<p>一家大型开发商正在准备进行法律挑战，因为其在伦敦南部建设数百套新住房的提案被阻止。</p>
<p>伯克利集团正在考虑在高等法院寻求司法审查，因为规划检查机构拒绝了其将佩卡姆的一个购物中心改建为 867 套新住房的计划。</p>
<p>在周一发布的决定中，规划检查员马修·施里格利称该项目 “过于主导” 和 “视觉上侵入”，警告称这将阻碍佩卡姆钟楼的视野。</p>
<p>施里格利先生裁定，该地区遗产建筑受到的损害超过了开发的好处，尽管他承认在首都建设更多住房的 “迫切需求”。</p>
<p>然而，伯克利集团的执行主席罗布·佩林斯表示，这一决定显示了 “开发商在规划系统中持续面临的极端不确定性”。</p>
<p>佩林斯先生说：“伦敦的住房交付处于历史最低水平，政府已制定明确的支持住房政策，但我们仍然被阻止在一个完全分配的棕地再开发地点建设住房。”</p>
<p>“当检查员支持我们的可负担住房提议和更广泛的利益，承认当地对住房的迫切需求，却因主观的遗产影响而阻止开发时，这显然是根本性的问题，我们认为这些影响的危害性很低。</p>
<p>“这就是为什么包括伯克利在内的开发商无法再投资新的伦敦项目，住房危机持续加深。阻碍住房交付和增长的决定必须受到挑战，我们现在将考虑所有可行的选项。”</p>
<p>这家 FTSE 100 房屋建筑商于 2021 年收购了艾尔沙姆中心的地块，并开始制定将其改建为新住房的计划。</p>
<p>该公司表示，其提案将创造近 1000 个就业机会，并通过超过 1300 万英镑的额外支出来促进当地经济。</p>
<p>但该计划遭到了当地议员、居民和运动团体的强烈反对，他们筹集了超过 55000 英镑以进行法律挑战。</p>
<p>该房屋建筑商于 2024 年 7 月向南华克市议会提交了规划申请，该市在 5 月的选举之前由工党主导。随后在决定仍未达成后，次年向规划检查员提出了非决定的上诉。</p>
<p>南华克的规划委员会随后投票拒绝了该申请，理由是对其 12% 可负担住房提案及其对当地保护区的影响表示担忧。</p>
<p>南华克市议会的工党领袖莎拉·金表示，检查员的裁决标志着 “佩卡姆的伟大日子”。</p>
<p>她补充道：“我想亲自感谢那些大声表达关切的社区。我们分享了这些关切，并在公众听证会上强烈辩称该方案设计不佳，我们的立场得到了验证。”</p>

<p>伯克利集团计划对阻止其在伦敦佩卡姆建设 867 套新住宅的决定提出挑战。规划检查机构认为该项目 “过于主导”，并对遗产建筑造成了损害，尽管承认住房需求。开发商辩称，该决定反映了规划系统的不确定性，并阻碍了住房供应。当地的反对声音和对可负担住房的担忧也导致了该项目的拒绝。市议会领导人称赞检查员的裁决是社区的胜利</p>

