源系統公司</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>12.17</td>
<td>16.40</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>18.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>32.48</td>
<td>3.46</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.56%</td>
<td>$32.4</td>
<td>$28.88</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>20.05</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>5.19%</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>79.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>124.04</td>
<td>20.21</td>
<td>34.52</td>
<td>7.99%</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>272.08%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>44.72</td>
<td>1.29</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
<td>$0.31</td>
<td>$1.06</td>
<td>-1.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>74.18</td>
<td>2.76</td>
<td>3.66</td>
<td>3.22%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>-11.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>聯華電子公司</td>
<td>14.54</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>2.57</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$30.07</td>
<td>$17.62</td>
<td>-2.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tower Semiconductor Ltd</td>
<td>67.87</td>
<td>4.63</td>
<td>8.79</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>6.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>367.90</td>
<td>14.25</td>
<td>20.54</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>4.92%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>43.76</td>
<td>7.68</td>
<td>14.73</td>
<td>3.84%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>平均</strong></td>
<td><strong>94.91</strong></td>
<td><strong>7.74</strong></td>
<td><strong>11.34</strong></td>
<td><strong>4.47%</strong></td>
<td><strong>$37.85</strong></td>
<td><strong>$32.52</strong></td>
<td><strong>31.75%</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>After a detailed analysis of NVIDIA, the following trends become apparent:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>經過對 NVIDIA 的詳細分析，以下趨勢變得明顯：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>A Price to Earnings ratio of 46.16 significantly below the industry average by 0.49x suggests undervaluation. This can make the stock appealing for those seeking growth.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>46.16 的市盈率顯著低於行業平均水平 0.49 倍，表明被低估。這可能使得該股票對尋求增長的投資者具有吸引力。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Price to Book ratio of 38.12, which is 4.93x the industry average, NVIDIA might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>38.12 的市淨率是行業平均水平的 4.93 倍，NVIDIA 在賬面價值方面可能被視為高估，因為其交易倍數高於行業同行。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The Price to Sales ratio of 24.5, which is 2.16x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>24.5 的市銷率是行業平均水平的 2.16 倍，表明該股票在銷售表現方面可能被高估。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 29.14% that is 24.67% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>29.14% 的股本回報率（ROE）比行業平均水平高出 24.67%，表明公司有效利用股本來創造利潤。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.75 Billion is 1.02x above the industry average, highlighting stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>387.5 億美元的息税折舊攤銷前利潤（EBITDA）比行業平均水平高出 1.02 倍，突顯出更強的盈利能力和穩健的現金流生成。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company has higher gross profit of $41.85 Billion, which indicates 1.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司毛利潤為 418.5 億美元，表明其高於行業平均水平 1.29 倍，顯示出更強的盈利能力和核心業務的更高收益。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>The company's revenue growth of 62.49% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 31.75%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>公司收入增長率為 62.49%，顯著高於行業平均水平 31.75%，展示了卓越的銷售表現和對其產品或服務的強勁需求。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>債務與股本比率</h3>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767366033_0.png" alt="debt to equity" original-src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2026/1767366033_0.png"/></p>
<p>The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a key indicator of a company's financial health and its reliance on debt financing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>債務與股本比率（D/E）是公司財務健康狀況及其對債務融資依賴程度的關鍵指標。</p>
</div><p>Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在行業比較中考慮債務與股本比率，有助於簡明評估公司的財務健康狀況和風險特徵，幫助做出明智的決策。</p>
</div><p>In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, NVIDIA stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在債務與股本比率方面，NVIDIA 與其前四大同行進行比較，得出以下比較結果：</p>
</div><ul>
<li>Compared to its top 4 peers, NVIDIA has a stronger financial position indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.09.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>與其前四大同行相比，NVIDIA 的財務狀況更強，債務與股本比率為 0.09。</li>
</ul>
</div><ul>
<li>This suggests that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive attribute by investors.</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>這表明公司對債務融資的依賴較小，債務與股本之間的平衡更為有利，這可以被投資者視為一個積極的特徵。</li>
</ul>
</div><h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
<div class="lb-trans"><h3>關鍵要點</h3>
</div><p>For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. The high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth highlight robust financial performance and growth prospects within the industry.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>對於 NVIDIA 來説，市盈率相較於同行較低，表明潛在的被低估。高市淨率和市銷率表明市場情緒強烈和收入倍數高。高 ROE、EBITDA、毛利潤和收入增長突顯出公司在行業內的強勁財務表現和增長前景。</p>
</div><p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>本文由 Benzinga 的自動內容引擎生成，並由編輯審核。</em></p>
</div>

Insights Into NVIDIA's Performance Versus Peers In Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Sector

- 本文分析了 NVIDIA 與競爭對手在半導體行業的比較。  
- NVIDIA 股價收益比為 46.16，顯示出低估潛力。  
- 其 62.49% 的收入增長遠高於行業平均水平，表明強勁需求。

深入分析英偉達在半導體和半導體設備行業中相較於同行的表現