<p>香港当局终于开始详细说明他们计划如何监管打车平台，如优步、Tada 和滴滴出行，这一举措是在立法者于十月通过该市首个法律框架几个月后。官员们提供了有关执法权、处罚和许可安排的更多信息，尽管关于最终允许多少打车车辆上路的关键问题尚未解决。《南华早报》探讨了目前围绕提议制度的一些主要问题，以及这可能对乘客和司机产生的影响。 1. 新框架下究竟有哪些变化？在提议的系统下，打车平台、司机和车辆都需要单独的许可证或许可才能在香港合法运营。官员们计划在立法会提交附属立法草案，预计在七月底立法者放暑假之前进行讨论。然后，他们将在第三季度邀请平台申请许可证，并在第四季度开始接受车辆和司机的申请。有关当局尚未决定最初将发放多少打车车辆许可证，只表示他们将继续听取公众和行业代表的意见，然后再最终确定上限。 2. 平台和司机可能面临什么处罚？一份政府文件在周一向立法者披露，首次详细列出了非法运营的处罚。未持有许可证的运营平台可能面临高达 100 万港元（约 128,000 美元）的罚款和 12 个月的监禁。允许未获许可的车辆或司机进入其系统的持证平台，也可能面临每个不合规车辆或司机 1 万港元的罚款和六个月的监禁。对于后续定罪，最高罚款将上升至每个司机或车辆 2.5 万港元，监禁时间为一年。未持有所需许可证或在未持证平台上运营的司机，可能面临高达 1 万港元的罚款和六个月的监禁，重复违法者的罚款将增加至 2.5 万港元，监禁时间为 12 个月。他们还可能被取消驾驶执照资格一至三年，而他们的车辆在首次违法时可能被扣押六个月，后续定罪则可能被扣押 12 个月。 3. 当局将如何监控打车平台？提议的监管制度将要求平台与运输署共享运营数据。平台需要保留涵盖司机和车辆信息、预订数量、取消情况、乘客等待时间、车费和投诉的记录。有关当局还计划与平台建立直接的电子通信渠道，以进行抽查和监控合规性。政府表示，平台可能还需要使用面部识别等技术来验证司机身份，确保他们驾驶的是自己注册的车辆。同时，乘客在确认预订后将通过应用程序收到司机的详细信息。平台还需提供投诉和客户服务功能。 4. 为什么坚持 “车主司机” 模式？其中一个较为重要的提议是要求打车车辆只能由其注册车主在提供服务时使用。官员表示，这一安排旨在防止许可证投机，避免出现类似出租车许可证制度的车辆租赁市场。但优步认为这一提议过于限制，希望许可证能够在家庭成员之间共享，指出许多现有司机已经使用注册在亲属名下的车辆。该平台表示，这一安排将提高车辆利用率，并帮助缓解高峰期的供应短缺。 5. 政府将如何决定许可证数量？打车许可证数量的上限是最受期待但尚未回答的细节之一。政府表示，任何上限都需要考虑公众需求、道路容量和更广泛的交通生态系统。有关当局估计，目前打车服务每天处理约 19 万名乘客，约 114,000 次行程，而出租车的乘客数量为 69 万。官员们还认为，由于大多数打车司机是兼职工作，三辆打车车辆的运营能力大致相当于一辆出租车。在周二的一档广播节目中，立法者陈汉彬表示，当局在推出系统时应采取 “谨慎” 的态度。他建议最初的许可证数量可能低于该市目前约 18,000 辆出租车的车队规模。但优步警告称，低配额可能导致高峰期高达四成的打车请求无法满足。该公司还表示，如果供应过于受限，等待时间可能会加倍，车费在繁忙时段可能上涨多达 70%。由前立法者张新宇领导的智能交通联盟，包括打车平台成员，早前建议在初始阶段发放 20,500 个许可证，称较低的数字可能会给居民的日常生活带来不便。 6. 乘客可能会注意到哪些变化？政府表示，持证打车车辆将被要求显示官方识别标记，使乘客和执法人员更容易识别合规车辆。有关当局还计划推出一个在线系统，允许公众检查某辆车是否持有有效许可证。申请许可证的打车平台也可能被要求解释他们将如何将出租车预订服务纳入其应用程序，并吸引出租车司机加入他们的系统。</p>

滴滴出行

优步

<p>香港将对像优步、Tada 和滴滴出行这样的打车平台进行监管，随后建立了法律框架。主要变化包括对平台、司机和车辆分别颁发许可证，违反规定的罚款可高达 100 万港元并可能面临监禁。有关部门将通过数据共享和技术监控运营。一项重要提议是 “车主司机” 模式，限制车辆使用仅限于注册车主。打车许可证的上限尚未决定，担心如果发放的许可证过少，可能会导致服务短缺</p>

