<h2>关键点</h2>
<ul>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 提供了更广泛的投资组合，共有 394 只股票，而 Vanguard Growth ETF 仅有 166 只。</li>
<li>Vanguard Growth ETF 的费用比率为 0.03%，过去 12 个月的股息收益率为 0.46%。</li>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的最大回撤为 32.7%，且五年总回报略高。</li>
<li>我们更喜欢的 10 只股票，胜过 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF ›</li>
</ul>
<p>比较 <strong>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF</strong>(NASDAQ:VONG) 和 <strong>Vanguard Growth ETF</strong>(NYSEMKT:VUG) 显示出两种低成本策略在股票集中度、股息分配和历史价格波动方面的细微差别。</p>
<p>这两只基金的目标都是大型美国成长股，作为激进投资组合的核心构建块。虽然它们有几个共同的主要持股，但基础指数在定义成长股领域时有所不同，导致持股数量和年度总成本的差异。</p>
<h2>快照（成本与规模）</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>发行人</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>费用比率</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
<td>0.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1 年回报（截至 26/04/30）</td>
<td>32.5%</td>
<td>30.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>股息收益率</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
<td>0.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>贝塔值</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>1.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>管理资产</td>
<td>3178 亿美元</td>
<td>449 亿美元</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>贝塔值衡量相对于 S&amp;P 500 的价格波动；贝塔值是根据五年的月度回报计算的。1 年回报代表过去 12 个月的总回报。股息收益率是过去 12 个月的分配收益率。</p>
<p>Vanguard 基金是更具成本效益的选择，其费用比率为 0.03%，尽管 VONG 的定价也非常有竞争力，为 0.06%。</p>
<h2>绩效与风险比较</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>最大回撤（5 年）</td>
<td>(35.6%)</td>
<td>(32.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5 年内 $1,000 的增长（总回报）</td>
<td>$1,867</td>
<td>$1,902</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>内部构成</h2>
<p>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 持有 387 只股票，覆盖了大型成长股的更广泛范围。其最大持股包括 <strong>Nvidia</strong> 12.9%、<strong>Apple</strong> 11.61% 和 <strong>Microsoft</strong> 8.8%。大约 60% 的基金投资于科技，13% 投资于消费周期性，12% 投资于通信服务。该基金于 2010 年推出，过去 12 个月每股支付 $0.56 的股息。</p>
<p>相比之下，Vanguard Growth ETF 更加集中，持有 153 只股票，并于 2004 年推出。其主要持股包括 Nvidia 13.29%、Apple 12.3% 和 Microsoft 9.08%。行业配置更倾向于科技，占 53%，通信服务占 16%，消费周期性占 12%。其过去 12 个月的股息为每股 $1.59。</p>
<p>有关 ETF 投资的更多指导，请查看 此链接。</p>
<h2>这对投资者意味着什么</h2>
<p>在过去五年中，VUG 和 VONG ETF 的回报相似，给每只基金的投资者带来了近乎翻倍的收益。尽管 VUG 的规模显著大于 VONG，但它们也有几个共同的主要持股，包括三只 “七大奇迹” 市场宠儿。它们对成长股的关注和低费用比率使这两只 ETF 成为激进成长投资组合的稳健选择。</p>
<p>权衡之下是收入——由于关注于具有高资本增值潜力的股票，这两只 ETF 提供相对较低的股息收益率，尽管 VONG 在这一类别中略微领先，达到 0.51%。</p>
<p>虽然这两只 ETF 都是投资组合的良好补充，但差异可能在于它们的基准指数。VUG 旨在跟踪 <strong>CRSP 美国大型成长股指数</strong>，该指数包括足够多的股票以代表 <strong>CRSP 美国整体市场指数</strong> 的前 85% 可投资市值。VONG 跟踪的 <strong>Russell 1000 成长指数</strong>，则专注于具有特定成长特征的 <strong>Russell 1000</strong> 股票，通常持股数量更多。尽管许多持股重叠，但这种方法上的差异意味着 VONG 可以提供对中型股的更大曝光，除了大型股之外。</p>
<h2>你现在应该购买 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的股票吗？</h2>
<p>在你购买 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的股票之前，请考虑以下几点：</p>
<p><em>Motley Fool Stock Advisor</em> 分析团队刚刚确定了他们认为的 <strong>10 只最佳股票</strong> 供投资者现在购买……而 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 并不在其中。入选的 10 只股票在未来几年可能会产生巨额回报。</p>
<p>考虑一下 <strong>Netflix</strong> 在 2004 年 12 月 17 日上榜时……如果你在我们推荐时投资了 $1,000，<strong>你将拥有 $504,832</strong>！* 或者 <strong>Nvidia</strong> 在 2005 年 4 月 15 日上榜时……如果你在我们推荐时投资了 $1,000，<strong>你将拥有 $1,223,471</strong>！*</p>
<p>现在值得注意的是，<em>Stock Advisor</em> 的总平均回报率为 971%——相比之下，标准普尔 500 指数的回报率为 202%，表现出色。<strong>不要错过最新的前 10 名股票列表，加入由个人投资者为个人投资者建立的投资社区，获取 <em>Stock Advisor</em> 的信息。</strong></p>
<p>查看这 10 只股票 »</p>
<p><em>*Stock Advisor 的回报截至 2026 年 5 月 1 日。</em></p>
<p><em>Sarah Sidlow 持有苹果、微软和英伟达的股票。Motley Fool 持有并推荐苹果、微软、英伟达和 Vanguard Growth ETF。Motley Fool 有一个 披露政策。</em></p>
