<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2025/07/image-65.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" width="1152" height="720" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2025/07/image-65.png"/></p>
<p>一起重大的安全事件動搖了人們對 Polkadot 跨鏈生態系統的信心，因為攻擊者成功利用了以太坊 Hyperbridge 系統中的一個漏洞。</p>
<p>這一漏洞已被 Polkadot 團隊確認，允許創建 10 億個虛假的 DOT 代幣，引發市場恐慌，並在短期內拖低了 Polkadot 的價格。</p>
<h2>Hyperbridge 漏洞是如何發生的</h2>
<p>此次攻擊針對的是一個連接 Polkadot 基礎資產與以太坊的跨鏈橋系統。</p>
<p>簡單來説，這些橋的目的是在一個鏈上鎖定代幣，並在另一個鏈上鑄造等值的 “包裝” 版本，以便在不同生態系統中使用。</p>
<p>在這種情況下，攻擊者發現了消息驗證過程中的一個弱點。</p>
<p>通過偽造一個看似有效的跨鏈消息，他們能夠欺騙系統，使其相信已發出了合法請求。</p>
<p>這使他們獲得了對負責發行橋接 DOT 的以太坊側合約的未授權管理控制。</p>
<p>一旦進入，攻擊者在以太坊上在一系列交易中鑄造了大約 10 億個沒有支持的 DOT 代幣。</p>
<p>這些代幣並不代表 Polkadot 網絡上的真實資產，但在以太坊基礎的流動性池中仍被視為有效。</p>
<p>攻擊者迅速在去中心化交易所出售新創建的代幣。</p>
<p>然而，這些市場的流動性極其薄弱，這意味着價格幾乎立即崩潰，因為賣壓壓倒了買家。</p>
<p>儘管鑄造的代幣名義價值巨大，但攻擊者在市場變得無法繼續獲利之前，僅提取了約 237,000 美元。</p>
<h2>Polkadot 的 DOT 價格對黑客攻擊反應劇烈</h2>
<p>在消息公佈後，Polkadot 的原生代幣價格下跌了約 6%，截至發稿時價格徘徊在 1.17 美元附近。</p>
<p>值得注意的是，這一波動並不是由於基礎供應或協議機制的變化，而是由於恐懼和不確定性在市場中蔓延。</p>
<p>交易者迅速對 “10 億個 DOT 代幣” 被鑄造的想法做出反應，儘管這一事件僅影響了以太坊上的橋接資產表現。</p>
<p>在即時反應中，原生 DOT 和包裝代幣之間的區別在很大程度上被忽視，這加劇了賣壓。</p>
<p>與此同時，整個加密貨幣市場已經顯示出輕微的疲軟，這進一步增加了下行壓力。</p>
<p>比特幣在同一時期的輕微下跌降低了整體風險偏好，使得山寨幣更容易受到劇烈波動的影響。</p>
<p>因此，DOT 的表現不及更廣泛的市場，並不是因為其核心區塊鏈的根本失敗，而是由於恐慌情緒和技術圖表上的崩潰結合造成的。</p>
<h2>Polkadot 價格展望</h2>
<p>從技術角度來看，Polkadot 的價格結構在漏洞發生之前已經傾向於看跌。</p>
<p>該代幣已經持續下跌，最近的價格下跌僅顯示出建立強勁上行動能的反覆失敗。</p>
<p>價格下跌使 DOT 跌破了 1.17 美元附近的關鍵支撐區域，短暫測試了接近 1.16 美元的低位。</p>
<p>這個區域現在對觀察短期穩定性的交易者變得重要。</p>
<p>如果買家能夠捍衞 1.15 美元區域，市場可能會進入一個整合階段，價格穩定並嘗試反彈。</p>
<p>在這種情況下，1.19 到 1.20 美元的區間成為首個值得關注的重要阻力區，因為它與最近的日內支撐水平相符。</p>
<p>然而，如果賣壓持續且 1.15 美元支撐失效，結構表明可能還有進一步下行的空間，尤其是考慮到 RSI 等動能指標顯示該山寨幣幾乎超賣。</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2026/04/image-1776076486.png?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" width="935" height="620" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2026/04/image-1776076486.png"/></p>
<p>Polkadot (DOT) 價格分析 | 來源：Tradingview</p>
<p>在這種情況下，市場可能會延續其更廣泛的下行趨勢，特別是如果對橋接安全的情緒仍然疲弱，或者開發者沒有傳達明確的解決方案。</p>
<p>標題為《Hyperbridge 黑客攻擊震撼 Polkadot，10 億虛假 DOT 代幣被鑄造》的文章首次出現在 Invezz 上。</p>

