<p>/PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center 是一家家族拥有和经营的专业护理机构，已在帕萨迪纳和阿尔塔迪纳为老年和残疾居民服务超过 55 年，现已对南加州爱迪生公司及其母公司爱迪生国际提起诉讼，指控该公用事业公司的电力基础设施故障引发了 2025 年 1 月的伊顿火灾，并彻底摧毁了该设施。Zimmerman Reed LLP 代表 Two Palms 处理此事。</p>
<p>该诉讼于洛杉矶县高级法院提起，指控南加州爱迪生在 2025 年 1 月 7 日的夜晚未能遵循自身的安全协议——尽管附近气象站的风速在当天超过了该公用事业公司自身的停电阈值，并且国家气象局发布了最高级别的火灾天气预警。晚上 6:11，南加州爱迪生的输电线路上检测到电气故障，同时在伊顿峡谷的南加州爱迪生输电塔下出现闪光和火花，点燃了伊顿火灾。风驱动的火焰在一小时内蔓延至 Two Palms 周围的建筑物。在火灾发生前，Two Palms 常常有等待名单。现在，它所服务的社区一无所有。</p>
<p>当火灾在点燃后一个小时内蔓延至周围建筑物时，Two Palms 的工作人员几乎没有时间。他们通过烟雾和灰烬，用轮椅和移动床将 45 名老年和残疾居民——许多人卧床不起，有些人患有痴呆——转移到安全地点。每位居民都安全撤离。许多人被转移到附属设施，大家都认为这将是临时安置。15 个月后，许多人仍然留在那里。洛杉矶时报对此次撤离的完整报道。</p>
<p>到黎明时，设施已不复存在。每个房间、每个治疗空间、每一件医疗设备——全部被吞噬。轮椅被遗弃在前草坪上。Two Palms 的标志依然矗立。</p>
<p>“我们的每一位居民都是选择 Two Palms 的，他们的家人将他们最爱的人托付给我们。在火灾发生的夜晚，我们的工作人员尊重了这种信任——他们冒着烟雾和火焰返回，确保没有人被遗留。我们无法接受的是，公用事业公司的所谓失误使这一切成为必要。火灾前，Two Palms 常常有等待名单。这个社区的家庭在等待一个他们信任的地方——而现在那个地方已经消失。提起这起诉讼是重建它和恢复这个社区仍然需要的护理的必要步骤。”</p>
<p>—— Juana Rodriguez，Two Palms Care Center 管理员</p>
<p>根据投诉，南加州爱迪生自己的调查得出结论，认为其设备 “可能是” 伊顿火灾的原因。该公用事业公司表示并不知晓指向其他点火源的证据。这一承认是 Two Palms 索赔的核心。</p>
<p>投诉还指控在点火地点附近的过时和不活动设备仍然存在，并且在危险条件下防止电力线路重新通电的安全系统未能正确启用。</p>
<p>南加州爱迪生曾受到警告。1 月 5 日，国家气象局对该地区发布了红色警报。次日，该警报升级为特别危险情况——这是可用的最高级别——预测 210 号公路走廊将出现危及生命的破坏性风暴条件，而 Two Palms 正是在该走廊内运营。加州消防局尚未正式发布伊顿火灾的官方原因；该调查仍在进行中。</p>
<p>“本案是关于在关键时刻是否遵循了旨在防止此类灾难的系统。Two Palms 不仅失去了建筑——社区失去了一个人们依赖的护理、稳定和尊严的地方。这个时刻是关于问责。”</p>
<p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合伙人</p>
<p>Two Palms 仍然致力于重建——但恢复完整不仅仅是重建被烧毁的部分。由于该设施建于 1959 年，它在监管豁免下运营，这些豁免不再适用于新建筑。</p>
<p>“任何重建的设施必须符合当前的建筑规范、无障碍要求和更新的医疗设施标准。这不是对正义的障碍——这是正义所要求的。完全恢复意味着能够再次以该社区应得的标准提供服务。南加州爱迪生的所谓疏忽是 Two Palms 与这一结果之间的障碍，而实现这一目标的成本是本诉讼寻求恢复的一部分。”</p>
<p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合伙人</p>
<p>该诉讼提出了七项诉因：过失及过失自证、火灾侵入、逆向征收、公共滋扰、私人滋扰、违反健康与安全法典第 13007 条，以及根据加州公共事业法第 2106 条的私人诉权。Two Palms 寻求赔偿财产损失、业务中断、收入损失、撤离和搬迁费用，以及持续的经济损害，并要求对南加州爱迪生进行强制性救济，要求其遵守适用的基础设施安全法规。</p>
<p>伊顿火灾于 2025 年 1 月 7 日引发，成为加州历史上第二大破坏性火灾。它造成 19 人遇难，烧毁超过 14,000 英亩，摧毁约 10,000 栋建筑，遍及帕萨迪纳和阿尔塔迪纳。Two Palms 是火灾中被摧毁的两家专业护理设施之一。那晚撤离的 45 名居民中，许多人被转移到附属设施，大家都认为这将是临时安置。15 个月后，许多人仍然留在那里。</p>
<p><strong>关于 Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP 是一家成立于 1983 年的全国性原告方律师事务所，在明尼阿波利斯、洛杉矶和凤凰城设有办公室。四十多年来，该事务所代表个人和机构处理复杂诉讼，包括集体诉讼、消费者保护、数据泄露和野火事务。Zimmerman Reed 致力于在企业和机构的行为造成严重伤害时追究其责任。我们从不忘记我们所为之奋斗的对象。</p>
<p><strong>媒体联系人</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<p>[email protected]</p>
<p>来源 Zimmerman Reed</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0"/></p>

爱迪生国际

公用事业 ETF - SPDR

标普全球公用事业 ETF - iShares

<p>位于帕萨迪纳的 Two Palms Care Center，一家专业护理机构，已对南加州爱迪生公司提起诉讼，指控该公司的故障基础设施导致了 2025 年 1 月的伊顿火灾，摧毁了该设施。诉讼称，南加州爱迪生未能遵循安全协议，尽管有严重天气警告。火灾导致 45 名居民被迫撤离，其中许多人在 15 个月后仍然无家可归。该诉讼寻求对南加州爱迪生的过失负责，并旨在追回重建设施以符合当前标准的费用</p>

<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center, a family-owned and operated skilled nursing facility that had served elderly and disabled residents in Pasadena and Altadena for more than 55 years, has filed suit against Southern California Edison Company and its parent, Edison International, alleging that the utility's faulty electrical infrastructure ignited the January 2025 Eaton Fire and destroyed the facility in its entirety. Zimmerman Reed LLP represents Two Palms in this matter.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>/PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center 是一家家族拥有和经营的专业护理机构，已在帕萨迪纳和阿尔塔迪纳为老年和残疾居民服务超过 55 年，现已对南加州爱迪生公司及其母公司爱迪生国际提起诉讼，指控该公用事业公司的电力基础设施故障引发了 2025 年 1 月的伊顿火灾，并彻底摧毁了该设施。Zimmerman Reed LLP 代表 Two Palms 处理此事。</p>
