<p>/PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center 是一家家族擁有和經營的專業護理機構，已在帕薩迪納和阿爾塔迪納為老年和殘疾居民服務超過 55 年，現已對南加州愛迪生公司及其母公司愛迪生國際提起訴訟，指控該公用事業公司的電力基礎設施故障引發了 2025 年 1 月的伊頓火災，並徹底摧毀了該設施。Zimmerman Reed LLP 代表 Two Palms 處理此事。</p>
<p>該訴訟於洛杉磯縣高級法院提起，指控南加州愛迪生在 2025 年 1 月 7 日的夜晚未能遵循自身的安全協議——儘管附近氣象站的風速在當天超過了該公用事業公司自身的停電閾值，並且國家氣象局發佈了最高級別的火災天氣預警。晚上 6:11，南加州愛迪生的輸電線路上檢測到電氣故障，同時在伊頓峽谷的南加州愛迪生輸電塔下出現閃光和火花，點燃了伊頓火災。風驅動的火焰在一小時內蔓延至 Two Palms 周圍的建築物。在火災發生前，Two Palms 常常有等待名單。現在，它所服務的社區一無所有。</p>
<p>當火災在點燃後一個小時內蔓延至周圍建築物時，Two Palms 的工作人員幾乎沒有時間。他們通過煙霧和灰燼，用輪椅和移動牀將 45 名老年和殘疾居民——許多人卧牀不起，有些人患有痴呆——轉移到安全地點。每位居民都安全撤離。許多人被轉移到附屬設施，大家都認為這將是臨時安置。15 個月後，許多人仍然留在那裏。洛杉磯時報對此次撤離的完整報道。</p>
<p>到黎明時，設施已不復存在。每個房間、每個治療空間、每一件醫療設備——全部被吞噬。輪椅被遺棄在前草坪上。Two Palms 的標誌依然矗立。</p>
<p>“我們的每一位居民都是選擇 Two Palms 的，他們的家人將他們最愛的人託付給我們。在火災發生的夜晚，我們的工作人員尊重了這種信任——他們冒着煙霧和火焰返回，確保沒有人被遺留。我們無法接受的是，公用事業公司的所謂失誤使這一切成為必要。火災前，Two Palms 常常有等待名單。這個社區的家庭在等待一個他們信任的地方——而現在那個地方已經消失。提起這起訴訟是重建它和恢復這個社區仍然需要的護理的必要步驟。”</p>
<p>—— Juana Rodriguez，Two Palms Care Center 管理員</p>
<p>根據投訴，南加州愛迪生自己的調查得出結論，認為其設備 “可能是” 伊頓火災的原因。該公用事業公司表示並不知曉指向其他點火源的證據。這一承認是 Two Palms 索賠的核心。</p>
<p>投訴還指控在點火地點附近的過時和不活動設備仍然存在，並且在危險條件下防止電力線路重新通電的安全系統未能正確啓用。</p>
<p>南加州愛迪生曾受到警告。1 月 5 日，國家氣象局對該地區發佈了紅色警報。次日，該警報升級為特別危險情況——這是可用的最高級別——預測 210 號公路走廊將出現危及生命的破壞性風暴條件，而 Two Palms 正是在該走廊內運營。加州消防局尚未正式發佈伊頓火災的官方原因；該調查仍在進行中。</p>
<p>“本案是關於在關鍵時刻是否遵循了旨在防止此類災難的系統。Two Palms 不僅失去了建築——社區失去了一個人們依賴的護理、穩定和尊嚴的地方。這個時刻是關於問責。”</p>
<p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合夥人</p>
<p>Two Palms 仍然致力於重建——但恢復完整不僅僅是重建被燒燬的部分。由於該設施建於 1959 年，它在監管豁免下運營，這些豁免不再適用於新建築。</p>
<p>“任何重建的設施必須符合當前的建築規範、無障礙要求和更新的醫療設施標準。這不是對正義的障礙——這是正義所要求的。完全恢復意味着能夠再次以該社區應得的標準提供服務。南加州愛迪生的所謂疏忽是 Two Palms 與這一結果之間的障礙，而實現這一目標的成本是本訴訟尋求恢復的一部分。”</p>
<p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合夥人</p>
<p>該訴訟提出了七項訴因：過失及過失自證、火災侵入、逆向徵收、公共滋擾、私人滋擾、違反健康與安全法典第 13007 條，以及根據加州公共事業法第 2106 條的私人訴權。Two Palms 尋求賠償財產損失、業務中斷、收入損失、撤離和搬遷費用，以及持續的經濟損害，並要求對南加州愛迪生進行強制性救濟，要求其遵守適用的基礎設施安全法規。</p>
<p>伊頓火災於 2025 年 1 月 7 日引發，成為加州歷史上第二大破壞性火災。它造成 19 人遇難，燒燬超過 14,000 英畝，摧毀約 10,000 棟建築，遍及帕薩迪納和阿爾塔迪納。Two Palms 是火災中被摧毀的兩家專業護理設施之一。那晚撤離的 45 名居民中，許多人被轉移到附屬設施，大家都認為這將是臨時安置。15 個月後，許多人仍然留在那裏。</p>
<p><strong>關於 Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP 是一家成立於 1983 年的全國性原告方律師事務所，在明尼阿波利斯、洛杉磯和鳳凰城設有辦公室。四十多年來，該事務所代表個人和機構處理複雜訴訟，包括集體訴訟、消費者保護、數據泄露和野火事務。Zimmerman Reed 致力於在企業和機構的行為造成嚴重傷害時追究其責任。我們從不忘記我們所為之奮鬥的對象。</p>
<p><strong>媒體聯繫人</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<p>[email protected]</p>
<p>來源 Zimmerman Reed</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0"/></p>

愛迪生國際

公用事業 ETF - SPDR

標普全球公用事業 ETF - iShares

<p>位於帕薩迪納的 Two Palms Care Center，一家專業護理機構，已對南加州愛迪生公司提起訴訟，指控該公司的故障基礎設施導致了 2025 年 1 月的伊頓火災，摧毀了該設施。訴訟稱，南加州愛迪生未能遵循安全協議，儘管有嚴重天氣警告。火災導致 45 名居民被迫撤離，其中許多人在 15 個月後仍然無家可歸。該訴訟尋求對南加州愛迪生的過失負責，並旨在追回重建設施以符合當前標準的費用</p>

<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center, a family-owned and operated skilled nursing facility that had served elderly and disabled residents in Pasadena and Altadena for more than 55 years, has filed suit against Southern California Edison Company and its parent, Edison International, alleging that the utility's faulty electrical infrastructure ignited the January 2025 Eaton Fire and destroyed the facility in its entirety. Zimmerman Reed LLP represents Two Palms in this matter.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>/PRNewswire/ -- Two Palms Care Center 是一家家族擁有和經營的專業護理機構，已在帕薩迪納和阿爾塔迪納為老年和殘疾居民服務超過 55 年，現已對南加州愛迪生公司及其母公司愛迪生國際提起訴訟，指控該公用事業公司的電力基礎設施故障引發了 2025 年 1 月的伊頓火災，並徹底摧毀了該設施。Zimmerman Reed LLP 代表 Two Palms 處理此事。</p>