ETHA

QETH

<p>一起涉及以太坊 Hyperbridge 系統的重大安全事件導致創建了 10 億個假 DOT 代幣，造成市場恐慌，波卡（Polkadot）價格下跌 6%。該漏洞使攻擊者能夠偽造消息，控制以太坊合約並鑄造無支持的代幣。儘管名義價值很高，但攻擊者在市場崩潰前僅提取了 237,000 美元。此次事件加劇了恐懼和不確定性，影響了波卡的價格結構，而其本身已經處於熊市。關鍵支撐位現在對潛在的反彈或進一步下跌至關重要</p>

<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2025/07/image-65.png" alt="" original-src="https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2025/07/image-65.png"/></p>
<p>A major security incident has shaken confidence around Polkadot’s cross-chain ecosystem after attackers managed to exploit a vulnerability in the Hyperbridge system on Ethereum.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一起重大的安全事件動搖了人們對 Polkadot 跨鏈生態系統的信心，因為攻擊者成功利用了以太坊 Hyperbridge 系統中的一個漏洞。</p>
</div><p>The exploit, which has been acknowledged by the Polkadot team, allowed the creation of 1 billion fake DOT tokens, triggering panic across the market and dragging Polkadot’s price lower in the short term.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一漏洞已被 Polkadot 團隊確認，允許創建 10 億個虛假的 DOT 代幣，引發市場恐慌，並在短期內拖低了 Polkadot 的價格。</p>
</div><h2>How the Hyperbridge exploit unfolded</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>Hyperbridge 漏洞是如何發生的</h2>
</div><p>The attack targeted a cross-chain bridge system that connects Polkadot-based assets to Ethereum.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>此次攻擊針對的是一個連接 Polkadot 基礎資產與以太坊的跨鏈橋系統。</p>
</div><p>In simple terms, these bridges are meant to lock tokens on one chain and mint equivalent “wrapped” versions on another chain so they can be used across different ecosystems.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>簡單來説，這些橋的目的是在一個鏈上鎖定代幣，並在另一個鏈上鑄造等值的 “包裝” 版本，以便在不同生態系統中使用。</p>
</div><p>In this case, the attacker found a weakness in the message verification process.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在這種情況下，攻擊者發現了消息驗證過程中的一個弱點。</p>
</div><p>By forging a valid-looking cross-chain message, they were able to trick the system into believing a legitimate request had been made.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>通過偽造一個看似有效的跨鏈消息，他們能夠欺騙系統，使其相信已發出了合法請求。</p>
</div><p>This gave them unauthorized administrative control over the Ethereum-side contract responsible for issuing bridged DOT.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這使他們獲得了對負責發行橋接 DOT 的以太坊側合約的未授權管理控制。</p>
</div><p>Once inside, the attacker minted roughly 1 billion unbacked DOT tokens on Ethereum in a single sequence of transactions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一旦進入，攻擊者在以太坊上在一系列交易中鑄造了大約 10 億個沒有支持的 DOT 代幣。</p>
</div><p>These tokens did not represent real assets on the Polkadot network, but they were still treated as valid within Ethereum-based liquidity pools.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這些代幣並不代表 Polkadot 網絡上的真實資產，但在以太坊基礎的流動性池中仍被視為有效。</p>
</div><p>The attacker quickly sold the newly created tokens on decentralised exchanges.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>攻擊者迅速在去中心化交易所出售新創建的代幣。</p>
</div><p>However, the liquidity in those markets was extremely thin, which meant the price collapsed almost immediately as selling pressure overwhelmed buyers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，這些市場的流動性極其薄弱，這意味着價格幾乎立即崩潰，因為賣壓壓倒了買家。</p>
</div><p>Despite the enormous nominal value of the minted tokens, the attacker only managed to extract around $237,000 before the market became unusable for further profit-taking.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>儘管鑄造的代幣名義價值巨大，但攻擊者在市場變得無法繼續獲利之前，僅提取了約 237,000 美元。</p>
</div><h2>Polkadot’s DOT price reacted sharply to the hack</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>Polkadot 的 DOT 價格對黑客攻擊反應劇烈</h2>
</div><p>Polkadot’s native token dropped around 6% following the news, with price hovering near the $1.17 region at press time.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在消息公佈後，Polkadot 的原生代幣價格下跌了約 6%，截至發稿時價格徘徊在 1.17 美元附近。</p>
</div><p>Notably, the move was not driven by any change in the underlying supply or protocol mechanics, but rather by fear and uncertainty spreading through the market.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>值得注意的是，這一波動並不是由於基礎供應或協議機制的變化，而是由於恐懼和不確定性在市場中蔓延。</p>