<p>Hong Kong authorities have finally begun laying out details on how they plan to regulate ride-hailing platforms such as Uber, Tada and Didi Chuxing, months after lawmakers passed the city’s first legal framework for the sector in October. Officials have provided more information on enforcement powers, penalties and licensing arrangements, although the key issue of how many ride-hailing vehicles will ultimately be allowed on the road has yet to be resolved. The South China Morning Post tackles some of the major questions surrounding the proposed regime so far, and how it may affect riders and drivers. 1. What exactly is changing under the new framework? Under the proposed system, ride-hailing platforms, drivers and vehicles would all need separate licences or permits to operate legally in Hong Kong. Officials plan to table subsidiary legislation in the Legislative Council before lawmakers go on summer break in late July. They will then invite platforms to apply for licences in the third quarter of the year, and begin accepting applications from vehicles and drivers in the fourth quarter. Authorities have not yet decided on how many ride-hailing vehicle permits will initially be issued, only saying they will continue listening to views from the public and industry representatives before finalising the cap. 2. What penalties could platforms and drivers face? A government paper for lawmakers revealed on Monday, ahead of chamber discussions the next day, set out detailed penalties for illegal operations for the first time. Platforms operating without a licence could face fines of up to HK$1 million (US$128,000) and 12 months’ imprisonment. Licensed platforms that allow unpermitted vehicles or drivers onto their systems could also face a fine of HK$10,000 for each non-compliant vehicle or driver and six months’ imprisonment. For subsequent convictions, the maximum penalty rises to HK$25,000 for each driver or vehicle, and a year in prison. Drivers operating without the required permit or outside licensed platforms could face fines of up to HK$10,000 and six months’ imprisonment, with repeat offenders facing increased fines of HK$25,000 and 12 months in prison. They could also be disqualified from holding a driving licence for one to three years, while their vehicles could be impounded for six months for a first offence, and then for 12 months upon subsequent convictions. 3. How will authorities monitor ride-hailing platforms? The proposed regulatory regime would require platforms to share operational data with the Transport Department. Platforms would need to keep records covering driver and vehicle information, booking numbers, cancellations, passenger waiting times, fares and complaints. Authorities also plan to establish direct electronic communication channels with platforms to conduct spot checks and monitor compliance. The government said platforms could also be required to use technology such as facial recognition to verify drivers’ identities and ensure they were driving their own registered vehicles. Meanwhile, passengers would receive driver details through the app after confirming a booking. Platforms would also be required to provide complaint and customer service functions. 4. Why the insistence on an ‘owner-driver’ model? One of the more significant proposals is a requirement that ride-hailing vehicles can only be used by their registered owners while providing services. Officials said the arrangement was aimed at preventing permit speculation and avoiding the emergence of a vehicle rental market similar to the taxi licence system. But Uber argued that the proposal was too restrictive and hoped permits could be shared among family members, noting many existing drivers already used vehicles registered under relatives’ names. The platform said the arrangement would improve vehicle utilisation rates and help ease supply shortages during peak periods. 