longbridgelongbridge
  • Platform Features
    Features
    Investment ProductsPrivate Wealth ManagementTrading ToolsMarket Data ServicesAnalysis ToolsNews ServicesFor Developers
    Account Types
    For IndividualsFor Institutions
  • Café
longbridge
© 2026 Longbridge|Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Samsung ordered to pay Swatch US$11. 6 million over copied smartwatch apps

Businesstimes News
Aug 26, 2026 at 03:33 PM
LongbridgeAII'm LongbridgeAI, I can summarize articles.

A London High Court judge ordered Samsung Electronics to pay Swatch Group US$11.6 million for trademark infringement. The ruling found that Samsung unlawfully hosted digital watch face designs replicating luxury brands like Omega and Longines on its app store between 2015 and 2019. Judge Marcus Smith stated that offering these designs at low prices was damaging and demeaning to the Swiss watchmaker's carefully curated brand image.

[LONDON] Samsung Electronics was ordered to pay Swatch Group US$11.6 million after a London judge found that it hosted copied displays for luxury brands on its smartwatch unlawfully.

The High Court’s trademark ruling, published Wednesday (Aug 26), came after the Swiss watchmaker sought about US$170 million from the Korean technology giant for displaying the Swatch brands that included Breguet, Longines and Omega.

“Use of the Swatch Group brands on Samsung’s supermarket shelves, downloadable for nothing or for little money, is to my mind very damaging,” Judge Marcus Smith said in the ruling. “The low price is demeaning of the brands the Swatch Group seek to promulgate.”

A previous judgment found Samsung had infringed the Swiss watchmaker’s trademarks by allowing designs that replicated the appearance of Swatch Group watches for digital watch displays on its app store between 2015 and 2019.

Swatch Group carefully curated and promoted its brands over decades, which formed a critical part of their business, the judge said. “It is quite clear that Samsung does not value the marks as such, and considers that they make no real marginal difference to its offering to consumers,” Smith said.

Samsung and Swatch spokespeople didn’t immediately respond to requests for comments. BLOOMBERG

Login to unlock794characters for free

Due to copyright restrictions, please log in to your Longbridge account to view this content.
Thank you for your understanding and support of licensed content.

Recommended Readings

  • Apr 22, 2026 at 04:20 AMWall Street Debates Intensely: Is It Right That Storage Giants Are Valued So Low?
  • Apr 21, 2026 at 02:39 AMIran Negotiation Hopes Boost Asia-Pacific Stocks; Korea Composite Index Hits New High, Tech Shares Lead as Oil Prices Co…
  • Apr 19, 2026 at 08:30 AMMemory Crisis Deepens: DRAM Manufacturers Expect to Meet Only 60% of Demand by 2027, Prolonged Shortage Likely Inevitabl…
  • Apr 17, 2026 at 07:25 PMSamsung Shortens HBM Development Cycle from Two Years to One, Aligning with NVIDIA's Pace to Capture Larger Market Share
  • Apr 17, 2026 at 03:33 PMIntel Hires 30-Year Sales Veteran from Samsung: The Biggest Challenge in Foundry Business Is Not Technology but "Unable …

Related Stocks

The Swatch Group AG

The Swatch Group AG

USSWGAY

-0.56%

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Sponsored GDR

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Sponsored GDR

UKSMSN

XI2CSOPSMSN

XI2CSOPSMSN

HK07347

LongbridgeAI