</div><p>Traders reacted quickly to the idea that “1 billion DOT tokens” had been minted, even though the event only affected a bridged representation of the asset on Ethereum.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>交易者迅速對 “10 億個 DOT 代幣” 被鑄造的想法做出反應，儘管這一事件僅影響了以太坊上的橋接資產表現。</p>
</div><p>The distinction between native DOT and wrapped tokens was largely ignored in the immediate reaction, which amplified selling pressure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在即時反應中，原生 DOT 和包裝代幣之間的區別在很大程度上被忽視，這加劇了賣壓。</p>
</div><p>At the same time, the broader cryptocurrency market was already showing mild weakness, which added further downside pressure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>與此同時，整個加密貨幣市場已經顯示出輕微的疲軟，這進一步增加了下行壓力。</p>
</div><p>Bitcoin’s slight decline during the same period reduced overall risk appetite, making altcoins more vulnerable to sharper moves.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>比特幣在同一時期的輕微下跌降低了整體風險偏好，使得山寨幣更容易受到劇烈波動的影響。</p>
</div><p>As a result, DOT underperformed compared to the wider market, not because of a fundamental failure in its core blockchain, but due to a combination of panic sentiment and technical breakdowns on the charts.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>因此，DOT 的表現不及更廣泛的市場，並不是因為其核心區塊鏈的根本失敗，而是由於恐慌情緒和技術圖表上的崩潰結合造成的。</p>
</div><h2>Polkadot price outlook</h2>
<div class="lb-trans"><h2>Polkadot 價格展望</h2>
</div><p>From a technical perspective, Polkadot’s price structure was already leaning bearish before the exploit occurred.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>從技術角度來看，Polkadot 的價格結構在漏洞發生之前已經傾向於看跌。</p>
</div><p>The token had been trending downward for an extended period, and the recent price drop only shows repeated failures to build strong upward momentum.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該代幣已經持續下跌，最近的價格下跌僅顯示出建立強勁上行動能的反覆失敗。</p>
</div><p>The drop has pushed DOT below a key support area around the $1.17 level, briefly testing lower levels near $1.16.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>價格下跌使 DOT 跌破了 1.17 美元附近的關鍵支撐區域，短暫測試了接近 1.16 美元的低位。</p>
</div><p>This zone now becomes important for traders watching short-term stability.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這個區域現在對觀察短期穩定性的交易者變得重要。</p>
</div><p>If buyers manage to defend the $1.15 area, the market could enter a consolidation phase, where price stabilises and attempts a recovery bounce.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>如果買家能夠捍衞 1.15 美元區域，市場可能會進入一個整合階段，價格穩定並嘗試反彈。</p>
</div><p>In that scenario, the $1.19 to $1.20 range becomes the first meaningful resistance zone to watch, as it aligns with recent intraday pivot levels.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在這種情況下，1.19 到 1.20 美元的區間成為首個值得關注的重要阻力區，因為它與最近的日內支撐水平相符。</p>
</div><p>However, if selling pressure continues and the $1.15 support fails, the structure suggests there may be room for further downside, especially seeing that momentum indicators like RSI show the altcoin is almost oversold.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，如果賣壓持續且 1.15 美元支撐失效，結構表明可能還有進一步下行的空間，尤其是考慮到 RSI 等動能指標顯示該山寨幣幾乎超賣。</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2026/04/image-1776076486.png" alt="" original-src="https://invezz-wp-media.lon1.digitaloceanspaces.com/2026/04/image-1776076486.png"/></p>
<p>Polkadot (DOT) price analysis | Source: Tradingview</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Polkadot (DOT) 價格分析 | 來源：Tradingview</p>
</div><p>In that case, the market could extend its broader downtrend, especially if sentiment around bridge security remains weak or if no clear resolution is communicated by developers.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>在這種情況下，市場可能會延續其更廣泛的下行趨勢，特別是如果對橋接安全的情緒仍然疲弱，或者開發者沒有傳達明確的解決方案。</p>
</div><p>The post Hyperbridge hack rocks Polkadot after 1B Fake DOT tokens minted appeared first on Invezz</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>標題為《Hyperbridge 黑客攻擊震撼 Polkadot，10 億虛假 DOT 代幣被鑄造》的文章首次出現在 Invezz 上。</p>
</div>

Hyperbridge hack rocks Polkadot after 1B Fake DOT tokens minted

invezz

IShares Ethereum Trust ETF

Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF

Proshares Ether Strategy ETF

Grayscale Ethereum Mini Staking ETF

21Shares Polkadot ETF

Bitwise Ethereum ETF

VanEck Ethereum ETF

21Shares Ethereum ETF

Fidelity Ethereum Fund

Franklin Ethereum ETF

Hyperbridge 攻擊導致 Polkadot 震動，10 億個假冒的 DOT 代幣被鑄造