Gary Black Tracker

Daily quotes, trades and insights from Gary Black.

Daily quotes, trades and insights from Gary Black.

Gary Black Tracker

U.S. stocks surged pre-market (SPX +1.2%, NDX +2.1%) after the U.S. and Iran reached an interim agreement halting their war, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and launching 60-day nuclear negotiations, with formal signing set for June 19 in Switzerland. Brent crude fell -4.9%, 10yr treasury yields declined, and longer duration AI/tech and beaten up consumer discretionary names rose as consumer confidence was poised to recover. I’ve argued for weeks that equities should reclaim their record highs as the Middle East conflict concludes, as oil prices retreat and employment growth slows. S&P 500 earnings have continued to rise during the Iran conflict, with 2026 EPS ests now at $342 +23% YoY reflecting increased AI investment. All eyes are on this week’s Fed meeting, which is Kevin Warsh’s first as Fed Chair.

Momentum stocks (buying what has worked) remain the clear YTD winners in equities despite the brief selloff triggered by the Iran conflict. The recovery since late March has been driven largely by momentum stocks, which are +14% since the recovery began in late-March as investors have looked past geopolitical risks. As a result, momentum remains the best-performing factor globally in 2026, with gains of nearly +30% YTD.

Defensive stocks have moved in the opposite direction. Low-volatility stocks are the worst-performing factor globally -18% this year. Value has posted a modest +1.5% gain year to date. Profitability has fared somewhat better during the recovery, with returns broadly flat year-to-date. It’s unclear how the spate of new equity and secondary offerings will impact equity returns ($SpaceX(SPCX.US), Anthropic, OpenAI, $Alphabet - C(GOOG.US) $300 billion equity sales) although SPCX’s post IPO +19% gain on Friday may portend strong investor interest. Source: Bloomberg

Here are the 10 most valuable companies in the world by market capitalization as of today 6/12/2026. Market caps fluctuate daily with stock prices, so these are approximates:

1. NVIDIA (NVDA) — ~$4.97 trillion (USA, Semiconductors/AI). Dominant leader in GPUs and AI hardware.

2. Alphabet (GOOG/GOOGL) — ~$4.40 trillion (USA, Technology/Search & Advertising). Parent of Google, YouTube, etc.

3. Apple (AAPL) — ~$4.28 trillion (USA, Consumer Electronics). iPhone, services, and ecosystem powerhouse.

4. Microsoft (MSFT) — ~$2.89 trillion (USA, Software/Cloud). Azure, Office, and AI integration.

5. Amazon (AMZN) — ~$2.55 trillion (USA, E-commerce/Cloud). AWS cloud dominance and retail operations.

6. SpaceX (SPCX) — ~ $2.25 trillion (USA, space travel, connectivity, AI.

7. Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg (TSM) — ~$2.21 trillion (Taiwan, Semiconductors). World’s leading chip foundry (powers many top tech firms).

8. Broadcom (AVGO) — ~$1.82 trillion (USA, Semiconductors). Key player in networking, AI chips, and infrastructure.

9. Saudi Aramco (

I never understood the logic of $Tesla(TSLA.US) bulls’ arguments that a $SpaceX(SPCX.US) IPO would somehow benefit $Tesla(TSLA.US) shares. As I suggested a few days ago, $Tesla(TSLA.US) shares should fall near-term ceteris paribus as SPCX debuts since the cash to pay for the record $75 billion $SpaceX(SPCX.US) IPO has to come from somewhere, and the most likely source would be long duration stocks like TSLA (YTD $Tesla(TSLA.US) -18% vs NDX +11%). When a hot new Mediterranean restaurant opens in Chicago and customers flock to it, it’s rarely good for neighboring restaurants. The same bulls who said $SpaceX(SPCX.US) going public would benefit $Tesla(TSLA.US) shares are now suggesting that SPCX will buy TSLA in a $3.5 trillion merger deal. Based on what logic? Other than sharing Elon Musk as the same CEO, the business models are starkly different with very different TAMs and risk/reward profiles.

The $SpaceX(SPCX.US) IPO opened at $150 +11% vs the IPO price of $135 and is now $164 (+21% vs IPO price) and reminds me of the $Meta Platforms(META.US) IPO in May 2012. META’s IPO priced at $38, and it opened at $42 (+11% above the IPO price), and rose to $45 (+18% vs IPO price) soon after opening. Over the course of the first day, META fell to the IPO price of $38 before closing at $38.23 (+0.6% above the IPO price) as underwriters led by MS provided price support to prevent it from falling below the IPO price.

