<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- 加州歷史上最嚴重火災的倖存者將在週二和週三的一系列聽證會上發聲，反對限制他們從引發野火的營利性公用事業公司索賠的權利。</p>
<p>聽證會將討論加州地震局（CEA）在 SB 254 下提出的建議，包括限制營利性電力公司的責任，阻止野火倖存者的索賠權，徵收銷售税以創建公用事業的 “救助基金”，以及阻止保險公司和公共實體在公用事業引發火災時索賠損失。</p>
<p>“SB 254 研究本應評估如何公平分配災難負擔，” 每位火災倖存者網絡的執行董事 Joy Chen 表示。“然而，這實際上是對公用事業的救助，偽裝成政策語言。它將每一個負擔從公用事業股東身上轉移到其他人身上：轉移到倖存者、保單持有人和納税人身上。這是一個零和遊戲。如果引發火災的公司支付更少，其他人就被迫支付更多。”</p>
<p>保險公司、公共實體、消費者團體和訴訟律師也反對研究中的有限責任建議，因為這些建議阻止了受害者、保單持有人和政府實體在公用事業引發野火時的索賠。</p>
<p>一個由 23 個公共利益團體組成的聯盟致信立法領導人，指責 CEA 未能承認公用事業在魯莽引發野火中的角色，並未能對未來的野火形成威懾。</p>
<p>“改革的一個關鍵目標應該是通過激勵公用事業不引發野火來減少未來的成本，” 這些團體寫道。“然而，報告似乎假設公用事業是氣候變化的被動受害者，而不是那些其運營決策、維護實踐和財務激勵對野火風險產生實質性影響的行為者。事實上，來自多場重大火災的證據表明，公用事業設備故障——通常與老化基礎設施、不足的維護或運營決策有關——在加州的野火危機中發揮了重要作用……當安全記錄糟糕的公用事業在加州人支付全國最高電價時獲得鉅額利潤時，改革應集中在遏制過度利潤和浪費上，而不是限制野火倖存者的索賠權。”</p>
<p>Chen 同意，指出需要通過 AB 1774（Boerner）法案，該法案要求對每年總額為 90 億美元的野火緩解支出進行審計，因為過去的審計發現公用事業未花費他們被分配的資金。</p>
<p>Chen 還指出，在立法機構批准 SB 254 中的公用事業救助後，營利性公用事業公司獲得了創紀錄的收益。</p>
<p>“在十月，CPUC 批准了愛迪生的大幅漲價和近 10 億美元的補發工資。僅僅兩個月後，愛迪生就增加了股東分紅，預計在 2025 年單年支付 13 億美元。其三大股東均來自外州：先鋒集團（Vanguard，賓夕法尼亞州）、黑石集團（BlackRock，紐約）和州街（State Street，波士頓），” Chen 説。</p>
<p>“誰在為這些企業的過度支出買單？同樣是那些努力維持住房的家庭。”</p>
<p>“CEA 研究迫使其他人支付公用事業的疏忽，” 消費者觀察組織的主席 Jamie Court 表示。“唯一不負責任的實體是那些引發火災的公司。公用事業的貪婪政治捐贈和遊説支出推動了這些建議，而不是良好的公共政策。”</p>
<p><strong>包括 SDG&amp;E 母公司 Sempra 在內的三家營利性電力壟斷公司在 2025-2026 年期間向州立法者捐贈了 19,377,728 美元，並花費了 11,866,570 美元進行遊説。</strong></p>
<p><strong>2025-2026 年的總計</strong></p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>支出</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>競選融資</strong></td>
<td><strong>遊説</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>按年分解的總計</strong></p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>競選融資</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>遊説</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年（截至 05/11/26）</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年總計（僅 Q1）</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計：</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Chen 將在參議院能源委員會、眾議院能源委員會和參議院聯合應急管理與自然資源委員會的聽證會上作證。</p>
<p>聽證會安排如下：</p>
<p>參議院能源、公用事業與通信</p>
<p>5 月 12 日（星期二）上午 9 點</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
<p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
<p>主題：增強加州對自然災害的韌性：聚焦電力公用事業相關政策建議的 SB 254（2025）研究報告</p>
<p>參議院保險委員會</p>
<p>5 月 12 日（星期二）下午 1:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
<p>主題：彎曲曲線：保護加州人免受野火風險</p>
<p>參議院聯合 - 應急管理與自然資源及水務委員會</p>
<p>5 月 13 日（星期三）上午 9:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
<p>主題：野火緩解、韌性融資和恢復</p>
<p>眾議院公用事業與能源委員會</p>
<p>5 月 13 日（星期三）下午 1:30</p>
<p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
<p>委員會將在這裏進行直播</p>
<p>主題：改善公用事業 - 原因野火成本回收系統，以幫助倖存者、用户和其他利益相關者</p>
<p>來源：消費者觀察者</p>
<p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy?x-oss-process=image/auto-orient,1/interlace,1/resize,w_1440,h_1440/quality,q_95/format,jpg" alt="" original-src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy"/></p>