</div><p>The suit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleges that SCE failed to follow its own safety protocols on the night of January 7, 2025 — despite wind gusts at nearby weather stations that had exceeded the utility's own shutoff thresholds throughout the day, and despite the National Weather Service issuing its highest-level fire weather designation. At 6:11 p.m., electrical faults were detected on SCE transmission lines coinciding with flashes and sparks beneath SCE transmission towers in the Eaton Canyon, which ignited the Eaton Fire. Wind-driven flames reached the structures surrounding Two Palms within the hour. Before the fire, Two Palms often had a waiting list. Now the community it served has nothing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該訴訟於洛杉磯縣高級法院提起，指控南加州愛迪生在 2025 年 1 月 7 日的夜晚未能遵循自身的安全協議——儘管附近氣象站的風速在當天超過了該公用事業公司自身的停電閾值，並且國家氣象局發佈了最高級別的火災天氣預警。晚上 6:11，南加州愛迪生的輸電線路上檢測到電氣故障，同時在伊頓峽谷的南加州愛迪生輸電塔下出現閃光和火花，點燃了伊頓火災。風驅動的火焰在一小時內蔓延至 Two Palms 周圍的建築物。在火災發生前，Two Palms 常常有等待名單。現在，它所服務的社區一無所有。</p>
</div><p>When the fire reached the surrounding structures within an hour of ignition, Two Palms staff had almost no time. They moved 45 elderly and disabled residents — many bedridden, some with dementia — through smoke and ash on wheelchairs and rolling beds. Every resident was evacuated safely. Many were transferred to affiliated facilities in what everyone expected would be temporary placements. More than 15 months later, many remain there still. The full account of the evacuation was reported by the Los Angeles Times.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>當火災在點燃後一個小時內蔓延至周圍建築物時，Two Palms 的工作人員幾乎沒有時間。他們通過煙霧和灰燼，用輪椅和移動牀將 45 名老年和殘疾居民——許多人卧牀不起，有些人患有痴呆——轉移到安全地點。每位居民都安全撤離。許多人被轉移到附屬設施，大家都認為這將是臨時安置。15 個月後，許多人仍然留在那裏。洛杉磯時報對此次撤離的完整報道。</p>
</div><p>By dawn, the facility was gone. Every room, every therapy space, every piece of medical equipment — consumed entirely. Wheelchairs lay abandoned on the front lawn. The Two Palms sign still stood.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>到黎明時，設施已不復存在。每個房間、每個治療空間、每一件醫療設備——全部被吞噬。輪椅被遺棄在前草坪上。Two Palms 的標誌依然矗立。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Every one of our residents chose Two Palms, and their families trusted us with the people they love most. On the night of the fire, our staff honored that trust — they went back through smoke and flames to make sure no one was left behind. What we cannot accept is that a utility company's alleged failures made any of that necessary. Two Palms often had a waiting list before the fire. Families in this community were waiting for a place they trusted — and now that place is gone. Filing this lawsuit is a necessary step toward rebuilding it and restoring the care this community still needs.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我們的每一位居民都是選擇 Two Palms 的，他們的家人將他們最愛的人託付給我們。在火災發生的夜晚，我們的工作人員尊重了這種信任——他們冒着煙霧和火焰返回，確保沒有人被遺留。我們無法接受的是，公用事業公司的所謂失誤使這一切成為必要。火災前，Two Palms 常常有等待名單。這個社區的家庭在等待一個他們信任的地方——而現在那個地方已經消失。提起這起訴訟是重建它和恢復這個社區仍然需要的護理的必要步驟。”</p>