</div><p>The suit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleges that SCE failed to follow its own safety protocols on the night of January 7, 2025 — despite wind gusts at nearby weather stations that had exceeded the utility's own shutoff thresholds throughout the day, and despite the National Weather Service issuing its highest-level fire weather designation. At 6:11 p.m., electrical faults were detected on SCE transmission lines coinciding with flashes and sparks beneath SCE transmission towers in the Eaton Canyon, which ignited the Eaton Fire. Wind-driven flames reached the structures surrounding Two Palms within the hour. Before the fire, Two Palms often had a waiting list. Now the community it served has nothing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该诉讼于洛杉矶县高级法院提起，指控南加州爱迪生在 2025 年 1 月 7 日的夜晚未能遵循自身的安全协议——尽管附近气象站的风速在当天超过了该公用事业公司自身的停电阈值，并且国家气象局发布了最高级别的火灾天气预警。晚上 6:11，南加州爱迪生的输电线路上检测到电气故障，同时在伊顿峡谷的南加州爱迪生输电塔下出现闪光和火花，点燃了伊顿火灾。风驱动的火焰在一小时内蔓延至 Two Palms 周围的建筑物。在火灾发生前，Two Palms 常常有等待名单。现在，它所服务的社区一无所有。</p>
</div><p>When the fire reached the surrounding structures within an hour of ignition, Two Palms staff had almost no time. They moved 45 elderly and disabled residents — many bedridden, some with dementia — through smoke and ash on wheelchairs and rolling beds. Every resident was evacuated safely. Many were transferred to affiliated facilities in what everyone expected would be temporary placements. More than 15 months later, many remain there still. The full account of the evacuation was reported by the Los Angeles Times.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>当火灾在点燃后一个小时内蔓延至周围建筑物时，Two Palms 的工作人员几乎没有时间。他们通过烟雾和灰烬，用轮椅和移动床将 45 名老年和残疾居民——许多人卧床不起，有些人患有痴呆——转移到安全地点。每位居民都安全撤离。许多人被转移到附属设施，大家都认为这将是临时安置。15 个月后，许多人仍然留在那里。洛杉矶时报对此次撤离的完整报道。</p>
</div><p>By dawn, the facility was gone. Every room, every therapy space, every piece of medical equipment — consumed entirely. Wheelchairs lay abandoned on the front lawn. The Two Palms sign still stood.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>到黎明时，设施已不复存在。每个房间、每个治疗空间、每一件医疗设备——全部被吞噬。轮椅被遗弃在前草坪上。Two Palms 的标志依然矗立。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Every one of our residents chose Two Palms, and their families trusted us with the people they love most. On the night of the fire, our staff honored that trust — they went back through smoke and flames to make sure no one was left behind. What we cannot accept is that a utility company's alleged failures made any of that necessary. Two Palms often had a waiting list before the fire. Families in this community were waiting for a place they trusted — and now that place is gone. Filing this lawsuit is a necessary step toward rebuilding it and restoring the care this community still needs.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我们的每一位居民都是选择 Two Palms 的，他们的家人将他们最爱的人托付给我们。在火灾发生的夜晚，我们的工作人员尊重了这种信任——他们冒着烟雾和火焰返回，确保没有人被遗留。我们无法接受的是，公用事业公司的所谓失误使这一切成为必要。火灾前，Two Palms 常常有等待名单。这个社区的家庭在等待一个他们信任的地方——而现在那个地方已经消失。提起这起诉讼是重建它和恢复这个社区仍然需要的护理的必要步骤。”</p>
