JPMorgan commodities strategist Natasha Kaneva issued a warning: global oil supply and demand accounts have &#34;gone seriously wrong.&#34; The supply disruption exceeding 13.7 million barrels per day in April is being misinterpreted by outsiders as accelerating demand contraction, but the logic behind it is precisely the opposite—what is called demand decline is largely a statistical illusion where supply shortages appear on the ledger as demand losses. When the market finally clarifies this confusion, the cost of clearing will be far more severe than currently visible.
From a numerical perspective, JPMorgan estimates that observable inventory drawdowns in April reached 7.1 million barrels per day; according to Goldman Sachs data, if invisible refined product inventories are included, the global daily inventory drawdown size in April was as high as 10.9 million barrels, marking the fastest single-month consumption rate since 2017. Since the outbreak of the Persian Gulf conflict, cumulative losses are estimated to have reached 474 million barrels. Meanwhile, including pipeline rerouting, petroleum flows from the Persian Gulf have dropped to approximately 9.3 million barrels per day, only 40% of normal levels.
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/d33f9884-2bbc-46c2-b959-cd806e70ef6d.jpeg?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/d33f9884-2bbc-46c2-b959-cd806e70ef6d.jpeg"/>
Kaneva's core judgment is: the observed global oil demand drop in April of about 4.3 million barrels per day exceeded the demand loss during the peak of the 2009 global financial crisis, yet current oil prices are not extreme by historical standards and are far insufficient to explain such a large-scale and rapid demand collapse. A more reasonable explanation is that most demand losses were not buyers voluntarily abandoning consumption, but rather physical stockouts directly suppressing actual purchasing behavior—supply losses are being presented through the demand ledger.
<img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/ec25f72f-d057-4823-b9a7-f12e0d753646.jpeg?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://wpimg-wscn.awtmt.com/ec25f72f-d057-4823-b9a7-f12e0d753646.jpeg"/>
This distinction is crucial. It means that adjustments so far have mainly been borne by fragile markets such as the Middle East, Asia, and Africa, while the price pain for Western consumers has not truly begun. Kaneva warns that even adding aggressive inventory contributions, there remains a supply-demand gap of about 2 million barrels per day that needs filling; it is only a matter of time before Western markets are forced to participate in the adjustment—meaning oil prices need to rise further, perhaps significantly, and the market will ultimately be forced to clear.
<h2>Supply and Demand &#34;Accounts Don't Match&#34;: Traditional Buffer Mechanisms Exhausted</h2>
In her latest report, Kaneva points out that the physical laws of commodity markets cannot be violated: supply plus inventory reduction always equals consumption plus inventory increase. Once production shortfalls occur, the gap does not disappear into thin air; the system must sequentially activate spare capacity, draw down inventories, urgently release strategic reserves, and finally force demand suppression through high prices. However, in this round of shock, this adjustment mechanism has failed one by one.
The Supply Shock unfolded with rare scale and speed: global oil supply disruptions were 9.1 million barrels per day in March, expanding to 13.7 million barrels per day in April. The traditional first line of defense—spare capacity—could not be activated at all. Most of the world's spare capacity is concentrated in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both of which are effectively cut off from international markets, rendering the industry's traditional shock absorbers useless.
As the global marginal supplier, even with significant price increases, shale oil's scaled capacity response requires 3 to 6 months, with an expected contribution of only 300,000 to 700,000 barrels per day; larger-scale production increases usually take 6 to 12 months to materialize. Russia's spare capacity is about 300,000 barrels per day, but with continued attacks on energy infrastructure, Russian supply has declined by about 350,000 barrels per day in recent weeks. With the first line of defense breached, inventory drawdown immediately became the only buffer—this is what Kaneva calls &#34;the clock has started ticking down.&#34;
<h2>&#34;Fake Demand Drop&#34;: Apparent Demand Contraction on Paper is Actually a Mirror of Supply Deficits</h2>
JPMorgan data shows that global oil demand fell by an average of 2.8 million barrels per day in March, widening to a drop of 4.3 million barrels per day in April. This scale exceeds the demand contraction of about 2.5 million barrels per day at the peak of the 2009 global financial crisis—at that time, the background was a global recession and a sharp contraction in industrial activity.
What confuses Kaneva is that this demand drop occurred in a relatively moderate price environment. The average price of Brent crude futures was around $100 per barrel in both March and April; the spot average price was $107 in March and approximately $123 so far in April. Although refined product prices nearly doubled compared to pre-war levels, the crude price level is not extreme by historical standards and alone cannot explain such a large-scale and rapid reduction in demand.
Kaneva concludes: most of the demand decline is not traditional price-driven active demand destruction, but rather physical shortages forcing consumption interruptions—buyers did not choose to buy less due to high prices, but simply had no goods to buy. This &#34;forced demand absence&#34; statistically presents as a demand drop, but essentially it is a reflection of supply losses on the demand side of the ledger, constituting a &#34;fake demand drop.&#34;
Of the 4.3 million barrels per day demand loss in April, 87% was concentrated in the Middle East (directly hit by war), Asia (structurally dependent on Gulf crude and refined products), and Africa (dependent on Gulf middle distillates, weak inventories, and limited fiscal response capabilities). As cargoes were diverted to higher-bidding Asian buyers, some demand parties were directly priced out of the market.
<h2>Record Inventory Drawdown: Operational Bottom Line Approaching</h2>
This is the clearest real-time alarm in this round of supply-demand imbalance. JPMorgan estimates that observable commercial and strategic inventories drew down by 4 million barrels per day in March, surging to 7.1 million barrels per day in April. JPMorgan also noted that due to limited visibility of some refined product inventories, the actual drawdown magnitude could be significantly larger than reported data.
Goldman Sachs data corroborates this. According to Goldman Sachs, global visible inventories were drawn down by an average of 6.3 million barrels per day in April; if non-OECD invisible refined product inventories are included, total global daily inventory drawdown in April reached 10.9 million barrels, the largest single-month consumption rate since 2017. Since the outbreak of the Persian Gulf conflict, cumulative losses are estimated to have reached 474 million barrels.
Pressure on the supply side is equally severe. Iranian oil exports have plummeted to about 300,000 barrels per day, and US exports have hit pipeline limits. Goldman Sachs expects that even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens completely, flow recovery will be a gradual process constrained by logistics bottlenecks such as capacity restart times, tanker voyage durations, and pipeline rates; global inventory declines may continue into May or longer.
It is worth noting that inventory drawdown has an insurmountable natural lower limit—the operational minimum inventory level. Once this bottom line is touched, with supply unable to recover, the only rebalancing mechanism will be a forced collapse of demand. This is the critical trigger condition for the &#34;bigger shock&#34; Kaneva refers to.
<h2>Market Forced to Clear: Shock Will Spread to Western Markets</h2>
Kaneva's accounting reveals an inescapable arithmetic problem: approximately 14 million barrels per day of supply have been removed; even estimating inventory contributions aggressively at 8 million barrels per day, the market still faces a gap of about 2 million barrels per day that must be bridged through deeper demand reductions or more aggressive inventory drawdowns.
She warns that this gap is &#34;too large to be absorbed solely by emerging markets.&#34; Europe and the United States inevitably need to participate in the adjustment, and the prerequisite for their participation is further—and potentially significant—oil price increases. European distillate and aviation fuel markets are already tightening further; the Americas, due to relatively sufficient domestic supply flexibility, face smaller short-term shocks, but rising US pump prices are beginning to suppress elastic driving demand, and rising ticket prices are gradually softening aviation fuel demand.
Regarding product structure, adjustments first appear in margin-thin, price-sensitive areas, especially petrochemical feedstocks and aviation fuel. Shortages of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), ethane, and naphtha from the Gulf have forced PDH units and steam crackers across Asia to significantly reduce operating rates or shut down entirely; this petrochemical feedstock-driven demand contraction accounted for about 55% of the total 4.3 million barrels per day demand loss in April. Official Indian data shows that LPG consumption fell 13% year-on-year in March. Aviation fuel accounted for about 11% of total demand losses, mainly reflecting the impact of Middle Eastern flight suspensions; Kaneva expects airlines in Asia and Europe to further reduce capacity in May, and aviation fuel demand will continue to weaken.
Gasoline price increases are currently significantly smaller than distillates, reflecting its relatively lower dependence on Gulf supplies. But Kaneva warns that as refinery constraints tighten overall refined product balances, this relative protection will gradually fade—especially as the US summer driving season approaches. Kaneva's final conclusion aligns with the iron law of commodity markets: the market must clear, and the cost will be far greater than what is currently shown on the books, leaving both consumers and financial markets with little escape.

