<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" width="960" height="540" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992"/></p>
<p>2025 年 3 月 10 日，懷俄明州最後一家墮胎診所 Wellspring Center 的檢查室空無一人，地點位於懷俄明州卡斯珀。- Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
<p>在懷俄明州最高法院推翻包括全國首個明確禁止墮胎藥物的法律後，墮胎在懷俄明州將繼續合法，法院週二裁定這些法律違反了州憲法。</p>
<p>法官們支持了該州唯一的墮胎診所及其他因 2022 年通過的禁令提起訴訟的機構，當時美國最高法院推翻了具有里程碑意義的羅訴韋德案。</p>
<p>卡斯珀的 Wellspring Health Access、墮胎權利倡導組織 Chelsea’s Fund 以及包括兩名婦產科醫生在內的四名女性辯稱，這些法律違反了確保合格成年人有權做出自身醫療決策的州憲法修正案。</p>
<p>然而，州政府的律師辯稱，墮胎不能違反懷俄明州憲法，因為它不是醫療保健。</p>
<p>選民在 2012 年通過了這一憲法修正案，以回應聯邦《平價醫療法案》。法官們承認該修正案並未寫明適用於墮胎，但表示他們的職責不是 “添加詞語” 到州憲法中。</p>
<p>“但立法者可以要求懷俄明州選民考慮一項更明確解決此問題的憲法修正案，” 法官們在總結他們的 4-1 裁決時寫道。</p>
<p>共和黨州長馬克·戈登在一份聲明中表示，他對這一裁決感到失望，並呼籲州立法者在冬季會議上通過一項提議的憲法修正案，禁止墮胎，並在今年秋季提交給選民投票。</p>
<p>“這一裁決可能暫時解決了一個法律問題，但並未解決道德問題，也未反映許多懷俄明州公民的立場，包括我自己。是時候讓這個問題交給人民投票了，” 戈登説。</p>
<p>這樣的修正案需要三分之二的投票才能在主要用於州預算的一個月立法會議上提出考慮。但在共和黨主導的州議會中，它將獲得廣泛支持。</p>
<p>週二推翻的法律之一試圖禁止墮胎，除非是為了保護孕婦的生命或涉及強姦或亂倫的情況。另一項法律將使懷俄明州成為唯一明確禁止墮胎藥物的州，儘管其他州通過廣泛禁止墮胎實際上實施了對墮胎藥物的禁令。</p>
<p>自從傑克遜的提頓縣地方法官梅麗莎·歐文斯在訴訟進行期間阻止了這些禁令以來，墮胎在這個保守的州一直是合法的。歐文斯在 2024 年裁定這些法律違憲。</p>
<p>Wellspring Health Access 及案件雙方的律師尚未立即回覆評論請求。</p>
<p>去年，懷俄明州通過了額外法律，要求墮胎診所必須是獲得許可的外科中心，並要求女性在進行藥物墮胎前接受超聲檢查。最高法院的裁決意味着這些限制可能會生效，儘管在另一項訴訟中，一名法官已阻止它們生效，案件仍在進行中。</p>
<p>欲獲取更多 CNN 新聞和通訊，請在 CNN.com 上創建賬户。</p>

<p>懷俄明州的墮胎在州最高法院推翻相關法律後仍然合法，包括美國首個禁止墮胎藥的法律，裁定這些法律違反了州憲法。法院支持該州唯一的墮胎診所及其他主張這些法律侵犯醫療決策權的團體。州長馬克·戈登表示失望，並呼籲進行憲法修正案以禁止墮胎，這需要立法機構的三分之二投票支持。該裁決允許現有對墮胎診所的限制在進一步法律挑戰之前可能生效</p>

