<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- 加州历史上最严重火灾的幸存者将在周二和周三的一系列听证会上发声，反对限制他们从引发野火的营利性公用事业公司索赔的权利。</p>
<p>听证会将讨论加州地震局（CEA）在 SB 254 下提出的建议，包括限制营利性电力公司的责任，阻止野火幸存者的索赔权，征收销售税以创建公用事业的 “救助基金”，以及阻止保险公司和公共实体在公用事业引发火灾时索赔损失。</p>
<p>“SB 254 研究本应评估如何公平分配灾难负担，” 每位火灾幸存者网络的执行董事 Joy Chen 表示。“然而，这实际上是对公用事业的救助，伪装成政策语言。它将每一个负担从公用事业股东身上转移到其他人身上：转移到幸存者、保单持有人和纳税人身上。这是一个零和游戏。如果引发火灾的公司支付更少，其他人就被迫支付更多。”</p>
<p>保险公司、公共实体、消费者团体和诉讼律师也反对研究中的有限责任建议，因为这些建议阻止了受害者、保单持有人和政府实体在公用事业引发野火时的索赔。</p>
<p>一个由 23 个公共利益团体组成的联盟致信立法领导人，指责 CEA 未能承认公用事业在鲁莽引发野火中的角色，并未能对未来的野火形成威慑。</p>
<p>“改革的一个关键目标应该是通过激励公用事业不引发野火来减少未来的成本，” 这些团体写道。“然而，报告似乎假设公用事业是气候变化的被动受害者，而不是那些其运营决策、维护实践和财务激励对野火风险产生实质性影响的行为者。事实上，来自多场重大火灾的证据表明，公用事业设备故障——通常与老化基础设施、不足的维护或运营决策有关——在加州的野火危机中发挥了重要作用……当安全记录糟糕的公用事业在加州人支付全国最高电价时获得巨额利润时，改革应集中在遏制过度利润和浪费上，而不是限制野火幸存者的索赔权。”</p>
<p>Chen 同意，指出需要通过 AB 1774（Boerner）法案，该法案要求对每年总额为 90 亿美元的野火缓解支出进行审计，因为过去的审计发现公用事业未花费他们被分配的资金。</p>
<p>Chen 还指出，在立法机构批准 SB 254 中的公用事业救助后，营利性公用事业公司获得了创纪录的收益。</p>
<p>“在十月，CPUC 批准了爱迪生的大幅涨价和近 10 亿美元的补发工资。仅仅两个月后，爱迪生就增加了股东分红，预计在 2025 年单年支付 13 亿美元。其三大股东均来自外州：先锋集团（Vanguard，宾夕法尼亚州）、黑石集团（BlackRock，纽约）和州街（State Street，波士顿），” Chen 说。</p>
<p>“谁在为这些企业的过度支出买单？同样是那些努力维持住房的家庭。”</p>
<p>“CEA 研究迫使其他人支付公用事业的疏忽，” 消费者观察组织的主席 Jamie Court 表示。“唯一不负责任的实体是那些引发火灾的公司。公用事业的贪婪政治捐赠和游说支出推动了这些建议，而不是良好的公共政策。”</p>
<p><strong>包括 SDG&amp;E 母公司 Sempra 在内的三家营利性电力垄断公司在 2025-2026 年期间向州立法者捐赠了 19,377,728 美元，并花费了 11,866,570 美元进行游说。</strong></p>
<p><strong>2025-2026 年的总计</strong></p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>支出</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>竞选融资</strong></td>
<td><strong>游说</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>按年分解的总计</strong></p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>竞选融资</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>游说</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年（截至 05/11/26）</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年总计（仅 Q1）</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计：</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Chen 将在参议院能源委员会、众议院能源委员会和参议院联合应急管理与自然资源委员会的听证会上作证。</p>
<p>听证会安排如下：</p>
<p>参议院能源、公用事业与通信</p>
<p>5 月 12 日（星期二）上午 9 点</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
<p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
<p>主题：增强加州对自然灾害的韧性：聚焦电力公用事业相关政策建议的 SB 254（2025）研究报告</p>
<p>参议院保险委员会</p>
<p>5 月 12 日（星期二）下午 1:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
<p>主题：弯曲曲线：保护加州人免受野火风险</p>
<p>参议院联合 - 应急管理与自然资源及水务委员会</p>
<p>5 月 13 日（星期三）上午 9:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
<p>主题：野火缓解、韧性融资和恢复</p>
<p>众议院公用事业与能源委员会</p>
<p>5 月 13 日（星期三）下午 1:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
<p>委员会将在这里进行直播</p>
<p>主题：改善公用事业 - 原因野火成本回收系统，以帮助幸存者、用户和其他利益相关者</p>
<p>来源：消费者观察者</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy"/></p>

