<p>胡志明市——胡志明市正式重新開放短期公寓租賃，採用新的監管框架，此舉預計將復興城市住宿市場的一部分，同時引發對安全、建築管理和居民權利的新擔憂。</p>
<p>根據市政府發佈的第 19 號決議，公寓業主可以通過 Airbnb 等平台提供短期住宿服務，前提是遵守合法使用目的、商業註冊、税務義務和臨時居住登記等要求。</p>
<p>這一新政策是在經歷了一年多的限制後出台的，這些限制顯著減少了城市內許多公寓項目的短期租賃活動。</p>
<p>物業業主和運營商歡迎這一決定，表示之前的收緊措施使許多單元空置，造成了巨大的財務壓力。</p>
<p>“過去一年，市場對我們幾乎是凍結的，” 37 歲的 Lê Thị Thu Trang 説，她在胡志明市中心管理幾處短期租賃公寓。</p>
<p>“一些公寓因為無法吸引長期租户而空置了數月，而運營成本和銀行利息支付仍在繼續。新的框架讓我們有信心合法透明地重返市場，” 她説。</p>
<p>42 歲的投資者 Võ Duy Phương 在 Xóm Chiếu 區經營兩處短期租賃公寓，他表示，之前的限制影響了收入和商業信譽。</p>
<p>“我們之前與外國客户簽訂了長期協議，但在法規變化時不得不終止這些協議，” 他説。“我們失去了押金，更重要的是失去了合作伙伴的信任。自政策調整以來，一些以前的客户已經再次聯繫了我們。”</p>
<p>行業代表還表示，更清晰的法規可以幫助規範一個儘管受到限制但仍在非正式運營的市場。</p>
<p>“法律框架使得當局和建築管理委員會能夠更有效地監督運營，” 一位胡志明市的服務公寓管理公司代表説。</p>
<p>“之前，許多業主仍然非正式地進行短期租賃，使得客人管理和服務質量難以控制，” 該代表説。</p>
<p><strong>居民的擔憂仍未解決</strong></p>
<p>然而，許多居民表示擔心 Airbnb 式住宿的迴歸可能會改變住宅樓內的生活環境。</p>
<p>“在週末，客人不斷地在樓內搬運行李，有時甚至在深夜，” 38 歲的 Lê Thị Thu Hương 説，她是 Bình Lợi Trung 區一處公寓綜合體的居民。</p>
<p>“我們常常不知道這些訪客是誰，或者他們會住多久。這給長期居民帶來了不安全感，” 她説。</p>
<p>另一位在 Tân Phú區的居民表示，共用設施在高峰時段已經承受了壓力。</p>
<p>“公寓樓主要是為穩定的居住生活而設計的，而不是酒店式運營，” 該居民説。“如果允許短期住宿，管理機制也需要相應改變。”</p>
<p>建築管理委員會預計將在平衡投資者和居民利益方面發揮核心作用。</p>
<p>一位來自 Thủ Thiêm 城市區域的住宅項目代表表示，公寓綜合體可能需要制定內部運營規則，管理客人登記、安全程序、共用設施的使用以及短期租賃單元的比例限制。</p>
<p>“如果沒有明確的內部規定，居民與投資者之間的爭議可能會持續，” 該代表説。</p>
<p><strong>國際比較</strong></p>
<p>專家表示，全球許多主要城市已經採取了更嚴格的短期租賃監管機制。</p>
<p>新加坡在私人住宅物業中基本禁止少於三個月的短期租賃，而東京則在註冊要求和年度運營限制下允許家庭共享活動。</p>
<p>房地產專家 Phạm Văn Bạch 表示，胡志明市的政策調整可能會帶來機遇和運營挑戰。</p>
<p>“在短期內，市場可能會看到為遊客和外國專業人士提供的住宿供應增加，” 他説。</p>
<p>“然而，從長遠來看，城市需要在建築運營、基礎設施管理和安全責任方面制定更明確的標準，以確保可持續發展，” 他補充道。</p>
<p>法律專家還警告説，未解決的治理問題可能仍然是衝突的來源。</p>
<p>胡志明市律師協會的律師 Nguyễn Hoàng Anh 表示，住宅公寓樓在設計和運營目的上與酒店根本不同。</p>
<p>“酒店是專門為住宿服務而建造的，而公寓樓則是為穩定的長期居住而設計的，” 他説。</p>
<p>“頻繁的客人更替增加了安全管理、身份驗證和基礎設施使用的壓力。此外，處理違規行為的責任可能變得不明確，因為客人只是暫時居住，” 他説。</p>
<p>專家表示，城市的決定顯示出承認城市旅遊和房地產市場中短期租賃需求的趨勢。</p>
<p>然而，他們指出，政策的長期成功將取決於有效的執行、運營透明度和居民社區之間的共識。</p>
<p>“如果這些治理問題沒有得到妥善解決，經濟利益與居民生活質量之間的緊張關係可能仍將是持續爭論的來源，” Bạch 説。——VNS</p>

愛彼迎

<p>胡志明市在新的監管框架下重新開放了短期公寓租賃，允許業主通過像 Airbnb 這樣的平台提供服務。此決定旨在在經歷了一年的限制後振興住宿市場，但也引發了對安全和居民權利的擔憂。雖然物業擁有者歡迎這一變化，但居民擔心這可能會擾亂他們的生活環境。專家強調需要明確的法規，以平衡投資者利益和居民關切，並指出有效執行對於長期成功的重要性</p>

<p>HCM CITY — HCM City has officially reopened the door to short-term apartment rentals under a new regulatory framework, a move expected to revive part of the urban accommodation market while raising fresh concerns over security, building management and residents’ rights.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>胡志明市——胡志明市正式重新開放短期公寓租賃，採用新的監管框架，此舉預計將復興城市住宿市場的一部分，同時引發對安全、建築管理和居民權利的新擔憂。</p>
</div><p>Under Decision 19 issued by the municipal authorities, apartment owners may provide short-term accommodation services through platforms such as Airbnb if they comply with requirements on lawful use purposes, business registration, tax obligations and temporary residence declarations.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>根據市政府發佈的第 19 號決議，公寓業主可以通過 Airbnb 等平台提供短期住宿服務，前提是遵守合法使用目的、商業註冊、税務義務和臨時居住登記等要求。</p>
</div><p>The new policy comes after more than a year of restrictions that significantly reduced short-term rental activity in many apartment projects across the city.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>這一新政策是在經歷了一年多的限制後出台的，這些限制顯著減少了城市內許多公寓項目的短期租賃活動。</p>
</div><p>Property owners and operators welcomed the decision, saying the previous tightening measures had left many units vacant and caused substantial financial pressure.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>物業業主和運營商歡迎這一決定，表示之前的收緊措施使許多單元空置，造成了巨大的財務壓力。</p>
</div><p>“The market was almost frozen for us over the past year,” said Lê Thị Thu Trang, 37, who manages several short-term rental apartments in central HCM City.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“過去一年，市場對我們幾乎是凍結的，” 37 歲的 Lê Thị Thu Trang 説，她在胡志明市中心管理幾處短期租賃公寓。</p>
