<p>胡志明市——胡志明市正式重新开放短期公寓租赁，采用新的监管框架，此举预计将复兴城市住宿市场的一部分，同时引发对安全、建筑管理和居民权利的新担忧。</p>
<p>根据市政府发布的第 19 号决议，公寓业主可以通过 Airbnb 等平台提供短期住宿服务，前提是遵守合法使用目的、商业注册、税务义务和临时居住登记等要求。</p>
<p>这一新政策是在经历了一年多的限制后出台的，这些限制显著减少了城市内许多公寓项目的短期租赁活动。</p>
<p>物业业主和运营商欢迎这一决定，表示之前的收紧措施使许多单元空置，造成了巨大的财务压力。</p>
<p>“过去一年，市场对我们几乎是冻结的，” 37 岁的 Lê Thị Thu Trang 说，她在胡志明市中心管理几处短期租赁公寓。</p>
<p>“一些公寓因为无法吸引长期租户而空置了数月，而运营成本和银行利息支付仍在继续。新的框架让我们有信心合法透明地重返市场，” 她说。</p>
<p>42 岁的投资者 Võ Duy Phương 在 Xóm Chiếu 区经营两处短期租赁公寓，他表示，之前的限制影响了收入和商业信誉。</p>
<p>“我们之前与外国客户签订了长期协议，但在法规变化时不得不终止这些协议，” 他说。“我们失去了押金，更重要的是失去了合作伙伴的信任。自政策调整以来，一些以前的客户已经再次联系了我们。”</p>
<p>行业代表还表示，更清晰的法规可以帮助规范一个尽管受到限制但仍在非正式运营的市场。</p>
<p>“法律框架使得当局和建筑管理委员会能够更有效地监督运营，” 一位胡志明市的服务公寓管理公司代表说。</p>
<p>“之前，许多业主仍然非正式地进行短期租赁，使得客人管理和服务质量难以控制，” 该代表说。</p>
<p><strong>居民的担忧仍未解决</strong></p>
<p>然而，许多居民表示担心 Airbnb 式住宿的回归可能会改变住宅楼内的生活环境。</p>
<p>“在周末，客人不断地在楼内搬运行李，有时甚至在深夜，” 38 岁的 Lê Thị Thu Hương 说，她是 Bình Lợi Trung 区一处公寓综合体的居民。</p>
<p>“我们常常不知道这些访客是谁，或者他们会住多久。这给长期居民带来了不安全感，” 她说。</p>
<p>另一位在 Tân Phú区的居民表示，共用设施在高峰时段已经承受了压力。</p>
<p>“公寓楼主要是为稳定的居住生活而设计的，而不是酒店式运营，” 该居民说。“如果允许短期住宿，管理机制也需要相应改变。”</p>
<p>建筑管理委员会预计将在平衡投资者和居民利益方面发挥核心作用。</p>
<p>一位来自 Thủ Thiêm 城市区域的住宅项目代表表示，公寓综合体可能需要制定内部运营规则，管理客人登记、安全程序、共用设施的使用以及短期租赁单元的比例限制。</p>
<p>“如果没有明确的内部规定，居民与投资者之间的争议可能会持续，” 该代表说。</p>
<p><strong>国际比较</strong></p>
<p>专家表示，全球许多主要城市已经采取了更严格的短期租赁监管机制。</p>
<p>新加坡在私人住宅物业中基本禁止少于三个月的短期租赁，而东京则在注册要求和年度运营限制下允许家庭共享活动。</p>
<p>房地产专家 Phạm Văn Bạch 表示，胡志明市的政策调整可能会带来机遇和运营挑战。</p>
<p>“在短期内，市场可能会看到为游客和外国专业人士提供的住宿供应增加，” 他说。</p>
<p>“然而，从长远来看，城市需要在建筑运营、基础设施管理和安全责任方面制定更明确的标准，以确保可持续发展，” 他补充道。</p>
<p>法律专家还警告说，未解决的治理问题可能仍然是冲突的来源。</p>
<p>胡志明市律师协会的律师 Nguyễn Hoàng Anh 表示，住宅公寓楼在设计和运营目的上与酒店根本不同。</p>
<p>“酒店是专门为住宿服务而建造的，而公寓楼则是为稳定的长期居住而设计的，” 他说。</p>
<p>“频繁的客人更替增加了安全管理、身份验证和基础设施使用的压力。此外，处理违规行为的责任可能变得不明确，因为客人只是暂时居住，” 他说。</p>
<p>专家表示，城市的决定显示出承认城市旅游和房地产市场中短期租赁需求的趋势。</p>
<p>然而，他们指出，政策的长期成功将取决于有效的执行、运营透明度和居民社区之间的共识。</p>
<p>“如果这些治理问题没有得到妥善解决，经济利益与居民生活质量之间的紧张关系可能仍将是持续争论的来源，” Bạch 说。——VNS</p>

爱彼迎

<p>胡志明市在新的监管框架下重新开放了短期公寓租赁，允许业主通过像 Airbnb 这样的平台提供服务。此决定旨在在经历了一年的限制后振兴住宿市场，但也引发了对安全和居民权利的担忧。虽然物业拥有者欢迎这一变化，但居民担心这可能会扰乱他们的生活环境。专家强调需要明确的法规，以平衡投资者利益和居民关切，并指出有效执行对于长期成功的重要性</p>

<p>HCM CITY — HCM City has officially reopened the door to short-term apartment rentals under a new regulatory framework, a move expected to revive part of the urban accommodation market while raising fresh concerns over security, building management and residents’ rights.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>胡志明市——胡志明市正式重新开放短期公寓租赁，采用新的监管框架，此举预计将复兴城市住宿市场的一部分，同时引发对安全、建筑管理和居民权利的新担忧。</p>
</div><p>Under Decision 19 issued by the municipal authorities, apartment owners may provide short-term accommodation services through platforms such as Airbnb if they comply with requirements on lawful use purposes, business registration, tax obligations and temporary residence declarations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根据市政府发布的第 19 号决议，公寓业主可以通过 Airbnb 等平台提供短期住宿服务，前提是遵守合法使用目的、商业注册、税务义务和临时居住登记等要求。</p>
</div><p>The new policy comes after more than a year of restrictions that significantly reduced short-term rental activity in many apartment projects across the city.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这一新政策是在经历了一年多的限制后出台的，这些限制显著减少了城市内许多公寓项目的短期租赁活动。</p>
</div><p>Property owners and operators welcomed the decision, saying the previous tightening measures had left many units vacant and caused substantial financial pressure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>物业业主和运营商欢迎这一决定，表示之前的收紧措施使许多单元空置，造成了巨大的财务压力。</p>
</div><p>“The market was almost frozen for us over the past year,” said Lê Thị Thu Trang, 37, who manages several short-term rental apartments in central HCM City.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“过去一年，市场对我们几乎是冻结的，” 37 岁的 Lê Thị Thu Trang 说，她在胡志明市中心管理几处短期租赁公寓。</p>