愛迪生國際

太平洋煤氣與電力

公用事業 ETF - SPDR

標普全球公用事業 ETF - iShares

<p>加利福尼亞州最嚴重森林火災的倖存者們正在反對對他們從營利性公用事業公司索賠權利的限制，這一提議在加利福尼亞地震局（CEA）根據 SB 254 發佈的報告聽證會上被提出。該報告建議限制公用事業公司的責任並創建救助基金，批評者認為這將負擔轉嫁給倖存者和納税人。消費者團體和公共機構呼籲進行改革，以追究公用事業公司對森林火災風險的責任，而不是保護它們的利潤。聽證會將討論這些問題以及對公用事業公司在森林火災緩解方面支出的更好監管的必要性</p>

<p>, /PRNewswire/ -- Survivors of the worst fires in California history will be speaking out against limits on their rights to recover damages from for-profit utilities that start wildfires in a series of hearings Tuesday and Wednesday.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>, /PRNewswire/ -- 加州歷史上最嚴重火災的倖存者將在週二和週三的一系列聽證會上發聲，反對限制他們從引發野火的營利性公用事業公司索賠的權利。</p>
</div><p>The hearings will discuss recommendations put forth by a California Earthquake Authority (CEA) report under SB 254, including limiting liability from for-profit electric utilities, preventing wildfire survivors' rights to recovery, imposing a sales tax to create a 'bailout fund' for the utilities, and preventing insurance companies and public entities from recovering losses when utilities start fires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>聽證會將討論加州地震局（CEA）在 SB 254 下提出的建議，包括限制營利性電力公司的責任，阻止野火倖存者的索賠權，徵收銷售税以創建公用事業的 “救助基金”，以及阻止保險公司和公共實體在公用事業引發火災時索賠損失。</p>
</div><p>&#34;The SB 254 study was supposed to evaluate how to equitably allocate catastrophe burdens,&#34; said Joy Chen, executive director of Every Fire Survivor's Network. &#34;Instead, it's a bailout for utilities, dressed up in policy language. Every burden it shifts away from utility shareholders lands on someone else: on survivors, on policyholders, on taxpayers. It's a zero-sum game. If companies that start fires pay less, everyone else is forced to pay more.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“SB 254 研究本應評估如何公平分配災難負擔，” 每位火災倖存者網絡的執行董事 Joy Chen 表示。“然而，這實際上是對公用事業的救助，偽裝成政策語言。它將每一個負擔從公用事業股東身上轉移到其他人身上：轉移到倖存者、保單持有人和納税人身上。這是一個零和遊戲。如果引發火災的公司支付更少，其他人就被迫支付更多。”</p>
</div><p>Insurance companies, public entities, consumer groups and trial lawyers also oppose the limited liability recommendations in the study because they prevent recovery for victims, policyholders, and governmental entities when utilities start wildfires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>保險公司、公共實體、消費者團體和訴訟律師也反對研究中的有限責任建議，因為這些建議阻止了受害者、保單持有人和政府實體在公用事業引發野火時的索賠。</p>
</div><p>A coalition of 23 public interest groups wrote legislative leaders calling out the CEA for failing to acknowledge the utilities' role in recklessly starting wildfires and to create deterrence to future wildfires.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一個由 23 個公共利益團體組成的聯盟致信立法領導人，指責 CEA 未能承認公用事業在魯莽引發野火中的角色，並未能對未來的野火形成威懾。</p>
</div><p>&#34;A key goal of reform should be to reduce future costs by incentivizing utilities not to start wildfires,&#34; the groups wrote. &#34;Yet the report appears to assume utilities are passive victims of climate change rather than actors whose operational decisions, maintenance practices, and financial incentives materially affect wildfire risk. In fact, evidence from multiple major fires shows that utility equipment failures — often tied to aging infrastructure, inadequate maintenance, or operational decisions — have played a significant role in California's wildfire crisis… When utilities with disastrous safety records post huge profits while Californians pay some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, reform should focus on curbing excessive profits and waste – not limiting wildfire survivors' right to recovery.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“改革的一個關鍵目標應該是通過激勵公用事業不引發野火來減少未來的成本，” 這些團體寫道。“然而，報告似乎假設公用事業是氣候變化的被動受害者，而不是那些其運營決策、維護實踐和財務激勵對野火風險產生實質性影響的行為者。事實上，來自多場重大火災的證據表明，公用事業設備故障——通常與老化基礎設施、不足的維護或運營決策有關——在加州的野火危機中發揮了重要作用……當安全記錄糟糕的公用事業在加州人支付全國最高電價時獲得鉅額利潤時，改革應集中在遏制過度利潤和浪費上，而不是限制野火倖存者的索賠權。”</p>
</div><p>Chen agrees, pointing to the need to pass AB 1774 (Boerner), that requires audits of wildfire mitigation spending, which totals $9 billion annually, because past audits found the utilities not spending money they were allocated.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 同意，指出需要通過 AB 1774（Boerner）法案，該法案要求對每年總額為 90 億美元的野火緩解支出進行審計，因為過去的審計發現公用事業未花費他們被分配的資金。</p>