JPMorgan warns that global oil accounts have "gone seriously wrong." April's apparent demand collapsed by 4.3 million barrels per day, a scale surpassing the peak of the 2008 financial crisis, but the truth is not demand contraction—it is the statistical mirror of supply disruption. Inventory drawdowns are now at their fastest pace since 2017, with traditional buffer mechanisms failing one by one. The price pain for Western consumers has not truly begun; the market clearing cost will be far more severe than the books suggest

- Morgan Stanley's Natasha Kaneva warns that global oil supply and demand accounts are significantly imbalanced, with April disruptions exceeding 13.7 million barrels per day indicating a misleading narrative of demand decline.  
- The majority of this demand loss, about 4.3 million barrels per day, reflects actual supply shortages rather than voluntary consumer withdrawal, especially in fragile markets like the Middle East and Asia.  
- Kaneva concludes that without substantial supply recovery, market adjustments will force a significant rise in oil prices, potentially leading to severe economic repercussions in both emerging and developed markets.

Wallstreetcn

Occidental Petroleum

BP p.l.c.

Us Brent Oil

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

iShares US Oil & Gas Expl & Prod

VanEck Oil Services ETF

SPDR O&G Ex & Prd

iShares US Oil Equip & Svcs

VG Energy

ISHRS S&P Glb Engy

Pro Ultr Bloomberg Crude Oil

SPDR Energy Select

United States Oil Fund LP

JPMorgan Chase

Goldman Sachs

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.20% DEP SHS REPSTG 1/400TH PFD SER MM

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 6%NON CUM DEP SHS REP 1/400TH PFD SER EE

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. DEP REP 1/400TH (5.75% NON CUM PFD DD)

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.625% DEP SH RE 1/400TH INT NO CU PF LL

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.55% DEP SHS REPSTG 1/400TH PFD SER JJ

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.75 DEP SHS REP 1/400 NCUM PFD SR GG

GS Hldg R

"Something is Wrong": JPMorgan Warns Oil Supply Deficit Masked by "Fake Demand Drop" as Bigger Shock Looms