Admit it, some "creative principles" are just gimmicks.

I used to believe in "using one article ten thousand times." It sounds cool, like the ultimate symbol of efficiency.

Until today, I read a passage from Teacher Wu Jun, and it felt like a slap in the face:

"Most things in the world are not static; it's hard to handle something once and then enjoy the results once and for all."

That's the truth.

You are growing. The viewpoint you wrote six months ago might need revision now. (There's a certain law, meaning the shorter the time span to recognize a mistake, the better the improvement effect.)

Platforms are changing. Overseas columns require English, official accounts require depth, Jike requires sharpness—you can't build three different houses with one brick.

So I threw away that "ten thousand times" principle.

The new principle is just one sentence: Iterate repeatedly in one direction.

Take the core material of a CRS, adapt it for the platform, publish it once, observe the effect, and iterate the next version. It's not copy-pasting; it's digging deeper into the same line of cognition.

Admitting you previously believed in a gimmick is not shameful. Not admitting it is what truly keeps you stuck in place.