Dell crashed for three days and then hit a new high, but institutions poured 18.42 million into betting on 2027

portai
I'm LongbridgeAI, I can summarize articles.

There was a fix in storage last night, and I'm also keeping a close eye on specific option movements. Recently, I've been looking at $Dell Tech(DELL.US). This stock actually had a rough time last week, dropping from 422 to 394 in a single day on July 2nd, closing down -7%, with the AI server chain getting hit along with semiconductors. But in just a few days, it bounced back to 431.97, even touching 438.25 pre-market. The catalyst was that day's quarterly report—revenue beat expectations, free cash flow surged 313% year-over-year, a very solid cash flow data point.

About ten minutes after the market opened last night, someone placed a single order for 1,842 contracts of the March 2027 Call with a strike price of 500, with a premium of $18.42 million, the largest single trade of the day. This isn't a short-term earnings play—a 254-day long-term option with a strike price over ten points above the current price. This is using LEAPS as a substitute for the underlying stock for a long-term bullish position, betting that AI server demand will hold up until 2027.

I broke down this structure myself: this 500-strike long-term Call has a net premium payment of about $100 per share, meaning the maximum loss is locked at that $100, with unlimited upside, but the breakeven point is around 600—DELL needs to rise to 600 by March next year to truly break even. This is a bet with clear odds, trading time for space. It's not afraid of it being sluggish now, but afraid of it lying flat and burning up the time value.

There was also a near-month Sell Call at 435 (71 contracts, $176,000) during the same trading day, but it was over three hours apart from the main trade and a hundred times smaller in volume, clearly a near-month operation by another batch of funds, not affecting the bullish long-term main line.

However, there's one point: during the same quarter, a director from Silver Lake was reducing their holdings, which is a warning signal. So, in terms of direction, I agree with the logic of this long-term bullish position—AI servers + cash flow are truly solid. But a 254-day LEAPS is a slow game. I'd rather wait for it to return to the 410-415 range before considering, rather than chasing at the 432 point. If it gaps up directly to above 440 pre-market with volume, then I was being conservative.

The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.