$Tesla(TSLA.US) (-2.8%) behaving about as well as other long-duration NDX tech stocks today ($NVIDIA(NVDA.US) -2.4%, $Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) -2.6%, NDX -1.0%) in this higher-for-longer interest rate environment. I believe many retail investors buying $SpaceX(SPCX.US) this week will lighten up on their TSLA positions to fund their SPCX shares. I continue to believe that lead bankers $Goldman Sachs(GS.US) and $Morgan Stanley(MS.US) will engineer a Day 1 pop for SPCX IPO investors, given huge potential paydays from Anthropic and OpenAI in the months ahead. That said, I continue to view SPCX as richly priced at 300x 2025 EV/EBITDA and 120x expected 2026 EV/EBITDA assuming a $1.8 trillion market cap ($135/share) and 2026 EBITDA of $15 billion, vs 35-40% expected long-term EBITDA growth (3-3.5x PEG), and would wait for the stock to come back to earth post-IPO before buying shares post-IPO.

Brent crude retreated to $94/bbl after Iran signaled an end to its current military operations against Israel just after President Trump said the two sides were looking to agree to an immediate ceasefire following a series of strikes that threatened to derail peace talks to end the war in the Middle East. Brent crude had spiked to $98/bbl earlier today.

Iran’s central military command warned that if Israel continued to attack, including in southern Lebanon, “much harsher and more crushing actions than before will be on the way”

The decision, which underscores how much the conflict in Lebanon has become a key issue in negotiations, came just after Trump said in a Truth Social post that final talks on a truce were “proceeding, subject to ignorance or stupidity getting in its way.”

After U.S. job growth for May blew out forecasts in the US (+172K vs +88K est), the focus is back on inflation. The May consumer price index due Wednesday is expected to jump by +4.2% from a year ago — the highest rate in more than three years. Core CPI, which excludes energy and food, is seen rising +2.9% YoY and increasing +0.3% MoM in May vs +0.4% MoM in April, potentially providing a welcome signal to Fed policymakers.

Meanwhile, the ECB is expected to RAISE short-term int rates in the euro-zone on Thursday, setting the bank at odds with the Fed which meets 6/16-6/17 and is likely to hold rates steady under the leadership of new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh.

$Tesla(TSLA.US) -6.6% today (NDX -4.3%) and -6.0% this week (NDX -4.5%) should not be a surprise to anyone paying attention to the two variables that matter:

1/ $SpaceX(SPCX.US) $75B IPO coming next week and is already oversubscribed. The IPO has to be paid for with funds from somewhere and taking it from $Tesla(TSLA.US) the most like-kind security to $SpaceX(SPCX.US) makes the most sense.

2/ Macro - Strong JOLTS (+7.6M vs +6.8M est), ADP (+122K vs +120K est), and today’s May non-farm payrolls (+120K vs +89K est) suggest the next Fed move is more likely a tightening than a cut, which hurts long duration equities like $Tesla(TSLA.US) most. The U.S.- Iran war is still ongoing, which does not relieve pressure on Brent crude - still up +33% since end of February, which prevents the Warsh-led Fed from even thinking about cutting short-term rates.

Commentary on the relationship between the price of bitcoin and the new megacap IPOs coming to market.

Market-watchers suggested the fanfare around the forthcoming listing on Wall Street of SpaceX, Elon Musk’s rockets-to-AI conglomerate, was also sapping money from the bitcoin market. SpaceX is seeking to raise as much as $86 billion from the initial public offering, which will value the business at almost $1.8 trillion, and retail investors are expected to account for a chunk of the deal.

Mark Dowding, the chief investment officer for fixed income at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, wrote in a note online that “it has been interesting to observe a sharp correction in the price of bitcoin and other digital assets as holders get bored by lacklustre returns in crypto and seek to jump on momentum.

“From this perspective, it is instructive to see how assets can struggle as they move from being the flavour of the month to being suddenly out of fashion.”