</div><p>— Juana Rodriguez, Administrator, Two Palms Care Center</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Juana Rodriguez，Two Palms Care Center 管理員</p>
</div><p>According to the complaint, SCE's own investigation concluded that its equipment was &#34;likely the cause&#34; of the Eaton Fire. The utility has stated it is not aware of evidence pointing to any other source of ignition. That acknowledgment is central to Two Palms' claims.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根據投訴，南加州愛迪生自己的調查得出結論，認為其設備 “可能是” 伊頓火災的原因。該公用事業公司表示並不知曉指向其他點火源的證據。這一承認是 Two Palms 索賠的核心。</p>
</div><p>The complaint also alleges that outdated and inactive equipment near the ignition site remained in place, and that safety systems designed to prevent re-energizing electrical lines during dangerous conditions were not properly enabled.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>投訴還指控在點火地點附近的過時和不活動設備仍然存在，並且在危險條件下防止電力線路重新通電的安全系統未能正確啓用。</p>
</div><p>SCE had been warned. On January 5, the National Weather Service issued a Red Flag Warning for the region. The following day, it elevated that warning to a Particularly Dangerous Situation — the highest designation available — forecasting life-threatening, destructive windstorm conditions along the Highway 210 corridor, where Two Palms operated. The official cause of the Eaton Fire has not been formally released by Cal Fire; that investigation remains ongoing.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>南加州愛迪生曾受到警告。1 月 5 日，國家氣象局對該地區發佈了紅色警報。次日，該警報升級為特別危險情況——這是可用的最高級別——預測 210 號公路走廊將出現危及生命的破壞性風暴條件，而 Two Palms 正是在該走廊內運營。加州消防局尚未正式發佈伊頓火災的官方原因；該調查仍在進行中。</p>
</div><p>&#34;This case is about whether the systems designed to prevent disasters like this were followed when it mattered most. Two Palms didn't just lose a building — the community lost a place that people depended on for care, stability, and dignity. This moment is about accountability.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“本案是關於在關鍵時刻是否遵循了旨在防止此類災難的系統。Two Palms 不僅失去了建築——社區失去了一個人們依賴的護理、穩定和尊嚴的地方。這個時刻是關於問責。”</p>
</div><p>— Caleb Marker, Partner, Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合夥人</p>
</div><p>Two Palms remains committed to rebuilding — but being made whole is not simply a matter of reconstructing what burned. Because the facility was built in 1959, it operated under regulatory exemptions that no longer apply to new construction.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Two Palms 仍然致力於重建——但恢復完整不僅僅是重建被燒燬的部分。由於該設施建於 1959 年，它在監管豁免下運營，這些豁免不再適用於新建築。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Any rebuilt facility must meet current building codes, accessibility mandates, and updated healthcare facility standards. That is not an obstacle to justice — it is what justice requires. Being fully restored means being able to serve this community again at the standard it deserves. SCE's alleged negligence is what stands between Two Palms and that outcome, and the costs of getting there are part of what this lawsuit seeks to recover.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“任何重建的設施必須符合當前的建築規範、無障礙要求和更新的醫療設施標準。這不是對正義的障礙——這是正義所要求的。完全恢復意味着能夠再次以該社區應得的標準提供服務。南加州愛迪生的所謂疏忽是 Two Palms 與這一結果之間的障礙，而實現這一目標的成本是本訴訟尋求恢復的一部分。”</p>