<p>此处表达的观点和意见仅代表作者的观点和意见，并不一定反映纳斯达克公司的观点。</p>

罗素 1000 成长指数 ETF - iShares

罗素 1000 成长股 ETF - Vanguard

全美成长股指数 MSCI ETF - Vanguard

<p>先锋罗素 1000 成长股 ETF（VONG）提供了更广泛的投资覆盖，共有 394 只成分股，而先锋成长股 ETF（VUG）则有 166 只。VUG 的费用比率较低，为 0.03%，股息收益率为 0.46%；而 VONG 的费用比率为 0.06%，股息收益率为 0.51%。这两只 ETF 均以大型美国成长股为目标，其中 VUG 专注于 CRSP 美国大型成长股指数，而 VONG 则关注罗素 1000 成长股指数。在过去五年中，两者的回报表现相似，成为激进投资组合的稳健选择，尽管 VONG 提供了稍微更好的收入潜力</p>

<h2>Key Points</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>关键点</h2>
</div><ul>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF provides broader exposure with 394 holdings compared to the 166 positions held by Vanguard Growth ETF.</li>
<li>Vanguard Growth ETF maintains a 0.03% expense ratio and a 0.46% trailing-12-month dividend yield.</li>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF has shown a smaller maximum drawdown of 32.7% and a slightly higher five-year total return figure.</li>
<li>10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF ›</li>
</ul>
<div class="lb-trans"><ul>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 提供了更广泛的投资组合，共有 394 只股票，而 Vanguard Growth ETF 仅有 166 只。</li>
<li>Vanguard Growth ETF 的费用比率为 0.03%，过去 12 个月的股息收益率为 0.46%。</li>
<li>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的最大回撤为 32.7%，且五年总回报略高。</li>
<li>我们更喜欢的 10 只股票，胜过 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF ›</li>
</ul>
</div><p>Comparing <strong>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF</strong>(NASDAQ:VONG) and <strong>Vanguard Growth ETF</strong>(NYSEMKT:VUG) reveals two low-cost strategies with subtle differences in stock concentration, dividend distributions, and historical price volatility.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>比较 <strong>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF</strong>(NASDAQ:VONG) 和 <strong>Vanguard Growth ETF</strong>(NYSEMKT:VUG) 显示出两种低成本策略在股票集中度、股息分配和历史价格波动方面的细微差别。</p>
</div><p>Both funds target large-cap U.S. growth stocks, serving as core building blocks for aggressive portfolios. While they share several top holdings, the underlying indexes differ in how they define the growth universe, leading to variations in the number of positions and total annual cost.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这两只基金的目标都是大型美国成长股，作为激进投资组合的核心构建块。虽然它们有几个共同的主要持股，但基础指数在定义成长股领域时有所不同，导致持股数量和年度总成本的差异。</p>
</div><h2>Snapshot (cost &amp; size)</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>快照（成本与规模）</h2>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Issuer</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Expense ratio</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
<td>0.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1-yr return (as of 30/04/26)</td>
<td>32.5%</td>
<td>30.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dividend yield</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
<td>0.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Beta</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>1.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AUM</td>
<td>$317.8 billion</td>
<td>$44.9 billion</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>发行人</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
<td>Vanguard</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>费用比率</td>
<td>0.03%</td>
<td>0.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1 年回报（截至 26/04/30）</td>
<td>32.5%</td>
<td>30.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>股息收益率</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
<td>0.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>贝塔值</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>1.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>管理资产</td>