</div><p>“Some apartments remained empty for months because they could not attract long-term tenants, while operating costs and bank interest payments continued. The new framework gives us confidence to return to the market legally and transparently,” she said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“一些公寓因為無法吸引長期租户而空置了數月，而運營成本和銀行利息支付仍在繼續。新的框架讓我們有信心合法透明地重返市場，” 她説。</p>
</div><p>Võ Duy Phương, 42, an investor operating two short-term rental apartments in Xóm Chiếu Ward, said earlier restrictions had affected both revenue and business credibility.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>42 歲的投資者 Võ Duy Phương 在 Xóm Chiếu 區經營兩處短期租賃公寓，他表示，之前的限制影響了收入和商業信譽。</p>
</div><p>“We previously signed long-term arrangements with foreign clients but had to terminate them when regulations changed,” he said. “We lost deposits and, more importantly, trust from partners. Since the policy adjustment, some former clients have already contacted us again.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我們之前與外國客户簽訂了長期協議，但在法規變化時不得不終止這些協議，” 他説。“我們失去了押金，更重要的是失去了合作伙伴的信任。自政策調整以來，一些以前的客户已經再次聯繫了我們。”</p>
</div><p>Industry representatives also said clearer regulations could help standardise a market that had continued operating informally despite restrictions.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>行業代表還表示，更清晰的法規可以幫助規範一個儘管受到限制但仍在非正式運營的市場。</p>
</div><p>“A legal framework allows authorities and building management boards to supervise operations more effectively,” said a representative of a serviced apartment management company in HCM City.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“法律框架使得當局和建築管理委員會能夠更有效地監督運營，” 一位胡志明市的服務公寓管理公司代表説。</p>
</div><p>“Previously, many owners continued short-term rentals unofficially, making guest management and service quality difficult to control,” the representative said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“之前，許多業主仍然非正式地進行短期租賃，使得客人管理和服務質量難以控制，” 該代表説。</p>
</div><p><strong>Resident concerns remain unresolved</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>居民的擔憂仍未解決</strong></p>
</div><p>However, many residents expressed concern that the return of Airbnb-style accommodation could alter the living environment inside residential buildings.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，許多居民表示擔心 Airbnb 式住宿的迴歸可能會改變住宅樓內的生活環境。</p>
</div><p>“At weekends, guests constantly move luggage in and out of the building, sometimes late at night,” said Lê Thị Thu Hương, 38, a resident of an apartment complex in Bình Lợi Trung Ward.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在週末，客人不斷地在樓內搬運行李，有時甚至在深夜，” 38 歲的 Lê Thị Thu Hương 説，她是 Bình Lợi Trung 區一處公寓綜合體的居民。</p>
</div><p>“We often do not know who these visitors are or how long they stay. It creates a feeling of insecurity for long-term residents,” she said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“我們常常不知道這些訪客是誰，或者他們會住多久。這給長期居民帶來了不安全感，” 她説。</p>
</div><p>Another resident in Tân Phú Ward said shared facilities were already under pressure during peak hours.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>另一位在 Tân Phú區的居民表示，共用設施在高峰時段已經承受了壓力。</p>
</div><p>“Apartment buildings are designed primarily for stable residential living, not hotel-style operations,” the resident said. “If short-term accommodation is permitted, management mechanisms also need to change accordingly.”</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“公寓樓主要是為穩定的居住生活而設計的，而不是酒店式運營，” 該居民説。“如果允許短期住宿，管理機制也需要相應改變。”</p>
</div><p>Building management boards are expected to play a central role in balancing the interests of investors and residents.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>建築管理委員會預計將在平衡投資者和居民利益方面發揮核心作用。</p>