</div><p>“Some apartments remained empty for months because they could not attract long-term tenants, while operating costs and bank interest payments continued. The new framework gives us confidence to return to the market legally and transparently,” she said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“一些公寓因为无法吸引长期租户而空置了数月，而运营成本和银行利息支付仍在继续。新的框架让我们有信心合法透明地重返市场，” 她说。</p>
</div><p>Võ Duy Phương, 42, an investor operating two short-term rental apartments in Xóm Chiếu Ward, said earlier restrictions had affected both revenue and business credibility.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>42 岁的投资者 Võ Duy Phương 在 Xóm Chiếu 区经营两处短期租赁公寓，他表示，之前的限制影响了收入和商业信誉。</p>
</div><p>“We previously signed long-term arrangements with foreign clients but had to terminate them when regulations changed,” he said. “We lost deposits and, more importantly, trust from partners. Since the policy adjustment, some former clients have already contacted us again.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我们之前与外国客户签订了长期协议，但在法规变化时不得不终止这些协议，” 他说。“我们失去了押金，更重要的是失去了合作伙伴的信任。自政策调整以来，一些以前的客户已经再次联系了我们。”</p>
</div><p>Industry representatives also said clearer regulations could help standardise a market that had continued operating informally despite restrictions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>行业代表还表示，更清晰的法规可以帮助规范一个尽管受到限制但仍在非正式运营的市场。</p>
</div><p>“A legal framework allows authorities and building management boards to supervise operations more effectively,” said a representative of a serviced apartment management company in HCM City.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“法律框架使得当局和建筑管理委员会能够更有效地监督运营，” 一位胡志明市的服务公寓管理公司代表说。</p>
</div><p>“Previously, many owners continued short-term rentals unofficially, making guest management and service quality difficult to control,” the representative said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“之前，许多业主仍然非正式地进行短期租赁，使得客人管理和服务质量难以控制，” 该代表说。</p>
</div><p><strong>Resident concerns remain unresolved</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>居民的担忧仍未解决</strong></p>
</div><p>However, many residents expressed concern that the return of Airbnb-style accommodation could alter the living environment inside residential buildings.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，许多居民表示担心 Airbnb 式住宿的回归可能会改变住宅楼内的生活环境。</p>
</div><p>“At weekends, guests constantly move luggage in and out of the building, sometimes late at night,” said Lê Thị Thu Hương, 38, a resident of an apartment complex in Bình Lợi Trung Ward.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在周末，客人不断地在楼内搬运行李，有时甚至在深夜，” 38 岁的 Lê Thị Thu Hương 说，她是 Bình Lợi Trung 区一处公寓综合体的居民。</p>
</div><p>“We often do not know who these visitors are or how long they stay. It creates a feeling of insecurity for long-term residents,” she said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我们常常不知道这些访客是谁，或者他们会住多久。这给长期居民带来了不安全感，” 她说。</p>
</div><p>Another resident in Tân Phú Ward said shared facilities were already under pressure during peak hours.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>另一位在 Tân Phú区的居民表示，共用设施在高峰时段已经承受了压力。</p>
</div><p>“Apartment buildings are designed primarily for stable residential living, not hotel-style operations,” the resident said. “If short-term accommodation is permitted, management mechanisms also need to change accordingly.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“公寓楼主要是为稳定的居住生活而设计的，而不是酒店式运营，” 该居民说。“如果允许短期住宿，管理机制也需要相应改变。”</p>
</div><p>Building management boards are expected to play a central role in balancing the interests of investors and residents.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>建筑管理委员会预计将在平衡投资者和居民利益方面发挥核心作用。</p>