<td>3178 亿美元</td>
<td>449 亿美元</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><p>Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&amp;P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>贝塔值衡量相对于 S&amp;P 500 的价格波动；贝塔值是根据五年的月度回报计算的。1 年回报代表过去 12 个月的总回报。股息收益率是过去 12 个月的分配收益率。</p>
</div><p>The Vanguard fund is the more affordable option with its 0.03% expense ratio, though VONG is also very competitively priced at 0.06%.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Vanguard 基金是更具成本效益的选择，其费用比率为 0.03%，尽管 VONG 的定价也非常有竞争力，为 0.06%。</p>
</div><h2>Performance &amp; risk comparison</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>绩效与风险比较</h2>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Metric</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Max drawdown (5 yr)</td>
<td>(35.6%)</td>
<td>(32.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)</td>
<td>$1,867</td>
<td>$1,902</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>指标</th>
<th>VUG</th>
<th>VONG</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>最大回撤（5 年）</td>
<td>(35.6%)</td>
<td>(32.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5 年内 $1,000 的增长（总回报）</td>
<td>$1,867</td>
<td>$1,902</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><h2>What's inside</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>内部构成</h2>
</div><p>The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF holds 387 stocks, providing a wider reach across the large-cap growth spectrum. Its largest positions include <strong>Nvidia</strong> at 12.9%, <strong>Apple</strong> at 11.61%, and <strong>Microsoft</strong> at 8.8%. Approximately 60% of the fund is dedicated to technology, followed by consumer cyclical at 13% and communication services at 12%. The fund, which launched in 2010, paid $0.56 per share over the trailing 12 months.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 持有 387 只股票，覆盖了大型成长股的更广泛范围。其最大持股包括 <strong>Nvidia</strong> 12.9%、<strong>Apple</strong> 11.61% 和 <strong>Microsoft</strong> 8.8%。大约 60% 的基金投资于科技，13% 投资于消费周期性，12% 投资于通信服务。该基金于 2010 年推出，过去 12 个月每股支付 $0.56 的股息。</p>
</div><p>In contrast, the Vanguard Growth ETF is more concentrated, with 153 holdings and it launched in 2004. Its top holdings include Nvidia at 13.29%, Apple at 12.3%, and Microsoft at 9.08%. The sector allocation tilts more toward technology at 53%, with communication services at 16% and consumer cyclicals at 12%. It has a trailing-12-month dividend of $1.59 per share.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>相比之下，Vanguard Growth ETF 更加集中，持有 153 只股票，并于 2004 年推出。其主要持股包括 Nvidia 13.29%、Apple 12.3% 和 Microsoft 9.08%。行业配置更倾向于科技，占 53%，通信服务占 16%，消费周期性占 12%。其过去 12 个月的股息为每股 $1.59。</p>
</div><p>For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>有关 ETF 投资的更多指导，请查看 此链接。</p>
</div><h2>What this means for investors</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>这对投资者意味着什么</h2>
</div><p>Over the past five years, the VUG and VONG ETFs have posted similar returns, rewarding investors in each fund with near doubles. Although VUG is significantly larger than VONG, they also share several top holdings, including three “Magnificent Seven” market darlings. Their focus on growth names and low expense ratios make both ETFs solid picks for aggressive growth portfolios.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在过去五年中，VUG 和 VONG ETF 的回报相似，给每只基金的投资者带来了近乎翻倍的收益。尽管 VUG 的规模显著大于 VONG，但它们也有几个共同的主要持股，包括三只 “七大奇迹” 市场宠儿。它们对成长股的关注和低费用比率使这两只 ETF 成为激进成长投资组合的稳健选择。</p>
</div><p>The tradeoff is income — with a focus on stocks with high capital appreciation potential, both ETFs offer relatively low dividend yields, though at 0.51%, VONG pulls slightly ahead in that category.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>权衡之下是收入——由于关注于具有高资本增值潜力的股票，这两只 ETF 提供相对较低的股息收益率，尽管 VONG 在这一类别中略微领先，达到 0.51%。</p>