</div><p>— Caleb Marker, Partner, Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>—— Caleb Marker，Zimmerman Reed LLP 合夥人</p>
</div><p>The suit asserts seven causes of action: negligence and negligence per se, trespass by fire, inverse condemnation, public nuisance, private nuisance, violation of Health and Safety Code §13007, and a private right of action under California Public Utilities Code §2106. Two Palms seeks compensation for property loss, business interruption, lost revenue, evacuation and relocation costs, and ongoing economic harm, as well as injunctive relief requiring SCE to comply with applicable infrastructure safety regulations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>該訴訟提出了七項訴因：過失及過失自證、火災侵入、逆向徵收、公共滋擾、私人滋擾、違反健康與安全法典第 13007 條，以及根據加州公共事業法第 2106 條的私人訴權。Two Palms 尋求賠償財產損失、業務中斷、收入損失、撤離和搬遷費用，以及持續的經濟損害，並要求對南加州愛迪生進行強制性救濟，要求其遵守適用的基礎設施安全法規。</p>
</div><p>The Eaton Fire ignited on January 7, 2025, and became the second most destructive fire in California history. It claimed 19 lives and burned more than 14,000 acres, destroying approximately 10,000 structures across Pasadena and Altadena. Two Palms were one of two skilled nursing facilities destroyed in the fire. Many of the 45 residents evacuated that night were transferred to affiliated facilities in what were expected to be temporary placements. More than 15 months later, many remain there still.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>伊頓火災於 2025 年 1 月 7 日引發，成為加州歷史上第二大破壞性火災。它造成 19 人遇難，燒燬超過 14,000 英畝，摧毀約 10,000 棟建築，遍及帕薩迪納和阿爾塔迪納。Two Palms 是火災中被摧毀的兩家專業護理設施之一。那晚撤離的 45 名居民中，許多人被轉移到附屬設施，大家都認為這將是臨時安置。15 個月後，許多人仍然留在那裏。</p>
</div><p><strong>About Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP is a national plaintiff-side law firm founded in 1983, with offices in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and Phoenix. For more than four decades, the firm has represented individuals and institutions in complex litigation, including mass tort, consumer protection, data breach, and wildfire matters. Zimmerman Reed is committed to holding corporations and institutions accountable when their conduct causes serious harm. We never forget who we're fighting for.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>關於 Zimmerman Reed LLP</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP 是一家成立於 1983 年的全國性原告方律師事務所，在明尼阿波利斯、洛杉磯和鳳凰城設有辦公室。四十多年來，該事務所代表個人和機構處理複雜訴訟，包括集體訴訟、消費者保護、數據泄露和野火事務。Zimmerman Reed 致力於在企業和機構的行為造成嚴重傷害時追究其責任。我們從不忘記我們所為之奮鬥的對象。</p>
</div><p><strong>MEDIA CONTACT</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>媒體聯繫人</strong> <strong>Kellan Anderson</strong> Zimmerman Reed LLP</p>
</div><p>[email protected]</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>[email protected]</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Zimmerman Reed</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>來源 Zimmerman Reed</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTA2Jk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9Q0c1MjI0NCZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MDYxMjIyUFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19DRzUyMjQ0" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=CG52244&amp;Transmission_Id=202605061222PR_NEWS_USPR_____CG52244&amp;DateId=20260506"/></p>

12:23 ET 在伊頓火災中被毀的療養院起訴南加州愛迪生公司，指控其存在可預防的失誤