<p>A major developer is preparing to mount a legal challenge after its proposals to build hundreds of new homes in south London were blocked.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一家大型开发商正在准备进行法律挑战，因为其在伦敦南部建设数百套新住房的提案被阻止。</p>
</div><p>Berkeley Group is considering seeking a judicial review in the High Court after the Planning Inspectorate rejected its plans to convert a shopping centre in Peckham into 867 new homes.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>伯克利集团正在考虑在高等法院寻求司法审查，因为规划检查机构拒绝了其将佩卡姆的一个购物中心改建为 867 套新住房的计划。</p>
</div><p>In its decision published on Monday, the planning inspector Matthew Shrigley called the project “overly domineering” and “visually intrusive”, warning it would obstruct views of Peckham clock tower.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在周一发布的决定中，规划检查员马修·施里格利称该项目 “过于主导” 和 “视觉上侵入”，警告称这将阻碍佩卡姆钟楼的视野。</p>
</div><p>Mr Shrigley ruled that the harm to heritage buildings in the area outweighed the benefits of the development, even as he acknowledged the “critical need” to build more houses in the capital.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>施里格利先生裁定，该地区遗产建筑受到的损害超过了开发的好处，尽管他承认在首都建设更多住房的 “迫切需求”。</p>
</div><p>However, Rob Perrins, the executive chairman of Berkeley Group, said the decision demonstrated “the extreme uncertainty developers continue to experience within the planning system”.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，伯克利集团的执行主席罗布·佩林斯表示，这一决定显示了 “开发商在规划系统中持续面临的极端不确定性”。</p>
</div><p>Mr Perrins said: “Housing delivery in London is at an all-time low, the Government has set clear pro‑housing policy, yet we are still blocked from building homes on a fully allocated brownfield regeneration site in a town centre.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>佩林斯先生说：“伦敦的住房交付处于历史最低水平，政府已制定明确的支持住房政策，但我们仍然被阻止在一个完全分配的棕地再开发地点建设住房。”</p>
</div><p>“There is something fundamentally wrong when the inspector supports our affordable housing offer and wider benefits, recognises the acute local housing need, yet blocks development due to subjective heritage impacts, which we believe are of low harm.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“当检查员支持我们的可负担住房提议和更广泛的利益，承认当地对住房的迫切需求，却因主观的遗产影响而阻止开发时，这显然是根本性的问题，我们认为这些影响的危害性很低。</p>
</div><p>“This is why developers, including Berkeley, can no longer invest in new London sites and the housing crisis continues to deepen. Decisions that block housing delivery and growth must be challenged, and we will now consider all options open to us.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“这就是为什么包括伯克利在内的开发商无法再投资新的伦敦项目，住房危机持续加深。阻碍住房交付和增长的决定必须受到挑战，我们现在将考虑所有可行的选项。”</p>
</div><p>The FTSE 100 housebuilder acquired the Aylesham Centre site in 2021 and began drawing up plans to convert it into new homes.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>这家 FTSE 100 房屋建筑商于 2021 年收购了艾尔沙姆中心的地块，并开始制定将其改建为新住房的计划。</p>
</div><p>The company said its proposals would create nearly 1,000 jobs and boost the local economy with more than £13m in additional spending.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该公司表示，其提案将创造近 1000 个就业机会，并通过超过 1300 万英镑的额外支出来促进当地经济。</p>
</div><p>But the plans were met with fierce opposition from local councillors and residents and campaign groups, who fundraised more than £55,000 to mount a legal challenge.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>但该计划遭到了当地议员、居民和运动团体的强烈反对，他们筹集了超过 55000 英镑以进行法律挑战。</p>
</div><p>The housebuilder submitted its planning application to Southwark council, which until May’s elections was dominated by Labour, in July 2024. It lodged an appeal with the planning inspector for non-determination the following year after a decision had still not been reached.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>该房屋建筑商于 2024 年 7 月向南华克市议会提交了规划申请，该市在 5 月的选举之前由工党主导。随后在决定仍未达成后，次年向规划检查员提出了非决定的上诉。</p>
</div><p>Southwark’s planning committee then voted to reject the application, citing concerns about its proposal for 12pc affordable housing and how it would affect the local conservation area.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>南华克的规划委员会随后投票拒绝了该申请，理由是对其 12% 可负担住房提案及其对当地保护区的影响表示担忧。</p>
</div><p>Sarah King, the Labour leader of Southwark council, said the inspector’s verdict marked a “great day for Peckham”.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>南华克市议会的工党领袖莎拉·金表示，检查员的裁决标志着 “佩卡姆的伟大日子”。</p>
</div><p>She added: “I’d like to personally thank the community who spoke loud and clearly about their concerns. We shared those concerns and strongly argued at the public inquiry that the scheme was poorly designed and our position has been vindicated.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>她补充道：“我想亲自感谢那些大声表达关切的社区。我们分享了这些关切，并在公众听证会上强烈辩称该方案设计不佳，我们的立场得到了验证。”</p>
</div>

开发商考虑提起法律诉讼，因 800 套伦敦新住宅项目被阻止