$SpaceX(SPCX.US) $Tesla(TSLA.US)

Source: Bloomberg

To be clear, I have always argued the $SpaceX(SPCX.US) i-bankers would engineer a Day 1 pop on the $SpaceX(SPCX.US) IPO. Given the heavy involvement of $Goldman Sachs(GS.US), $Morgan Stanley(MS.US), and now $JPMorgan Chase(JPM.US), there is no question there will be excess demand at the $135/share IPO price which could still be increased. As we know from past IPOs a strong day 1 pop doesn’t always translate to strong year 1 returns.

Three issues from LULU’s conference call yesterday should give investors pause that $Lululemon(LULU.US) may still not be on the right path after a disastarous 6-month stretch which included the firing of their previous CEO.

1/ Nothing epitomizes LULU ‘s problems than its recently introduced “off the body” — loose fitting — yoga pants and gym wear. The concept is wholly inconsistent with the LULU brand - which is yoga wear that is tight-fitting, sexy, shows off one’s body. It would be akin to putting the Tesla brand on non-EV vehicles.

2/ Blaming weak 1Q sales on the boardroom drama where founder Chip Wilson and the current board demanded more seats. Since when does a proxy fight impact underlying sales?

3/ New CEO Heidi O’Neill won’t start until September (perhaps due to a non-compete limitation from Nike during her previous role there as President, Consumer and Marketing). That implies another two quarters of mediocre results as LULU struggles to build momentum as

competitors Vuori, Alo, and Slims continue to take share.

$Lululemon(LULU.US) -11% AH after cutting its net revenue and earnings guidance for the full year, which missed consensus ests. I have been critical of LULU in the past given the revolving door of CEOs over the past five years, the strained relationship between founder Chip Wilson and the Board, and intense competition from Vuori, Alo, and Skims (Kardashian) with little or no product differentiation.

FY’2027 Forecast

- Net revs $11B to $11.15B, saw $11.35B to $11.5B vs 11.49B est.

- EPS $10.95 to $11.15, saw $12.10 to $12.30, vs $12.38 est

2Q Forecast

- Net revs $2.45B to $2.48B vs $2.6B est

- EPS $1.76 to $1.81, vs $2.69 est

1Q Results

- EPS $1.69 vs. $1.69 est

- Net revenue $2.47 vs $2.44B est

- Total SSS comps -2% vs -0.23% est

- Americas SSS comps -6% vs -7.1% est

- Internat’l SSS comps +8% vs +13.2% est

- Gross margin 54.2% vs 54.6% est

Commentary

- This is last quarter before incoming CEO Heidi O’Neill joins the company from Nike, where she put up mixed results as President of Consumer and Matketing

- CFO Meghan Frank: “We have been navigating headwinds that have led us to adjust our outlook for the full year. We have assessed the business and are taking additional actions to reposition where needed and further strengthen our product engine.”

$Broadcom(AVGO.US) (-6.7% after hours) reported 2Q earnings ahead of expectations and 3Q rev guidance above expectations but 3Q guidance for AI semiconductor solutions was slightly below expectations. With $Broadcom(AVGO.US) stock up +13% in the past five trading sessions (vs NDX +2%), it would be reasonable for AVGO to retreat after today’s 2Q results and soft 3Q guidance.

2Q actual

- Rev $22.19B vs $22.13B est

- EBITDA $15.24B vs $14.96B est

- EPS $2.44 vs $2.39 est

- AI Semi solutions $7.18B vs $7.23B est

3Q guidance

- Rev $29.4B vs $28.6B est

- EBITDA $20.0B inline with $20.0B est

- AI Semi solutions to grow +200% to $16.2B vs $17.2B exp

Stock was pricing in a healthy 3Q guidance beat especially on its AI semiconductor solutions business. With results slightly below expectations, and the stock’s rally of +13% over the past 5 sessions, a fair conclusion is that AVAGO’s 3Q outlook likely disappointed investors who were hoping for blowout guidance.

$Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) and $Broadcom(AVGO.US) seem to be the big winners in Wall Street’s new appreciation for custom AI chips. Shares of $Broadcom(AVGO.US) (Broadcom) rose +4.7% on Tuesday, and were up another +2.1% after hours in front of tomorrow’s 1Q earnings report. $Broadcom(AVGO.US) may be capitalizing on the enthusiasm for rival Marvell Technology ( $Marvell Tech(MRVL.US)), whose own shares surged +33% on Tuesday and rose another +9% after hours after $NVIDIA(NVDA.US) CEO Jensen Huang touted MRVL as "the next trillion-dollar company" at the annual Computex tech trade show in Taiwan on Tuesday.

