<div id="readability-page-1" class="page"><div> The Greenland crisis showed that if Europe shows spine, it can be strong. It must now apply that lesson to industrial policy, or suffer the consequences. By William Todts, Executive DirectorBrussels (EU), T&amp;E “The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must,” wrote the Greek historian Thucydides 2500 years ago. His words haven’t lost any of their salience (see this great Davos speech by Mike Carney). The Greenland crisis showed that if Europe shows spine, it can be strong. It must now apply that lesson to industrial policy, or suffer the consequences. Today, Europe has strategic autonomy in vehicle production — just about, see the Nexperia chips saga. In the essential shift to electrification — crucial for climate, security and future jobs — the EU cannot afford to lose this autonomy. Can Europe go electric and remain sovereign? It all depends on batteries. One year ago, with Northvolt bankrupt, Europe’s battery dream lay in tatters. And yet in late 2025 PowerCo and Verkor, two European companies, started churning out cells, joining ACC which had started a year earlier. Umicore, a Belgian company, is producing cathodes in Poland. <img height="702" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/diverse-EU-battery-industry.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1588" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/diverse-EU-battery-industry.png"/> What’s emerging is the kind of diverse battery industry the EU needs, with European and Chinese companies adding to the existing (mostly) South Korean capacity (e.g. LG, Samsung). <img height="1142" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-gigafactories-map.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1586" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-gigafactories-map.png"/> Factories are spread all across Europe, and the expected 600 GWH of gigafactory capacity would enable production of around 8 mn BEVs per year in 2030. That’s enough to supply Europe and export some EVs. <img height="1266" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-production.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1588" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-production.png"/> <h3 dir="ltr">Reality check</h3> A lot of analysis based on announcements and nameplate capacity stops at this point. In reality, things are a bit more complicated. First, even though nameplate capacity suggests the EU is already ‘autonomous’, in reality it is a large importer of battery cells from both China (28%) and Korea (2%). Germany is one of the prime — but by no means the only EU — destinations for Chinese EV battery exports which are cheaper than EU produced cells. Verkor and PowerCo have only just started production. It will take years for their factories to produce at the same quality and efficiency of their Asian competitors. Industry experts estimate some of the existing European gigafactories to have actual output of just 20% of their nameplate capacity right now. The reality is the Europeans are in the battery valley of death. Survival is not guaranteed. It will take years of disciplined execution and EU support — more on that later. So, all of a sudden the picture looks a lot bleaker with Europe mostly dependent on Asian batteries. <img height="1209" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-gigafactories-scaled.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="2560" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/EU-battery-gigafactories-scaled.png"/> <h3 dir="ltr">South Korea</h3> Companies like LG Chem, Samsung and SK On localised in Europe and went through production hell years ago. South Korea is a trusted partner for the EU. Its companies are a key pillar of a diverse battery industry. But as NMC producers, they too are at risk. The Chinese market has shifted away from NMC/NCA to now around 80% LFP, mainly because it is cheaper. <h3 dir="ltr">China</h3> Today most Chinese cells come directly from factories in mainland China. This changes once CATL’s plants in Hungary and Spain start to produce at scale. Cathodes and other inputs will continue to be imported from China and its lossmaking and subsidised LFP supply chain. EU and Korean producers are much more likely to rely on local cathode producers like Umicore, or Ecopro BM (Korean, but localised). Cathodes, including their key building blocks CAM and pCAM, account for around 30% of the added value of batteries and are a key piece of the puzzle if the EU wants to derisk its supply chains. And so the reality is that by 2030, China may completely dominate the EU battery market, especially if European producers are forced out of the market. <img height="632" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/China-battery-domination.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1588" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/China-battery-domination.png"/> <h3 dir="ltr">Can Europe keep its battery dream alive?</h3> In short, a diverse EU battery supply chain remains possible. But action is needed. So far, the EU has failed to muster significant financial support for battery producers. It has also shown to be unwilling to impose tariffs on imported cells and cathodes, despite evidence that the Chinese battery supply chain is heavily subsidised. And so all eyes are now on the local content rules the EU will adopt as part of the so-called Industry Accelerator Act (due 25 February). The act will likely restrict all public support and tax breaks for cars sold in Europe – so around 60% of EU BEV sales, not all cars! – to vehicles meeting certain local content requirements. The key questions the EU Commission needs to answer are: <ol> <li dir="ltr">What components must be produced locally? Just cells, or also cathodes, CAM and pCAM?</li> <li dir="ltr">Whether to distinguish between chemistries or to set the same targets for NMC and LFP localisation.</li> <li dir="ltr">Does #MadeinEU really mean EU27, or will we also consider countries the EU has trade deals with as European (e.g. Korea or Vietnam, i.e. everyone but China)?</li> </ol> These choices will determine to what extent there will be a diverse and/or European battery industry in 2030. Indeed, low targets, with looser rules for LFP, and half of the world qualifying as #MadeInEU, would fail to stop the Chinese dominance scenario described above. <img height="1176" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/2026_oped_maps.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1588" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/2026_oped_maps.png"/> We believe all cells for EVs covered by the IAA should be produced in Europe. The same principle (perhaps with different timing) should apply to cathodes, with the same rules for both NMC and LFP. And Europe should mean Europe for key components like cells and cathodes. For materials, processing and refining, the EU can be more flexible. <img height="1252" src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Made-in-EU-EVs-batteries.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" width="1964" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://cleantechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Made-in-EU-EVs-batteries.png"/> Carmakers are split on the EU’s effort to prioritise “made in Europe” products, despite the backing of 1,000 European chief execs. Some like Volkswagen, Stellantis and Renault back local content (although with different definitions). Others like BMW oppose the idea, pretending the old world order is still alive, because it suits their short term interests. Opposition often boils down to local content rules requiring (significant) changes in industrial plans. Well, indeed, that’s exactly the point. The coming years will test Europe like no other. We need vision and plans, but as the old Greek historian noted: to succeed, you above all need to act and move forward without hesitation. While it is still strong, Europe must do what it can. </div></div>

這篇文章討論了歐洲在電氣化轉型中保持電池生產戰略自主權的挑戰。儘管像 PowerCo 和 Verkor 這樣的公司最近取得了一些進展，但歐洲仍然在很大程度上依賴於來自亞洲，特別是中國的進口。歐盟的電池產業面臨着顯著的障礙，包括生產效率低下和缺乏財政支持。即將出台的《產業加速法》可能會施加本地內容要求，這可能會影響歐洲電池生產的未來及其與亞洲製造商的競爭力。文章強調了採取果斷行動以維持歐洲電池雄心的必要性

Can Europe Go Electric & Remain Sovereign?

cleantechnica

Volkswagen AG Pref

納斯達克全球汽車指數 - First Trust

大眾集團

北京汽車

大眾汽車(ADR)

華寶智能電動汽車ETF

大眾(ADR)

大眾B股

眾泰汽車

平安中證新能源汽車產業ETF

華夏中證新能源汽車ETF

特斯拉

歐洲能否在實現電動化的同時保持其主權？