</div><p>— Juana Rodriguez, Administrator, Two Palms Care Center</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Juana Rodriguez，Two Palms Care Center 管理员</p>
</div><p>According to the complaint, SCE's own investigation concluded that its equipment was &#34;likely the cause&#34; of the Eaton Fire. The utility has stated it is not aware of evidence pointing to any other source of ignition. That acknowledgment is central to Two Palms' claims.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根据投诉，南加州爱迪生自己的调查得出结论，认为其设备 “可能是” 伊顿火灾的原因。该公用事业公司表示并不知晓指向其他点火源的证据。这一承认是 Two Palms 索赔的核心。</p>
</div><p>The complaint also alleges that outdated and inactive equipment near the ignition site remained in place, and that safety systems designed to prevent re-energizing electrical lines during dangerous conditions were not properly enabled.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>投诉还指控在点火地点附近的过时和不活动设备仍然存在，并且在危险条件下防止电力线路重新通电的安全系统未能正确启用。</p>
</div><p>SCE had been warned. On January 5, the National Weather Service issued a Red Flag Warning for the region. The following day, it elevated that warning to a Particularly Dangerous Situation — the highest designation available — forecasting life-threatening, destructive windstorm conditions along the Highway 210 corridor, where Two Palms operated. The official cause of the Eaton Fire has not been formally released by Cal Fire; that investigation remains ongoing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>南加州爱迪生曾受到警告。1 月 5 日，国家气象局对该地区发布了红色警报。次日，该警报升级为特别危险情况——这是可用的最高级别——预测 210 号公路走廊将出现危及生命的破坏性风暴条件，而 Two Palms 正是在该走廊内运营。加州消防局尚未正式发布伊顿火灾的官方原因；该调查仍在进行中。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This case is about whether the systems designed to prevent disasters like this were followed when it mattered most. Two Palms didn't just lose a building — the community lost a place that people depended on for care, stability, and dignity. This moment is about accountability.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“本案是关于在关键时刻是否遵循了旨在防止此类灾难的系统。Two Palms 不仅失去了建筑——社区失去了一个人们依赖的护理、稳定和尊严的地方。这个时刻是关于问责。”</p>
</div><p>— Caleb Marker, Partner, Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合伙人</p>
</div><p>Two Palms remains committed to rebuilding — but being made whole is not simply a matter of reconstructing what burned. Because the facility was built in 1959, it operated under regulatory exemptions that no longer apply to new construction.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Two Palms 仍然致力于重建——但恢复完整不仅仅是重建被烧毁的部分。由于该设施建于 1959 年，它在监管豁免下运营，这些豁免不再适用于新建筑。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Any rebuilt facility must meet current building codes, accessibility mandates, and updated healthcare facility standards. That is not an obstacle to justice — it is what justice requires. Being fully restored means being able to serve this community again at the standard it deserves. SCE's alleged negligence is what stands between Two Palms and that outcome, and the costs of getting there are part of what this lawsuit seeks to recover.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“任何重建的设施必须符合当前的建筑规范、无障碍要求和更新的医疗设施标准。这不是对正义的障碍——这是正义所要求的。完全恢复意味着能够再次以该社区应得的标准提供服务。南加州爱迪生的所谓疏忽是 Two Palms 与这一结果之间的障碍，而实现这一目标的成本是本诉讼寻求恢复的一部分。”</p>