Both Marvell and Broadcom make application-specific integrated circuits aka “ASIC” custom chips. $Broadcom(AVGO.US) has a market cap of $2.3T and a reported 70% share of the ASIC market. AVGO’s customers include Google for whom it makes custom tensor processing units and stands to benefit from Alphabet's aggressive purchasing of AI hardware. AVGO’s other major customers include Meta (MTIA), Microsoft, OpenAI, and potentially Apple. Even after its 33% rise today, MRVL has a market cap of $254 billion and a reported 15-20% share of the ASIC market. MRVL customers include $Amazon(AMZN.US), $Microsoft(MSFT.US), and more recently $Alphabet - C(GOOG.US) for inference chips.

$Broadcom(AVGO.US) trades at a CY’26 P/E of 38x, a CY’27 P/E of 25x and is expected to post 2026-30 Adj EPS CAGR of +22% (2026 PEG 1.7x). $Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) trades at a CY’26 P/E of 75x, a 2027 CY’27 P/E of 47x and is expected to post 2026-30 Adj EPS CAGR of +40% (2026 PEG 1.8x). For reference, $NVIDIA(NVDA.US) trades at a CY’26 P/E of 26x, a 2027 CY P/E of 18x, and is expected to show 2026-30 Adj EPS CAGR of +21% (2026 PEG 1.2x).

In March 2026, NVDA invested $2 billion in $Marvell Tech(MRVL.US) as part of a broader strategic partnership to expand NVIDIA’s AI ecosystem via NVLink Fusion, a rack-scale platform. The NVDA investment caused MRVL’s stock price to rise 13% when the investment was announced.

I still don’t get the logic of investors cheering for a $SpaceX(SPCX.US) $Tesla(TSLA.US) combo. One, mergers of two megacap disparate companies rarely work as target synergies do not live up to their expectations. To argue both are AI plays and there are AI synergies to combining seems naive, since we have heard repeatedly during this earnings season all tech stories (e.g. $Salesforce(CRM.US), $Dell Tech(DELL.US), $Marvell Tech(MRVL.US)) are now AI plays. Any tech combo can now promise that.

Second, and perhaps more importantly, proponents of a $SpaceX(SPCX.US) $Tesla(TSLA.US) merger don’t even try to address the dilution math of such a merger: If a 300x EV/EBITA company like $SpaceX(SPCX.US) acquires a 100x EV/EBITDA stock of similar size such as $Tesla(TSLA.US), the consolidated entity will trade at the least common multiple - so here 100x EV/EBITDA - effectively wiping out 28% [(100x) x (SPCX $6.6Bb Adj EBITDA + TSLA $15B Adj EBITDA)/ $3T = .72]/ of the combined enterprise value. Why would a $SpaceX(SPCX.US) investor other than maybe Elon who might presumably prefer to be CEO of 1 rather than 2 megacap companies go for that?

$Dell Tech(DELL.US) +17% AH after significantly beating ests behind the strength of AI servers demand. 7.2% short interest.

1Q actuals:

- Net revs $43.8B vs $35.5B est

- AI servers rev $16.1B vs $13.1B est

- Adj Gross margin 18.1% vs 17.3% est

- Adj EPS $4.86 vs $2.99 est

- Net revs +88% YoY, fastest since returning to public markets in 2018

2Q guidance:

- Net revs $44B - $45B vs $35.1B est

- Adj EPS $4.80 vs $2.98 est

FY’27 guidance:

- Net revs $165B - $169B vs $142B est

- AI server rev $60B vs $51B est

- Adj EPS $17.90 at midpoint vs $13.10 est

Conf call 430pm ET

SK Hynix became the 15th company to reach the $1 trillion market cap club, and the third Korean chip mnfr after TSMC and Samsung Electronics. On Tuesday, both $Micron Tech(MU.US) and SK Hynix passed $1T market cap.

Stocks rose pre-market despite new US and Israeli strikes on Iranian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, which killed Iran personnel and disrupted shipping amid mine-laying attempts. Trump had indicated negotiations with Tehran are “proceeding nicely.” Brent crude surged 3.9% to $99/bbl although 10yrTY fell -5.1bp to 4.50%.

