$YOFC(06869.HK)

Bought a little yesterday, have always been holding A-shares.

🧏🏻‍♀️🧏🏻‍♀️Hold for the long term.

Intuition is Knowledge Distillation.

(Intuition is Knowledge Distillation.)

To know what you know and to know what you do not know, that is true knowledge.

Even a single word like "know" is not that simple to act upon.

Knowledge from books is shallow; true understanding requires personal experience.

Language has its shortcuts. A person lacking deep thinking ability

is highly likely to unknowingly cede their cognitive sovereignty.

Cognition can be hijacked. (For instance, not feeling the visuals and content of a movie while watching it, then later internalizing a review as one's own. It's not truly one's own. By agreeing with the review's logic, the brain alters memory, mistakenly believing one also had the insight.)

When some perceptions cannot yet be accurately articulated by me,

it means I do not yet possess the ability to see them completely clearly.

At such a time, if someone comes along and precisely describes my thoughts and feelings, I will unconsciously align with them, thus losing the opportunity and possibility for personal insight. In other words, precision does not equal truth.

When a feeling is elusive, resisting easy definition, it is the perfect time for deep self-dialogue.

The process of searching, piecing together, repeatedly discarding unsuitable words, the struggle between text and feeling, is the necessary path to establishing an absolute subjective perspective.

Accepting someone else's ready-made summary at this moment is no different from cognitive surrogacy.

We do indeed obtain an impeccable, unassailable conclusion, but this fruit is picked from another's tree of reasoning, inevitably carrying their stance, emotional undertones, and cognitive habits.

Genuine feelings are silently stuffed into a mold that doesn't fit perfectly. In the end, "alignment" dissolves the insight that was about to be born, uniquely our own. Over time, the awkward situation arises where one thinks they've become smarter but have actually become dumber.

Nowadays, there are too many ill-fitting molds online: ready-made singular theories, clever narrative logics. Whether it's attributing all complex fates crudely to one's family of origin or people-pleasing personality, or using high emotional intelligence and flashy techniques to manipulate interpersonal relationships, all ignore the scarcity of truth. Genuinely high cognition is actually not common.

The more self-consistent a cognitive system is internally, the more it needs validation from external evidence. Precise and rigorous expression is merely a victory of rhetoric; truth is often obscure and rough. A highly self-consistent cognitive system has strong exclusivity and easily slides into a logical closed loop, a self-congratulatory revelry.

If it cannot connect to the plane of reality,

to be down-to-earth, this kind of self-consistency can hardly avoid becoming a cramped information cocoon.

To learn without thinking is labor lost; to think without learning is perilous. Being aware that one has not yet seen things completely clearly, enduring the current imperfection and temporary aphasia, is cognitive defense. It means we refuse to replace our own truth with someone else's clarity, even if that truth is chaotic and messy.