</div><p>Chen also pointed out that shortly after the legislature approved a bailout for utilities in SB 254, the for-profit utilities had record paydays.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 還指出，在立法機構批准 SB 254 中的公用事業救助後，營利性公用事業公司獲得了創紀錄的收益。</p>
</div><p>&#34;In October, the CPUC approved a massive Edison rate hike and nearly $1 billion in back pay. Just two months later, Edison increased shareholder dividends, to pay out $1.3 billion in 2025 alone. Its three largest shareholders are all out of state: Vanguard, Pennsylvania, BlackRock, New York, and State Street, Boston,&#34; Chen said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在十月，CPUC 批准了愛迪生的大幅漲價和近 10 億美元的補發工資。僅僅兩個月後，愛迪生就增加了股東分紅，預計在 2025 年單年支付 13 億美元。其三大股東均來自外州：先鋒集團（Vanguard，賓夕法尼亞州）、黑石集團（BlackRock，紐約）和州街（State Street，波士頓），” Chen 説。</p>
</div><p>&#34;Instead of protecting against bankruptcy, the backroom deals forced Californians into a massive transfer of wealth to these Wall Street shareholders…In 2025, Edison's profits tripled from $1.3 billion to $4.5 billion in a single year. For 2025, Edison CEO Pedro Pizarro's own compensation rose 20% to $17 million, in the same year his company caused one of the most devastating fires in U.S. history.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“誰在為這些企業的過度支出買單？同樣是那些努力維持住房的家庭。”</p>
</div><p>&#34;Who's paying for all this corporate excess? The same families fighting to stay housed.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“CEA 研究迫使其他人支付公用事業的疏忽，” 消費者觀察組織的主席 Jamie Court 表示。“唯一不負責任的實體是那些引發火災的公司。公用事業的貪婪政治捐贈和遊説支出推動了這些建議，而不是良好的公共政策。”</p>
</div><p>&#34;The CEA study forces everyone else to pay for the utilities' negligence,&#34; said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. &#34;The only entities not accountable are the ones who started the fires. The power of the utilities' rapacious political giving and lobbying expenditures are driving these recommendations, not good public policy.&#34;</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>包括 SDG&amp;E 母公司 Sempra 在內的三家營利性電力壟斷公司在 2025-2026 年期間向州立法者捐贈了 19,377,728 美元，並花費了 11,866,570 美元進行遊説。</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>The three for-profit electric monopolies, including SDG&amp;E's parent company Sempra, gave state legislators $19,377,728 in 2025-2026 and spent $11,866,570 on lobbying.</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>2025-2026 年的總計</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>Grand totals for 2025-2026</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>支出</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>競選融資</strong></td>
<td><strong>遊説</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2025-2026</strong><br/><strong>Spending</strong><br/><strong>Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>Campaign Finance</strong></td>
<td><strong>Lobbying</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$13,961,878.66</td>
<td>$6,500,762.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,892,500.00</td>
<td>$2,858,414.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,483,350.00</td>
<td>$2,507,392.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>$19,337,728.66</strong></td>
<td><strong>$11,866,570.00</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>按年分解的總計</strong></p>
</div><p><strong>Totals broken out by year</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>競選融資</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>遊説</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年（截至 05/11/26）</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 年總計</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 年總計（僅 Q1）</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>總計：</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
<th></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Campaign Finance</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Lobbying</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 Total</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 (As of 05/11/26)</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>2025 Totals</strong></td>
<td><strong>2026 Totals (Q1</strong><br/><strong>Only)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>PG&amp;E</strong></td>
<td>$2,157,678.66</td>
<td>$11,804,200.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$4,713,213.05</td>