</div><p>A representative of a residential project in Thủ Thiêm urban area said apartment complexes would likely need internal operating rules governing guest registration, security procedures, use of shared facilities and limits on the proportion of units used for short-term rentals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>一位來自 Thủ Thiêm 城市區域的住宅項目代表表示，公寓綜合體可能需要制定內部運營規則，管理客人登記、安全程序、共用設施的使用以及短期租賃單元的比例限制。</p>
</div><p>“Without clear internal regulations, disputes between residents and investors could continue,” the representative said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“如果沒有明確的內部規定，居民與投資者之間的爭議可能會持續，” 該代表説。</p>
</div><p><strong>International comparisons</strong></p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p><strong>國際比較</strong></p>
</div><p>Experts said many major cities worldwide have adopted stricter supervisory mechanisms for short-term rentals.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>專家表示，全球許多主要城市已經採取了更嚴格的短期租賃監管機制。</p>
</div><p>Singapore largely prohibits short-term rentals of less than three months in private residential properties, while Tokyo permits home-sharing activities under registration requirements and annual operating limits.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>新加坡在私人住宅物業中基本禁止少於三個月的短期租賃，而東京則在註冊要求和年度運營限制下允許家庭共享活動。</p>
</div><p>Real estate expert Phạm Văn Bạch said HCM City’s policy adjustment could create both opportunities and operational challenges.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>房地產專家 Phạm Văn Bạch 表示，胡志明市的政策調整可能會帶來機遇和運營挑戰。</p>
</div><p>“In the short term, the market may see an increase in accommodation supply for tourists and foreign professionals,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“在短期內，市場可能會看到為遊客和外國專業人士提供的住宿供應增加，” 他説。</p>
</div><p>“In the longer term, however, the city will need clearer standards on building operations, infrastructure management and security responsibilities to ensure sustainable development,” he added.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“然而，從長遠來看，城市需要在建築運營、基礎設施管理和安全責任方面制定更明確的標準，以確保可持續發展，” 他補充道。</p>
</div><p>Legal experts also warned that unresolved governance issues could remain a source of conflict.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>法律專家還警告説，未解決的治理問題可能仍然是衝突的來源。</p>
</div><p>Lawyer Nguyễn Hoàng Anh of the HCM City Bar Association said residential apartment buildings were fundamentally different from hotels in terms of design and operational purpose.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>胡志明市律師協會的律師 Nguyễn Hoàng Anh 表示，住宅公寓樓在設計和運營目的上與酒店根本不同。</p>
</div><p>“Hotels are built specifically for accommodation services, while apartment buildings are designed for stable long-term living,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“酒店是專門為住宿服務而建造的，而公寓樓則是為穩定的長期居住而設計的，” 他説。</p>
</div><p>“Frequent guest turnover increases pressure on security management, identity verification and infrastructure usage. In addition, responsibility for handling violations can become unclear because guests stay only temporarily,” he said.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“頻繁的客人更替增加了安全管理、身份驗證和基礎設施使用的壓力。此外，處理違規行為的責任可能變得不明確，因為客人只是暫時居住，” 他説。</p>
</div><p>Experts said the city’s decision showed a trend of recognising short-term rental demand within urban tourism and property markets.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>專家表示，城市的決定顯示出承認城市旅遊和房地產市場中短期租賃需求的趨勢。</p>
</div><p>However, they noted that the long-term success of the policy would depend on effective enforcement, operational transparency and consensus among resident communities.</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>然而，他們指出，政策的長期成功將取決於有效的執行、運營透明度和居民社區之間的共識。</p>
</div><p>“If these governance issues are not addressed properly, tensions between economic interests and residential quality of life will likely remain a continuing source of debate,” Bạch said. — VNS</p>
<div class="lb-trans"><p>“如果這些治理問題沒有得到妥善解決，經濟利益與居民生活質量之間的緊張關係可能仍將是持續爭論的來源，” Bạch 説。——VNS</p>
</div>

胡志明市在新規下重新開放短期公寓租賃市場