I expect equities to reclaim new records as the conflict ends, oil retreats, and S&P 500 2026 EPS ests now at $340 (+22% YoY) on AI and energy gains, implying a 4.5% forward earnings yield, the same as 10yrTY. Several specialty retailers will announce 1Q earnings this week. I remain cautious on $Tesla(TSLA.US) due to declining estimates, rising autonomous competition, and an extended valuation.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ For more detail see my pre-mkt summary for Subscribers only.

Cover story in Barron’s today about SpaceX IPO summarizing the history of megacap IPOs. I tend to agree that while $SpaceX(SPCX.US) is likely to be overpriced at $2T valuation vs 2025 EBITDA of $6.6B (SPCX EV/EBITDA 300x, $Tesla(TSLA.US) 150x) and 2025 Revs of $18.7B (SPCX EV/Rev 107x, $Tesla(TSLA.US) 16.5x), the relatively low % float to be issued in the SPCX IPO (4%), the fact that NDX and S&P 500 will fast track how quickly SPCX can join its indices, and the distribution power of GS and MS as the two lead bankers should be enough to engineer a first day IPO pop for investors who are allocated shares.

SpaceX IPO Is a Game You Should Play at Your Own Risk (WSJ subscription required)

I don’t know of a single company with a $2T market cap that doesn’t make money. That should give potential $SpaceX(SPCX.US) investors pause. $Tesla(TSLA.US)

Not that interested in $SpaceX(SPCX.US). I don’t know of any $2T market cap companies that trade at 300x EBiTDA. Given all the hype, likely to be way overpriced. Will be more interested after it falls by 50%.

Brent crude -4.4% to $106/bbl as Trump cites “final stages” of U.S.-Iran peace talks, pushing 10yrTY down -8.7bp to 4.58%. This is causing long-duration (high P/E) stocks like $Tesla(TSLA.US) to rise today, reversing the trends of the past few days.

In shorting stocks, it’s far better to short a company with deteriorating fundamentals than a rich valuation. Deteriorating fundamentals mean a bad business model where volumes are declining, or there’s no innovation, or management can’t execute, or there’s a loss in pricing power because of excess competition and a lack of differentiated products.

In my experience there are too many PMs and analysts in the industry with mainly financial backgrounds who pay little or no attention to fundamentals and rely instead on valuations and short term estimate trends to develop short ideas rather than try to determine whether a company with a hot new product can turn around stagnating comps when rising comps are what drives the stock. Over and over again, getting a company’s fundamentals right beats valuation insight.

We would not short $Tesla(TSLA.US) even though its base business (EVs) seems to be deteriorating (2026 will be third consecutive down year for deliveries) while the overall EV industry is growing at 20-25% per year in units. TSLA mgmt’s strategy to use zero interest rate and promotional incentives instead of communicating its competitive advantages directly to consumers is clearly not working but with generalized unsupervised autonomy technology about to transform the industry, TSLA is likely to offset declines in its base EV business with new autonomous revenue streams. While TSLA’s 2026 P/E of 210x seems way extended vs +35% long-term earnings growth, we would not short TSLA stock on what are largely valuation grounds.

$Cava(CAVA.US) +6% AH after posting 1Q SSS well in excess of Street ests (+9.7% vs +6.0%E) on the strength of its new pomegranate Salmon dish and raising its FY’26 outlook, defying restaurant downturn fears. All 1Q metrics beat ests. CAVA +13% short interest will add to strength on the beat.

1Q actual:

- SSS +9.7% vs. +6.0% est

- Revs $438.3M vs. $418.2M est

- Adj Ebitda $61.7M vs. $57.3M est

- CAVA restaurant-level profit margin 25.1% vs. 25.0% est

- Net new Cava restaurant openings 20 vs 17 est

- Adj EPS $.20 vs $.17 est

FY’26 guidance:

- Sees SSS +4.5% to +6.5% vs +4.95% est, saw +3% to +5%

- Sees Adj Ebitda $181M - $191M vs $186.9M est, previous $176M-$184M est

- Sees net new Cava restaurant openings 75 to 77, vs 76 est

- Sees CAVA restaurant-level profit margin 23.7% to 24.3%, vs 24.0% est

Commentary:

- CEO Brett Schulman: These results, which include the lap of strong prior year comparisons, speak to the structural strength of our business, the resonance of our compelling value proposition, and our position as the dominant leader in Mediterranean – all of which fuel our confidence to sustain this momentum going forward .”

Conf call 5pm.