<td>$1,787,549.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sempra</strong></td>
<td>$1,845,000.00</td>
<td>$47,500.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,406,198.01</td>
<td>$452,216.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Edison</strong></td>
<td>$3,437,050.00</td>
<td>$46,300.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$2,157,935.55</td>
<td>$349,457.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>TOTALS:</strong></td>
<td>$7,439,728.66</td>
<td>$11,898,000.00</td>
<td></td>
<td>$9,277,346.61</td>
<td>$2,589,223.39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Chen 將在參議院能源委員會、眾議院能源委員會和參議院聯合應急管理與自然資源委員會的聽證會上作證。</p>
</div><p>Chen will testify at hearings in the Senate Energy, Assembly Energy, and Senate Joint- Emergency Management and Natural Resources Committee.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>聽證會安排如下：</p>
</div><p>The hearings are scheduled for:</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>參議院能源、公用事業與通信</p>
</div><p>Senate Energy, Utilities &amp;Communication</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 12 日（星期二）上午 9 點</p>
</div><p>Tuesday, May 12th at 9am</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1200</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主題：增強加州對自然災害的韌性：聚焦電力公用事業相關政策建議的 SB 254（2025）研究報告</p>
</div><p>Subject: Enhancing California's Resiliency to Natural Catastrophes: Senate Bill 254 (2025) Study Report Focusing on Electric Utility-Related Policy Recommendations</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>參議院保險委員會</p>
</div><p>Senate Insurance</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 12 日（星期二）下午 1:30</p>
</div><p>Tuesday, May 12th at 1:30pm</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主題：彎曲曲線：保護加州人免受野火風險</p>
</div><p>Subject: Bending the Curve: Protecting Californians from Wildfire Risk</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>參議院聯合 - 應急管理與自然資源及水務委員會</p>
</div><p>Senate Joint - EmergencyManagement and Natural Resources &amp; Water</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 13 日（星期三）上午 9:30</p>
</div><p>Wednesday, May 13th at 9:30am</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 2100</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委員會將在此進行直播</p>
</div><p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主題：野火緩解、韌性融資和恢復</p>
</div><p>Subject: Wildfire Mitigation, Resilience Financing, and Recovery</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>眾議院公用事業與能源委員會</p>
</div><p>Assembly Utilities &amp; Energy</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>5 月 13 日（星期三）下午 1:30</p>
</div><p>Wednesday, May 13th at 1:30pm</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
</div><p>Swing Space - 1021 O St., Room 1100</p>
<p>The committee will be livestreamed here</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>委員會將在這裏進行直播</p>
</div><p>Subject: Improving the Utility-Cause Wildfire Cost Recovery System for Survivors, Ratepayers, and Other Stakeholders</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>主題：改善公用事業 - 原因野火成本回收系統，以幫助倖存者、用户和其他利益相關者</p>
</div><p>SOURCE Consumer Watchdog</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>來源：消費者觀察者</p>
</div><p><img src="https://imageproxy.pbkrs.com/https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif/query-RGF0ZUlkPTIwMjYwNTEyJk5ld3NJdGVtSWQ9REM1NzY2MiZUcmFuc21pc3Npb25fSWQ9MjAyNjA1MTIxMjU0UFJfTkVXU19VU1BSX19fX19EQzU3NjYy" alt="" original-src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=DC57662&amp;Transmission_Id=202605121254PR_NEWS_USPR_____DC57662&amp;DateId=20260512"/></p>

12:54 ETWildfire Survivors, Consumer Groups, Insurers, Public Entities Oppose Limits on Survivors' Rights At Hearings In CA Capitol On CEA SB 254 Report, Says Consumer Watchdog

prnewswire

貝萊德

道富銀行

桑普拉能源

BlackRock Tech and Private Equity Term Trust

BLACKROCK MULTI-SECTOR INCOME TR COM USD0.001(S/R 09/09/2025) WI

Blackrock Enhanced Div Achievers Trust

BlackRock Science and Tech Term Trust

BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust

State Street® US Equity Premium Inc ETF

桑普拉能源-5.750% Junior Subordinated Notes

PG&E CORP 6% SER A MAND CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STK

12:54 ET 消費者監督組織表示，在加州議會聽證會上，火災倖存者、消費者團體、保險公司和公共實體反對限制倖存者權利的措施，涉及 CEA SB 254 報告