</div><p>— Caleb Marker, Partner, Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合伙人</p>
</div><p>The suit asserts seven causes of action: negligence and negligence per se, trespass by fire, inverse condemnation, public nuisance, private nuisance, violation of Health and Safety Code §13007, and a private right of action under California Public Utilities Code §2106. Two Palms seeks compensation for property loss, business interruption, lost revenue, evacuation and relocation costs, and ongoing economic harm, as well as injunctive relief requiring SCE to comply with applicable infrastructure safety regulations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该诉讼提出了七项诉因：过失及过失自证、火灾侵入、逆向征收、公共滋扰、私人滋扰、违反健康与安全法典第 13007 条，以及根据加州公共事业法第 2106 条的私人诉权。Two Palms 寻求赔偿财产损失、业务中断、收入损失、撤离和搬迁费用，以及持续的经济损害，并要求对南加州爱迪生进行强制性救济，要求其遵守适用的基础设施安全法规。</p>
</div><p>The Eaton Fire ignited on January 7, 2025, and became the second most destructive fire in California history. It claimed 19 lives and burned more than 14,000 acres, destroying approximately 10,000 structures across Pasadena and Altadena. Two Palms were one of two skilled nursing facilities destroyed in the fire. Many of the 45 residents evacuated that night were transferred to affiliated facilities in what were expected to be temporary placements. More than 15 months later, many remain there still.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>伊顿火灾于 2025 年 1 月 7 日引发，成为加州历史上第二大破坏性火灾。它造成 19 人遇难，烧毁超过 14,000 英亩，摧毁约 10,000 栋建筑，遍及帕萨迪纳和阿尔塔迪纳。Two Palms 是火灾中被摧毁的两家专业护理设施之一。那晚撤离的 45 名居民中，许多人被转移到附属设施，大家都认为这将是临时安置。15 个月后，许多人仍然留在那里。</p>
</div><p><strong>About Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP is a national plaintiff-side law firm founded in 1983, with offices in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and Phoenix. For more than four decades, the firm has represented individuals and institutions in complex litigation, including mass tort, consumer protection, data breach, and wildfire matters. Zimmerman Reed is committed to holding corporations and institutions accountable when their conduct causes serious harm. We never forget who we're fighting for.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>关于 Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP 是一家成立于 1983 年的全国性原告方律师事务所，在明尼阿波利斯、洛杉矶和凤凰城设有办公室。四十多年来，该事务所代表个人和机构处理复杂诉讼，包括集体诉讼、消费者保护、数据泄露和野火事务。Zimmerman Reed 致力于在企业和机构的行为造成严重伤害时追究其责任。我们从不忘记我们所为之奋斗的对象。</p>
</div><p><strong>MEDIA CONTACT</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>媒体联系人</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
</div><p>[email protected]</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>[email protected]</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Zimmerman Reed</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>来源 Zimmerman Reed</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=CG52244&amp;Transmission_Id=202605061222PR_NEWS_USPR_____CG52244&amp;DateId=20260506"/></p>

12:23 ET 在伊顿火灾中被毁的疗养院起诉南加州爱迪生公司，指控其存在可预防的失误