爱迪生国际

太平洋煤气与电力

公用事业 ETF - SPDR

标普全球公用事业 ETF - iShares

<p>加利福尼亚州最严重森林火灾的幸存者们正在反对对他们从营利性公用事业公司索赔权利的限制，这一提议在加利福尼亚地震局（CEA）根据 SB 254 发布的报告听证会上被提出。该报告建议限制公用事业公司的责任并创建救助基金，批评者认为这将负担转嫁给幸存者和纳税人。消费者团体和公共机构呼吁进行改革，以追究公用事业公司对森林火灾风险的责任，而不是保护它们的利润。听证会将讨论这些问题以及对公用事业公司在森林火灾缓解方面支出的更好监管的必要性</p>

<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Survivors of the worst fires in California history will be speaking out against limits on their rights to recover damages from for-profit utilities that start wildfires in a series of hearings Tuesday and Wednesday.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- 加州历史上最严重火灾的幸存者将在周二和周三的一系列听证会上发声，反对限制他们从引发野火的营利性公用事业公司索赔的权利。</p>
</div><p>The hearings will discuss recommendations put forth by a California Earthquake Authority (CEA) report under SB 254, including limiting liability from for-profit electric utilities, preventing wildfire survivors' rights to recovery, imposing a sales tax to create a 'bailout fund' for the utilities, and preventing insurance companies and public entities from recovering losses when utilities start fires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>听证会将讨论加州地震局（CEA）在 SB 254 下提出的建议，包括限制营利性电力公司的责任，阻止野火幸存者的索赔权，征收销售税以创建公用事业的 “救助基金”，以及阻止保险公司和公共实体在公用事业引发火灾时索赔损失。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The SB 254 study was supposed to evaluate how to equitably allocate catastrophe burdens,&#34; said Joy Chen, executive director of Every Fire Survivor's Network. &#34;Instead, it's a bailout for utilities, dressed up in policy language. Every burden it shifts away from utility shareholders lands on someone else: on survivors, on policyholders, on taxpayers. It's a zero-sum game. If companies that start fires pay less, everyone else is forced to pay more.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“SB 254 研究本应评估如何公平分配灾难负担，” 每位火灾幸存者网络的执行董事 Joy Chen 表示。“然而，这实际上是对公用事业的救助，伪装成政策语言。它将每一个负担从公用事业股东身上转移到其他人身上：转移到幸存者、保单持有人和纳税人身上。这是一个零和游戏。如果引发火灾的公司支付更少，其他人就被迫支付更多。”</p>
</div><p>Insurance companies, public entities, consumer groups and trial lawyers also oppose the limited liability recommendations in the study because they prevent recovery for victims, policyholders, and governmental entities when utilities start wildfires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>保险公司、公共实体、消费者团体和诉讼律师也反对研究中的有限责任建议，因为这些建议阻止了受害者、保单持有人和政府实体在公用事业引发野火时的索赔。</p>
</div><p>A coalition of 23 public interest groups wrote legislative leaders calling out the CEA for failing to acknowledge the utilities' role in recklessly starting wildfires and to create deterrence to future wildfires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一个由 23 个公共利益团体组成的联盟致信立法领导人，指责 CEA 未能承认公用事业在鲁莽引发野火中的角色，并未能对未来的野火形成威慑。</p>
</div><p>&#34;A key goal of reform should be to reduce future costs by incentivizing utilities not to start wildfires,&#34; the groups wrote. &#34;Yet the report appears to assume utilities are passive victims of climate change rather than actors whose operational decisions, maintenance practices, and financial incentives materially affect wildfire risk. In fact, evidence from multiple major fires shows that utility equipment failures — often tied to aging infrastructure, inadequate maintenance, or operational decisions — have played a significant role in California's wildfire crisis… When utilities with disastrous safety records post huge profits while Californians pay some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, reform should focus on curbing excessive profits and waste – not limiting wildfire survivors' right to recovery.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“改革的一个关键目标应该是通过激励公用事业不引发野火来减少未来的成本，” 这些团体写道。“然而，报告似乎假设公用事业是气候变化的被动受害者，而不是那些其运营决策、维护实践和财务激励对野火风险产生实质性影响的行为者。事实上，来自多场重大火灾的证据表明，公用事业设备故障——通常与老化基础设施、不足的维护或运营决策有关——在加州的野火危机中发挥了重要作用……当安全记录糟糕的公用事业在加州人支付全国最高电价时获得巨额利润时，改革应集中在遏制过度利润和浪费上，而不是限制野火幸存者的索赔权。”</p>