</div><p>A representative of a residential project in Thủ Thiêm urban area said apartment complexes would likely need internal operating rules governing guest registration, security procedures, use of shared facilities and limits on the proportion of units used for short-term rentals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一位来自 Thủ Thiêm 城市区域的住宅项目代表表示，公寓综合体可能需要制定内部运营规则，管理客人登记、安全程序、共用设施的使用以及短期租赁单元的比例限制。</p>
</div><p>“Without clear internal regulations, disputes between residents and investors could continue,” the representative said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“如果没有明确的内部规定，居民与投资者之间的争议可能会持续，” 该代表说。</p>
</div><p><strong>International comparisons</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>国际比较</strong></p>
</div><p>Experts said many major cities worldwide have adopted stricter supervisory mechanisms for short-term rentals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>专家表示，全球许多主要城市已经采取了更严格的短期租赁监管机制。</p>
</div><p>Singapore largely prohibits short-term rentals of less than three months in private residential properties, while Tokyo permits home-sharing activities under registration requirements and annual operating limits.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>新加坡在私人住宅物业中基本禁止少于三个月的短期租赁，而东京则在注册要求和年度运营限制下允许家庭共享活动。</p>
</div><p>Real estate expert Phạm Văn Bạch said HCM City’s policy adjustment could create both opportunities and operational challenges.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>房地产专家 Phạm Văn Bạch 表示，胡志明市的政策调整可能会带来机遇和运营挑战。</p>
</div><p>“In the short term, the market may see an increase in accommodation supply for tourists and foreign professionals,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在短期内，市场可能会看到为游客和外国专业人士提供的住宿供应增加，” 他说。</p>
</div><p>“In the longer term, however, the city will need clearer standards on building operations, infrastructure management and security responsibilities to ensure sustainable development,” he added.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“然而，从长远来看，城市需要在建筑运营、基础设施管理和安全责任方面制定更明确的标准，以确保可持续发展，” 他补充道。</p>
</div><p>Legal experts also warned that unresolved governance issues could remain a source of conflict.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法律专家还警告说，未解决的治理问题可能仍然是冲突的来源。</p>
</div><p>Lawyer Nguyễn Hoàng Anh of the HCM City Bar Association said residential apartment buildings were fundamentally different from hotels in terms of design and operational purpose.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>胡志明市律师协会的律师 Nguyễn Hoàng Anh 表示，住宅公寓楼在设计和运营目的上与酒店根本不同。</p>
</div><p>“Hotels are built specifically for accommodation services, while apartment buildings are designed for stable long-term living,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“酒店是专门为住宿服务而建造的，而公寓楼则是为稳定的长期居住而设计的，” 他说。</p>
</div><p>“Frequent guest turnover increases pressure on security management, identity verification and infrastructure usage. In addition, responsibility for handling violations can become unclear because guests stay only temporarily,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“频繁的客人更替增加了安全管理、身份验证和基础设施使用的压力。此外，处理违规行为的责任可能变得不明确，因为客人只是暂时居住，” 他说。</p>
</div><p>Experts said the city’s decision showed a trend of recognising short-term rental demand within urban tourism and property markets.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>专家表示，城市的决定显示出承认城市旅游和房地产市场中短期租赁需求的趋势。</p>
</div><p>However, they noted that the long-term success of the policy would depend on effective enforcement, operational transparency and consensus among resident communities.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，他们指出，政策的长期成功将取决于有效的执行、运营透明度和居民社区之间的共识。</p>
</div><p>“If these governance issues are not addressed properly, tensions between economic interests and residential quality of life will likely remain a continuing source of debate,” Bạch said. — VNS</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“如果这些治理问题没有得到妥善解决，经济利益与居民生活质量之间的紧张关系可能仍将是持续争论的来源，” Bạch 说。——VNS</p>
</div>

胡志明市在新规下重新开放短期公寓租赁市场