$Ferrari(RACE.US) Double beat and hitting speed bumps
EPS: $2.73 vs $2.70 estREV: $2.164B vs $2.120B est🟥 -1.18%What's on your mind?
Total Assets
Rate Of ReturnThe markets have been really impressive and may have legs to go further but provided supports hold. At the moment, this market does not even need support! Stay safe!
🇺🇸🇭🇰🇸🇬 Big moves across US, HK, SG markets. Join the chat & earn Task Coins!
$Tesla(TSLA.US) ‘s plans to stake its future on a two-seat Cybercab is wholly inconsistent with how consumers buy cars. While 90% of miles traveled are for 1-2 passengers, only 1% of actual global consumer automotive purchases are for vehicles configured for just 2 passengers. When buying a car, consumers build in extra seating capacity for kids, extra passengers, or baggage. Think about eating at home: While 90% of dinners consumed at home might be for 1-2 persons, furniture manufacturers sell very few dining tables designed for just 1-2 people. Even if TSLA took 50% share of the 2-seat auto segment - a segment now dominated by sports cars like Corvette and Ferrari - actual sales might only total 80K in the U.S. and 400K globally - a far cry from the 2M/year Cybercab production runs being contemplated.
Adding to this, many consumers would prefer autonomy as an option rather than either/or. Elon said on the call that Cybercab would not come with a steering wheel or pedals, and reiterated that either Cybercab drives itself or it doesn’t drive at all. IMHO, ignoring consumer preferences in favor of engineering efficiency will prove to be a major strategic mistake by $Tesla(TSLA.US).