</div><p>Chen agrees, pointing to the need to pass AB 1774 (Boerner), that requires audits of wildfire mitigation spending, which totals $9 billion annually, because past audits found the utilities not spending money they were allocated.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 同意，指出需要通过 AB 1774（Boerner）法案，该法案要求对每年总额为 90 亿美元的野火缓解支出进行审计，因为过去的审计发现公用事业未花费他们被分配的资金。</p>
</div><p>Chen also pointed out that shortly after the legislature approved a bailout for utilities in SB 254, the for-profit utilities had record paydays.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 还指出，在立法机构批准 SB 254 中的公用事业救助后，营利性公用事业公司获得了创纪录的收益。</p>
</div><p>&#34;In October, the CPUC approved a massive Edison rate hike and nearly $1 billion in back pay. Just two months later, Edison increased shareholder dividends, to pay out $1.3 billion in 2025 alone. Its three largest shareholders are all out of state: Vanguard, Pennsylvania, BlackRock, New York, and State Street, Boston,&#34; Chen said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在十月，CPUC 批准了爱迪生的大幅涨价和近 10 亿美元的补发工资。仅仅两个月后，爱迪生就增加了股东分红，预计在 2025 年单年支付 13 亿美元。其三大股东均来自外州：先锋集团（Vanguard，宾夕法尼亚州）、黑石集团（BlackRock，纽约）和州街（State Street，波士顿），” Chen 说。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Instead of protecting against bankruptcy, the backroom deals forced Californians into a massive transfer of wealth to these Wall Street shareholders…In 2025, Edison's profits tripled from $1.3 billion to $4.5 billion in a single year. For 2025, Edison CEO Pedro Pizarro's own compensation rose 20% to $17 million, in the same year his company caused one of the most devastating fires in U.S. history.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“谁在为这些企业的过度支出买单？同样是那些努力维持住房的家庭。”</p>
</div><p>&#34;Who's paying for all this corporate excess? The same families fighting to stay housed.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“CEA 研究迫使其他人支付公用事业的疏忽，” 消费者观察组织的主席 Jamie Court 表示。“唯一不负责任的实体是那些引发火灾的公司。公用事业的贪婪政治捐赠和游说支出推动了这些建议，而不是良好的公共政策。”</p>
</div><p>&#34;The CEA study forces everyone else to pay for the utilities' negligence,&#34; said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. &#34;The only entities not accountable are the ones who started the fires. The power of the utilities' rapacious political giving and lobbying expenditures are driving these recommendations, not good public policy.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>包括 SDG&amp;E 母公司 Sempra 在内的三家营利性电力垄断公司在 2025-2026 年期间向州立法者捐赠了 19,377,728 美元，并花费了 11,866,570 美元进行游说。</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>The three for-profit electric monopolies, including SDG&amp;E's parent company Sempra, gave state legislators $19,377,728 in 2025-2026 and spent $11,866,570 on lobbying.</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>2025-2026 年的总计</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>Grand totals for 2025-2026</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>支出</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>竞选融资</strong></td>
<td><strong>游说</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong><br/><strong>Spending</strong><br/><strong>Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>Campaign Finance</strong></td>