5. How will the government decide the number of permits? The cap on the number of ride-hailing permits was one of the most anticipated details that went unanswered. The government said that any cap would need to account for public demand, road capacity and the wider transport ecosystem. Authorities estimate ride-hailing services currently handle about 190,000 passengers daily, representing roughly 114,000 trips, compared with 690,000 passengers for taxis. Officials also argued that because most ride-hailing drivers worked part-time, three ride-hailing vehicles were needed to provide roughly the same operating capacity as one taxi. Speaking on a radio programme on Tuesday, lawmaker Ben Chan Han-pan said authorities should take a “prudent” approach when launching the system. He suggested that the initial number of permits could be lower than the city’s current taxi fleet of about 18,000 vehicles. But Uber warned that a low quota could result in up to four in 10 ride requests being unfulfilled during peak periods. The company also said waiting times could double and fares could rise by as much as 70 per cent during busy periods if supply was too restricted. The Smart Transportation Alliance, headed by former lawmaker Gary Zhang Xinyu and including ride-hailing platform members, earlier suggested 20,500 licences in the initial phase, saying a lower figure risked inconveniencing the daily lives of residents. 6. What changes might passengers notice? The government said licensed ride-hailing vehicles would be required to display official identification markings, allowing passengers and law enforcement officers to identify compliant vehicles more easily. Authorities also plan to launch an online system allowing members of the public to check whether a vehicle holds a valid permit. Ride-hailing platforms applying for licences may also be required to explain how they would incorporate taxi-booking services into their apps and attract taxi drivers onto their systems.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>香港当局终于开始详细说明他们计划如何监管打车平台，如优步、Tada 和滴滴出行，这一举措是在立法者于十月通过该市首个法律框架几个月后。官员们提供了有关执法权、处罚和许可安排的更多信息，尽管关于最终允许多少打车车辆上路的关键问题尚未解决。《南华早报》探讨了目前围绕提议制度的一些主要问题，以及这可能对乘客和司机产生的影响。 1. 新框架下究竟有哪些变化？在提议的系统下，打车平台、司机和车辆都需要单独的许可证或许可才能在香港合法运营。官员们计划在立法会提交附属立法草案，预计在七月底立法者放暑假之前进行讨论。然后，他们将在第三季度邀请平台申请许可证，并在第四季度开始接受车辆和司机的申请。有关当局尚未决定最初将发放多少打车车辆许可证，只表示他们将继续听取公众和行业代表的意见，然后再最终确定上限。 2. 平台和司机可能面临什么处罚？一份政府文件在周一向立法者披露，首次详细列出了非法运营的处罚。未持有许可证的运营平台可能面临高达 100 万港元（约 128,000 美元）的罚款和 12 个月的监禁。允许未获许可的车辆或司机进入其系统的持证平台，也可能面临每个不合规车辆或司机 1 万港元的罚款和六个月的监禁。对于后续定罪，最高罚款将上升至每个司机或车辆 2.5 万港元，监禁时间为一年。未持有所需许可证或在未持证平台上运营的司机，可能面临高达 1 万港元的罚款和六个月的监禁，重复违法者的罚款将增加至 2.5 万港元，监禁时间为 12 个月。他们还可能被取消驾驶执照资格一至三年，而他们的车辆在首次违法时可能被扣押六个月，后续定罪则可能被扣押 12 个月。 3. 当局将如何监控打车平台？提议的监管制度将要求平台与运输署共享运营数据。平台需要保留涵盖司机和车辆信息、预订数量、取消情况、乘客等待时间、车费和投诉的记录。有关当局还计划与平台建立直接的电子通信渠道，以进行抽查和监控合规性。政府表示，平台可能还需要使用面部识别等技术来验证司机身份，确保他们驾驶的是自己注册的车辆。同时，乘客在确认预订后将通过应用程序收到司机的详细信息。平台还需提供投诉和客户服务功能。 4. 为什么坚持 “车主司机” 模式？其中一个较为重要的提议是要求打车车辆只能由其注册车主在提供服务时使用。官员表示，这一安排旨在防止许可证投机，避免出现类似出租车许可证制度的车辆租赁市场。但优步认为这一提议过于限制，希望许可证能够在家庭成员之间共享，指出许多现有司机已经使用注册在亲属名下的车辆。该平台表示，这一安排将提高车辆利用率，并帮助缓解高峰期的供应短缺。 5. 政府将如何决定许可证数量？打车许可证数量的上限是最受期待但尚未回答的细节之一。政府表示，任何上限都需要考虑公众需求、道路容量和更广泛的交通生态系统。有关当局估计，目前打车服务每天处理约 19 万名乘客，约 114,000 次行程，而出租车的乘客数量为 69 万。官员们还认为，由于大多数打车司机是兼职工作，三辆打车车辆的运营能力大致相当于一辆出租车。在周二的一档广播节目中，立法者陈汉彬表示，当局在推出系统时应采取 “谨慎” 的态度。他建议最初的许可证数量可能低于该市目前约 18,000 辆出租车的车队规模。但优步警告称，低配额可能导致高峰期高达四成的打车请求无法满足。该公司还表示，如果供应过于受限，等待时间可能会加倍，车费在繁忙时段可能上涨多达 70%。由前立法者张新宇领导的智能交通联盟，包括打车平台成员，早前建议在初始阶段发放 20,500 个许可证，称较低的数字可能会给居民的日常生活带来不便。 6. 乘客可能会注意到哪些变化？政府表示，持证打车车辆将被要求显示官方识别标记，使乘客和执法人员更容易识别合规车辆。有关当局还计划推出一个在线系统，允许公众检查某辆车是否持有有效许可证。申请许可证的打车平台也可能被要求解释他们将如何将出租车预订服务纳入其应用程序，并吸引出租车司机加入他们的系统。</p>
</div>

香港计划实施的网约车制度可能会对你下一次的 Uber 行程产生什么影响