<div id="readability-page-1">Mouse traps, snares, investment scams or traps in front of mouse holes, isometric mouse traps placed in front of mouse holes and dollar signs getty The bankruptcy of auto-parts supplier First Brands has hit a corner of the market known for high dividends. Does that make these assets bargains?  Maybe. But we need to be careful here, and avoid making the mistake of “reaching for yield”: that is, buying yields that are high for a reason: the stock price has plunged.  But I’m getting ahead of myself. The corner of the market I’m talking about is business development companies (BDCs), which loan money to small- and mid-sized firms.  Investors first got worried about BDCs a couple months ago, when the First Brands story broke. The news raised alarm about the private-credit market (where BDCs operate). JPMorgan &amp; Co. (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon added to those fears, saying there were likely more “cockroaches” here than just First Brands.  I know that quite a few readers of my CEF Insider service invest in BDCs, or at least follow them. It’s easy to see why, with the double-digit yields many BDCs offer.  But if you’re looking to buy this dip, there are two tickers I urge you to avoid. We’ll discuss those now, then follow up with another high-income play—a deep-discounted closed-end fund (CEF) yielding 8% that’s well-suited to this market. To be clear, neither of the BDCs we’re going to discuss now has any real exposure to First Brands.  First up is Blue Owl Capital (OBDC), which has fallen along with most of the BDC market. You can see that in the chart below, with its total return (in purple) and the return of the BDC benchmark VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD), in orange:  MORE FOR YOU Ycharts So does this dip make Blue Owl a bargain?  Nope. The first reason why? Fees. As of now, OBDC’s base management fee is 1.5% of assets, according to BDC Investor, plus it takes roughly 17.5% of all net investment income. So yes, high fees are an issue here.  But we do need to keep in mind that running a BDC is a complex job requiring a lot of legwork: OBDC manages over 200 assets, and almost all of those are loans made to smaller, unlisted companies. That means more monitoring and due diligence than if you’re lending to large, publicly traded firms. So those fees are understandable if the BDC delivers strong results.  But so far this year, OBDC is simply matching the BDC market (which is itself underwater), so it hasn’t shown outperformance. How about the long run? Since its IPO in 2019, the stock’s total return (in purple below) has trailed that of BIZD.  So let’s move on to our next BDC, which, according to BDC Investor, is the cheapest one on the market, at a 60% discount to NAV. That would be Prospect Capital Corp (PSEC). Here’s its long-term chart.  It’s fair to say that PSEC’s long-term return doesn’t inspire, at 7% over the last decade. Moreover, its 20.9% current yield is a danger sign. It’s no doubt attracted plenty of buyers over the years, but they’re paying in the form of missed gains and lower income. PSEC’s payout has dropped in half in the last decade.  Ycharts PSEC and OBDC are examples of common risks involved with BDCs. Which is why, at this moment, I recommend putting more weight on another high-yielding asset class: closed-end funds (CEFs).  Ycharts In purple above, you see the performance of the 9%-paying Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (ASG) over the last decade. As you can see, it’s outrun BDCs, with a 175% total return. ASG doesn’t loan to companies, preferring instead to go the equity route.  Its portfolio holds S&amp;P 500 mainstays like tech darlings NVIDIA (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL), as well as cornerstones of other sectors, such as JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (JPM), Visa (V) and Constellation Energy (CEG).  I should mention that the fund’s managers tie its payout to the performance of its underlying portfolio, so the dividend does float a bit. But management commits to paying about 8% of NAV as dividends yearly, so we do have some predictability here.  To be sure, ASG is very different from a BDC. But right now I’d argue it has more upside, thanks in part to its 11.2% discount to NAV, well below the 2.4% discount it’s averaged over the last five years.  With a discount like that, plus a 9% dividend, there’s simply no need to take the risk of “reaching for yield” with PSEC and OBDC. With ASG, you don’t need to reach at all.  Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook . For more great retirement income ideas, click here for our latest report “ Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 9.1% Dividends. ”</div>

BIGGQ

PSEC

<p>First Brands 的破产引发了人们对高收益 BDC 的担忧，这些 BDC 提供诱人的股息，但伴随着显著的风险。Blue Owl Capital 和 Prospect Capital Corp 被指出是高费用和长期回报不佳的 BDC 的例子。相反，建议选择 Liberty All-Star Growth Fund，这是一只 CEF，因其强劲的表现和可预测的股息而受到推荐，提供 9% 的收益率和 11.2% 的净资产折扣，成为更安全的投资选择</p>

这些大型 BDC 的高收益看似诱人，但风险更大