<td><strong>Lobbying</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>按年分解的总计</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>Totals broken out by year</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>竞选融资</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>游说</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年（截至 05/11/26）</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年总计</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年总计（仅 Q1）</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>总计：</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Campaign Finance</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Lobbying</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 (As of 05/11/26)</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 Totals (Q1</strong><br/><strong>Only)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>TOTALS:</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 将在参议院能源委员会、众议院能源委员会和参议院联合应急管理与自然资源委员会的听证会上作证。</p>
</div><p>Chen will testify at hearings in the Senate Energy, Assembly Energy, and Senate Joint- Emergency Management and Natural Resources Committee.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>听证会安排如下：</p>
</div><p>The hearings are scheduled for:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>参议院能源、公用事业与通信</p>
</div><p>Senate Energy, Utilities &amp;Communication</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 12 日（星期二）上午 9 点</p>
</div><p>Tuesday, May 12th at 9am</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主题：增强加州对自然灾害的韧性：聚焦电力公用事业相关政策建议的 SB 254（2025）研究报告</p>
</div><p>Subject: Enhancing California's Resiliency to Natural Catastrophes: Senate Bill 254 (2025) Study Report Focusing on Electric Utility-Related Policy Recommendations</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>参议院保险委员会</p>
</div><p>Senate Insurance</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 12 日（星期二）下午 1:30</p>
</div><p>Tuesday, May 12th at 1:30pm</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主题：弯曲曲线：保护加州人免受野火风险</p>
</div><p>Subject: Bending the Curve: Protecting Californians from Wildfire Risk</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>参议院联合 - 应急管理与自然资源及水务委员会</p>
</div><p>Senate Joint - EmergencyManagement and Natural Resources &amp; Water</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 13 日（星期三）上午 9:30</p>
</div><p>Wednesday, May 13th at 9:30am</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委员会将在此进行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主题：野火缓解、韧性融资和恢复</p>
</div><p>Subject: Wildfire Mitigation, Resilience Financing, and Recovery</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>众议院公用事业与能源委员会</p>
</div><p>Assembly Utilities &amp; Energy</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 13 日（星期三）下午 1:30</p>
</div><p>Wednesday, May 13th at 1:30pm</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
<p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委员会将在这里进行直播</p>
</div><p>Subject: Improving the Utility-Cause Wildfire Cost Recovery System for Survivors, Ratepayers, and Other Stakeholders</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主题：改善公用事业 - 原因野火成本回收系统，以帮助幸存者、用户和其他利益相关者</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Consumer Watchdog</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>来源：消费者观察者</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=DC57662&amp;Transmission_Id=202605121254PR_NEWS_USPR_____DC57662&amp;DateId=20260512"/></p>

12:54 ETWildfire Survivors, Consumer Groups, Insurers, Public Entities Oppose Limits on Survivors' Rights At Hearings In CA Capitol On CEA SB 254 Report, Says Consumer Watchdog

prnewswire

贝莱德

道富银行

桑普拉能源

BlackRock Tech and Private Equity Term Trust

BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR INCOME TR COM USD0.001(S/R 09/09/2025) WI

Blackrock Enhanced Div Achievers Trust

BlackRock Science and Tech Term Trust

BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust

State Street® US Equity Premium Inc ETF

桑普拉能源-5.750% Junior Subordinated Notes

PG&E CORP 6% SER A MAND CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STK

12:54 ET 消费者监督组织表示，在加州议会听证会上，火灾幸存者、消费者团体、保险公司和公共实体反对限制幸存者权利的措施，涉及 CEA SB 254 报告