<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992" alt="" original-src="https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/v9nLi4xZ9JIFcfujsUk78A--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD02OTk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/cnn_articles_875/e8063a7cb54e52feedfa35a870b9f992"/></p>
<p>An examination room is empty at Wyoming's last abortion clinic, Wellspring Center, on March 10, 2025, in Casper, Wyoming. - Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>2025 年 3 月 10 日，懷俄明州最後一家墮胎診所 Wellspring Center 的檢查室空無一人，地點位於懷俄明州卡斯珀。- Natalie Behring/Getty Images</p>
</div><p>Abortion will remain legal in Wyoming after the state Supreme Court struck down laws that include the country’s first explicit ban on abortion pills, ruling Tuesday that they violate the state constitution.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在懷俄明州最高法院推翻包括全國首個明確禁止墮胎藥物的法律後，墮胎在懷俄明州將繼續合法，法院週二裁定這些法律違反了州憲法。</p>
</div><p>The justices sided with the state’s only abortion clinic and others who had sued over the bans passed since 2022, when the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法官們支持了該州唯一的墮胎診所及其他因 2022 年通過的禁令提起訴訟的機構，當時美國最高法院推翻了具有里程碑意義的羅訴韋德案。</p>
</div><p>Wellspring Health Access in Casper, the abortion access advocacy group Chelsea’s Fund and four women, including two obstetricians, argued that the laws violated a state constitutional amendment ensuring that competent adults have the right to make their own health care decisions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>卡斯珀的 Wellspring Health Access、墮胎權利倡導組織 Chelsea’s Fund 以及包括兩名婦產科醫生在內的四名女性辯稱，這些法律違反了確保合格成年人有權做出自身醫療決策的州憲法修正案。</p>
</div><p>Attorneys for the state, however, argued that abortion can’t violate the Wyoming constitution because it is not health care.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，州政府的律師辯稱，墮胎不能違反懷俄明州憲法，因為它不是醫療保健。</p>
</div><p>Voters approved the constitutional amendment in 2012 in response to the federal Affordable Care Act. The justices recognized that the amendment wasn’t written to apply to abortion but said it’s not their job to “add words” to the state constitution.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>選民在 2012 年通過了這一憲法修正案，以回應聯邦《平價醫療法案》。法官們承認該修正案並未寫明適用於墮胎，但表示他們的職責不是 “添加詞語” 到州憲法中。</p>
</div><p>“But lawmakers could ask Wyoming voters to consider a constitutional amendment that would more clearly address this issue,” the justices wrote in summarizing their 4-1 ruling.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“但立法者可以要求懷俄明州選民考慮一項更明確解決此問題的憲法修正案，” 法官們在總結他們的 4-1 裁決時寫道。</p>
</div><p>Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, said in a statement that he was disappointed by the ruling and called on state lawmakers meeting this winter to pass a proposed constitutional amendment banning abortion that would go before voters this fall.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>共和黨州長馬克·戈登在一份聲明中表示，他對這一裁決感到失望，並呼籲州立法者在冬季會議上通過一項提議的憲法修正案，禁止墮胎，並在今年秋季提交給選民投票。</p>
</div><p>“This ruling may settle, for now, a legal question, but it does not settle the moral one, nor does it reflect where many Wyoming citizens stand, including myself. It is time for this issue to go before the people for a vote,” Gordon said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“這一裁決可能暫時解決了一個法律問題，但並未解決道德問題，也未反映許多懷俄明州公民的立場，包括我自己。是時候讓這個問題交給人民投票了，” 戈登説。</p>
</div><p>Such an amendment would require a two-thirds vote to be introduced for consideration during the month-long legislative session devoted primarily to the state budget. But it would have wide support in the Republican-dominated statehouse.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這樣的修正案需要三分之二的投票才能在主要用於州預算的一個月立法會議上提出考慮。但在共和黨主導的州議會中，它將獲得廣泛支持。</p>
</div><p>One of the laws overturned Tuesday sought to ban abortion except to protect a pregnant woman’s life or in cases involving rape or incest. The other law would have made Wyoming the only state to explicitly ban abortion pills, though other states have instituted de facto bans on abortion medication by broadly prohibiting abortion.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>週二推翻的法律之一試圖禁止墮胎，除非是為了保護孕婦的生命或涉及強姦或亂倫的情況。另一項法律將使懷俄明州成為唯一明確禁止墮胎藥物的州，儘管其他州通過廣泛禁止墮胎實際上實施了對墮胎藥物的禁令。</p>
</div><p>Abortion has remained legal in this conservative state since Teton County District Judge Melissa Owens in Jackson blocked the bans while the lawsuit challenging them went ahead. Owens struck down the laws as unconstitutional in 2024.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>自從傑克遜的提頓縣地方法官梅麗莎·歐文斯在訴訟進行期間阻止了這些禁令以來，墮胎在這個保守的州一直是合法的。歐文斯在 2024 年裁定這些法律違憲。</p>
</div><p>Wellspring Health Access and attorneys on both sides of the case didn’t immediately reply to requests for comment.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Wellspring Health Access 及案件雙方的律師尚未立即回覆評論請求。</p>
</div><p>Last year, Wyoming passed additional laws requiring abortion clinics to be licensed surgical centers and women to get ultrasounds before having medication abortions. The Supreme Court ruling means those limitations could take effect, although a judge in a separate lawsuit has blocked them from taking effect while the case proceeds.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>去年，懷俄明州通過了額外法律，要求墮胎診所必須是獲得許可的外科中心，並要求女性在進行藥物墮胎前接受超聲檢查。最高法院的裁決意味着這些限制可能會生效，儘管在另一項訴訟中，一名法官已阻止它們生效，案件仍在進行中。</p>
</div><p>For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>欲獲取更多 CNN 新聞和通訊，請在 CNN.com 上創建賬户。</p>
</div>

懷俄明州的墮胎仍然合法，因為該州最高法院推翻了包括美國首個藥物禁令在內的法律