</div><p>While both ETFs would be solid additions to a portfolio, the difference may come down to their benchmark indexes. VUG seeks to track the <strong>CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index</strong>, which includes as many stocks as is necessary to represent the top 85% of the investable market cap of the <strong>CRSP US Total Market Index</strong>. The <strong>Russell 1000 Growth Index</strong>, which VONG follows, focuses on <strong>Russell 1000</strong> stocks with specific growth characteristics, and generally has more holdings. While many of the holdings overlap, this difference in methodology means VONG can provide greater exposure to mid-cap stocks in addition to large caps.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>虽然这两只 ETF 都是投资组合的良好补充，但差异可能在于它们的基准指数。VUG 旨在跟踪 <strong>CRSP 美国大型成长股指数</strong>，该指数包括足够多的股票以代表 <strong>CRSP 美国整体市场指数</strong> 的前 85% 可投资市值。VONG 跟踪的 <strong>Russell 1000 成长指数</strong>，则专注于具有特定成长特征的 <strong>Russell 1000</strong> 股票，通常持股数量更多。尽管许多持股重叠，但这种方法上的差异意味着 VONG 可以提供对中型股的更大曝光，除了大型股之外。</p>
</div><h2>Should you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF right now?</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>你现在应该购买 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的股票吗？</h2>
</div><p>Before you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF, consider this:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在你购买 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 的股票之前，请考虑以下几点：</p>
</div><p>The <em>Motley Fool Stock Advisor</em> analyst team just identified what they believe are the <strong>10 best stocks</strong> for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>Motley Fool Stock Advisor</em> 分析团队刚刚确定了他们认为的 <strong>10 只最佳股票</strong> 供投资者现在购买……而 Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF 并不在其中。入选的 10 只股票在未来几年可能会产生巨额回报。</p>
</div><p>Consider when <strong>Netflix</strong> made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, <strong>you’d have $504,832</strong>!* Or when <strong>Nvidia</strong> made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, <strong>you’d have $1,223,471</strong>!*</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>考虑一下 <strong>Netflix</strong> 在 2004 年 12 月 17 日上榜时……如果你在我们推荐时投资了 $1,000，<strong>你将拥有 $504,832</strong>！* 或者 <strong>Nvidia</strong> 在 2005 年 4 月 15 日上榜时……如果你在我们推荐时投资了 $1,000，<strong>你将拥有 $1,223,471</strong>！*</p>
</div><p>Now, it’s worth noting <em>Stock Advisor’s</em> total average return is 971% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 202% for the S&amp;P 500. <strong>Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with <em>Stock Advisor</em>, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>现在值得注意的是，<em>Stock Advisor</em> 的总平均回报率为 971%——相比之下，标准普尔 500 指数的回报率为 202%，表现出色。<strong>不要错过最新的前 10 名股票列表，加入由个人投资者为个人投资者建立的投资社区，获取 <em>Stock Advisor</em> 的信息。</strong></p>
</div><p>See the 10 stocks »</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>查看这 10 只股票 »</p>
</div><p><em>*Stock Advisor returns as of May 1, 2026.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>*Stock Advisor 的回报截至 2026 年 5 月 1 日。</em></p>
</div><p><em>Sarah Sidlow has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.</em></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><em>Sarah Sidlow 持有苹果、微软和英伟达的股票。Motley Fool 持有并推荐苹果、微软、英伟达和 Vanguard Growth ETF。Motley Fool 有一个 披露政策。</em></p>
</div><p>The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>此处表达的观点和意见仅代表作者的观点和意见，并不一定反映纳斯达克公司的观点。</p>
</div>

先锋成长型 ETF：您应该投资 VONG 还是 VUG？